Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 6:12:26 PM by Armaggedon
When the elect were deceived and placed the usurper Obama in the White House on January 20, 2009, the tribulation count began. We are now in the second year of increasing slavery under this Pharaoh. Obama will make us build his socialist projects and delusions. We will be forced to produuce while the straw, our money is made useless.
The Pharoah in Egypt forced his slaves to produce bricks without straw. Pharoah Obama destroys our (straw) currency and commands us to produce out of nothing. He commands us to praise him for lowering our taxes while Obama raises them before our eyes. Obama truly is the supreme Liar in Chief.
We were commanded in Revelation 18:4.
“And I heard another voice from heaven saying, Come out of her my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.”
The “elect” were deceived and the election subverted by the deceiver and usurper Obama. Daniel 11:21.
“And in his estate shall stand up a vile person, to whom they shall not give the honour of the kingdom: but he shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdomm by flatteries.”
The vile Obama is the deceiver of the electorate. We must come out of his kingdom of sin so we may serve the Lord our God. The kingdom of Pharaoh Obama works only when he finds people who deny God and serve their own desires and opinios. Obama is the ruler of them that desire and believe they can act as gods.
Trying to act as gods is the sin that leads to death. We see all around us the plagues upon the kingdoms and systems of fallen humanity. How many plagues must fall and how intense must they be before the people wake up and serve God?
We are in year two of tribulations and the signs are everywhere. Even the earth and mountains groan and spew forth. Obama the deceiver is trying to destroy the special annointing of Israel and America. Obama wants us to be like everyone else on earth serving the desires of the impure heart. Obama wants us to be as gods and make Obama our king so he will deliver what he says we want and need.
Obama can only deliver what his master Satan can deliver and that is death.
Obama, Trial, Usurper, CIA, Dr. James Manning, Conspiracy, Media…???
What is all this about?
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 5:34:13 PM by STARWISE
On Thursday, April 15, 2010, Hon. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was giving testimony before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on the issue of the composition of the United States Supreme Court.
The hearing was broadcast on C-Span. Subcommittee Chairman, Rep. Jose Serrano, D-NY (now the most senior Member of Congress of Puerto Rican descent), and he were having a pleasant exchange.
Rep. Serrano was explaining to Justice Thomas how he feels “a little uneasy” despite much of the dismay of his friends on the “left” about having a hearing for the Supreme Court because of the respect that he has for the Court.
He added that it was “humbling” but that the public understood the importance of what the Court does and the impact that it has on the future of our country.
Justice Thomas thanked Rep. Serrano for his words. Rep. Serrano then jumped in and commented on Justice Thomas’ view on who can sit on the Supreme Court. The following exchange occurred:
Rep. Serrano: I’m glad to hear that you don’t think that there has to be a judge on the Court because I am not a judge. I have never been a judge.
Justice Thomas: And you don’t have to be born in the United States. So you never have to ask, answer that question (smiling).
Rep. Serrano: Oh, really?
Justice Thomas: Yeah (the audience laughing).
Rep. Serrano: So, you haven’t answered the one whether I can serve as (Justice Thomas interjecting) President but you answered this one (smiling).
Justice Thomas: We’re evading that one (laughter from Justice Thomas and the audience). We are giving you another option (more laughter from Justice Thomas and the audience).
Rep. Serrano: Thanks a lot.
Justice Thomas: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Rep. Serrano: Mrs. Emerson.
Mrs. Emerson, Ranking Members, then starts to address Justice Thomas as he continues to laugh.
The YouTube video may be viewed at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7qEH-tKoXA&feature=player_embedded. A biography on Rep. Serrano may be found at http://serrano.house.gov/Biography.aspx.
What does all of this mean in relation to Obama’s eligibility question? What is the message behind all the joking, laughter, and body language that can be viewed on the video?
From Justice Thomas’ first mentioning that one does not have to be born in the United States to sit on the U.S. Supreme Court, it appears that Justice Thomas is telling Congress that the Court is angry with Congress for allowing Obama to sit as President even though there is a reasonable doubt as to whether he was born in the United States.
