Did you catch it? All the headlines about Peas and the NFL were amusing, but they weren’t the punchline to today’s stand-up routine. This admission was:
“I’d rather be talking about stuff that everybody welcomes — like new programs…”
Pretty amazing statement from a guy expressing an urgent rush to cut the cost of ‘programs” in his crisis negotiations with the Republicans, isn’t it? Perhaps he is bulldozing some old programs to make way for some new and improved “Programs”, just like when Chicago’s Richie Daley bulldozed Meigs Field in the dark of night?
Here revealed is the heart and soul of a Community Organizer President, a Program President. This is the inner truth that gushes forth without the TelePrompter. According to him, “everybody” would welcome more new programs. Really? Everybody?
In an allegation that pushes the dispute over Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president to a new level, an affidavit prepared to accompany a criminal complaint over the “Certificate of Live Birth” released on April 27 suggests there was a plan to mislead the American public, and it went as high as the Oval Office.
“What I believe you are looking at is a classic example of an attempt at plausible deniability,” wrote Doug Vogt, who has filed a criminal complaint that charges Obama’s birth record is forged.
Vogt, who describes himself as an expert in documents, typesetting, imaging, scanners and document imaging programs and has owned Archive Index Systems since 1993, referenced the widely broadcast White House event when officials, including then-White House Counsel Robert Bauer and Obama’s communications director Daniel Pfeiffer, released the purported Hawaiian “Certificate of Live Birth.”
“Everything that came out of the mouths of both these men and the president’s was carefully orchestrated and scripted. It also implies that the president’s contingency plan was that in case the forgery was detected, that one or both of them would take the blame,” Vogt concluded.
He said in the affidavit, a copy of which was obtained by WND, “The preponderance of evidence leads me to conclude that the Certificate of Live Birth the White House presented at the 8:48 a.m. news conference (on April 27) and not mentioned on television an hour later is a forgery.”
(Story continues below)
Boehner Should Tell Obama: “Call When You’re Ready to Talk Cutting Spending…”
Posted on Monday, July 11, 2011 8:01:38 PM by COBOL2Java
Remember that story from a few days ago, the one about the Obama administration giving ACORN a $79,819 grant in March despite a federal law that prohibits the government from giving money to ACORN?
It turns out that sum is a lowball figure.
I discovered Obama’s Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) gave ACORN another $461,086 in January. The funds were earmarked for ACORN Housing Corp. in January under HUD’s Self-help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP), according to the government website USAspending.gov.
In order words, the Obama administration gave fraud-ridden ACORN nearly a half million dollars to be used on housing development.
The administration isn’t even trying to conceal the fact that it gave this money to ACORN.
USAspending.gov identifies the recipient as “ACORN Housing Corporation Inc.” even though that nonprofit entity filed papers last year legally changing its name to Affordable Housing Centers of America (AHCOA).
(Excerpt) Read more at biggovernment.com …
“(T)he ultimate goal is to get rid of the media capitalists in the phone and cable companies and to divest them from control.”
That ain’t good.
Because not today, not tomorrow, but soon – all radio and television will be on the Internet.
And ask the newspapers and publishers of the world where “print” journalism is headed.
All things news, media and communications will in the not-too-distant future be delivered solely on the Web.
Thusly is Net Neutrality your one-day-soon one-stop-shop for censorship.
Have a radio talk show host you want to shut up? Net Neutrality.
Have a TV show you don’t like? Net Neutrality.
Someone writing something of which you aren’t fond? The Big NN.
(Excerpt) Read more at biggovernment.com …
Call him what you will, Barack (Barry) Obama (Soetoro) but this is mask-off, classic Marxism 101 and it comes some two and a half years into the fundamental transformation of America. This is the Big Crisis patently manufactured by the current White House tenant and his unelected czars. Just as you can read in any text on Marxism wherever it’s been imposed on a weary world. The Marxists always create the crisis—then jump in feet first to rescue the proletariat.
