Monday, January 25, 2010 8:32:34 PM · by Libloather · 22 replies · 510+ viewsAJC ^ | 1/08/10 | Jim GallowayWhite House confirms receipt of Nathan Deal letter questioning birthplace of Barack Obama9:36 am January 8, 2010, by Jim Galloway The White House on Thursday confirmed receipt of a letter from U.S. Rep. Nathan Deal that formally asks Barack Obama to address questions about his place of birth – and thus, whether he is qualified to be president. The letter arrived Dec. 10. Beyond that, no one is willing to say much. According to my AJC colleague Bob Keefe in Washington, Todd Smith, Deal’s chief of staff, likewise confirmed that the letter had been sent. But neither Smith nor his…
- Read more…
Quo Warranto is being filed today in DC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Dr. ORLY TAITZ, PRO SE Plaintiffv. Barack Hussein Obama, Defendant. Jurisdiction The court has jurisdiction under DC statute §§16-3501- 16-3503. Federal court is proper as diversity between the parties exist and the case revolves around the Federal Question of eligibility of the President under Quo Warranto.Parties [snip] From birth and until now Mr. Obama had citizenship of and allegiance to three other nations: Great Britain, Kenya and Indonesia.Standing Taitz is an attorney and has submitted request to Attorney General Eric Holder and US attorney…
- Read more…
Rep. Michele Bachmann told Bill O’Reilly tonight that the tea party members will become the dominant members of the Republican Party. She added that if the Republicans are smart they will embrace them.
- Read more…
FWIW, Morris certain that Dems are going to try to pass Senate bill though House after secretly agreeing to then add provisions piecemeal to make it far worse that was first proposed. Dems have no plan to abandon Obamacare.
- Read more…
Posted on Monday, January 25, 2010 7:38:27 PM by mumblinbuffalo
This kicks. You’ll see. The end is just smokin. Enjoy.
This should be shared…
Ever since the November 2008 election, many conservatives have correctly criticized Barack Obama as a pathological narcissist. What other forty-something year-old do you know who has written two autobiographical books before achieving anything meaningful in their lives? The warning signs have always been there through his entire campaign and well into President Obama’s first year in the White House.
- Read more…
Obama Can’t Tap Voter Anger Because It’s Directed at Him
U.S. News & World Report ^ | January 25, 2010 | Peter Roff
Posted on Monday, January 25, 2010 6:35:32 PM by 2ndDivisionVet
Now that the voters in Massachusetts have put him on the ropes, President Barack Obama is spoiling for a fight. Speaking last week in Elyria, Ohio, the president, the New York Times reported, used some version of the word “fight” more than 20 times as he railed against the big banks, Wall Street, joblessness, and the economic downturn that has hit the nation hard.
As a newly-minted populist, Obama is hoping to win back the support of the independents and the “Reagan Democrats” who, over his first year in the White House, have become steadily less enthusiastic about his performance in office. The president, as the numbers reflect, has been losing the support of the center. On Monday, the Gallup organization released a new survey that shows the nation’s first postpartisan president is an extremely polarizing figure despite an average job approval rating of 57 percent for his first year in office. Underneath that, however, is a lot of bad news.
He came into office seeking to unite the country, and his initial approval ratings ranked among the best for post-World War II presidents, including an average of 41 percent approval from Republicans in his first week in office. But he quickly lost most of his Republican support, with his approval rating among Republicans dropping below 30 percent in mid-February and below 20 percent in August. Throughout the year, his approval rating among Democrats exceeded 80 percent, and it showed little decline even as his overall approval rating fell from the mid-60s to roughly 50 percent.
The fact that the president continues to run strong among Democrats, which the White House political operation must certainly regard as good news, is tempered by his poor showing among the overall electorate. The latest Gallup presidential job approval numbers have the streams about to cross, with 48 percent of those surveyed approving of his performance and 47 percent disapproving.
Taking these two sets of data together, the high marks he gets from better than three quarters of Democrats means that, while retaining the support of the left, he is losing the right and, more importantly, the center.