Rep. Serrano read the real message of Justice Clarence’s statement and let him know about it, saying “Oh, really.”
Rep. Serrano did not like Justice Thomas blaming Congress for the mishandling of the matter so he shoots back at Justice Thomas by telling him the Court failed to answer the Obama eligibility question when it should have but now is answering the question of whether someone who is not born in the United States can sit on the U.S. Supreme Court.
From this comment we can conclude that Congress did not believe that it was its job to answer the question of whether Obama is eligible to be President and expected the judicial branch of government to answer that question.
This is borne out by the many letters that Congressmen wrote to concerned Americans on the question of what was being done to address the issue of whether Obama was eligible for the Presidency.
Justice Thomas then answered that the Court is “evading that one” and giving Congress “another option.” Here we can see that the Court is telling Congress that it avoided addressing the Obama eligibility issue so Congress could resolve it through the political process, giving Congress some other unknown “option” to resolve the crisis.
We can only speculate what that other “option” is at this point.
Needless to say, it appears that both Congress and the Court are angry at each other for the constitutional crisis that each accuses the other to have caused regarding the Obama eligibility question.
The Obama eligibility issue has run its course through the political process. We can reasonably expect Obama to run for a second term. We surely do not want to repeat during Obama’s second run for President what occurred during his first.
We cannot reasonably expect to resolve the question of whether Obama was born in Hawaii and the meaning of the “natural born Citizen” clause by way of Americans voting at the polls.
This issue is not going away. It is dividing our nation and needs to be decided as soon as possible. There is now no other way to resolve the question of Obama’s eligibility other than through the legal process.
As Chief Justice John Marshall so well taught in many of his important U.S. Supreme Court decisions, there is no doubt that the judicial branch of government is well equipped and capable of deciding this critical issue of constitutional law and by doing so will not interfere in the work of the other two branches of government.
The Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress et al case which is now pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia with a tentative merits hearing date of June 29, 2010 gives the judicial branch of government the prime opportunity to put this constitutional crisis finally to rest one way or the other.
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 4:25:22 PM by opentalk
During the 2008 Presidential campaign, “mainstream” media confused the public over whether Obama ever released any real proof of his claim to being born in Hawaii. The confusion continues. Jonathan Alter, senior editor at Newsweek magazine, told MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann on February 20, 2009 that “The Obama campaign actually posted his birth certificate from a Hawaii hospital online.”
But Alter lied, since “the Obama campaign” never “actually posted his birth certificate from a Hawaii hospital online.” Remarkably, no hospital in Hawaii yet lays definitive claim to be the birthplace of the sitting President.
.. On the FactCheck.org website, the claim is made that “FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate.” They only saw and touched the COLB. So FactCheck.org lied about this as well.
Why would Factcheck.org tell so obvious a lie and endanger the site’s reputation? In August 21, 2008, when questions about the COLB began to reach critical mass and threatened to enter the public discourse, the mostly pro-Obama TV and newspaper/magazine media needed cover for their collective decision to ignore questions about whether Obama met qualifications for the Presidency set forth in Article II Section I of the Constitution. .. FactCheck.org helped stifle the birth certificate debate.
Under Section 57 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii (in effect in 1961), a mailed-in form (without mention of a hospital, doctor, or midwife) signed by only one of Obama’s parents (who could have been out of the country or whose signature could have been forged by a grandparent) or grandparents, would be enough to set up a birth record at the Department of Vital Statistics. This meager birth record would then automatically generate newspaper announcements, and also, a computer-generated COLB in 2008.
‘Birther’ Lt. Col. Terry Lakin to be court-martialed for refusing order to deploy to Afghanistan
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 4:33:37 PM by cycle of discernment
Do you feel the conspiracy theory of President Obama’s birth has been settled, or remains unanswered?
29% Settled – Evidence clearly shows he was born in Hawaii.
