Archive
Race of the Day: Allen West vs. Ron Klein
Race of the Day: Allen West vs. Ron Klein
Townhall.com ^ | May 12, 2010 | Bryan Walsh
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 3:18:56 PM by Kaslin
For today’s Race of the Day – I’m excited to have the opportunity to shed light on one of the marquee races of this cycle – Allen West vs. Ron Klein in Florida’s 22nd Congressional District.
Florida’s 22nd Congressional District stretches along the coastline from the upper portion of Broward County in the south to Palm Beach County in the north. The district was represented for seven terms by Republican Clay Shaw from 1992 until Democrat Ron Klein won the seat in the Democrat wave year of 2006 by a 51%-48% margin. It was also Ground Zero for the 2000 Presidential election drama between Democratic nominee Al Gore and eventual winner George W. Bush on the Republican side. President Obama won the district by a 52%-48% margin and it is scored as a D+1 on the Cook Partisan Voting Index, underscoring the tossup nature of the seat.
Prior to his election in this swing district in South Florida in 2006, Ron Klein previously served as a state senator. But instead of representing his constituents, he’s marched in lockstep with Speaker Pelosi from Day One, voting with her 98.1% of the time.
Questions surround Kagan’s handling of White House eco-terrorist controversy
Questions surround Kagan’s handling of White House eco-terrorist controversy
washingtonexaminer.com ^ | May 12, 2010 | Byron York
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 3:22:38 PM by Free ThinkerNY
n 1995 and 1996, future Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan was involved in a bizarre controversy in which the Clinton White House was accused of siding with an eco-terrorist group locked in a standoff with federal agents deep in the woods of Oregon. The incident led to an investigation by House Republicans, who concluded that a staffer on the White House Council on Environmental Quality tipped off the environmental radicals to impending action by U.S. Forest Service law enforcement agents — a leak that Forest Service officials believed endangered the lives of their agents on the ground.
Kagan, at the time an associate White House counsel, had no role in leaking the feds’ plans to the radicals, but House Committee on Natural Resources investigators concluded she shirked her responsibility by not searching for the source of the leak or pushing for punishment of the leaker.
“Nothing was ever done by Elena Kagan to learn the details about the leaks, or to identify the leaker and ensure that proper punishment occurred,” the committee’s 1999 report concluded. In fact, investigators found evidence suggesting that Kagan, in internal White House discussions, defended the alleged leaker.
So who’s sponsoring Glenn Beck’s highly rated TV shows?
So who’s sponsoring Glenn Beck’s highly rated TV shows?
The Radio Patriot ^ | May 12, 2010 | Andrea Shea King
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 1:35:18 PM by patriotgal1787
“For I light my candle from their torches.” — Robert Burton
Ok, look. I know there are a lot of you who are pissed that Glenn Beck has repudiated the “birther” question. I’m not crazy about it either. But as another “hold-their-feet-to-the-fire” media firebreather Andrew Breitbart put it during an argument with Joseph Farah of World Net Daily, the “birther” eligibility issue is not a winnable argument. At least not YET.
If and when we retake the majority in Congress, Americans might have a shot at unveiling and unraveling the background and official records of “AKA” — the ONE believed to be a usurper in the White House. Nevertheless, you have to admit that even without the birth records ad infinitum, the REAL Barack Obama is being revealed. So… having said that, this post is for all of you who believe the tripe put out there by the Left and/or the uninformed, that Beck’s ratings have fallen off as a result. NOT true. I did a check on it and here’s the latest from Nielsen:
Is Obama set to deploy his “FemBot”
Is Obama set to deploy his “FemBot”
Mens Daily Forum ^ | 10-12-10 | B.H.Traakon
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 1:26:36 PM by beericus
Is Obama set to deploy his “FemBot”?
Now that President Obama has announced his choice for the soon to be vacant Supreme Court seat we are learning that Elena Kagan is as close to a “manufactured candidate” as possible without a degree in robotics.
As the investigation of Elena Kagan builds momentum, the early picture is of an academic ideologue whose path was carefully directed to this very point in time. Ironically, the information on her history is far more clear and verifiable than the man who nominated her for the highest court in the land.
Booted and operational it was time for field-testing. Phase one she clerks for Judge Abner Mikva at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. A “mail-room entry” where integration can be fine-tuned and if need be, pulled for larger corrections without many ripples. Phase two, she enters the inner sanctum and performs the reconnaissance role serving as law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall. This completes her field-testing and there is nary a suspicion that she has just made a trial run at her ultimate target.
