Home > Uncategorized > Prison Planet.com » Ron Paul is the Only Candidate Who Will Cut Spending

Prison Planet.com » Ron Paul is the Only Candidate Who Will Cut Spending

Ron Paul is the Only Candidate Who Will Cut Spending

Ron Paul is the only candidate serious about reducing the deficit and the national debt.

http://i40.tinypic.com/24buw3p.jpg

This fact was recently underscored by a study released by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a bipartisan think tank.

Newt Gingrich’s tax and budget plans would add $7 trillion to the debt over the remainder of the decade and Rick Santorum would do about the same.

Mitt Romney’s tax-cut and spending proposals would keep the deficit and debt on keel.

Ron Paul would reduce spending and slowly eliminate the debt by zeroing out a host of federal agencies. He would work to bring back honest money and sane economic policies by getting rid of the Federal Reserve – a prospect opposed by both sides of the establishment political party now ruling the roost in Washington.

“I think Ben Bernanke is a student of monetary policy,” said the declared Republican front-runner Mitt Romney last year, “he’s doing as good a job as he thinks he can do… I’m not going to spend my time going after Ben Bernanke. I’m not going to spend my time focusing on the Federal Reserve.”

Earlier this week, ABC News commentator Jonathan Karl was asked which candidate will reduce spending the most and he said Ron Paul.

He looked a bit sheepish about it but had to tell the truth despite the concerted effort by the establishment media to ignore Ron Paul.

via Prison Planet.com » Ron Paul is the Only Candidate Who Will Cut Spending.

About these ads
  1. No comments yet.
  1. February 25, 2012 at 10:02 PM | #1
  2. February 26, 2012 at 2:57 PM | #2
  3. February 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM | #3
  4. February 27, 2012 at 5:59 PM | #4
  5. February 28, 2012 at 8:29 AM | #5
  6. February 28, 2012 at 9:11 AM | #6
  7. February 29, 2012 at 9:15 AM | #7
  8. February 29, 2012 at 1:54 PM | #8
  9. February 29, 2012 at 2:41 PM | #9
  10. February 29, 2012 at 2:55 PM | #10
  11. March 1, 2012 at 7:12 AM | #11
  12. March 1, 2012 at 7:20 AM | #12
  13. March 1, 2012 at 8:03 AM | #13
  14. March 1, 2012 at 12:38 PM | #14
  15. March 2, 2012 at 9:52 AM | #15
  16. March 2, 2012 at 11:18 AM | #16
  17. March 2, 2012 at 11:55 AM | #17
  18. March 2, 2012 at 2:45 PM | #18
  19. March 3, 2012 at 1:17 AM | #19
  20. March 3, 2012 at 5:00 PM | #20
  21. March 4, 2012 at 7:44 AM | #21
  22. March 5, 2012 at 9:26 AM | #22
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 673 other followers