59% Unanswered – Obama needs to show the world his birth certificate.
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 3:21:03 PM by Attention Surplus Disorder
The Obama administration, on a roll, will now ban the words Islam and jihad – words that appeared hundreds of times in the 9/11 Commission report
The Manning Report…
Clarence Thomas Can Save The Planet
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 3:03:43 PM by CaroleL
At a recent Democratic Party fundraiser, President Barack Obama claimed to have cut taxes and therefore was “amused over the last couple of days where people have been having these rallies about taxes.” He added, “You would think they would be saying thank you.” Instantly the video was playing everywhere and everyone was horrified or thrilled (depending on their political persuasion) at the president’s mocking tone and obvious contempt for the Tea Party protesters. As usual with Mr. Obama, the truth is intentionally lost in his rhetoric and his polarizing brand of “charm”.
MICHELE BACHMANN AND THE DEATH OF THE DOLLAR
by Alan Stang
April 2, 2009
In Memory of Alan Stang:
Until recently, I may have heard of Michele Bachmann, but I wasn’t sure who she was. When I finally did see her in action the other day, in a congressional hearing, I felt a thrill run up my leg. I don’t know how it compared to the thrill that runs up the leg of Chris Matthews, the media degenerate who hosts “No Ball,” when he sees illegal alien Mr. Big Ears.
My thrill began at my big toe, kerbobbled for a moment at my ankle, then ran up my leg to the knee, where it kerbobbled again, and did not stop until it reached my hip. There it reversed course, stopped at the same places to kerbobble again and finally left at the big toe, where the adventure had begun.
Needless to say, a thrill runs up my leg whenever I see the Love Priestess, so I consulted with her, not sure what was happening. She went to her monitor, took a gander at Michele in action, and said she would have no problem were a Bachmann thrill to run up both my legs. But since then I have experienced the phenomenon only in the original leg, which may harbor a weakness for the lady.
But I was still disoriented. When I first tuned into the now historic sound bite, I did not for a while understand that a Member of Congress was speaking, not just because she looked so good, but because Mrs. Bachmann did not appear to be a predatory bull dyke in a pants suit, which I had thought was mandatory for membership.
By the way, allow me to digress for a moment. As you know, I believe that the Democrud and Republicrud Parties are both legs on the same bug. They are both tools and extrusions of the conspiracy for world government. One is worse than the other. Indeed, yet again, the Republicruds could be even more dangerous because of the phony façade of normalcy they put forth. Regular readers know they are overrun with sodomy. See my book, Not Holier Than Thou.
But impartial observers must admit there is a basic difference between Republicrud and Democrud women. Let’s face it, the latter are just howling ugly. Remember Bella Abzug? Why did she always wear a hat? Because her head came to a point. I saw that myself, sitting in the House gallery. She was on the floor where there is a rule against hats.
I don’t believe I need to say anything about Barbara Mikulski, except that however vehement is your rejection of Darwin, it will be sorely tested at the sight. We don’t really know what the original Madam Peelousy looked like. Her real face disappeared several surgeries ago. And there is the unindicted felon radio sissy Mark Levin calls “her Thighness.”
These are just a few examples. You have seen them yourselves, strutting on stage at Democrud events, in pants suits and heels, like preening bull dykes. Their grooming is inadequate, their hair a horror; they don’t want to project femininity because they are not real women; they are womanoids innately hostile to real women. Have they confronted Mrs. Bachmann in the ladies’?
If you are visiting these columns for the first time, a womanoid is a creature that shares some of the superficial characteristics of the true woman – it tends to present a more prominent forecastle and afterdeck – but it isn’t really a woman. A womanoid is to a woman as a humanoid is to a human.
On the other hand, your typical Republicrud woman is comfortable being a woman. She is beautifully groomed and dressed. Indeed, she wears hose and a dress. You younger people may not know what a dress is; or you may have heard of it but never seen one. A dress was a garment the female of the species used to wear before the revolution. Imagine a tee shirt long enough to reach below the knee, tailored to complement and compliment the figure.
