Archive
(“…a big, boring bag of nothingness, but because they’ve heard O’Reilly spout the neocon party line about “Father Abraham” on his television show and they smell a rat”) O’Reilly’s Book on Lincoln « LewRockwell.com Blog

[Abraham Lincoln, Congressman-elect from Illinois. Three-quarter length portrait, seated, facing front
O’Reilly‘s Book on Lincoln
Posted by Thomas DiLorenzo on November 13, 2011 06:29 AM
Quite a few people have emailed me begging me to critically review Bill O’Reilly’s new book, Killing Lincoln, about the assassination. They do this not because they have read the book, which is a big, boring bag of nothingness, but because they’ve heard O’Reilly spout the neocon party line about “Father Abraham” on his television show and they smell a rat.
I’ve …read the book, and it really is a big bunch of nothing. All it is is a narrative of the events leading up to the assassination. Over 100 books are already in print on the subject, and all O’Reilly and his coauthor do is cut and paste what others have written on the subject, but without including a single footnote!
The authors also have the annoying habit of writing things like, “in his mind, he was thinking that . . . ” as though they could know what Lincoln was thinking when he did this or that 150 years ago. This is a standard practice of the “Lincoln scholars,” who also constantly claim to know what was “in his heart” (nothing but love and kindness, of course) in their writings.
There is nothing at all in O’Reilly’s book about Lincoln’s policies and behavior in office. There is nothing about his statist economic policies, his trashing of the Constitution by illegally suspending Habeas Corpus and mass arresting thousands of Northern political dissenters, his intentionally waging war on Southern civilians in violation of all moral and legal codes regarding warfare, his lifelong obsession with deporting all black people, free or slave, from America, etc. In addition, it is apparently so full of historical errors that it has been banned from the bookstore at Ford’s Theater, the famous site of the assassination.
Sen. Chuck Grassley Blasts The History Channel: Where’s The History?
Republican Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley is fed up with The History Channel’s programming and took his rage out on Twitter, unleashing a fury of tweets, chewing out the network for their reality programming and lack of actual historical shows.
“When I signed up for the History Channel on my satellite service, I expected to get history,” Grassley told the Washington Examiner. “Instead, all I see are people chopping wood or driving trucks on an icy road.”
Wayne Madsen: Obama’s CIA Connections, Part I and II | Veterans Today
- Special Report: The Story of Obama: All in The Company Part I -
By Wayne Madsen
WMR [Wayne Madsen Report] has discovered CIA files that document the agency’s connections to institutions and individuals figuring prominently in the lives of Barack Obama and his mother, father, grandmother, and stepfather.
President Obama’s own work in 1983 for Business International Corporation, a CIA front that conducted seminars with the world’s most powerful leaders and used journalists as agents abroad, dovetails with CIA espionage activities conducted by his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham in 1960s post-coup Indonesia on behalf of a number of CIA front operations, including the East-West Center at the University of Hawaii, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and the Ford Foundation. Dunham met and married Lolo Soetoro, Obama’s stepfather, at the East-West Center in 1965. Soetoro was recalled to Indonesia in 1965 to serve as a senior army officer and assist General Suharto and the CIA in the bloody overthrow of President Sukarno.
SOLDIER MURDERS AFGHANS, GENERALS MURDER SOLDIERS: It Was Only a Matter of Time...
Reblogged from NOW BLOG THIS! ~ GUNNY.G: AMERICAN !:
SOLDIER MURDERS AFGHANS, GENERALS MURDER SOLDIERS: It Was Only a Matter of Time...
Family Security Matters Foundation ^ | March 13, 2012 | Ralph Peters
Posted on Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:43:10 AM by Cocoa2012
Right now, our troops are being used as props in a campaign year, as pawns by dull-witted generals who just don’t know what else to do, and as cash cows by corrupt…
GUNNY G: YOU BETCHA! REAL AMERICANS, RESTORE THE REPUBLIC !!!!!!!!!!
Santorum Tells Voter: “Vote For Ron Paul” If You Want Limited Government
Because you certainly will not get it from slick Rick
Steve Watson
Prisonplanet.com
March 13, 2012
In a remarkable video posted to Youtube yesterday, Rick Santorum tells a man attending one of his events that if he supports limited government and debt reduction he should “go vote for Ron Paul.”
