Home > Uncategorized > Warriors and wimps in the GOP

Warriors and wimps in the GOP

The Republican Party in 2012 faces two challenges: how to replace Barack Obama, and how to steer the nation back to constitutional government. The two are related goals, but not the same. We saw in 1968 the election of Richard Nixon – and in 1969, Nixon created the EPA.Mitt Romney - CaricatureMitt Romney – C

Mitt Romney can provide that restorative leadership if he chooses, but what about the leadership deficit in our 50 states? Has the Republican Party at the local level produced a generation of leaders, or a generation of wimps?

A mistake made in 1980 was in thinking that having Ronald Reagan in the White House meant a total reversal of the socialist tide of the previous 50 years. Conservatives neglected state and local government, and the left continued its march toward the nanny state.

LAS VEGAS, NV - MAY 17:  U.S. Rep. Ron Paul (R...

LAS VEGAS, NV – MAY 17: U.S. Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) speaks to members of the Clark County Republican Party at the Silverton Casino Lodge May 17, 2011 in Las Vegas, Nevada. Paul announced last week that he is seeking the 2012 GOP nomination for president. (Image credit: Getty Images via @daylife)

At first glance the future of state-level conservatism appears bright when you look at the rising conservative Republican stars across the nation. In Indiana, Wisconsin, South Carolina, Louisiana and Texas, we see state officials – governors, lieutenant governors, attorneys general – leading energetic campaigns for conservative reform and return to limited government. The conservative “bench” appears blessed with talented and principled leaders.

And then, to balance the picture, there is my home state of Colorado.

Colorado has a Democratic governor elected in 2010 with 51 percent of the vote and a split state legislature. But three of its four elected state constitutional officers are Republicans, so the conservative “bench” might appear to be strong. Well, two of them are heavy hitters, but the third has a talent for striking out.

The newly elected Colorado secretary of state, Scott Gessler, is demonstrating courage in battling against election fraud and voter registration reforms. He takes a lot of heat from the liberal media for his fidelity to constitutional principles, but he is a hero to the grass roots, and that is enough for now.

The new Republican state treasurer, Walker Stapleton, has taken on one of the thorniest issues in state government, the reform of state pension systems. As a result, he is hated by the public-sector unions and fans of big government everywhere. A bright star on the Republican horizon? You bet!

And then, to balance the leadership ledger on the negative side, there is Colorado’s wimpish attorney general, John Suthers. Is he a principled conservative leader like Gessler and Stapleton? Not so much.

As seasoned observers of Colorado politics will tell you, John Suthers is cut from a different cloth. Suthers is the type of Republican loved by the liberal media and other purveyors of the newest political snake oil, “bipartisan consensus building.”

This sounds good in editorial offices and political science classrooms, but it has a fatal flaw. In practice, it means giving Democrats a veto over acceptable political reforms. This breed of Republican centrist not only does not seek controversy, he avoids it like the plague.

Two examples will suffice to illustrate the Suthers way of representing the public trust in legal matters. The first example shows lack of seriousness in enforcing state law, and the second shows how he backs away from offending any powerful interest group beloved of the state’s Democratic power elite. Both are related to the issue of illegal immigration.

In 2006, the state Legislature passed a law directing the state’s attorney general to sue the federal government to collect money owed to the state to reimburse the taxpayers for the millions of dollars it costs to incarcerate illegal aliens convicted of crimes. There is a federal program to provide such reimbursement. Suthers did file suit, but asked for only the cost of incarceration in state prisons, not the equal or greater amount of funds expended by local government for holding illegal aliens in local jails. His office had not even bothered to ask local sheriffs what those costs are………

EXCERPT

via Warriors and wimps in the GOP.

Enhanced by Zemanta
About these ads

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,254 other followers