Supreme Court insults America With Latest Decision
This morning, we have once again been reminded that our system of checks and balances no longer functions for the good of the American people.
Nine lawyers in the Supreme Court, hiding behind legalese written by other lawyers, has decided that Americans, through our various states, have no right to either enforce the sovereignty and security of our borders or demand that the federal government’s lawyers do so.
We don’t count in the cynical view of the lawyers who have wormed their way into controlling our lives essentially “because WE say so.” Oh, they claim the United States Constitution sanctions and supports their denial of our rights of self-defense, but the truth is they have stolen away the power of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution by bowing to claims that what is abundantly obvious is not at all obvious. In effect, the Supreme Court has cynically asked us: “Who are you going to believe: us or your lying eyes?”
To say this was not a political interpretation of law twisted to favor those who would erase our borders and open the floodgates of the world to our midst is the type of infuriating insult we have to take with us as we vote to correct what has happened to our government from top to bottom. This decision ought to be carried like a “bloody shirt” by every American who is alarmed by the ever-quickening pace of the destruction of our freedoms.
They have reduced our lives to a children’s game of tag as the Supreme Court, acting as egalitarian school yard monitors, admonish us to “Play nice with the new children!”
Well, we don’t want to “play nice with the new Children!” We want to kick them the hell out of our country – a county OUR forefathers risked their lives to build and gave their blood to preserve.
The Supreme Court has made it very clear………..
EXCERPT
via Supreme Court insults America With Latest Decision.
Related articles
- Supreme Court: No more life without parole for juveniles (thegrio.com)
- Here’s the Supreme Court’s decision on SB1070, the Arizona immigration law. Most of it was struck down, but not a key, controversial element: (shortformblog.com)
- BREAKING: Supreme Court Doubles Down On Citizens United (thinkprogress.org)
- Supreme Court: No more life without parole for juveniles (kansascity.com)
- 55% of Americans Wanted U.S. Supreme Court to Uphold Arizona Immigration Law (righttruth.typepad.com)
- Supreme Court issues split decision on Arizona immigration law (latimes.com)
- Supreme Court guts most of Arizona’s anti-immigration law | The Raw Story (faktensucher.wordpress.com)
- Supreme Court rules mandatory life sentences for juveniles unconstitutional (jurist.org)
- Blame The Supreme Court: Acting As An Arm Of The Republican Party (mykeystrokes.com)
-
June 29, 2012 at 7:10 AM | #1(“Bloggers Say Impeach Roberts”) Supreme Court health care ruling: Blog chatter: Impeach Roberts – POLITICO.com « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL
-
June 29, 2012 at 8:10 AM | #2THE ROBERTS DOCTRINE (“In support of an imperial presidency, it has become sovereign itself.”) « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL
-
June 29, 2012 at 8:32 AM | #3How Can a Conservative Support a RINO For President? « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL
-
July 4, 2012 at 7:32 AM | #4Supreme Errors by Peter Schiff (“The Evil Republicans Will Never Repeal O-Care They love power and pelf, too. Article by Peter Schiff.”) « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL
-
July 11, 2012 at 8:45 PM | #5(“Check points? We don’t need no stinkin’ check points.”) Open-Border President Swings Open The Floodgates « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL
-
July 12, 2012 at 3:25 PM | #6What does a conservative believe? « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL















Recent Comments