In the brief clip, the man who describes himself as an independent voter, questions Santorum’s record and support for big government programs like Medicare Part D, No Child Left Behind, and five debt ceiling increases, while he was a Senator from Pennsylvania.
“What is limited government about that sir?” the man asks Santorum.
A visibly annoyed Santorum fires back “Vote for Ron Paul, that’s what you should do.”
Watch the video:
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
So there you have it from Santorum himself. If you actually care about scaling back spending, reducing the debt and limiting federal government over reach, Ron Paul is the only candidate to vote for.
The Ron Paul campaign has directly targeted Santorum’s record in recent weeks, making the case that it is a myth that Santorum is in any way a fiscal conservative, as he claims to be.
Paul has been running an ad, entitled simply “Fake”, that points out how Santorum has not voted conservatively on many big issues.
Obama Continues to Lie About Oil
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Wilmington, Delaware. We’re gonna start with Michael. I’m great. You appreciate your patience, and hello, sir.

CALLER: How you doing, Rush? And thanks for taking the call. Affordable energy is the absolute, I believe, only way back for this country.
RUSH: Yep.
CALLER: We cannot create jobs unless we go to the bottom of the job-creation ladder.
RUSH: People have to get to work!
CALLER: You must have a manufacturer or a person with an idea to open up a little warehouse — a plant, a garage, wherever — and bring energy into that building, powerfully and inexpensively. But Obama knows that. And he knows if he gives us a 5¢ KW; a $1.50-a-gallon gas; a decent, decent way of bringing natural gas to our trucks; he knows he’s finished. He knows their party is finished. There will be no need for food stamps. There will be no need for tax reform. We don’t need anything, Rush, other than affordable energy. What is wrong with the electorate?
"WHY WOMEN ARE SO CRAZY" A BOOK REVIEW by Alan Stang
Reblogged from NOW BLOG THIS! ~ GUNNY.G: AMERICAN !:
November 13, 2008
NewsWithViews.com
[Announcement: Did you know Alan Stang has a new radio show? Click here for details.]
The title is Why Women Are So Crazy: Not In Their Place (Houston, Patton House, 2008). Like one of my other books, Scumbags I Have Known and Other Profundities, this new one is a compendium of magazine pieces I have done on the subject for years.
Marine calls President Obama the ‘Enemy’ | Western Journalism.com
A controversial anti-Obama Facebook post from a U.S. Marine is now under
Young Obama Wanted to Be Like Sukarno, Says Transgender Nanny
President Obama harbored a childhood dream to follow in the footsteps of Indonesian “Lifetime President” Sukarno, according to an interview Sunday with Obama’s childhood transgender Indonesian nanny. According to France24.com:
A transgender Indonesian man who shot to fame after it emerged he had worked as Barack Obama’s nanny in the late 1960s wants nothing from “little Barry” but to meet him again some day.
The transgendered individual, named Turdi, nannied Obama when the future president and his mother and Indonesian stepfather Lolo Soetoro lived in a suburb of Jakarta in the 1960s. Turdi subsequently spent time as a sex worker and now lives in the slums. Obama did not contact Turdi when he visited Jakarta in 2010 and 2011.
Prison Planet.com » Department Of Justice Wants Court To Keep Google/NSA Partnership Secret
Court hearing scheduled for next week in ongoing effort by privacy group to expose details of working relationship
Department Of Justice Wants Court To Keep Google/NSA Partnership Secret google nsa 665
The Department of Justice will ask a federal court to uphold the secrecy that surrounds the working relationship between Google and the National Security Agency in a hearing that is scheduled for next week.
Privacy watchdog group The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) is returning to court once again in an effort to disclose more information regarding the widely publicized partnership between the spy agency and the search engine giant.
EPIC is suing to obtain documents that detail the relationship, and will appeal against the NSA’s so-called “Glomar” response, claiming it “could neither confirm nor deny” the existence of any information about its relations with Google, because “such a response would reveal information about NSA’s functions and activities.”
Prison Planet.com » Bioethics Professor: Drug The Population Into Accepting ‘Green World Order’
“Pharmacological enhancement of empathy and altruism” needed to address climate change
A new paper to be published in Ethics, Policy & Environment argues that serious consideration should be given to mass drugging the population to make them more environmentally conscious while also proposing that babies should be genetically engineered to be smaller in order to reduce their carbon footprints.
