Andrew Breitbart’s media empire undoubtedly posed a threat to the establishment. From the takedown of New York Rep. Anthony Weiner to the outing of the USDA’s Shirley Sherrod and very public revelations about the seamy underside of ACORN, Breitbart was considered a thorn in the side of the liberal establishment.
But it was his promise to release information that would critically damage Barack Obama prior to an election that really grabbed the attention of the establishment and possibly led to his assassination.
As firebrand talk show host Michael Savage said following Breitbart’s collapse on a Brentwood, California, street and his subsequent death from an apparent heart attack, he would be remiss if he didn’t suggest that the liberal gadfly was assassinated. “I’m asking a crazy question,” Savage said on his nationally syndicated radio show, “but so what? We the people want an answer. This was not an ordinary man. If I don’t ask this question, I would be remiss.”
Others insist Breitbart had a history of health issues and simply collapsed and died from a heart attack as thousands of Americans do every day. They say Savage, Alex Jones and many others who posit a Breitbart assassination are engaging in baseless conspiracy theories.
However, we do know that government engages in assassination of political enemies and has the means to do so without leaving a trace.
During Senate testimony in 1975 into illegal activities by the CIA, it was revealed that the agency had developed a dart gun capable of causing a heart attack. “At the first televised hearing, staged in the Senate Caucus Room, Chairman Church dramatically displayed a CIA poison dart gun to highlight the committee’s discovery that the CIA directly violated a presidential order by maintaining stocks of shellfish toxin sufficient to kill thousands,” a Senate web page explains.
“The lethal poison then rapidly enters the bloodstream causing a heart attack. Once the damage is done, the poison denatures quickly, so that an autopsy is very unlikely to detect that the heart attack resulted from anything other than natural causes. Sounds like the perfect James Bond weapon, doesn’t it? Yet this is all verifiable in Congressional testimony,” writes Fred Burks.
Chicago radio host says Breitbart’s death was a warning shot and that others are in danger
Mancow Muller: Breitbart Was Murdered
Contrary to today’s release of edited and seemingly innocuous footage that shows Barack Obama making a speech at Harvard in 1991 and has already been in the public domain for years, Chicago radio host Erich “Mancow” Muller told the Alex Jones Show today that his friend Andrew Breitbart had in fact planned to release information that would “destroy Barack Obama” on March 1st, hours after his untimely death.
Muller said he was speaking with Breitbart “every other day” about a TV show he had lined up on a major network on which Breitbart would make regular appearances in a segment called “Breitbart predicts”.
Will damning footage Andrew Breitbart intended to release March 1 ever surface unedited?
Media outlets are frothing at the release of video that shows now President Obama a ‘radical’ Harvard rally supposedly demonstrative of racial division tactics he took part in. Indeed, Breitbart.com reports:
Earlier today, Buzzfeed’s Ben Smith announced on Twitter that video researcher Andrew Kaczynski had released “the mysterious Harvard/Obama/race video that the Breitbart folks have been talking about.”
Here is that video:
This is surely not the video that Andrew Breitbart was dying to release at the 2012 CPAC conference weeks before his untimely death. As predicted by Alex Jones, Mancow Mueller and others, the public will be distracted with less than bombshell issue while the real revelations Andrew Breitbart said he held likely ‘go with him to the grave,’ as Mancow put it earlier today.
Instead, this ‘newly leaked’ footage of Barack Obama speaking at a Harvard rally was ALREADY released in a 2008 piece produced by PBS’s Frontline program. It shows Obama speaking in support of the controversial Professor Derrick Bell. The footage is reportedly ‘selectively edited’ and was admittedly licensed from Boston TV station WGBH, who produce Frontline. See below:
As Paul Joseph Watson reported:
“The footage shows Obama from his Harvard days fraternizing with Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, leading members of the Weather Underground terrorist group which carried out a wave of bombings against government targets in the 70′s.”
It’s kind of an amazing, interesting moment because he looks so young but he sounds exactly the same. It’s a really interesting moment in his career, he’d always try to take this conciliatory middle ground, particularly around issues of race. This was a moment he couldn’t there was an intense, divisive moment at Harvard where Derrick Bell was threatening to quit if they did not increase divserity in hiring and everyone had to choose to side and he ultimately chose to side with Bell and he gave this very classic Obama speech.”
“And what’s classic about it is it’s race and gender!” Mitchell exclaimed. “It’s the very issues we are talking about today, it’s issues of gender that have certainly taken hold in the republican campaign and we have heard what the president said when he called Sandra Fluke and spoke out about it at his press conference.”