Someday in the far distant future when children are educated rather than indoctrinated, the July 2011 Obama Marxism 101 narrative will be compulsory reading.
President Obama wants to let you know that no one is getting off the hook. Be it CEOs of Fortune 500 companies, corporate jet owners, hedge fund managers, or …. best-selling authors? Yes: We weren’t balancing the budget off of middle-class families and working-class families. And we weren’t letting hedge fund managers or authors of best-selling books off the hook. That is a reasonable proposition. Obama concluded, “we’re not looking to raise taxes right now” — just in 2013 and 2014.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com …
The Blaze ^
According to several agents who are now ready to offer testimony, each operation where weapons were allowed to “walk” into Mexico from the U.S. was approved at the highest levels of the United States Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of State. Some believe that operations of this magnitude could not have been possible without the knowledge and approval of Obama himself.
Almost 40 years after the biggest scandal to rock the nation, it is again time to ask the question to Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama under oath and in front of congress: What did you know and when did you know it?
via Obama’s Watergate.
Time to throw this Marxist bum out of office.
The Colorado prosecution of a woman accused of a mortgage scam will test whether the government can punish you for refusing to disclose your encryption passphrase. The Obama administration has asked a federal judge to order the defendant, Ramona Fricosu, to decrypt an encrypted laptop that police found in her bedroom during a raid of her home.
Because Fricosu has opposed the proposal, this could turn into a precedent-setting case. No U.S. appeals court appears to have ruled on whether such an order would be legal or not under the U.S. Constitution’s Fifth Amendment, which broadly protects Americans’ right to remain silent.
In a brief filed last Friday, Fricosu’s Colorado Springs-based attorney, Philip Dubois, said defendants can’t be constitutionally obligated to help the government interpret their files. “If agents execute a search warrant and find, say, a diary handwritten in code, could the target be compelled to decode, i.e., decrypt, the diary?”
“Decrypting the data on the laptop can be, in and of itself, a testimonial act–revealing control over a computer and the files on it,” said EFF Senior staff attorney Marcia Hofmann. “Ordering the defendant to enter an encryption password puts her in the situation the Fifth Amendment was designed to prevent: having to choose between incriminating herself, lying under oath, or risking contempt of court.”
(Excerpt) Read more at news.cnet.com …
Smaller than life-size, the so-called ‘gynoids’ were to be targeted at the men most at temptation from a ‘quick adventure’ with a French prostitute.
Initially, the Hungarian actress Kathe von Nagy was asked if the doll could be modelled on her, but she refused.
Instead the look of the Aryan doll with blonde bob hair and blue eyes was left bland so soldiers could apply their own fantasy.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk …
Republicans, using their control of the House of Representatives and Supreme Court are blackmailing America. Their threat? They say they will collapse our economy, shut it down and throw America into a total depression if we don’t agree to end Medicare and give the rich a tax free existence. They have more demands too, ones we haven’t seen yet. I suspect nuking Iran is on their list. There are a few lakes and streams not polluted yet.
They have mentioned they want an end to all regulations and inspections of nuclear power plants.
Can they pull it off? Yes. How should the president respond? Should he “give in?”
We have seen President Obama do two crazy things recently.
“I had no idea you might be unfamiliar with the problem with history on Lincoln, nor the writings of Dr Thomas DiLorenzo and like-minded historians
After posting here today, I assumed–the old story with assumptions–that you had just already made up your mind on this.
Thank you for your attention.
What do Most Americans Really Know About The American Civil War and Lincoln?
A shocking report authored by the office of Russia’s top religious leader Patriarch Kirill I states that this past week the United States ordered over 10 million Christian websites destroyed that they claimed were a “threat” to their National Security and that the American Internet giant Google quickly responded by making them all disappear.
According to this report, Google first came under assault from the US government in June when the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that they had launched an investigation into the company, a move defended against by top Google executive Amit Singhal who aside from claiming the attacks against them were baseless said, “At Google, we’ve always focused on putting the user first.”