The new populism unveiled in Ohio–which will almost certainly be a key refrain in Wednesday’s State of the Union address–is an effort to win back the allegiance of those voters who have been deserting the president in droves. By positioning himself as someone who “fights” and will keep fighting for the little guy, Obama is attempting to tap into the anger among the electorate that helped propel Scott Brown into the Senate. The problem for Obama is that he fails to understand that much of that anger is directed directly at him.
It is now generally agreed that, as a candidate for president, Obama failed to define himself as a liberal–but it is as a liberal he has attempted to govern. He has attempted to tax, he has spent, and he has regulated in ways that threaten livelihoods and which run counter to Main Street common sense. The sense of alienation that produces among voters is not transient; it endures and it is costly.
It is difficult, if not impossible, to govern the country from either the left or the right alone. The center, as political consultant Dick Morris has written, is the “vital” part of the electorate. By losing it, Bush drove the Republicans into minority status. Without the center it is highly unlikely Obama can do much better.
Monday, January 25, 2010 5:30:04 PM · by jazminerose · 14 replies · 417+ viewswww.joytiz.com ^ | 1/25/10 | Joy TizThe Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV-TR) is the diagnostic manual used by mental health professionals. A diagnosis of narcissism requires five out of nine characteristics. Note these traits must endure overtime and must not be reactions to a particular situation or environmental stressor: Grandiose sense of self-importance. Preoccupation with fantasies of unlimited success, power, beauty, or ideal love. Sense of specialness, belief he can only be understood by or should associate only with other special or high-status individuals or institutions. Need for excessive admiration. Heightened sense of entitlement, leading to unreasonable expectations that others should treat…
- Read more…
- Prison Planet.com – http://www.prisonplanet.com -
Glenn Beck For Dummies
Posted By admin On January 25, 2010 @ 8:02 am In Featured Stories, News In Focus, Paul Watson Articles | 132 Comments
Beck is a fake revolutionary who has hijacked the freedom movement and is being used to lead conservatives and libertarians down the rabbit hole
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Prison Planet.com 
Monday, January 25, 2010
Glenn Beck is being characterized by the establishment as the leader of the freedom movement and yet a closer analysis of his ideology reveals that Beck is nothing more than a fake revolutionary who has supported and is pushing policies that are diametrically opposed to those embraced by true constitutionalists.
Beck and Fox News have hijacked the patriot movement and are leading conservatives and libertarians down a meaningless partisan rabbit hole in a clear attempt to neutralize genuine opposition to the big government agenda of the Obama administration.
It is important to stress that we are not picking a fight with Glenn Beck or Fox News in general as a crude effort to garner attention. Glenn Beck routinely attacks real libertarians, Ron Paul supporters, and those who would define themselves as constitutionalists. We are constantly forced to rebut his smears against people in the freedom movement while Beck claims to be one of us.
Indeed, Judge Andrew Napolitano, who also appears on Fox News, is an example of a real constitutionalist and we are in full agreement with his views.
As the video below illustrates, despite the fact that Beck claims to be “a Libertarian at heart,” he has publicly supported programs and legislation that are universally abhorred by the vast majority of libertarians, such as the banker bailout and the USA Patriot Act.
Monday, January 25, 2010 2:55:30 PM · by Jim Robinson · 14 replies · 208+ viewsVanity | Jan 25, 2010 | Jim RobinsonCan they hear us now? They tried and tried to ignore us and pretend we did not exist, but they’re not ignoring us now. And there’s gonna be hell to pay this November. The Tea Party has declared war on the political ruling class and, IMHO, it will be an effective war. Incumbents beware! Just vote them out in 2010!! Meanwhile, Chief Justice Roberts is cleaning house!! Woo hoo!! Rebellion is brewing!! What say you?