That is correct. It had no legs. You can see dresses on display in old movies. Because all that cultural foundation is lost, so is the significance of comedic genius Steve Martin’s classic soliloquy, “What I Believe.” Younger people are incapable of comprehending the master’s opening lines: “I believe a woman should be put on a pedestal. High. So high, that I can look up her dress.”
The problem is that most Republicrud women have quiche for brains. Because they value their lives in social events, they have a horror of accidentally stepping out of line. They worship the Party. If the Party decrees that they work their afterdecks off for a Republicrud jackass, they will do so. They did so for el senador Juan McCrud, the Arizona slug, who reminds me of Dorothy Parker’s famous quip when they told her President Coolidge was dead: “How do they know?”
April 16, 2010
Beck Takes Sharp Turn to the Left
Socialism: Rich Class, Poor Class, No Middle Class
‘Israel costs us blood and treasure’ – What about Obama?
Castle Defense Final Reload: A Patriot’s Spiritual War
The Manning Report
Obama Civilian Army CreatingA Police State?
Click Below For Flyer:
The Manning Report
Justice Thomas: We Are Evading That One…
Click Below For Flyer:
The Manning Report ~ The Obama We Know
Click Below For Flyer:
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 12:56:35 PM by K-oneTexas
We have a president loath to acknowledge American exceptionalism. Indeed, the weight of the evidence suggests that our chief executive, through both word and deed and with malice aforethought, seeks to undermine – if not dismantle – that exceptionalism. At one time we properly called such activity anti-American, seditious, or even – under certain circumstances – treasonous. Today we call it “progressive.”
NBC Reporter To Black Man At Tea Party: “Have You Ever Felt Uncomfortable?”
Real Clear Politics ^ | April 16, 2010 | Real Clear Politics
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 12:10:51 PM by avacado
NBC Reporter To Black Man At Tea Party: “Have You Ever Felt Uncomfortable?”
NBC News reporter Kelly O’Donnell questions a black man at the DC tax day tea party.
Obama hosting 500 Muslims for intensive entrepreneurship seminars
creeping sharia ^ | April 17, 2010 | creeping sharia
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 12:27:10 PM by opentalk
Nearly a year after President Barack Obama’s historic speech in Cairo announcing that America wanted a “new beginning” with the Muslim world, evidence of that policy shift has, in recent weeks, become hard to ignore.
The Obama administration is revising national security guidelines that strip references to “Islamic radicalism” and other terms deemed inflammatory to Muslims. Officials also reversed 3-month-old guidelines that singled out passengers on flights arriving from 13 Muslim countries, and Cuba, for mandatory screening.
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 12:30:43 PM by ConservativeHideout
The political and religious “identity” of Barak Obama is a contentious and much debated topic these days. Claims of, “He’s a Muslim,” and “ he’s a socialist,” abound. The left, as well as the MSM are able to field these claims, and contradict them, at least partially. They are able to do this because he’s neither of these things.
Religion: While Obama may have a soft spot for Islam, he sat in Jeremiah Wright’s church for over 20 years. While Wright’s teachings are radical, they are clearly not Islamic. Like the rest of us, the radical wing of Islam would cut his head off, unless he converted.
It is well documented that he attended an Islamic school while he lived in Indonesia. That, in and of itself, does not mean that he is a Muslim, but unlike other Presidents, he has a depth of knowledge into Islam that unparalleled. That might bias him, and blind him to the potential dangers that we face. Either way, he does not appear to be Muslim, or, for that matter, Christian (or at least any Christianity with which we would be familiar).
Obama sneaks a payoff to Big Labor with an Executive order media ignored
The Collins Report ^ | April 17, 2010 | Kevin “Coach” Collins
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 12:38:40 PM by jmaroneps37
It’s kickback time
In 2008 unions gave Democrats $68,272,996 and Republicans $6,022,906 meaning 92% went to Barack Obama and his Democrats. For this money Big Labor thought it was buying the un-American Card Check scheme which would force all workers to “join” a union.