War Clouds Gather Around Obama. Interesting Perspective By Victor Davis Hanson.
War Clouds Gather Around Obama. Interesting Perspective By Victor Davis Hanson.
http://www.davidhorowitztv.com/retreat/2010/297-hanson ^
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 3:15:40 PM by Armaggedon
Expose Obama mania for what it is, a blind engineer driving an express train to hell. Obama is sowing the winds and he shall reap the whirlwinds. The tornadoes of war are upon us.
A Congressional Medal of Cowardness?
A Congressional Medal of Cowardness?
Washington Examinar ^ | 5/7/10 | http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/world/Medal-for-_courageous-restraint_-plan-get-mixed-review-from-
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 2:07:46 PM by OneVike
A proposal to grant medals for “courageous restraint” to troops in Afghanistan who avoid deadly force at a risk to themselves has generated concern among U.S. soldiers and experts who worry it could embolden enemy fighters and confuse friendly forces.
Lt. Col. Edward Sholtis, a spokesman for Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, who commands NATO forces in Afghanistan, said that no final decision has been made on the award, which is the brainchild of British Maj. Gen. Nick Carter.
“The idea is being reviewed at Headquarters ISAF,” Sholtis said. “The idea is consistent with our approach. Our young men and women display remarkable courage every day, including situations where they refrain from using lethal force, even at risk to themselves, in order to prevent possible harm to civilians. … That restraint is an act of discipline and courage not much different than those seen in combat actions.”
Hold fire, earn a medal (USMC Medal for NOT shooting???)
Hold fire, earn a medal (USMC Medal for NOT shooting???)
Marine Corps Times | 5/12/2010 | William H. McMichael
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 2:10:50 PM by markomalley
John Boehner: Rebellion against both parties
John Boehner: Rebellion against both parties
Politico ^
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 2:17:44 PM by Sub-Driver
John Boehner: Rebellion against both parties
By JAKE SHERMAN | 5/12/10 12:57 PM EDT
House Minority Leader John Boehner says there’s a “political rebellion” brewing in America that is touching both Democratic and Republican incumbents.
Boehner offered a stern assessment of the political environment after meeting with his party behind closed doors Wednesday, saying “it’s politicians beware.”
“[Utah Republican] Senator [Robert] Bennett found out on Saturday, [West Virginia Democratic] Rep. [Alan] Mollohan found out on Tuesday night,” Boehner said.
Mollohan, a 28-year incumbent, was trounced in the Democratic primary by 12 points Tuesday night, and Bennett, an 18-year Senate veteran, was ousted at a weekend convention of the Utah Republican Party.
“The American people are awake,” Boehner said. “They’re more involved in their government than at any time in our history and what irritates the American people most is the arrogance of Washington.”
President Eisenhower Defends A “Traitor?”
President Eisenhower Defends A “Traitor?”
Old Virginia Blog ^ | 05/11/2010 | Richard Williams
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 2:50:16 PM by Davy Buck
“General Robert E. Lee was, in my estimation, one of the supremely gifted men produced by our Nation. He believed unswervingly in the Constitutional validity of his cause which until 1865 was still an arguable question in America. . .”
The Future of the GOP Is Ron Paul?
The Future of the GOP Is Ron Paul?
Pajamas media ^ | Frank J. Fleming
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 2:51:52 PM by big black dog
It’s a good time for a reemergence of conservatism. Liberalism has discredited itself by trying to govern and passing hugely unpopular legislation, and the opportunity for the right to strike back is coming this November.
Thus conservatives are looking for someone who can lead us to victory and small government, and one candidate in particular has emerged, winning the CPAC straw poll in November and falling just one vote short of winning the Southern Republican Leadership Conference straw poll last month.
Of course, I’m talking about Ron Paul.
Yeah. Him again. Just when we thought it was safe to once again have an inconsequential poll, here come the Ronulans to try and snatch up a pointless victory. Yeah, okay guys — all the online polls and text polls Paul won back in 2008 didn’t convince me Ron Paul had any actual support, but now I think it’s for real. That was sarcasm, by the way (I don’t think a lot of Ron Paul’s supporters understand sarcasm), but sarcasm aside, I argue that if we’re smart, we’ll invest the future of the GOP in Ron Paul.
So who is Ron Paul? I don’t really know. I think he’s like a representative from Texas or something who thinks gold is shiny and wants to follow the principles of George Jefferson. The point isn’t who he is, though; it’s that he’s catnip for crazies.