(Excerpt) Read more at pakalertpress.com …
From containerized cargos they can’t rob to Voter Id they can’t cheat Democrats always fight honesty « Coach is Right
Across the country the tsunami that flipped so many state legislatures is beginning to prove how profound our side’s version of “change” is and will be. Among the top priorities of the new Republican majorities in state Senates and Assemblies has been fixing the problem of Democrat voter fraud.
The most obvious and easily accomplished remedy to cure this social cancer is a photo identification card for anyone wishing to vote. We need a photo ID to get on a plane;to cash a check and even to use our local gym. Why then should those without photo ID be allowed to vote? The answer of course is there are no genuine reasons only those fake “reasons” generated by Democrats who would sell out America’s sacred voting process to stay in power.
All so familiar
Those interested in honesty have seen this fight played out in the battles to curb thefts from shipments passing through our seaports. In the 19th and 20th centuries as international commerce increased,the rate of theft from cargos handled by longshoremen grew as well. These workers imagined that since they were handling valuable commodities some of each shipment belonged to them personally. My own grandfather regularly stole sugar from cargos he unloaded on the Brooklyn waterfront when it was scarce during World War I. As unions took over the docks the theft became absolutely institutionalized to a point that drove companies to find ways to defeat these “inventory shrinkages.” The answer was containerization.
So commonplace were these thefts before containerization that once they became inevitable and the unions knew they couldn’t find enough “safety” reasons to stop them they negotiated contracts that provided huge unwarranted benefits to longshoremen as compensation for their “loss of income” due to the new more honest handling system.
Today’s “containerization fight” is being
Give Us Liberty: Tyrants are ruthless villains, hostile to the basic freedoms granted to humanity by God.
Tyrants are ruthless villains, hostile to the basic freedoms granted to humanity by God.
Tyrannus Obama Rex
By Jay Clarke
The woman, known only as juror number 12 left her job and went into hiding fearing co-workers would ‘want her head on a platter’.
Her husband said before leaving she told him: ‘I’d rather go to jail than sit on a jury like this again.’
He told NBC News he was worried for her health and had his bags packed ready to leave if his 60-year-old wife’s name gets released.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk …
Is there any mindset which defines Obama’s default attitude better than to say it is simply “adolescent?” No, for the following reasons. Barack’s interactions with the real world evokes from him responses which can be described as: angry; superior, haughty, dismissive, dishonest, petulant, cocky, petty, vengeful, mocking, holier-than-thou, and full of faux-insights and dishonesty. In other words, Barack acts like a big kid pretending to be someone he’s not, everyday on the job. This is not only aggravating to observe, and depressing to consider, but worse—extraordinarily dangerous for a leader.
This article examines this disturbing pattern.
I. Passive-Aggressive & Delayed Adolescence
A passive aggressive person pretends to do good while sabotaging everything. It has often been remarked that Obama seems to be doing this very thing with his endless screwups and leftist beliefs. The psychological phrase “Passive-Aggressive” is defined by the New York Times as,
Passive-aggressive personality disorder is a long-term (chronic) condition in which a person seems to actively comply with the desires and needs of others, but actually passively resists them. In the process, the person becomes increasingly hostile and angry.
Miriam-Webster‘s defines Adolescence:
Adolescence:1. the state or process of growing up; 2. the period of life from puberty to maturity terminating legally at the age of majority; 3. a stage of development (as of a language or culture) prior to maturity.
Adolescence is actually rampant today amongst adults. It is especially common amongst those who grew up without a stable home, and therefore missed out on a normal childhood. One writer explains our commonplace adolescent culture in the West today: Adolescent Culture – The Marks of Adolescent Culture
What are the marks of a culture with a dominant adolescent mindset?
1. Demand for immediate gratification. We want what we want now, and we will not wait or work for it.
2. Absence of long-term thinking about life and the world. Demand for immediate gratification is a distraction from real issues. Our culture is largely ignorant of economic theory, political distinctions, or the rules of logic.
