Senators Challenge Obama on Executive Order for Mass Amnesty
Maggie’s Notebook ^ | June 22, 2010 | Maggie M. Thornton
Posted on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 4:57:31 PM by maggiesnotebook
Eight Republican senators are asking Barack Obama to validate rumors that he is considering “deferred action or parole” to millions of illegal aliens in the United States
Desperate Obama Moves (Further) Left
http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/2010/06/21/desperate-obama-moves-left/#more-1092 ^ | 06.21.2010 | Dick Morris – Eileen McGann
Posted on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 5:38:38 PM by MindBender26
Drowning in oil, the Obama Administration is pulling out all the stops to halt the hemorrhaging of liberal support which is driving his ratings down to the low 40s–previously unexplored territory.
Obama has already lost all the Republicans and almost all of the Independents. But he has kept his head above water with the solid support of liberal Democrats and African-Americans. But now that the Gulf oil spill enters its eighth week, with no sign of abating, he is shedding Democrats. Rapidly.
It is not that the gushing oil will drive a single Democrat to vote Republican. The GOP’s strong support for off shore drilling will bar such switches. But the increasing image of incompetence, arrogance, conceit, aloofness, and poor management skills may induce millions of Democrats to stay home during the midterm elections of 2010.
The oil spill will not cost Obama the presidency in 2012. It is too far away for that. But it may be a big part of his losing Congress this year.
Posted on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 6:05:21 PM by Red Steel
An unidentified man walks up behind a reporterette to mouth the words ‘Where is Obama’s birth certificate’. The reporter tries to stand in front of him looking annoyed. Heehee. It is a 25 second Youtube vid.
News Link • Revolution
Gather Your Armies (Now _this_ is a Political Commercial
06-22-2010 • YouTube
Rick Barber, running for Congress in a GOP primary runoff in Alabama’s 2nd District July 13th, meets with three very important people to discuss the evils of the progressive income tax and its intersection with health care. Television ad, Interne
News Link • Afghanistan
Top allied commander [McChrystal] apologizes for magazine profile [Rolling Stone]
06-22-2010 • Ernesto Londoño, Washington Post
The profile in Rolling Stone magazine, titled the “Runaway General,” is certain to increase tension between the White House and Gen. Stanley McChrystal.
It also raises fresh questions about the judgment and leadership style of the commander Obama appointed last year in an effort to turn around a worsening conflict.
McChrystal and some of his senior advisors are quoted criticizing top administration officials, at times in starkly derisive terms. An anonymous McChrystal aide is quoted calling national security adviser James Jones a “clown.”
Sensational claim! Antichrist will be Islamic Author: Euro-centric prophecy scholars looking to Rome all wrong
| This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit
Monday, June 21, 2010
DEAL OF THE DAY
Sensational claim! Antichrist will be Islamic
Author: Euro-centric prophecy scholars looking to Rome all wrong
Posted: June 21, 2010
6:11 pm Eastern
It’s one of the most thought-provoking and sensational books of our time, and today only, WND readers can get an autographed, hardcover copy of Joel Richardson’s blockbuster, “The Islamic Antichrist,” for only $4.95 – a radical $21 discount!
The Bible predicts that in the last days a charismatic leader will establish a global following in the name of peace. The Quran also predicts a man will rise up to lead the nations, pledging to usher in an era of peace. The man in the Quran is called the Mahdi, or Islam’s savior. However, the man in the Bible is the Antichrist. Could it be possible they are one and the same person?
Joel Richardson’s remarkable research and analysis suggest that it is. In “The Islamic Antichrist” – subtitled “The Shocking Truth about the Real Nature of the Beast” – Richardson exposes Western readers to the traditions of Islam and predicts that the end times may not be that far away. His book will stun readers who are unaware of the similarities between the Antichrist and the “Islamic Jesus.”
(Story continues below)
Chapter titles include “Islamic Eschatology,” “The Sacred Texts of Islam,” “Comparing the Biblical Antichrist and the Mahdi,” “The Dark Nature of Muhammad’s Revelations,” “How Should We Respond” and “Preparing for Martyrdom.”
Joel Richardson is a human-rights activist, lecturer and artist. Involved in evangelism and ministry to Muslims since 1994, he is the co-author, along with Walid Shoebat, of “God’s War on Terror: Islam, Prophecy and the Bible” and co-editor of “Why We Left Islam: Former Muslims Speak Out.”