Barack Obama plans to punish BP with tax hike as Gulf spill worsens
Barack Obama plans to punish BP with tax hike as Gulf spill worsens
Timesonline ^
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 2:54:38 PM by Sub-Driver
Barack Obama plans to punish BP with tax hike as Gulf spill worsens
Nico Hines in Washington
President Obama plans to force the oil industry to pay for the spill in the Gulf of Mexico by introducing a hike in tax rates and increasing the liability for clean-up costs.
The White House sent an unusually detailed proposal to Congress today that included a blanket 25 per cent tax increase on every barrel of oil produced. The legislation would allow the federal Government to demand more money from companies responsible for environmental disasters.
Mr Obama has been deeply frustrated by the failure to plug a ruptured pipe near the coast of Louisiana as it spews an estimated 25,000 gallons of oil every day. If passed his proposals could leave BP with a bill running to $10 billion (£6.8 billion).
Gunny G Online…(More Posts)
- US troops executing prisoners in Afghanistan, journalist says
- Kagan Involved In 9/11 Cover Up
- Kagan: More Qualified Than Obama…
- Canada Free Press Mailout…
- Soros Idol: Suppress Disagreement by Force By Joy Tiz
- Kagan’s qualifications as nonexistent as a Birth Certificate
- US Orders Blackout Over North Korean Torpedoing Of Gulf Of Mexico Oil Rig
- Obama: Too Much Information Is Bad For America
- Kagan spit in the eye of America’s Armed Forces
- Obama won’t golf with Limbaugh
- Man kills neighbor after his dog relieves itself on neighbor’s lawn
- What Is Your Line In The Sand? Rise of the Republic
- Kagan: ‘Disappear’ Free Speech If The Government Deems It Offensive
- Stopping Obama’s Plan to Subvert the Constitution
- Born In The USA?
–
**********
POSTS ADDED 24/7…
JUST CLICK LINK BELOW”’
http://www.GunnyG.wordpress.com
*****
R. W. “Dick” Gaines (Gunny G)
http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/
**********
The “G” WebLog @Network54
http://www.network54.com/Forum/578302/
**********
FOR Gunny G E-Mail UPDATES…
SEND: “ADD-ME”
GunnyG@gmail.com
**********
“We Are Behind ‘ENEMY WITHIN’ Lines,
… surrounded, If Ya Can “grok” that!
Our “Novembers Are Behind Us!”
*********
US troops executing prisoners in Afghanistan, journalist says
US troops executing prisoners in Afghanistan, journalist says
The journalist who helped break the story that detainees at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq were being tortured by their US jailers told an audience at a journalism conference last month that American soldiers are now executing prisoners in Afghanistan.
Kagan Involved In 9/11 Cover Up
Kagan Involved In 9/11 Cover Up
In addition to the attacks on free speech, detainee rights and the close connections to Goldman Sachs, another noteworthy black mark on the record of Elena Kagan, the president’s nominee to the Supreme Court, is that she played a significant part in killing off the efforts of 9/11 victims’ families to bring lawsuits against members of the Saudi Royal family for financial links to the conspiracy.
Kagan: More Qualified Than Obama…
Kagan: More Qualified Than Obama
www.joytiz.com ^ | 5/12/10 | Joy Tiz
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 11:27:29 AM by jazminerose
Of course Elena Kagan is unqualified for the job of Supreme Court justice. So what? Barack Obama isn’t remotely qualified for his job either. What is all the commotion about? If experience and intellect were relevant, we would never have gotten ourselves saddled with Sotomayor who would have been fully self actualized presiding over municipal traffic court.
Canada Free Press Mailout…
Canada Free Press Mailout
Canada Free Press | CFP RSS Feed | World RSS Feed | Medical RSS Feed | Automotive RSS Feed | Business Feed
CFP Photo Gallery | CFP Speakers Bureau | CFP Shop
Cover Stories, News
The Coming Crash: Usury and the Irrelevant Church
By Damon Vrabel
Please, let us stop this usury! – Nehemiah 5:10
It’s been a wild couple of weeks—increasing unemployment, Greek debt crisis, yet another ridiculous bailout, pressure on Goldman Sachs, accusations of commodities manipulation by JP Morgan Chase, and new freakish levels of market volatility that might be signaling the next phase of market collapse. The many day-to-day issues can leave us dazed and confused, so most people ignore them. Huge mistake.