Although Card Check has failed the reason for its necessity has not changed. Union membership is shrinking and with that contraction union dues are falling sharply. Since 92% of all union campaign contributions go to Democrats, having unemployed union workers not paying dues, which eventually turns into Democrat war chest cash can not be tolerated.
Obama paying his bills Read more…
The Ex-Soldier Will Lose All of His Military Benefits
knx1070 ^ | : Saturday, 17 April 2010 7:28AM
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 12:47:47 PM by Touch Not the Cat
The U.S. Army has dismissed a soldier who threatened fellow troops and sent the Pentagon a violent rap song he wrote to protest his Iraq redeployment orders, officials said Saturday.
The dismissal for misconduct means Spc. Marc A. Hall will avoid criminal charges but lose all military benefits earned over at least four years of service, including an earlier tour in Iraq.
Check out the video below — a news report on the case against Hall, including some excerpts from his song — and then read more about the latest developments below. NOTE that this video story originally aired back in January, after Hall was first jailed by the military. So it does not include the latest information about him being released and thrown out of the Army, rather than being taken to trial…
When Then Judge Sotomayor Violated Judicial Canon 2 Code of Conduct
National Review ^ | April 17th 2010 | Ed Whelan
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 12:45:23 PM by Steelfish
This Day in Liberal Judicial Activism—April 17 [Ed Whelan]
2009—Canon 2 of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges provides that a judge “should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.” But then-Second Circuit judge Sonia Sotomayor evidently doesn’t see that canon as a barrier to partisan public cheerleading for Barack Obama. In a speech to the Black, Latino, Asian Pacific American Law Alumni Assocation—two weeks before news of Justice Souter’s decision to resign from the Court becomes public—Sotomayor makes a number of surprisingly partisan pro-Obama comments:
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 11:17:55 AM by Big Bureaucracy
The US Congress is a redundant body. Two hundred years ago “We the people” had to send our representatives to Washington DC because it was just not possible to fit all of us under the Capitol roof. Today we don’t really need representatives. We can easily vote on any piece of legislature electronically while eating chips on our couch.
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 11:33:21 AM by Ooh-Ah
“I don’t think it was done intentionally. I excluded such a possibility, but it was an unfortunate coincidence, yes.” Those haunting words were of “lifelong skeptic of Russia” Lech Kaczynski, the late president of Poland. Kaczynski discussed with Brett Baier of Fox News the unusual concurrence of President Obama reversing the Bush administration’s U.S. Patriot missile defense decision on the 70th anniversary of Russia invading Poland.
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 9:52:13 AM by iloveamerica1980
This video was taped in West Side Park in Champaign, IL. Mayor Jerry Schweighart claims Obama is not an American citizen. “I don’t think he’s American, personally.”
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 9:51:56 AM by TigerLikesRooster
Nation wising up on corn ethanol
Published: Thursday, April 15, 2010 8:28 AM CDT
Corn-based ethanol is losing some of its luster, and that is a good thing for the average American, if not the corn grower.
For the past 30 years, ethanol has had powerful advocates in the nation’s capital, including senators and congressmen from corn-producing states from both political parties. The fact that the Iowa presidential primary comes so early hasn’t hurt the corn growers either.
But billions of dollars in tax credits for ethanol companies expire at the end of this year, and a fight appears to be brewing over whether they’ll be renewed.
Some credits probably will be renewed, but the Associated Press reports there’s evidence that Congress is weary of giving money to an industry that critics say should be able to stand on its own after getting its start in the early 1980s.