McChrystal accuses Obama buddy of covering ‘his flank’ Commander levels unprecedented criticism over handling of war on terrorists
This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
IN THE MILITARY
McChrystal accuses Obama buddy of covering ‘his flank’
Commander levels unprecedented criticism over handling of war on terrorists
Posted: June 22, 2010
9:57 am Eastern
By F. Michael Maloof
Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, has leveled an open and unprecedented attack on the current U.S. ambassador, Karl Eikenberry, whom he accuses of betraying him by firing off cables to Washington critical of the U.S. war strategy.
Eikenberry, a former Army lieutenant general, sent two cables last November, apparently without McChrystal’s knowledge.
Not only did the cables criticize McChrystal’s recommendation of a proposed troop buildup out of concern that it would make the Karzai government too dependent on the U.S., but they complained about Afghan President Hamid Karzai and his government and the state of its military.
Col. Jack Jacobs: Most In Military Will Say McChrystal ‘Was Right’
NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein
Posted on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 1:48:46 PM by governsleastgovernsbest
Contessa Brewer got a lot more than she was likely looking for when she interviewed Col. Jack Jacobs this afternoon about the McChrystal situation. The MSNBC host wanted to focus on the impropriety of McChyrstal publicly airing his criticisms of Pres. Obama and others in the chain of command.
But while the Medal of Honor recipient readily agreed that McChrystal was out of line, and would probably pay with his job, Jacobs also went out of his way—twice—to add an inconvenient truth: that when it comes to the substance of the criticism, most in the military think McChrystal “was right.”
Thomas James DiLorenzo on Abraham Lincoln, U.S. Authoritarianism and Manipulated History
Daily Bell: Was it difficult to write a revisionist history about Lincoln?
Thomas DiLorenzo: As a libertarian, I saw it as my duty to spread the truth about what a horrific tyrant Lincoln was, with his illegal suspension of Habeas Corpus and the imprisonment of tens of thousands of political dissenters in the North; his shutting down of over 300 opposition newspapers; his deportation of the leader of the congressional opposition, Democratic Congressman Clement Vallandigham of Ohio; and his purposeful waging of total war on civilians. He destroyed the voluntary union of the founding fathers and destroyed the system of federalism that was the hallmark of the original constitution by using military force to “prove” that nullification and secession were illegal. Might makes right. Unlike England, Spain, France, Denmark, Holland, Sweden, and other countries that ended slavery peacefully in the nineteenth century, Lincoln used the slaves as political pawns in a war that both he and the U.S. Congress declared to the world in 1861 was being waged for one reason only: to “save the union.” But as I said, he really destroyed the voluntary union of the founders.
Daily Bell: Was the Civil War popular in the North? What did people think of Lincoln in his day?
Bob Sez We Need An American President….And he’s p!zzed!!!!!
Posted on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 2:07:05 AM by 2ndDivisionVet
Typically, I try not to write when I’m angry about something. This week, however, that is proving to be well nigh impossible. How can I not be just a bit miffed about the way our ostensible President has been handling the oil spill crisis currently taking place in the Gulf of Mexico? Perhaps it is because I don’t suffer fools lightly, but the stunning, nay, mindboggling incompetence emanating from our government, and especially its executive branch, is pushing me past even my expectations for governmental ineptitude.
The “Peter Principle” is a well-known principle of hierarchical organizations. At its simplest, it basically says that within any organization, every employee will rise to his or her level of incompetence. Essentially, each employee will perform their work well and will be promoted within the organization up until they reach the position where they are no longer capable of competently performing the tasks assigned to them, at which point they will not be promoted further.
Posted on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 11:03:05 AM by Alaphiah123
President Obama swore to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.—Presidential Oath
If what Arizona’s Sen. Kyl is alleging is true and correct president Barry Hussein Soetoro and the Democrat Party are engaged in an ongoing conspiratorial act of treason against the United States of America for political advantage and gain. That act is called Comprehensive Immigration Reform. (see 1:23min video)
The neglected areas in the Constitution due to a government out of control
TheCypressTimes.com ^ | 06/22/2010 | Kevin Price
Posted on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 10:25:33 AM by Patriot1259
I feel like a broken record, but the Constitution is explicit about what the federal government can and cannot do. Article I of that document lists seventeen powers that the federal government can do. The Tenth Amendment was designed to dismiss any notion that the federal government had broad powers beyond those laid out in Article I. The founders’ agenda was clear — very restrictive powers for the federal government and vast powers to the states and local governments.