Soros Idol: Suppress Disagreement by Force By Joy Tiz
Soros Idol: Suppress Disagreement by Force
By Joy Tiz
Addressing the graduates of Hampton University in Virginia, the President of the United States denounced the curse of free flowing information:
Kagan’s qualifications as nonexistent as a Birth Certificate
Kagan’s qualifications as nonexistent as a Birth Certificate
Creating Orwellian Worldview ^ | 5/12/10 | alaphiah
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 10:59:28 AM by Alaphiah123
Paul Campos is a professor of law at the University of Colorado at Boulder. In his article The Next Harriet Miers? He absolutely slays the phony Liberal narrative that Elena Kagan is a brilliant legal scholar who makes up for a lack of jurist experience with unsurpassed legal scholarship.
Therefore according to linear Liberal logic Kagan is worthy of being nominated and confirmed for the Supreme Court only because president Soetoro says so. Not because of any deserving scholarly works or experience. This is starting to sound strangely familiar to the president’s own eligibility problems.
According to Professor Campos there is no there there in Kagan’s legal academic scholarship. Campos recounts a career of nearly 20 years since Kagan became a law professor in which Kagan’s academic writings are so scant he was able to read everything that Kagan had ever published in one day. (see article)
US Orders Blackout Over North Korean Torpedoing Of Gulf Of Mexico Oil Rig
News Link • Propaganda
US Orders Blackout Over North Korean Torpedoing Of Gulf Of Mexico Oil Rig
05-11-2010 • (“PROPAGANDA TIMES” ????????)
A grim report circulating in the Kremlin today written by Russia’s Northern Fleet is reporting that the United States has ordered a complete media blackout over North Korea’s torpedoing of the giant Deepwater Horizon oil platform owned by the World’s
Obama: Too Much Information Is Bad For America
News Link • Free Speech
Obama: Too Much Information Is Bad For America
05-11-2010 • FOX News
Speaking at Hampton University in Virginia, the president raised alarms when he said “information becomes a distraction, a diversion” that is putting “pressure on our country and on our democracy.”
Kagan spit in the eye of America’s Armed Forces
News Link • Military
Kagan spit in the eye of America’s Armed Forces
5/10/10 • Western Journalism
Millions of Americans will be outraged when they learn that Obama has picked a Supreme Court nominee with a demonstrated hostility to the very armed forces that make our freedom and constitutional rights possible. But that’s just one reason why Presi
Obama won’t golf with Limbaugh
Obama won’t golf with Limbaugh
NY POST ^ | May 12, 2010
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 10:06:37 AM by Bigtigermike
Edited on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 10:07:44 AM by Admin Moderator. [history]
When President Obama was asked if he would play a round of golf with his talk-radio nemesis Rush Limbaugh, the response, relayed by a top Democrat, was: “Limbaugh can play with himself.”
Man kills neighbor after his dog relieves itself on neighbor’s lawn
Man kills neighbor after his dog relieves itself on neighbor’s lawn
wgn ^ | May 11, 2010 | WGN News
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 10:03:40 AM by tlb
Edited on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 10:05:53 AM by Admin Moderator. [history]
UNIVERSITY PARK, Ill. – A 69-year-old former Marine is being held on $3 million bond, accused of shooting and killing his neighbor after the neighbor’s dog urinated on his lawn.
What Is Your Line In The Sand? Rise of the Republic
What Is Your Line In The Sand? Rise of the Republic
From the Tea Party Movement to State Legislators, the American people are drawing a line in the sand. On what side of it will you stand?
Kagan: ‘Disappear’ Free Speech If The Government Deems It Offensive
Kagan: ‘Disappear’ Free Speech If The Government Deems It Offensive
President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan is perfect in every way – perfect that is if you think the role of the highest judicial body in the United States is to ban free speech, indefinitely detain Americans without trial, resurrect command and control socialism, while urinating on everything the Constitution stands for.
Stopping Obama’s Plan to Subvert the Constitution
Stopping Obama’s Plan to Subvert the Constitution
Townhall.com ^ | May 12, 2010 | Ken Blackwell
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 9:26:37 AM by Kaslin
Editor’s note: This column was co-authored by Ken Klukowski, SCOTUS correspondent for Townhall.com.]
On October 31, 2008, Barack Obama proclaimed, “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” In November 4, he won the presidency. Ever since that day, he’s been pursuing his vision of fundamentally transforming our country.
He must be stopped. We show you how to do it in The Blueprint: Obama’s Plan to Subvert the Constitution and Build an Imperial Presidency, our new bestselling book.