- Read more…
Monday, January 25, 2010 12:29:05 PM · by Starman417 · 16 replies · 451+ viewsFlopping Aces ^ | 01-25-10 | Alec RawlsHe already wanted to tax the banks for having the temerity to turn a profit with the bailout money (wasn’t that the point, to get the banks into the black again?), so the new plan to break up the banks is not different in kind. What IS different is the atmospherics. The move, immediately after Obama’s election defeat in Massachusetts, seems to have been very sudden, catching even his closest allies by surprise. With no warning, the previously “indispensable” Timmy-boy Geithner was cast aside in favor of the Depression-era nostrums of Paul Volker. Obama didn’t even take the time to…
- Read more…
Monday, January 25, 2010 12:05:07 PM · by Stoutcat · 4 replies · 89+ viewsGrand Rants ^ | 01-25-10 | StoutcatToday’s Inside the Beltway column at the Washington Examiner reports that in 2009, mainstream media outlets proved to be far more interested in protecting President Obama from criticism than actually reporting on his policies and decisions. “Instead of acting as government watchdogs holding the people in power accountable, the nation’s broadcast news networks deliberately suppressed and de facto censored embarrassing scoops — at least until President Obama or Congress took action and made them impossible to ignore…” And so it fell to the bloggers to report on news like communist Van Jones, the weird science of ClimateGate, ACORN’s assistance to…
- Read more…
Monday, January 25, 2010 12:05:13 PM · by opentalk · 3 replies · 316+ viewsThe Postemail ^ | Jan. 24, 2010 | Charles F. Kerchner, Jr, Lead PlaintiffTHERE IS MUCH EVIDENCE TO SHOW THAT AN AGREEMENT WAS MADE TO PUSH OBAMA AND IGNORE THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN REQUIREMENT I believe that the RNC and DNC at the highest levels in 2008 were both complicit in shutting down all discussion of Obama’s eligibility issue in the Congress, Main Stream Media, Print Press, and in the leading conservative Talk Show radio stations. I believe that the RNC and the DNC were complicit in subverting Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of our Constitution as to the eligibility requirements for the Office of the President, i.e., the person eligible for…
- Read more…
Monday, January 25, 2010 12:18:05 PM · by Shellybenoit · 5 replies · 304+ viewsThe Lid/Arkansas Democrat-Gazette ^ | 1/25/10 | The LidThe term “Obamessiah” has been used frequently to joke about the adoration of the POTUS displayed by his supporters. According to retiring Democratic Party Congressman Marion Berry, the President actually believes his clippings. Berry was interviewed for hometown paper Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, about his retirement and the future of the Democratic Party. The blue-dog revealed when he discussed his concerns about the 2010 mid-term elections being a repeat of 1994 with President Obama, the POTUS said: ‘Well, the big difference here and in ’94 was you’ve got me.’
- Read more…
Thanks to Glenn for his documentary, which included info about the Ukrainian Famine/Genocide/Holodomor, but the Holodomor has two tragic attributes – it was a genocide that claimed more than all the battlefields of WWI and it was subject to a cover up that is unsurpassed, continuing today. However this leftist site, Media Matters, tries to belittle the cover up aspect by claiming that the Holodomor is well known – having been “on the History Channel”! However true to form, the History Channel link betrays not a hint of genocide – only that “unknown thousands died during collectivization” which is the…
- Read more…
Monday, January 25, 2010 11:34:10 AM · by Federalist Patriot · 2 replies · 91+ viewsFreedom’s Lighthouse ^ | January 25, 2010 | BrianHere is the first available clip from the “Bold Fresh Tour” being conducted by Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck. They are touring together and appearing on-stage before audiences in several cities. This brief clip was from their kickoff appearance together on Long Island, New York. . . . (VIDEO)
- Read more…
Alinsky VS Paine (Intro)
Rules for Radicals | 1/25/10
Posted on Monday, January 25, 2010 9:55:59 AM by eeevil conservative
The purpose of these writings is quite simple. We wanted to provide an easy to use tool in understanding Alinsky’s teachings, the tactics used by his followers, their motives, and the contrast of these to the spirit of America and her forefathers. Alinsky’s goal was revolution, just as our forefathers; but the outcome of each revolution are as different as freedom vs slavery.
No one can begin the study of Rules for Radicals without noting that Alinsky includes a quote from Thomas Paine and one from himself at the onset.
“Lest them call me rebel and welcome, I feel no concern from it; but I should suffer the misery of devils, were I to make a whore of my soul….”
“Lest we forge at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgement to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins- or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom—Lucifer.”