Posted on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 10:35:31 AM by IbJensen
Democrats have lost faith in Obama’s political invulnerability
In a single year Obama lost the support of independent voters and liberal Republicans by passing the left’s agenda. And this year, he is well on the way to losing the support of the left for not passing enough of their agenda. Being too left wing for mainstream America, and too mainstream for the left is not a new problem for the Democratic party. It’s a problem they’ve faced since what had been the counterculture became the party establishment. But it’s a special problem for the man who rose to power as the poster child of the left. Barack Hussein Obama.
Mark Levin attacks ‘phony, populist idiot’ O’Reilly over BP fund (BOR defending Dear Leader)
The Washington Post’s Right Now ^ | June 21, 2010 | David Weigel
Posted on Monday, June 21, 2010 9:27:17 PM by 2ndDivisionVet
Twice last week, Bill O’Reilly booked conservative Republican stars on his show–Sarah Palin and Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) — and came at them from the unexpected stance of defending President Obama. With Palin, he defended Obama’s handling of the BP spill. With Bachmann, he disagreed with her criticism of how the BP escrow fund was set-up.
All of that sparked an outraged rant from radio host Mark Levin, which the Right Scoop has captured and put online. In it, Levin makes the case that a lot of conservatives who don’t have to worry about re-election are making–that, yes, the president “shook down” BP, and that O’Reilly is a “phony, populist idiot” for thinking otherwise.
(VIDEO AT LINK)
“Let me explain something to you, Mr. Cable TV!” says Levin, not using O’Reilly’s name. “British Petroleum was in the back pocket of the Democrat Party! It gave Obama a million dollars. It backs cap and trade!” And he defends Rep. Joe Barton for “speaking the truth.”
Hawks for Dissent A pro-Iraq war ex-soldier defends the generals who took on Rumsfeld.
washington monthly ^ | june 2006 | ralph peters
Posted on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 10:12:55 AM by milwguy
Americans who care about our country should be very skeptical of the administration’s line that no military dissent–not even from retirees–is ever permissible. As a nation, we need to ask ourselves some very uncomfortable questions about the rise of hyper-political defense secretaries, the politicization of military affairs by both Republicans and Democrats, the isolation of the president from frank military advice and civilian interference in the smallest details of combat operations.
Each of these men played by the rules, retiring before speaking out. None prejudiced good order. Not one stands to profit from his courage (quite the contrary).
Posted on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 10:06:48 AM by FiddlePig
Since the Federal government and most “blue” states” are now essentially run as a “protection racket” (and have been for awhile IMHO) “fat cats” (and some not so fat) of all varieties must pony up with the campaign contributions. That way they try to avoid harmful regulations and also, in some cases, become qualified to get bailed out (too big to fail ya know), when their malfeasance (financial and otherwise) gets ‘em in trouble. Democrats, to their credit, are more honest about this practice, but GOPers do it too… they’re just not as good at it. Too give the “devil” his due… the Obama administration has just about perfected this (all that good “Chicago” experience?). BP’s misdeeds have led to a large “shakedown” (note to Rep. Barton: there’s NO GREATER punishment in Washington DC, than for telling the truth!!!). I soon expect all “Big Oil” to be victims as they get caught up in the BP mess (guilt by association)! I am curious to see if ANY but a bare minimum of folks adversely effected by this oil spill disaster get much help… (unless they display the “Union Label”… IMHO).
Someone mentioned the amphib operations in europe during WWII of which the Marines were not employed in any major way…
I have attempted through the years to post to my many sites, blogs, forums, etc. but finding these again years later is not always successful. Nothing is forever on the Internet, and many are now lost in cyberspace as webpages disappear due to servers going bellyup, etc. Then again, much of the info has been from books and other sources that mention certain topics only as incidental to the man theme of the book thus making may topics hard to retrieve—not to mention my own memory not now as good as I would like it to be.
Posted on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 7:48:31 AM by Biggirl
When Adolf Hitler was building up the Nazi movement in the 1920s, leading up to his taking power in the 1930s, he deliberately sought to activate people who did not normally pay much attention to politics.
Such people were a valuable addition to his political base, since they were particularly susceptible to Hitler’s rhetoric and had far less basis for questioning his assumptions or his conclusions.
“Useful idiots” was the term supposedly coined by V.I. Lenin to describe similarly unthinking supporters of his dictatorship in the Soviet Union.
Put differently, a democracy needs informed citizens if it is to thrive, or ultimately even survive.