Born In The USA?
| BORN IN THE USA? WorldNetDaily Exclusive Investigators: Obama using Connecticut Soc. Sec. Number ![]() 3 experts insist White House answer new questions about documentation –WND |
| WND POLL Origin of the specious Why do you think Obama has a Connecticut-based Social Security Number? –WND |
| WorldNetDaily Exclusive Eligibility lawyer to become election favorite? ![]() Taitz seeking position as secretary of state to audit Obama’s credentials –WND |
| WorldNetDaily Exclusive Obama waives ethics rules for eligibility lawyer White House: Restrictions on top attorney ‘not in public interest’ –WND |
| WorldNetDaily Exclusive NASCAR has new connection to Obama’s birth certificate Drivers near famed racetrack confronted with president’s eligibility –WND |
| WorldNetDaily Exclusive ‘New eligibility strategy working’ Petition drive spurs action in half a dozen states –WND |
| THE FULL STORY WorldNetDaily Exclusive Is Obama constitutionally eligible to serve? WND’s complete archive of news reports on the issue –WND |
| WND FILMS WorldNetDaily Exclusive The movie Obama doesn’t want you to see! Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential eligibility mystery! –WND |
| WND APPAREL Make yourself a walking billboard! T-shirt demands eligibility proof from Obama –WND Superstore |
–
**********
POSTS ADDED 24/7…
JUST CLICK LINK BELOW”’
http://www.GunnyG.wordpress.com
*****
R. W. “Dick” Gaines (Gunny G)
http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/
**********
The “G” WebLog @Network54
http://www.network54.com/Forum/578302/
**********
FOR Gunny G E-Mail UPDATES…
SEND: “ADD-ME”
GunnyG@gmail.com
**********
“We Are Behind ‘ENEMY WITHIN’ Lines,
… surrounded, If Ya Can “grok” that!
Our “Novembers Are Behind Us!”
*********
Obama’s Natural-Born Useful Idiots ~ JB Williams
Obama’s Natural-Born Useful Idiots
Canada Free Press ^ | May 11, 2010 | JB Williams
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 12:22:30 AM by Smokeyblue
For people who don’t like and don’t care what the US Constitution says, it doesn’t matter whether or not Barack Obama meets eligibility requirements for the office he currently holds. Obots, who regard the Constitution as an outdated useless piece of paper that should be burned, and our republic as nothing more than a democracy of mob rule by iron fist, see Obama’s eligibility as a laughing matter.
New York Times blogger (and deconstructionist professor of law) Stanley Fish writes – Why Bother With the Constitution? In it, he quotes from a book titled The Living Constitution,” by David A. Strauss which states—“the Constitution does not play a central role in constitutional interpretation.”
A deeper understanding of the useful idiot’s interpretation of the Constitution is found in Strauss’ book;
In Star Spangled Spirit Tea Parties Will Prevail ~ by Lloyd Marcus
In Star Spangled Spirit Tea Parties Will Prevail
Then it dawned on me. The battle at Fort McHenry is our heritage. It symbolizes who we are as Americans. We tea party patriots are the same as those patriots who defended Fort McHenry. We are them and they are us. Just as the patriots at Fort McHenry prevailed over the seemingly all powerful British, we modern day patriots will defeat the deaf to the will of the American people Obama anti-American regime…….
GOSSAMER WINGS PART 1 of 2 ~ By Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.
GOSSAMER WINGS
PART 1 of 2
By Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.
May 12, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin226.htm
In his latest series on “Secession or Declaration of Independence”, particularly Parts 4 and 5, Mr. Timothy Baldwin raises some interesting points.
Unfortunately, he misconstrues my meaning when he attributes to me the notion that (in his words) “as long as the [General G]overnment is executing laws, regulations, restriction, mandates, etc., ‘in the name of doing good’, then such a regime and such acts are not tyrannous regardless of effect”. I thought I had made it clear enough in my commentaries on this subject that, if public officials were actually trying to obey the Constitution (not just going through the motions “in the name of doing good”), their actions would not constitute “tyranny” even if the effects thereof inadvertently might not satisfy with mathematical precision some hyper-technical definition of “the common defence” and “the general Welfare”. This is because there must always be some “play in the gears” for any government to function. Mr. Baldwin, however, seems to contend that any such “play” amounts, at least presumptively, to “tyranny”.
