Archive

Archive for December, 2010

New eligibility challenge reaches Supreme Court Attorney calls for recusal of Obama judicial appointees…

December 31, 2010 Leave a comment

WND Exclusive


BORN IN THE USA?

New eligibility challenge reaches Supreme Court

Attorney calls for recusal of Obama judicial appointees

 


Posted: December 30, 2010
11:00 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

U.S. President Barack Obama (R) delivers remarks at the Chrysler Indiana Transmission Plant II in Kokomo, Indiana on November 23, 2010. Obama along with Vice President Joe Biden traveled to Kokomo as part of their White House to Main Street tour of areas helped by the Recovery Act and auto industry bailout.   UPI/Brian Kersey Photo via Newscom

Another legal challenge to Barack Obama’s eligibility to occupy the White House has been docketed for consideration before the U.S. Supreme Court, and the plaintiff this time formally is asking that the justices appointed by Obama, the “respondent” in the case, be excluded.

“There is a widespread perception among ‘conservative’ media figures such as Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin that judicial appointments have been made by the respondent Obama with the expectation of favors in return. This has combined with a campaign of ridicule and ‘unthinkability’ on these serious issues led by the press spokesman of the respondent Obama among others,” said a “motion to recuse” submitted by attorneys working on behalf of Gregory S. Hollister, a retired military officer.

The motion cites Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, both of whom were awarded the lifetime tenure positions on probably the most influential court in the world by Obama.

Get the free, in-depth special report on eligibility that could bring an end to Obama’s presidency

“What is very much at issue here is the question of public perception. Will this court be bound by the Constitution and the law that it sets out under the Constitution? It is important that this court, above all institutions, preserves and protects the Constitution and a rule of law based upon it,” the motion states.

(Story continues below)

It also reminded the justices of the verbal attack they sustained from Obama at last year’s State of the Union address, when Obama publicly criticized their ruling in an election case.

Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee during the fourth day of her confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington on July 16, 2009. UPI/Kevin Dietsch Photo via Newscom

“We would think that this is particularly the case in light of the historically unprecedented attack on this court’s determination to uphold the constitutional rule of law engaged in by the respondent Obama during the State of the Union Address that he gave in January of 2010. It is as if he and those working with him and backing him believe that this court and the federal judiciary can be manipulated and intimidated in the manner that investigations have revealed as having occurred in the courts of Cook County, Illinois.

Read more…

Devvy’s Email Alerts: Do you know that “Federal” judges have ruled you as a parent have NO right to object to your minor child being subjected to filthy porn disguesed as sex education — graphic material that should never, ever be shown to children? “/From brainwashing children to institutions of “higher education” — how can parents remain silent when their precious children are literally being sexually and mentally abused in schools across this country?

December 31, 2010 1 comment

Posted on my web site with links; www.devvy.com

From brainwashing children to institutions of “higher education” — how can parents remain silent when their precious children are literally being sexually and mentally abused in schools across this country?

Do you know that “Federal” judges have ruled you as a parent have NO right to object to your minor child being subjected to filthy porn disguesed as sex education — graphic material that should never, ever be shown to children? “

In the 1995 First Circuit Court of Appeals case Brown v. Hot, Sexy, and Safer Productions, Inc. the court acknowledged as fact that “he minor teenagers in this case were compelled to attend a sexually explicit AIDS awareness assembly without prior parent approval,” and “the defendants’ failure to provide opt-out procedures … displayed a certain callousness towards the sensibilities of the minors….” Nevertheless, the court held that no constitutional rights of the parents or the children had been violated. (To read more about the court’s decision, click here).

Read more…

Why is Megyn Kelly refusing to ask tough questions about Obama’s background?

December 31, 2010 2 comments

Why is Megyn Kelly refusing to ask tough questions about Obama’s background?

Share 0diggsdigg

IS SHE A REAL JOURNALIST, OR AN IMPOSTOR?

December 31, 2010

Dear Editor:

 

Megyn Kelly grew up in Syracuse, NY and is an attorney as well as a Fox News anchor

The following email was sent to Megyn Kelly of Fox News in response to her recent coverage of those questioning Barack Hussein Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president:

From: David LaRocque
Sent: Thu 12/30/10 3:18 PM
To: kelly@foxnews.com

Megyn,

I was looking forward to your coverage of the birther issue this morning in connection with Gov. Abercrombie’s recent call for the release of Obama’s original Hawaii long-form birth certificate.

Read more…

True Grit Redux…

December 31, 2010 1 comment

True Grit Redux
Townhall.com ^ | December 31, 2010 | Suzanne Fields

Posted on Friday, December 31, 2010 3:28:39 PM by Kaslin

“True Grit” is a tale whose time had come and gone. It’s the good fortune of a new generation that its time has come again. The novel by Charles Portis, which sold only about 25,000 copies between 2007 and 2009, has been bought by 10,000 new readers since the new version of the movie opened this month.

