Home > Uncategorized > McChrystal accuses Obama buddy of covering ‘his flank’ Commander levels unprecedented criticism over handling of war on terrorists

McChrystal accuses Obama buddy of covering ‘his flank’ Commander levels unprecedented criticism over handling of war on terrorists

This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=169501

Tuesday, June 22, 2010


IN THE MILITARY
WorldNetDaily Exclusive

McChrystal accuses Obama buddy of covering ‘his flank’
Commander levels unprecedented criticism over handling of war on terrorists


Posted: June 22, 2010
9:57 am Eastern


WorldNetDaily

By F. Michael Maloof

HERAT, AFGHANISTAN - MARCH 25: General Stanley A. McChrystal,  Commander, U.S. Forces Afghanistan inspects an Afghan National Army  guard of honor during a ceremony on March 25, 2010 in Herat,  Afghanistan. The Italian Provincial Reconstruction Team, who funded the  ceremony, are civilian and military personnel providing security for aid  workers and to help reconstruction in Afghanistan's provinces. (Photo  by Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, has leveled an open and unprecedented attack on the current U.S. ambassador, Karl Eikenberry, whom he accuses of betraying him by firing off cables to Washington critical of the U.S. war strategy.

Eikenberry, a former Army lieutenant general, sent two cables last November, apparently without McChrystal’s knowledge.

Not only did the cables criticize McChrystal’s recommendation of a proposed troop buildup out of concern that it would make the Karzai government too dependent on the U.S., but they complained about Afghan President Hamid Karzai and his government and the state of its military.


McChrystal’s criticism of Eikenberry is to be published in an article in Rolling Stone magazine on Friday. The article depicts McChrystal as being on the outs with people at the White House, including President Barack Obama. In fact, McChrystal was publicly criticized for being too open in his request for additional troops.

(Story continues below)

The upcoming article also pointed to administration figures about whom McChrystal was critical, including Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Vice President Joseph Biden.

The article reportedly points out that McChrystal had taken control of the war “by never taking his eye off the real enemy: The wimps in the White House.” That list apparently includes Eikenberry.

McChrystal now has been summoned back to Washington.

McChrystal was picked to stop a quickly deterioriating situation in the U.S. war in Afghanistan as the Taliban had begun to regain territory once under government control.

A counter-insurgency expert, McChrystal had requested an additional 40,000 troops to confront the Taliban and al-Qaida. Last October when McChrystal sought the additional troops, there was considerable hesitancy in Washington to act on the request by an administration that preferred to avoid any further troop buildup.

“It is simply premature to consider additional resources until Gen. McChrystal’s assessment has been fully reviewed and discussed by the president and his team,” Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said at the time.

Obama’s delay in deciding on the McChrystal request led to frustration within the military. Ultimately, the president reluctantly approved an increase of 30,000 U.S. troops, with the remainder coming from other countries who are members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

The troop increase approval was coupled with a requirement to begin bringing the troops back to the U.S. in July 2011. Given the difficulties encountered in defeating the Taliban, that deadline may not be reached.

“I like Karl, I’ve known him for years, but they’d never said anything like that to us before,” McChrystal reportedly said. “Here’s one that covers his flank for the history books. Now if we fail, they can say, ‘I told you so.’”

McChrystal’s open criticism of Eikenberry is reminiscent of the way the former Army general and now U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan operated when he was the desk officer at the Pentagon covering China during the administration of President Bill Clinton. At the time, he was a full colonel.

Former Defense Department staff members who worked with Eikenberry were aware of his approach of saying one thing to people but doing something else. It was his way of “getting on the bandwagon to look good to the policymakers,” one former defense official complained.

Critics of Eikenberry said that he took the expedient approach that looked out more for his career than what was in the best interest of national security.

Indeed, Eikenberry’s support for the new Clinton approach toward China at the time won him the position of U.S. defense attaché to Beijing and an immediate promotion to brigadier, or one-star, general.

Critics complained that Eikenberry, while at the Pentagon, undermined a very well-defined policy toward limiting certain militarily critical technologies to China at a time when the Clinton administration sought to liberalize those controls to improve commercial trade for major contributors.

Eikenberry translated that policy approach of pushing for the liberalization of export controls in so-called special mission areas that defined U.S. strategic concerns over China then and now.

Those special mission areas for which technologies were to be limited included anti-submarine and electronic warfare, nuclear weapons and their delivery system, aerospace and power projection.

Eikenberry then pressed for a policy to allow exports only to good end-users which proved to be difficult due to limited intelligence on Chinese entities in a closed society.

Nevertheless, expansion of commercial relations with China at the time was paramount under the Clinton administration, which granted more waivers to the export of militarily critical technologies to China that also saw some of the most serious diversions of those technologies to enhance China’s intercontinental ballistic missile capability.

Those technologies also enhanced China’s computer capabilities to the point that it has one of the fastest super-computers in the world after the United States. The technologies which were allowed to be exported also improved China’s power projection and blue navy capabilities.

During the period when Eikenberry was in the Pentagon, it saw some of the greatest export liberalization of technologies which just now are beginning to seriously challenge U.S. strategic capabilities.


Related offers:

China: The Gathering Threat (book)

Ride the Thunder: A Vietnam War Story of Honor and Triumph – (Autographed)(Hardcover)

The Enemy Within: Saving America from the Liberal Assault on Our Churches, Schools, and Military – (Autographed) (Paperback)

We Were Soldiers (DVD)

Why Israel Can’t Wait: The Coming War Between Israel and Iran – (Autographed)(Paperback)

Quantcast

HERAT, AFGHANISTAN - MARCH 25: General Stanley A. McChrystal,  Commander, U.S. Forces Afghanistan inspects an Afghan National Army  guard of honor during a ceremony on March 25, 2010 in Herat,  Afghanistan. The Italian Provincial Reconstruction Team, who funded the  ceremony, are civilian and military personnel providing security for aid  workers and to help reconstruction in Afghanistan's provinces. (Photo  by Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)


**********
POSTS ADDED 24/7…
JUST CLICK LINK BELOW”’
http://www.GunnyG.wordpress.com
*****
R. W. “Dick” Gaines (Gunny G)
http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/
**********
FACEBOOK-GunnyG
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000763008392
**********
The “G” WebLog @Network54
http://www.network54.com/Forum/578302/
**********
FOR Gunny G E-Mail UPDATES…
SEND: “ADD-ME”
GunnyG@gmail.com
**********
“We Are Behind ‘ENEMY WITHIN’ Lines, Our ‘Novembers’ Are Behind Us… surrounded!
If Ya Can “grok” that!”…

*********
TODAY’s TOONS by Pookie
http://www.gopachy.com/smf/index.php?board=4.0
**********

Advertisement
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.
You must be logged in to post a comment.