Bioethics Professor: Drug The Population Into Accepting Green World Order meds small for web
In an interview with The Atlantic the lead author of the paper, New York University bioethics professor S. Matthew Liao, argues that humans need to be be subjected to “biomedical modifications” in order to help combat climate change.
Followed to their logical conclusion, Liao’s proposals outstrip anything Aldous Huxley wrote about in Brave New World, a 1932 dystopian novel about a future scientific dictatorship that seeks to drug, genetically manipulate, and medically induce humanity into complete slavish subservience.
The South says Obama is not Christian, but a Muslim
Just when you were feeling good about being an American, maybe because spring has sprung a little earlier this year, out comes some news that makes you wonder about your country. Sad to say, it appears that Obamaphobia is rampant in the South.
If you listen to a majority of Republican voters in two key Southern states, President Obama lies about his religion.
Obama may claim he is Christian, but voters in Mississippi and Alabama say that is just not true. He’s a Muslim.
A few others aren’t so sure what he is.A Public Policy Poll released on March 12 that looks at the voters in the Mississippi and Alabama races and their choices in the primary also asked them about their values.
No matter what you think of their choices for Tuesday’s primary, their values and lack of knowledge are truly appalling.For starters, they have a high opinion of Rush Limbaugh and by a two-thirds majority they do not believe in evolution. Is there any hope for a country when its electorate is so ill informed? How are they going to be making informed choices in the primary?
Poll: 45-52% Believe Obama Is A Muslim And GOP Elites Don’t Get It
Poll: 45-52% Believe Obama Is A Muslim And GOP Elites Don’t Get It
America’s Conservative News ^ | 03/13/2012 | America’s Conservative News
Posted on Tuesday, March 13, 2012 12:46:36 PM by ElIguana
According to a recently released poll by the left-leaning Public Policy Polling, 45% of likely GOP primary voters in Alabama believe that Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim. 41% of those polled were unsure and only 14% responded that they believe that Mr. Obama is a Christian. Similar results were obtained in Mississippi where 52% of respondents said they believe that Obama is a Muslim, while 36% claimed they were not sure and only 12% said they believe Obama is a Christian.
The Mainstream Media Blackout Of The Arpaio News Conference | Expose Obama
We are living in strange times.
The Russian news service Pravda has written an extremely detailed article not only about Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s revelation of the forgery of Obama’s birth certificate and Selective Service document,but has picked up on the long-time charge of Obama’s obvious usurping of the presidency by ignoring the natural born clause of the U.S. Constitution. What is strange about this? Only that the article decries—almost mocks—the total mainstream media blackout.
The mainstream media couldn’t simply pretend that Arpaio’s news conference didn’t occur,stuffing it down an Orwellian memory hole,so they came up with another Obamabot explanation:that Arpaio is simply paying back the DOJ and Obama for their various criminal investigations of his department. This has been repeated ad nauseam before and after the press conference as if Arpaio has already been charged and convicted of these various “high crimes and misdemeanors.” Strangely,minutes after Arpaio’s conference,these various “charges” were repeated by a single Associated Press writer,Jacques Billeaud,and parroted verbatim within hours by literally hundreds of news organizations.
Billeaud’s basis for the dismissal of Arpaio forgery charges:“Some critics suggest Arpaio’s aim is to divert attention from his own legal troubles while raising his political profile as he seeks a sixth term this year. The sheriff vehemently denies such strategies are in play.”
Like the Body Snatchers movie,this blurb was used in hundreds if not thousands of news organizations and websites,and repeated not as opinion,which it is,but substantiated fact. Add to the news organizations that simply rewrote the article under someone else’s name and changed a few words,and this number would be in the tens of thousands. It makes the old Soviet Politburo in terms of speed and efficiency look like child’s play.
The “legal troubles” Billeaud refers to is Obama’s rogue DOJ alleging that Arpaio routinely uses racial profiling to make arrests,among other things. The evidence for this? When Arpaio,in customary fashion said,in effect,show me the money,DOJ,as they always do when someone stands up to their Brown Shirt tactics,retreated,babbling incoherently.
