MSM Chooses Ignoring Obama Lawsuit Eligibity Challenge
Posted on Saturday, August 23, 2008 1:57:27 PM by Texas Songwriter
Several years ago as the MSM began to fall in love the leftist Republican Arnold Swartznegger they chose to carefully examine the fourteenth amendment regarding Arnold’s possible requirement deficit, even going to the point of ‘floating a trial balloon’ to determine the public attitude toward amending the Constitution to ‘force a fit’. It is noted that the idea did not gain any traction to speak of, but there was, and still remains, some interest in this notion.
Now comes an examination of a true contender, someone who has a good chance of being elected, and with serious people asking pertinent questions of eligibility, even going to the length of an Attorney in Pennsylvania who is a long time democrat and previous office holder in that state, bringing a cause of action with sworn expert testimony, with several exhibits and proofs of allegation to prove a fact issue to explain the tort, and the MAINSTREAM MEDIA chooses to ignore this issue, which is of tantamount importance to every American of any political stripe. The small issue of Constitutionality hangs in the balance and the Fourth Estate has clearly decided to pretend this issue does not exist. So, we Americans, may just elect a person with dual or triple loyalties to one of three different countries, and the MAINSTREAM MEDIA chooses to pretend these circumstances do not exist.
BOMBSHELL: Barack Obama Is Not a US Citizen, Not Eligible to be US President.
Birth Certificate Found in Kenya. Citizen of Kenya and Indonesia. Hawaiian Certificate Forged.
Republicans Can Hardly Wait for Dems to Take Obama Bait
Attorney Phil Berg on Federal Suit to Stop Obama, CoastToCoast AM Aug 23rd ca. 1 AM Eastern, plus Aug. 23rd, 2:00 – 2:30 p.m. EST World Crisis Radio with Webster Tarpley, http://www.gcnlive.com (and On Demand for the week following at http://gcnlive.com/Programs/WorldCrisisRadio/On_Demand.html ).
On Aug. 21st attorney Philip J. Berg requested an injunction in Federal Court against the nomination of Barack Obama, citing evidence that candidate Barack Obama is not a US citizen, and “the obvious problems that will occur when the Republican Party raises these issues after Obama is nominated.” See Berg’s website, http://www.ObamaCrimes.com .
Berg argues that Barack Obama was born in Kenya in 1961 to an American woman, Stanley Ann Dunham, and a Kenyan man, Barack Hussein Obama Senior, as reportedly shown by a birth certificate from Mombasa Maternity Hospital. According to the law at that time, a parent could pass US citizenship on to a child born abroad if the parent was at least 19 years old. Obama’s mother was only 18.
No hospital birth certificate has been produced to show Obama was born in Hawaii, only a certificate of birth registry after the fact, which forensics experts have denounced as a forgery.
Gunny G: IS THE CONSTITUTION “…JUST A GD PIECE OF PAPER”?
Down With The Presidency provides some good reasons for this.
But replace the whole Constitution or just the presidency?
Maybe just eliminate/revise the presidency as it is now, but replace it with what? Maybe have a sort of presidency by committee with members being a president, vice-president, representatives from each of the two other branches of government (judicial and legislative), representaives of two or more political parties, etc. Maybe even include the fourth estate, etc.
Or maybe something else altogether.
Excerpt from an original document located at Jackson County, MO Election Board
In order to appreciate the reasons for the Electoral College, it is essential to understand its historical context and the problem that the Founding Fathers were trying to solve. They faced the difficult question of how to elect a president in a nation that:
- was composed of thirteen large and small States jealous of their own rights and powers and suspicious of any central national government
- contained only 4,000,000 people spread up and down a thousand miles of Atlantic seaboard barely connected by transportation or communication (so that national campaigns were impractical even if they had been thought desirable)
- believed, under the influence of such British political thinkers as Henry St. John Bolingbroke, that political parties were mischievous if not downright evil, and
- felt that gentlemen should not campaign for public office (The saying was “The office should seek the man, the man should not seek the office.”).
How, then, to choose a president without political parties, without national campaigns, and without upsetting the carefully designed balance between the presidency and the Congress on one hand and between the States and the federal government on the other?
Origins of the Electoral College
The Constitutional Convention considered several possible methods of selecting a president.
| BLOWHARD COULD BE JUST WHAT O NEEDS By CHARLES HURT Washington Bureau Chief
August 23, 2008 –DENVER – Joe Biden is one of the mouthiest politicians in all of Washington, but that’s precisely why he may be the perfect pick as Barack Obama‘s vice president.
His ability to steal center stage during any hearing has made him unrivaled for grating on fellow lawmakers’ nerves.
He makes his point – often two or three times – quite bluntly, but always colorfully and memorably. And it’s usually Biden who makes the evening news and the next day’s papers.
His refreshingly unguarded bluntness also has been the source of some of the worst headaches in his latest failed attempt at the Democratic nomination.
In just the last primary alone, Biden’s wild mouth managed to run him afoul of Indians, 7-Eleven clerks and African-Americans.
August 22, 2008
UPDATED 6-22-08 @ 6:18 PM CDT
Below is an update on the suit brought against Obama, the DNC and the FEC. I have a thought and want to share it. If there is a valid question, which there is, to the Constitutionality of Obama’s eligibility to run for POTUS, what difference does it make what the Plaintiffs political party is? The fact that this Federal Judge asked those questions rather than addressing the Constitutional Eligibility of Barack Obama’s candidacy, and the fact that this was an open court hearing that the American Media has yet to report makes clear the DNC and Barack Obama are to be exempt from the Laws of and the Constitution of The United States of America.