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 8:04:13 AM by Yooperman
Karl Marx was paid by the “League of the Just” (later “Communist League”) in 1847 to write the Communist Manifesto, and again to rewrite it in 1848. The Manifesto was intended to incite violent revolution, was a recipe for tyranny itself, and later served as a ‘glorious goal’ to believe in to blind followers to the realities of the brutal dictatorships that oppressed all “workers” and slaughtered millions under Communist rule. Hitler’s Mein Kampf served a similar gruesome and bloody purpose. These 10 steps are a part of the Manifesto. Western nations including the United States have gradually implemented virtually all of Marx’s 10 key steps toward creating a dictatorship. What are some examples can you find? Americans would be wise to study the “Ten Planks” and demand that the President and Congress abolish all laws, regulations and agencies which govern these (and all other) unconstitutional seizures of power. Karl Marx’s “10 Planks” to seize power and destroy freedom: 1. Abolition of Property in Land and Application of all Rents of Land to Public Purpose. 2. A Heavy Progressive or Graduated Income Tax. 3. Abolition of All Rights of Inheritance. 4. Confiscation of the Property of All Emigrants and Rebels. 5. Centralization of Credit in the Hands of the State, by Means of a National Bank with State Capital and an Exclusive Monopoly.
I have done my share of criticizing Glenn Beck–usually regarding his attacks on some not so-PC-conspiracy-type-theories, etc.–however, I realize he likely does so on orders from his masters at faux-noose. But I fail to see where the following holds any water at all!
“Beck spent the early part of his Thursday program complaining about the size of the U.S. defense budget and even the new U.S. embassy in Iraq. “This is what we went into Iraq for?” he asked. He also said he was close to adopting the Ron Paul view of foreign policy, which holds that the U.S. is the cause of most of the region’s troubles and should therefore pull back to its shores.”
“Ron Paul and his son, Kentucky Republican Senate candidate Rand Paul, have suggested that U.S. intervention in the Middle East was the cause of the Muslim attacks on America on 9/11.
“I don’t want a global force,” Beck said of the U.S. military, adding that he has “changed” his foreign policy views and is now “on the road to Ron Paul,” an isolationist in foreign policy. He said he wants the U.S. to “come home” and wrote on his famous blackboard that the U.S. should withdraw from Iraq and Afghanistan.”
“However, Beck paused when considering that an American withdrawal from the rest of the world, of the kind argued by Cato, would lead to the isolation and destruction of the state of Israel, a major U.S. ally. Beck also seemed to pause when Logan insisted that the religious zealots running Iran would not risk a nuclear attack on the Jewish state. Beck shook his head in disbelief.”
Excerpt Only…CONTINUED LINK BELOW….
Posted on Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:06:15 AM by JoeProBono
The Mothman is a creature reportedly seen in the Charleston and Point Pleasant areas of West Virginia from November 12, 1966, to December 1967. Most observers describe the Mothman as a winged man-sized creature with large reflective red eyes and large wings. The creature was sometimes reported as having no head, with its eyes set into its chest.
A number of hypotheses have been presented to explain eyewitness accounts, ranging from misidentification and coincidence, to paranormal phenomena and conspiracy theories.
Geneva Conventions Redefined – Part 3: UCMJ and the separation between military and civilian affairs
News Link • Martial Law
Geneva Conventions Redefined – Part 3: UCMJ and the separation between military and civilian affairs
04-16-2010 • Eric Shine
Title 10 reinforces a bright line of separation between our military and civilian affairs that should not be breached under any circumstances. So why are we doing it?
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2010 8:09:30 AM by Zakeet
Former President Bill Clinton warned Friday that the anger some members of the Tea Party movement express about higher taxes and the size of government could feed the same right-wing extremism that led to the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, which killed 168 people and injured hundreds more.
“Before the bombing occurred, there was a sort of fever in America,” Clinton said at a symposium commemorating the 15th anniversary of the bombing. “Meanwhile, the fabric of American life had been unraveling. More and more people who had a hard time figuring out where they fit in, it is true that we see some of that today.”
On Friday, Clinton appeared to draw implicit parallels between Tea Partiers — who are accused by some critics of espousing racist and radical views — and the far-right militia veterans that carried out the 1995 attack on the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.