SOLDIER MURDERS AFGHANS, GENERALS MURDER SOLDIERS: It Was Only a Matter of Time…
SOLDIER MURDERS AFGHANS, GENERALS MURDER SOLDIERS: It Was Only a Matter of Time…
Family Security Matters Foundation ^ | March 13, 2012 | Ralph Peters
Posted on Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:43:10 AM by Cocoa2012
Right now, our troops are being used as props in a campaign year, as pawns by dull-witted generals who just don’t know what else to do, and as cash cows by corrupt Afghan politicians, generals and warlords (all of whom agree that it’s virtuous to rob the Americans blind).
What are our goals? What is our strategy? We’re told, endlessly, that things are improving in Afghanistan, yet, ten years ago, a U.S. Army general, unarmed, could walk the streets of Kabul without risk. Today, there is no city in Afghanistan where a U.S. general could stroll the streets. We may not have a genius for war, but we sure do have a genius for kidding ourselves…
Mystery solved! Why Americans think President is Muslim
Mystery solved! Why Americans think President is Muslim
A Whig Manifesto ^ | March 13, 2012 | Chuck Morse
Posted on Tuesday, March 13, 2012 12:22:40 PM by Chuckmorse
His campaign blamed “shameful, shadowy attackers.” The media actually blamed the media (and human nature). But the only person to blame for the surprising number of Americans who think the president is a Muslim is Barack Hussein Obama.
So says author and Boston talk-radio personality Chuck Morse.
White House doormat: Obama tramples Constitution at every opportunity
When Barack Obama became president of the United States, he swore an oath to “preserve, protect and defend our Constitution.” Unfortunately, evidence has accumulated ever since that he feels no obligation to honor his commitment.
In fact, Mr. Obama has been violating that oath, left and, well, left. Here are a few of the most egregious examples:
Under the president’s health care legislation, now universally known as Obamacare, Americans are compelled to purchase health care. The constitutionality of this measure is being tested in court at this writing. But such a mandate smacks of big-government overreach that must be struck down by the Supreme Court.
John Jay’s Worst Nightmare Comes to Life in Obama…
One thing we can surmise from Jay’s concern is that no foreigner would be allowed to hold the office of Commander-in-Chief of the United States armed forces. The definition of who is a foreigner is fairly simply. According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary a foreigner is “a person belonging to or owing allegiance to a foreign country.”
From the remarks of Panetta, the Obama administration has effectively placed the control of deploying the United States armed forces in the hands of foreign interests that are more often than not, hostile to the interests of the United States. We can only hope that the Obama administration will defend the United States if we are attacked by one of the Iranian nuclear warheads Obama failed to keep out of the Iranian’s hands.
While the Obama administration is reluctant to use the Armed Forces of the United States outside of finding an international rule of law letting him, he has no compunctions against using the Armed Forces of the United States against the people of the United States on United States soil in violation of both US Law and the US Constitution when he signed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 into laws.
Gunny G: Dr Ron Paul: Many of my colleagues who stood by as then-President Bush used the military as a kind of king’s army are now calling for Congress to act against this president for openly admitting that is his intent. I agree it is time for Congressional action in response to these attacks on our Constitution, but the solution is simple and Constitutional. The solution is simply voting to withhold funds, since Congress has the power of the purse. No money for undeclared wars!
While Senator Sessions expressed surprise at the casual audacity of Panetta in making this statement, in reality his was just a bluntly stated explanation of what has been, de facto, the case for many years. When President Obama committed the US military to a pre-emptive war against Libya last year, for example, Congress was kept completely out of the process. Likewise, military action in Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, and so on, proceed without a Congressional declaration. In fact, we haven’t had a proper, constitutional declaration of war since 1942, yet the US military has been engaged in Korea, Lebanon, Iraq, Bosnia, Liberia, Haiti, and Libya with only UN resolutions as the authority. Congress’s only role has been authorizing funds, which it always does without question, because one must “support the troops”.

Of course we should reserve our harshest criticism for Congress rather than the Administration. If the people’s branch of government abrogates its Constitutional authority to the Executive branch, who is to blame? Who is to blame that Congress as a body will not stand up and demand that the president treat the Constitution as more than an anachronistic piece of paper, or merely a set of aspirations and guidelines? The Constitution is the law of the land and for Congress to allow it to be flouted speaks as badly about Congress as it does about a president who seeks to do the flouting.