Report: Insubordinate McChrystal Called Back to Washington for White House Meeting
Tuesday, June 22, 2010 | Kristinn
Posted on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 7:07:18 AM by kristinn
NBC News’ Savannah Guthrie reports this morning that Gen. Stanley McChrystal is being called to Washington for a meeting at the White House tomorrow in the wake of a Rolling Stone article that has exposed McChrystal and his staff as mockingly disrespectful of their civilian overseers, including their commander-in-chief President Barack Obama.
Guthrie posted at Twitter:
McChrystal has been ordered to the Sit Rom tomorrow to explain his stmts criticizing admin officials to Rolling Stone to POTUS in person 15 minutes ago via UberTwitter
Guthrie added: “McChrystal has been calling around town apologizing to officials.”
The Atlantic reported late last night that McChrystal had been called by numerous top officials last night:
Here we go again!
Remember, better men than those now present in gubmint have tried to get rid of the Corps—will these johnny-come-lately pvnks be successful?
In a pig’s @$$ they will!!!!!!!!!!
aka: Dick Gaines
POSTS ADDED 24/7…
JUST CLICK LINK BELOW”’
June 19, 2010
— @ 9:24 am
by James Buchanan
In a startling development, a long-time pro-White activist, Edgar Steele has been charged with plotting to kill his wife. An article in the Spokesman-Review notes “(Edgar) Steele pleads not guilty… (Steele) pleaded with U.S. District Court Judge Candy Dale to release him from jail before next week’s bail hearing to tend to his clients and ‘put my affairs in order.’ The judge declined and ordered Steele not to contact his mother-in-law and wife…. ‘They know me far better than the U.S. government does,’ Steele said. ‘The United States government is doing everything in its power to try to drive a wedge between me and my wife…’ Steele’s wife and son, who appeared to be in his early 20s, declined interviews but spoke with Whelan at the hearing and communicated with Steele before the no-contact order. Steele’s wife cried after the hearing and slammed her hand against a wall outside the courtroom. “I need to be allowed to talk to my husband…,’ she said to court officials.”
All the people who know Edgar Steele who have been posting on pro-White blogs like Stormfront have been emphatic that he would never try to murder his wife. Add to that Steele’s long history of law-abiding behavior, his intelligence and his devotion to an idealistic cause. Steele has been married for 25 years and there has not been one mention of serious strife in the marriage. There has to be a motive for a crime. A husband is not going to kill his wife unless he truly hates her.
An Epidemic Of Terminal Ignorance
By Alexander Massa
There is an epidemic spreading like wildfire across America. No, the Centers for Disease Control hasn’y issued a warning for this outbreak. I assure you, it is all too real, and it is wreaking havoc across America on all fronts: social, economic, political, religious, and many, many others. What is this mystery disease I am speaking of?
It is ignorance the most destructive disease of the mind, a deadly corrosion of our collective intellectual capacity. You may be thinking that while ignorance is certainly not a good thing, it really isn’t a disease. Oh no? Tell me, which has wrought more destruction and caused the downfall of America? Is it tuberculosis, or AIDS, or leprosy? No, it is ignorance.
I have seen this disease firsthand on many occasions. Whether it be shown in people who strain to remember who the Vice-President of the United States is, or those who have no clue what a Secretary of State is, it is the growing mass of ignorant individuals, and the overall ignorance of the populace, which are destroying our sacred Republic. The more stupid the population gets, the more ignorant the populace becomes, the more powerful our shady overlords become – and the men pulling the strings behind the grand curtain just laugh in amusement.
“…are planning a lame-duck session of Congress, “filled with defeated and retired senators and House members,” to pass a VAT (value-added tax)…..”
Posted on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 6:20:01 AM by Scanian
According to Fred Barnes at The Weekly Standard, the Obamis are planning a lame-duck session of Congress, “filled with defeated and retired senators and House members,” to pass a VAT (value-added tax).
Liberals know that they get a chance to enact progressive legislation only once in a generation. That’s when the cycle of politics throws up a liberal majority in Congress, and liberals have the votes to cram down their agenda. That’s why President Obama is in such a hurry, eager to jam down liberal legislation in the teeth of popular opposition.
I call it the ratchet.
In the 1900s, liberals got to do a ratchet on popular election of senators, the income tax, and central banking. They got to do a ratchet on financial regulation, pro-labor legislation, Social Security, and welfare in the 1930s. Only the NRA wage and price controls got repealed. They got to do civil rights and ratchet the war on poverty and environment in the 1960s. Only one welfare program out of 79 got repealed — thirty years later. And now, after a forty-year hiatus, liberals are hoping to ratchet ObamaCare and a huge expansion of the stealth welfare state onto the American people.