Home > Uncategorized > Benghazi: No Other Explanation Fits

Benghazi: No Other Explanation Fits

A Mideast “Fast and Furious” emerging within weeks of the election would be devastating

 

On October 4 in Canada Free Press, I wrote a column entitled Was Ambassador Stevens’ Death a Hit?, so suspicious did I find the circumstances surrounding the attack on the US embassy in Benghazi, Libya at that time.

 

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 12:  U.S. President...

WASHINGTON, DC – SEPTEMBER 12: U.S. President Barack Obama (R) makes a statement about the death of U.S. ambassador to Libya J. Christopher Stevens with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the Rose Garden at the White House September 12, 2012 in Washington, DC. Stevens and three other embassy employees were killed when the embassy in Benghazi was attacked by a mob potentially angered by an American-made video mocking Islam’s founding prophet. (Image credit: Getty Images via @daylife)

 

On October 25, I followed up with Obama’s Feet of Clay, in which I discussed the likelihood that President Barack Obama failed to react to the attack despite real-time knowledge of developments in Benghazi because he wished to obscure or bury evidence of the administration’s gun running activities to Libyan and Syrian rebels.

 

 

The reason for Obama’s desire to do so, in this scenario, would be twofold. One, because weapons were not only being provided to Libyan and Syrian rebels, but were in fact being provided to jihadists across the Middle East with whom Obama sympathizes, but who are enemies of the US. Two, because Ambassador Christopher Stevens himself may have become a liability for reasons still uncertain (although my first column outlines one possibility). The fact that Stevens’ mission, and that of other US operatives in Libya was a clandestine one has been established; this is certainly a likely reason for Obama to want a lid kept on it. If revealed, obviously this would substantially threaten his re-election chances.

 

gophum

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

As I indicated early on, not only did I see Obama’s pre-September 11 actions as being executed in order to cultivate plausible deniability on his part, but I suspected even then that he might have employed rebels or jihadis to eliminate Stevens. It does bear mentioning that Obama’s cavalier dismissal of intelligence briefings leading up to Sept. 11, 2012 was widely reported prior to that date.

 

 

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com …

 

via Benghazi: No Other Explanation Fits.

 

 

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
  1. No comments yet.
  1. October 27, 2012 at 11:00 PM | #1
  2. October 27, 2012 at 11:24 PM | #2
  3. October 28, 2012 at 9:35 AM | #3
  4. October 28, 2012 at 9:57 AM | #4
  5. October 28, 2012 at 3:10 PM | #5
  6. October 28, 2012 at 6:48 PM | #6
  7. October 31, 2012 at 10:02 AM | #7
  8. October 31, 2012 at 10:56 AM | #8
  9. October 31, 2012 at 11:12 AM | #9
  10. November 1, 2012 at 2:40 PM | #10
  11. November 13, 2012 at 11:28 AM | #11
  12. November 13, 2012 at 7:50 PM | #12
  13. December 4, 2012 at 10:14 AM | #13
  14. December 20, 2012 at 9:23 AM | #14
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 682 other followers