Alinsky makes it clear with his quote from Paine, that his soul is invested in this revolution; hence calling him a name, like “rebel,” does not concern him. Yet he uses Paine of all people to establish this. I submit he used Paine as some way to not just legitimize himself, but to portray him as noble in his own eyes as well to others. I also conclude that he uses Lucifer as an example of a rebel, the first one to set the record straight that even calling him Satan himself will not dissuade him, he is committed. He wants his followers to be just as committed. He also establishes with his quote about Lucifer that the prize or goal for this deep dedication is one’s own “kingdom.” I’d also like to note that it is quite cute that he compares history to legends and mythology and challenges that no one really knows that there is any difference between them. As we continue this study, you will notice that he uses this technique quite often. He takes legitimate things, and mixes them among “evils” in an attempt to subliminally make them equal.
In the first paragraph of his prologue he attempts to establish that the “system” is flawed, everyone knows it, and the people cry out to “burn it down.” In the second paragraph he claims that the radicals of his generation are the vanguard, and few of them survived the “Joe McCarty holocaust of the early 1950’s” and even fewer gained an insight “beyond the “dialectical materialism of orthodox Marxism.” Alinsky wastes not time making very clear his motivation and his end game objective; Marxism.
The third paragraph begins with this:
“Today’s generation is desperately trying to make some sense out of their lives and out of the world. Most of them are products of the middle class. They have rejected their materialistic backgrounds, the goal of a well-paid job, suburban home, automobile, country club membership, first class travel, status, security, and everything that meant success to their parents. They have had it, they watched it lead their parents to tranquilizers, alcohol, long-term-endurance marriages, or divorces, high blood pressure, ulcers, frustration, and the disillusionment of “the good life.”
Note that he combines country club membership, first class travel, and status, with a well-paid job, suburban home, automobile, and security; while labeling them all as materialistic. I have yet to find a youngster who does not long for the freedom of the use of or for the possession of their own car. He is suggesting that a poor paying dead-end job, an inner city shack, dependence upon public transportation (government run and subsidized transportation, by the way), and lack of security should be the goals of true radicals? What kind of world or future is that? You see, security and personal property are evil and materialistic. Having nothing to live for is noble and makes you sincere and worthy to be his foot soldier. He believes the youth have rejected these sins of their parents. He wants his followers, his fellow radicals, to have NOTHING that would interfere with what he wants from them. He wants them to have nothing to lose, so there is no action or deed with too big a price for them to take.
We are only 2 and a half paragraphs into the prologue folks, but I think this is enough for today. I want to keep these short so that busy folks can keep up without giving up too much time with their families, etc.
Please feel free to share your thoughts on anything I have written above or to add your own insights.
Open mike time!
Obama Called For Jury Duty; Told Court ‘Would Not Be Able To Serve’
Politics Daily/Woman Up ^ | January 23, 2010 | Lynn Sweet
Posted on Saturday, January 23, 2010 9:02:22 PM by Diana in Wisconsin
President Barack Obama was called to jury duty at a southwest suburban Chicago courthouse, the Chicago Sun-Times reports. But the White House said Saturday that the president notified the Cook County Circuit Court that “he would not be able to serve.”
Chicago Sun-Times columnist Michael Sneed reported that Obama’s jury duty summons was sent to his home on the South Side of Chicago asking him to report on Monday at the county courthouse in the suburb of Bridgeview. The White House said the court was told weeks ago – no surprise – that Obama could not make it.
This isn’t the first time a president has been called to serve on a jury. Former President George W. Bush in 2006 got a jury summons from McLennan County, Texas, where his ranch is located, but he was let off the hook, according to the Christian Science Monitor.
The Christian Science Monitor reported in 2006 that “in fact, no modern court has had a sitting president on a jury. Ronald Reagan came the closest when he was summoned in the 1980s by Santa Barbara County, Calif. He was granted a deferment until he was out of office.’
Former President Bill Clinton was willing to serve on a case involving a gang-related shooting when he was called in 2003, but the judge dismissed him.
Google Web Alert for: gunnyg.wordpress.com
Full Coverage: US Weapon Test Aimed at Iran Caused Haiti Quake
Found 1 documents: gunnyg.wordpress.com: Chavez and the Russian Fleet: U.S. Used Earthquake Weapon gunnyg.wordpress.com …