Presumptively may not be the half of it, either. For example, Congress may decide to build a naval base in Norfolk, Virginia, rather than in Savannah, Georgia. If Congress does this in good faith, for sufficient reasons, is it to be condemned because the construction and operation of a base in Norfolk will stimulate the local economy there, but do nothing for Savannah in that regard? Has Congress violated “the general Welfare”, and thereby engaged in “tyranny”, by not building a base in Savannah, too, even though “the common defence” did not require it? According to Mr. Baldwin’s test, perhaps so, because the inevitable “effect” of Congress’s action would be to create economic discrimination between the two cities deriving directly from the location of the base. But every such decision will have such an effect, more or less. To avoid a charge of “tyranny” with respect to “the general Welfare”, then, must Congress build half of the base in Norfolk and half in Savannah, so that each city will share equally in the economic benefits? Yet, if it did so, would Congress not undermine “the common defense” by making neither demi-base sufficient for the Navy’s needs—thereby exposing itself to a charge of “tyranny” with respect to “the common defense”? In situations of this kind, then, are “the general Welfare” and “the common defence” mutually contradictory and antagonistic? Will Congress be committing “tyranny” no matter what it does? Is the Constitution psychotic? Well, if such is the consequence of Mr. Baldwin’s theory, perhaps that theory is overly broad.
Along the same lines, Mr. Baldwin later contends that “[w]here the law does not grant to the government the power to do an act, then the government’s doing that act in contradiction of the law is tyranny”. Again, he overstates the matter. Consider, for example, the following case. The Constitution requires that “[n]o Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law”. Article I, § 9, cl. 7. Assume that Congress has appropriated “by Law” $1,375,276.00 for some public construction project, to be paid over to a private contractor. By mistake, a clerk causes an electronic check to be drawn on the Treasury for $1,735,276.00 and deposited directly into the contractor’s account. Without noticing the error, the contractor’s accountants start paying the contractor’s employees and suppliers on that project with funds from that account. During the period before the error is discovered and corrected, has the General Government (or the Treasury, or perhaps the clerk) been engaged in “tyranny”? After all, the payment was in excess of the “Appropriation[ ] made by Law”, and therefore was “in contradiction of the law”. And Mr. Baldwin contends that any act of the government (which always entails an act of some public official or employee) “in contradiction of the law is tyranny”. If, however, the posited situation does not entail “tyranny” (as common sense suggests it does not), then Mr. Baldwin’s definition must be flawed.
The evident flaw is Mr. Baldwin’s notion that the intent of the actor is irrelevant to whether his misbehavior can properly be characterized as “tyranny” or not. Now, I believe every violation of a public official’s “Oath or Affirmation, to support th[e] Constitution” (as required by Article VI, cl. 3) should be punishable in some manner. That does not mean, however, that every such violation constitutes “tyranny” and deserves the very same punishment. Consider two cases:
[1] Congress is trying to decide whether to build a new naval base in Norfolk, Virginia, or Savannah, Georgia. The Congressmen in the committee to which the bill is assigned take a light and careless approach to their duties. They fail to study the matter sufficiently. As a result, the committee recommends Savannah, when it should have recommended Norfolk. Based upon that faulty recommendation, the bill passes. Several years later, the mistake is discovered, but by then cannot easily or inexpensively be rectified—meaning that “the common defense” has been compromised. Can this situation, as serious as it may be, be fairly described at any stage as the embodiment or the consequence of “tyranny”? Not, I suggest, without seriously trivializing that word.
Americans in the Crosshairs ~ by Greg Evensen
Americans in the Crosshairs
Who set the jackals loose in Arizona to try to derail the much needed state protecting legislation to find and deport illegals in their midst? Could it be the rogue Catholic clergy or La Raza, or perhaps the Democratic Party Socialists and their counterparts in Mexico? It doesn’t matter, ACLU and SPLC communist agitators will tie up the legislation for years while Washington encourages the continuing illegal invasion, and mocks the Arizona lawmakers, victim ranchers, and local taxpayers……..
A LOOK INTO THE SOCIOLOGY AND NATURE OF SECESSION ~ By Timothy N. Baldwin, JD.
By Timothy N. Baldwin, JD.
May 12, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
http://www.newswithviews.com/Timothy/baldwin136.htm
Many have come to the conclusion that Secession by those States that desire to throw off the ties of tyranny is necessary–more so now than ever before in America’s history. I would place myself into this category. There are many in the United States who argue with this conclusion, either on the basis of practicality or right.