“It gives you a sense of how adept he is at navigating these issues in public and how look he’s been doing it — and how much practice he’s has,” Smith noted.
RUSH: And one other thing, ladies and gentlemen, replacing oil is not going to make energy cheaper. Oil is the cheapest form of energy, for what it provides, that we have. That’s what the market does. The market provides the cheapest and the most efficient of everything. Or it won’t survive. Eventually it’ll go kaput. It’s called competition. Oil does not have any impression right now, not any serious competition.
Great to have you back, Rush Limbaugh and the EIB Network, the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies. Telephone number if you want to be on the program, we will get to your calls in this hour, 800-282-2882.
So Obama’s in North Carolina, yeah, we’re gonna have alternative energy, gonna bring down energy costs. Nope, they’re gonna skyrocket. President Obama wants higher energy costs. Barack Obama wants higher gasoline prices. When it hit four dollars a gallon years ago Barack Hussein Obama said he was only unhappy about how fast the price got to four dollars.
(“Why do you suppose that Obama went to Osawatomie, Kansas to give that speech awhile back? That’s John Brown territory and Obama knows it. “) revisedhistory | Just another WordPress.com site
by Al Benson Jr.
Much has been written about John Brown of Harpers Ferry, Virginia fame over the years. And much of it is historical and political goop. In the North he has been portrayed as everything from slavery emancipation messiah to national hero. In parts of eastern Kansas, to this day, the unwritten commandment is “Thou shalt not take the name of John Brown in vain.”
I have never forgotten a “conversation” I had with a woman in eastern Kansas several years ago as she tried to inform me that John Brown was a hero while Jeb Stuart was a terrorist. Yes, folks, that’s the way it is in parts of eastern Kansas even today. You talk about skewed history! Why do you suppose that Obama went to Osawatomie, Kansas to give that speech awhile back? That’s John Brown territory and Obama knows it. He was identifying with the crowd that thinks John Brown was the greatest thing since sliced bread.
In actuality, John Brown was never much good at much of anything until he tried his hand at terrorism–and even in that occupation he had lots of help and support from other would-be Yankee terrorists who wanted him to do their dirty work so their hands would stay clean–and even that didn’t quite work out……
- This Day in History: John Brown Hanged for Raid on Harpers Ferry (1859) (euzicasa.wordpress.com)
- Do We Really Want to Remind Kansans of Him? (patospapa.wordpress.com)
- John Brown: The Man Who ‘Sparked’ The Civil War (npr.org)
- John Brown’s Fort (eoghann.com)
- WALTER RUSSELL MEAD: The Age Of Hamilton. As President Obama travels to John Brown’s old stomp… (pjmedia.com)
- American Heroes~JOHN BROWN (1800-1859)~by rldubour (ourpoetrycorner.wordpress.com)
- Major Events Before The American Civil War (socyberty.com)
- Review: Midnight Rising: John Brown and the Raid That Sparked the Civil War (writingwrongs.wordpress.com)
- Decreasing Economic Upward Mobility Blogging: John Brown’s Body Lies A-Mouldering in Its Grave Department (delong.typepad.com)
It has been established for at least the past three years how close Barack Obama’s ties are with the unions. We know that he and Richard Trumka are the best of pals. We know that the unions have been in lock step with and have supported left wing liberals for years. What I am about to lay out for you is absolutely stunning. This is what the CSEA local 1000 (a branch of the AFL-CIO) has managed to accomplish in the state of New York.
This state union was able to sucessfully lobby the Legislature to change the wording in the New York State Labor Law to include a “fair share” program in an attempt to collect forced union dues from subsisdized home child care workers and home health care workers. Here is how it works. The home care provider receives some of their income from the parties being taken care of and the rest of their income comes from the county department of social services as a subsisdy. The county department of social services has advised the providers that they work for the families that they care for and are not connected to social services in any way. Under the new regulations,the home care providers are now FORCED to pay union dues,whether they choose to become a union member or not.
These new regulations took effect in January of 2012. The dues are automatically deducted from the subsisdized county social services portion of the care providers’ check at a rate of 2 percent per month or up to $690.00 per year. The home care provider has absolutely no choice in this. I have contacted Assemblyman Peter Lopez’s office and have submitted documentation. After three months of waiting, I still have not received a response. I have also contacted the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation and have learned that to date, mine is the only complaint filed in New York.
My question is this: if the home care provider works for the family or the receiver of services, as stated by the county department of social services, how can a union come in and take forced dues? The only difference between this and armed robbery is the lack of a gun. And we know that the liberals and unions don’t like guns, don’t we? So there you have it, the unwilling donations to the Democrat machine.