In an age when twittering conversation is limited to 140 characters, where children become chubby couch potatoes changing channels with a remote control or playing war games moving fantasy soldiers around on a screen, Mattie Ross is an authentic heroine — lean, mean, articulate and downright inspirational at the toughened age of 14.

Read more…

Net Neutrality 2011: What Storms May Come

December 31, 2010 1 comment

Net Neutrality 2011: What Storms May Come
Internet News ^ | Dec 30, 2010 | Kenneth Corbin

Posted on Friday, December 31, 2010 2:51:17 PM by dila813

Both Republican commissioners have predicted that the new rules will ultimately be struck down, along the same lines as the Comcast case.

While many critics of expanded FCC regulation over broadband providers have at least feigned support of the action (while notably reserving final judgment until they can thoroughly review the 194-page report and order), Verizon took a more hostile view. Tom Tauke, a former congressman and the telecommunications giant’s top lobbyist, said the company is “deeply concerned” by the order, calling it an “assertion of authority without solid statutory underpinnings.”

While no industry group has yet initiated a legal challenge, analysts say it’s only a matter of time. Rebecca Arbogast of Stifel Nicolaus, a former bureau chief at the FCC, said that while congressional Republicans will have a hard time winning enough Democrats over to their side to overturn the rules and skirt a presidential veto, “litigation prospects will depend on the strength of the FCC’s order, the parties that are challenging it, and the court that hears the case.”

Read more…

You Are A Terrorist

December 31, 2010 2 comments

- Prison Planet.com – http://www.prisonplanet.com -

You Are A Terrorist

Posted By admin On December 21, 2010 @ 6:31 am In Featured Stories,News In Focus,Paul Watson Articles | 188 Comments

Being a “nice guy,” supporting Ron Paul and talking about the Constitution all signs of terror, according to fusion centers now overseeing massive surveillance program of American people

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com [1]
Tuesday, December 21, 2010

While the establishment constantly invokes the contrived terror threat as justification for the announcement that your every activity is being sent to federal fusion centers, those same fusion centers have been busy defining peaceful assembly, non-violent protest and criticism of the government as domestic terrorism. According to the government’s own definition of what constitutes terrorist activity – you are a terrorist.

There’s no doubt that the Washington Post’s eight page “Monitoring America” story [2] is correct when it states that Homeland Security is building a gargantuan database of every website you visit, every email you send and every phone conversation you have in order to genuinely hunt down terrorists.

The problem is, according to numerous law enforcement advisories, training manuals, seminars and other literature, the federal government defines political activism, flying American flags, wearing Levi jeans, being nice, looking “normal” and going scuba diving all as signs of domestic terror.

By encouraging Americans to “report suspicious activity” that includes such behavior, the feds are knowingly on a mission to chill political dissent, by making people afraid to exercise their constitutional rights in the fear that their neighbors will turn them in to the authorities unless they rigidly control their behavior and don’t risk even patently benign activities being misconstrued.

The following is a list of behaviors, actions or interests that the federal government, via centralized threat fusion centers that collate such information, considers to be potential signs of terrorism under the MIAC Report [3].

- Displaying bumper stickers and other paraphernalia associated with the Constitutional, Campaign for Liberty, and Libertarian parties

Read more…

Krauthammer: Obama can’t pass laws — so he rewrites the rules (governing by regulation)

December 31, 2010 1 comment

Krauthammer: Obama can’t pass laws — so he rewrites the rules (governing by regulation)
New York Daily News ^ | Friday, December 31st 2010 | Charles Krauthammer

Posted on Friday, December 31, 2010 1:35:16 PM by presidio9

Most people don’t remember Obamacare‘s notorious Section 1233, mandating government payments for end-of-life counseling. It aroused so much anxiety as a possible first slippery step on the road to state-mandated late-life rationing that the Senate never included it in the final health care law.

Well, it’s back – by administrative fiat. A month ago, Medicare issued a regulation providing for end-of-life counseling during annual “wellness” visits. It was all nicely buried amid the simultaneous release of hundreds of new Medicare rules.

Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., author of Section 1233, was delighted. “Mr. Blumenauer’s office celebrated ‘a quiet victory,’ but urged supporters not to crow about it,” reports The New York Times. Deathly quiet. In early November, his office sent an e-mail plea to supporters: “We would ask that you not broadcast this accomplishment out to any of your lists . . . e-mails can too easily be forwarded.” They had been lucky that “thus far, it seems that no press or blogs have discovered it. . . . The longer this (regulation) goes unnoticed, the better our chances of keeping it.”

Read more…

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,253 other followers