As to the question of practicality, its analogy is like a husband and wife asking the question, “can we now afford to have children?” The answer most always is “no.” Having children is always a sacrifice and inconvenience. Of course no one prefers inconvenience, but such a price should be willingly paid where freedom is obtained. Thus, at some point, a State must act upon the freedom to be gained at the cost of the sacrifice to be initially made.
As to the basis of right, most do so based upon a scheme of creative constructions and implicit arguments of the U.S. Constitution or based upon the results of the Civil War.
While I can, to some degree, “stomach” those who argue that the U.S. Constitution prohibits secession, I am repulsed by those who argue that the results of the Civil War “settled the issue” of secession. I do not desire at this time to get into the fatal error of this position and implied philosophy, but I will state conclusively that if one really believes this, then he or she has to accept the logical conclusion that:
- this union is held together by force alone and not by the consent of the governed, thus making us all slaves to the union;
- the Confederate States of America were States controlled and occupied by an enemy conqueror, and still are today;
- the U.S. Constitution has nothing to do with the legitimacy or rightfulness of the union’s forceful existence; and
- “might makes right.”
I find those positions to be dangerous to liberty, freedom and rights and do not see how holders of such positions can adhere to any principles resulting in freedom as expressed by the Declaration of Independence.
However, for the student of truth and freedom, coming to the conclusion of Secession’s right and necessity obtains from the study of nature and the principles and laws derived therefrom, just as America’s founding fathers did in 1776 by their expression in the Declaration of Independence.
As I wrote about in my previous articles, Secession or Declaration of Independence, Parts 1-5, people have a certain immutable nature which leads them to form society for certain beneficial purposes. These people will lay down a certain part of their natural rights to receive the benefits of that society. As a result, that society inevitably forms government to protect their natural rights from others in society so that each may live in peace and for the purposes they entered the society.
Army Birther Doc’s Lawyer: ‘Mounting Evidence’ Obama an Illegal Alien
Army Birther Doc’s Lawyer: ‘Mounting Evidence’ Obama an Illegal Alien
Chattah Box ^ | May 10, 2010 | “Sue”
Posted on Tuesday, May 11, 2010 9:32:43 PM by 2ndDivisionVet
This is just plain nuts. Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, a highly-decorated Army surgeon, with 18-years of service behind him, is willingly throwing his career and reputation away, because be believes in the birther conspiracy nonsense that President Obama is not a natural born citizen. The Army has instituted court martial proceedings against him for refusing to obey deployment orders to Afghanistan, which Lakin says are illegal orders from an illegal alien. The birther doctor appeared on CNN’s Anderson Cooper’s 360 program Friday evening with his lawyer. And the interview soon turn heated, as Cooper attempted to inject some fact-based reality into the conversation.
Lakin’s lawyer Paul Jensen, obtained by the birther conspiracy groups American Patriot Foundation/Safeguard Our Constitution, continually jumped in to answer Cooper’s questions posed to Lakin. The basis of Jensen’s arguments all center on his rejection of Obama’s Certificate of Live birth issued by the state of Hawaii. He contends it’s not proof of Obama’s birth in the United States, because it’s merely an “abstract” of the original document on file. Lakin through his lawyer, is demanding to see the original document.
Jensen couldn’t explain Obama’s two birth notices in local Hawaii newspapers. And he refuses to accept the determination made by the Republican governor of Hawaii, who examined the original birth certificate on file, declaring it valid.
Puller Of The Marines!
THE Marine’s Marine: ‘Straight-Talkin’ Marine!
![]()
//
Straight-Talkin’ Marine!
![]()
//
LtGen Lewis B. “Chesty Puller USMC (Ret.) , deceased

The Marine’s Marine, Chesty Puller, is well known for his remarks–short and to the point!
Here are some of the better “quotes” on Puller, I think.
The following Puller remarks, documented by Time magazine interviewing him upon his return from Korea in 1951.
-RWG
~~~~~
“Last week, after nine months in Korea, weather-beaten Chesty Puller, 52, assistant commander of the ist Division, veteran of the Inchon landing and the Marines’ heroic retreat from the Changjin Reservoir, was back in the U.S. to take over a training command.
Facing the press, he announced that he was under strict orders not to criticize anyone. Then, in his best parade-ground voice, he got off a few observations:”
¶”What the American people want to do is fight a war without getting hurt. You can’t do that any more than you can go into a barroom fight without getting hurt.”
Strategy For America Revealed….