3. Motivated by feeling rather than truth. This is a key indicator of a volatile person, and an even more significant indicator of a failing culture.
4. Wanting grown-up things without growing up. Ironically, despite our addiction to all things adolescent, we still expect to be treated like adults.
5. Expecting bailouts rather than accepting consequences. Not thinking before acting is a trait of adolescence as is making excuses.
6. Focusing on appearance rather than depth. Cultures that choose style over substance quickly become silly cultures. Neil Postman discusses this in Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. Silly cultures are easily deceived and destined for tyranny. History proves this.
II. Passive-Aggressive Traits
In a 75-minute meeting Sunday night, President Obama once again demanded that more than $1 trillion in tax increases be part of any deficit reduction package attached to a vote on the debt ceiling. In the session, Obama rejected a Republican proposal to seek $2.5 trillion in spending cuts and reforms, and insisted on higher taxes on businesses and wealthy individuals. Barack Obama,
It’s a curious position, given the anemic economic growth and rising unemployment. And it’s even more curious considering that Obama himself has warned about the deleterious effects of raising taxes in a struggling economy.
In August 2009, on a visit to Elkhart, Indiana to tout his stimulus plan, Obama sat down for an interview with NBC’s Chuck Todd, and was conveyed a simple request from Elkhart resident Scott Ferguson: “Explain how raising taxes on anyone during a deep recession is going to help with the economy.”
Obama agreed with Ferguson’s premise – raising taxes in a recession is a bad idea. “First of all, he’s right. Normally, you don’t raise taxes in a recession, which is why we haven’t and why we’ve instead cut taxes. So I guess what I’d say to Scott is – his economics are right. You don’t raise taxes in a recession. We haven’t raised taxes in a recession.”
Todd reminded Obama that he had promised to raise taxes on “some of the wealthiest” Americans.
Obama responded by reiterating his opposition to tax hikes during a recession and making an argument about timing. “We have not proposed a tax hike for the wealthy that would take effect in the middle of a recession. Even the proposals that have come out of Congress – which by the way were different from the proposals I put forward – still wouldn’t kick in until after the recession was over. So he’s absolutely right, the last thing you want to do is raise taxes in the middle of a recession because that would just suck up – take more demand out of the economy and put business further in a hole.”
When Obama warned about the consequences of raising taxes, the economy was moving away from recession—growth in the fourth quarter of 2009 was nearly 6 percent. Today, however, economic growth has slowed to less than 2 percent. Even before the horrible June jobs report, economists were warning about the “substantial” possibility of a double-dip recession. Many others agreed after the news last week. “In addition to the shock value…we need to seriously question whether a double-dip is there,” David Ader, chief treasury strategist at CRT Capital, told CNBC. “I would say it’s back on the table.”
If raising taxes in a recession would be “the last thing you want to do,” wouldn’t raising taxes in a struggling economy teetering on a double-dip be the second last thing you’d want to do?
Obama made a similar argument in December, when he signed the bipartisan tax relief agreement – a deal that maintained Bush tax rates (even for the wealthy) and included additional tax breaks for businesses. “Millions of entrepreneurs who have been waiting to invest in their businesses will receive new tax incentives to help them expand, buy new equipment or make upgrades – freeing up other money to hire new workers.”
If Obama was right and the tax breaks in that deal freed up money for job creators to hire new workers, isn’t the reverse true? Isn’t it the case that new taxes on entrepreneurs and other job creators will leave them with less money to hire new workers? And wouldn’t raising taxes on the “wealthiest” just “put business further in a hole,” as Obama believed just two years ago?
His economics were right. So why the change?
via Obama vs. Obama.
KEEP THESE COLORS FLYING!
When Did The Turning Point Really Occur For America? (AND WHY!)
“symbol of opposition to state tyranny”
ABOUT THE CONFEDERATE BATTLE FLAG FLOWN HERE!
“… America Can’t Be Saved Or Returned To Its Roots Until The “R” Party Is Destroyed”
The Real DiLorenzo: A Southern Partisan Interview…