Just last week the administration announced that it would begin providing material support to the rebels who seek to overthrow the Syrian government. Was Congress involved in this decision to take sides in what may develop into a full-fledged civil war? And what of reports that US special forces may already be operating inside Syria? Still, Congress sits silently as its authority is undermined. Does anybody really wonder why approval numbers for Congress are so low?
Prison Planet.com » An Administration Gone Rogue
Prisonplanet.com
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
Have certain parts of the Constitution become irrelevant, as a former Republican leader once told me at a Foreign Affairs Committee hearing? At the time, I was told that demanding a Congressional declaration of war before invading Iraq, as Article I Section 8 of the Constitution requires, was unnecessary and anachronistic. Congress and the president then proceeded without a Constitutional declaration and the disastrous Iraq invasion was the result.
Last week, Obama administration officials made it clear that even the fig leaf of Congressional participation provided by the 2003 “authorization” to use force in Iraq was to be ignored as well.

In a hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta stated clearly and repeatedly that the administration felt it was legally justified to use military force against Syria solely with “international permission”. Such “international permission” could come by way of the United Nations, NATO, or some other international body. Secretary Panetta then told Senator Sessions that depending on the situation, the administration would consider informing Congress of its decision and might even seek authorization after the fact.
While Senator Sessions expressed surprise at the casual audacity of Panetta in making this statement, in reality his was just a bluntly stated explanation of what has been, de facto, the case for many years. When President Obama committed the US military to a pre-emptive war against Libya last year, for example, Congress was kept completely out of the process. Likewise, military action in Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, and so on, proceed without a Congressional declaration. In fact, we haven’t had a proper, constitutional declaration of war since 1942, yet the US military has been engaged in Korea, Lebanon, Iraq, Bosnia, Liberia, Haiti, and Libya with only UN resolutions as the authority. Congress’s only role has been authorizing funds, which it always does without question, because one must “support the troops”.
Thomas More Fights Trojan Horse of Radical Islam
There is a fierce battle under way for the soul of our nation. Many of us feel helpless because of the massive, unrelenting onslaught by the evil forces that are beating at our country’s Judeo-Christian foundation from every direction. In this terrible, ancient fight which dates all the way back to the Garden of Eden, there are modern-day warriors who understand that this fight is a spiritual one. Yes, we have earthly, physical enemies, but ultimately the real enemies are the spiritual forces of evil that are the motivators behind our enemies in the physical world.
American Massacres Have Been Common for Centuries by Jack D. Douglas
For hundreds of years Americans have been committing massacres of women and children, old men and sometimes even young men, mostly unarmed or armed only with primitive weapons. The early massacres were mostly of Indians who refused to leave their lands when Americans decided it was God’s will that they steal those lands for nothing or for a few trinkets.
In the Civil War Sherman and Grant routinely massacred Southern civilian populations with bombardments of cities, burning homes and Atlanta [though I do not know death figures], and so on.
The introduction of automatic weapons led quickly to far more massive U.S. massacres, obviously in the Philippines where freedom fighters were using primitive weapons to try to gain freedom from the U.S. Empire.
The U.S. gunned down tens of thousands of the Philippine sons of liberty and piled them in mass graves. In WWII the U.S. massacred vast numbers of Japanese soldiers trapped and starving on remote islands, bombed and burned all the cities of Germany and Japan [except Kyoto] and killed and maimed millions in a vast American Holocaust, capping it all off with the ghastly murder and maiming of hundreds of thousands of women and children in seconds by two nuclear weapons dropped to catch them going to school and in ways to maximize the deadly blast effects. The nuclear bombings were done against the pleas of Adm. Nimitz and most U.S. scientists who made the bombs. Nimitz said the Japanese were starving, surrounded and strangled by U.S. ships and would have to surrender soon to avoid starvation mass deaths. But Truman and his War Dept. and Pentagon brass wanted massacres to terrify the world into submission, especially the Soviets who had no such weapons.
Today’s Toons 3/13/12
Today’s Toons 3/13/12The Briefing Room ^ | 3/13/12 | pookie18Posted on Tuesday, March 13, 2012 4:24:19 AM by pookie18Click on link.














Recent Comments