Today’s Toons 5/12/10
GOP Briefing Room ^ | 5/12/10 | pookie18
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 7:30:40 AM by pookie18
The Myth of the Menacing Militias
The Myth of the Menacing Militias
Reason ^ | 5 May, 2010 | Jesse Walker
Posted on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 8:20:14 AM by marktwain
Flash back to the end of March, when the authorities hauled in nine members of the Hutaree, a Christian paramilitary group, and charged them with plotting a mass assassination of police officers. The media quickly added the arrests to the ongoing narrative of “rising right-wing violence,” with the Michigan-based militants cast as the leading edge of a smoldering paramilitary threat. Newscasters and columnists touted a report by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) claiming that the number of anti-government “Patriot” organizations is skyrocketing. An “astonishing 363 new Patriot groups appeared in 2009,” the center declared, “with the totals going from 149 groups (including 42 militias) to 512 (127 of them militias)—a 244% jump.” If you worry about political violence, the SPLC warned, such growth “is cause for grave concern.”
A month later, the Hutaree case is in a state of flux, with prosecutors appealing Judge Victoria Roberts’ ruling that the accused should be released on bond while awaiting their trial. There are signs that the judge is unimpressed with the state’s case, and she has stressed that prosecutors must demonstrate that the arrestees were guilty of an actual conspiracy to kill cops, not just loose talk. Even “hate-filled, venomous speech,” she said, is “a right that deserves First Amendment protection.”
Obviously we don’t know what evidence has yet to be introduced at trial. Perhaps there really is more at issue here than some chest-beating chatter; perhaps there’s a good reason to think a genuine murder plot was underway. But either way, we’ve learned enough about the Hutaree in the last month to know that the media narrative that greeted their arrests hasn’t held up. Assume the worst-case scenario: that the defendants really were planning a massacre and that they really were capable of carrying it out. They still aren’t the vanguard of the right-wing revolution. The Hutaree are isolated and despised, not just by the American mainstream but by the bulk of the groups on the SPLC’s Patriot list. Indeed, the government may have had the help of some anti-Hutaree militiamen as it forged its case against the accused.
I’ve Got a Little List…
Gunny G Online….
-
Recent Posts
- About the months ahead with Comrade Obama…
- Obama’s Social Security number fraudulent ?
- Ralph Peters: Obama Administration Discovers Terrorism
- NJ: Local Filmmaker Judge Quits So He Can Promote Flick Ridiculing Obama
- Devvy: This is my new column. Financial “reform” bill will guarantee more stealing the fruits of our labor…
- What Kagan Nomination Tells Us About Obama
- Enemy of the State – An Extremist Manifesto 2010 | Ward Dorrity
- Fight Agenda 21 or Lose Your Freedom ~ by Tom DeWeese
- Gunny G: What? You Never Heard of Pancho Villa’s Raid On Columbus, New Mexico!
- Democracy in Action…
- Saving the Republic? Part 1 and 2 ~ by Kelleigh Nelson
- Kagan Botches Oral Argument In Supreme Court Appearance At Citizens United Lawsuit
- Gunny G: Is This Story Being Blacked-Out By The News Media, etc?????
- “Do you think America’s armed forces are the best in the world? In history? Against whom? Think gain. “
–
R. W. “Dick” Gaines (Gunny G)
http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/
*********
The “G” WebLog @Network54
http://www.network54.com/Forum/578302/
**********
FOR Gunny G E-Mail UPDATES…
SEND: “ADD-ME”
GunnyG@gmail.com
**********
“We Are Behind ‘ENEMY WITHIN’ Lines,
… surrounded, If Ya Can “grok” that!
Our “Novembers Are Behind Us!”
*********
About the months ahead with Comrade Obama…
About the months ahead with Comrade Obama
about some rather disturbing scenarios that could take place in the next few months as we all labor under the yoke of Comrade Obama and his (and George Soros’ )socialist minions.
cpprhd10@aol.com
Al
***
(EXCERPT ONLY…)
“Therefore, it is imperative for them that all illegal aliens in this country be given amnesty before this year’s mid-term elections so they can be registered to vote in this year’s elections. If the majority of the twelve million or so of them are registered to vote, they should be enough, along with our current socialists and welfare deadbeats, to turn back any possibilities that Obama will lose his socialist Congress this year, or his presidency in 2012. Should they not prove numerically sufficient for that task, there is always martial law, provided some false flag incident can be manufactured to give them a reason to do it.“
***














Recent Comments