Home > Uncategorized > Chuck Baldwin — No Change… (“Frankly, Mitt Romney deserved to lose, not only due to his big-government, liberal track record, which is out of step with rank and file freedomists, but also due to the shameful treatment of Ron Paul and his supporters, which he …”)

Chuck Baldwin — No Change… (“Frankly, Mitt Romney deserved to lose, not only due to his big-government, liberal track record, which is out of step with rank and file freedomists, but also due to the shameful treatment of Ron Paul and his supporters, which he …”)

As everybody on the planet knows now, Barack Obama was re-elected President of the United States. Democrats retained control of the US Senate, while Republicans retained control of the US House of Representatives. In other words, the national elections produced no change. But, in reality, we haven’t had any significant change in a national election in many years.

The last significant national election that produced dramatic change (at least temporarily) was the congressional elections of 1994, when Republicans swept both houses of Congress and denied President Bill Clinton’s Democrats control of the legislature. It was dubbed the “Conservative Revolution.” The other election that could be regarded as a national coup against the established political order was the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980.

However, within a year of the 1994 congressional elections, Newt Gingrich and Trent Lott had successfully fought off attempts of rank and file GOP congressmen to truly reduce the size and scope of the federal government, and by 1995, it was business as usual once again. And after Mr. Reagan was shot just a little over a year after taking office, much of the conservative agenda that he had campaigned on seemed to quickly fade away.

But ever since Reagan, republicans have routinely rejected legitimate freedomists and have nominated pseudo-conservatives. The result has always led to a resounding defeat for republicans at the polls. Since the defeat of George H.W. Bush after one term in 1992, due to his blatant big-government and globalist policies, Democrats have dominated the White House. The lone exception was the election of G.W. Bush in 2000 and 2004. But, Bush, Jr., ran as a Reagan-conservative. He wasn’t, of course, but he was perceived as one. But it was Bush, the Big-Spending-Warmonger, that doomed the GOP‘s future failures. Bush’s out-of-control deficit spending, coupled with his preemptive wars of aggression, and the implementation of a burgeoning police state/surveillance society made the name “Republican” something dirty to the American electorate. As a result, the GOP is in complete disarray and without principled leadership.

Mitt Romney was just the latest attempt by the GOP establishment to force a big-government “moderate” upon party faithful. The true freedomist Ron Paul was treated in much the same way that Pat Buchanan was treated back in 1996. By hook or by crook, the GOP was not going to let a principled freedomist win the Presidential nomination. They wanted a controlled big-government toadie. They got what they wanted, and they lost! In fact, every time the GOP nominates a “moderate” as their Presidential nominee, he loses. Every time! One could almost get the feeling that the party establishment would rather lose with a moderate than win with a conservative. After all, why would the American people want a Wall Street moderate who will implement 85% of the Democrat agenda when they can elect a blue-collar Democrat and have the real deal? At least the Democrats are perceived as being compassionate. The GOP’s refusal to listen to their grassroots, to advance populist causes, and to disconnect themselves from Wall Street continues to cost them elections. In short, the Republican Party in Washington, D.C., is completely out of touch with average Americans.

The same scenario played out here in the State of Montana. The GOP candidates for Governor and US Senator (both pseudo-conservatives) lost to Democrats. (At the time of this writing, the race for governor is very close with only 7000 votes separating them; but the Democrat has held the lead all yesterday and today, and it is doubtful that the Republican can overtake him.) This is actually a good thing for the Montana Republican Party, as it removes from leadership the two most powerful neocons. These are men who had steered and manipulated the State party away from freedomist principles in much the same way that both Bush I and Bush II had done nationally. Now, true freedomists within the State GOP have an opportunity to rise to positions of leadership and begin steering the party back to its conservative roots.

But as I predicted earlier, the Presidential election did not provide long coattails. In DC, Republicans ended where they started, with control of the House of Representatives. Neither did Democrats increase their advantage on Capitol Hill at all. So, let’s not forget that the GOP controls the US House of Representatives. This means that the GOP controls the purse strings for ALL federal spending. If the Republican Party is serious about reducing spending, they have the power to do it. All monies appropriated for federal expenditures must be authorized by the House of Representatives. So, Republicans should quit crying in their milk and start demanding that House

Speaker John Boehner and the rest of the House Republican leadership start growing some man-stuff and stop funding all of these big-government, unconstitutional expenditures-including all of these foreign wars that are sapping both our freedom and our prosperity.

Here in……..

EXCERPT!!!!!

via Chuck Baldwin — No Change.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
About these ads
  1. November 8, 2012 at 3:09 PM | #1

    A very small change. We left men and woman in-charge who didn’t pass a budget, put USA 16 trillion in debt. Gave themselves a pay raise last year with a deficit. We need a miracle. For these men to gain wisdom and quit spending. As my wise Grandfather taught me. “Can’t fix other folks houses when your house is a mess.” Thank you for the information. I have great fear for the future.

  2. November 8, 2012 at 11:14 PM | #2

    I took a lot of hits for not voting for this idiot, what in the world was it that even resembled Conservatism about Romney? I had family, close family tear my corn holster wide open with their feet snugly fitted, but instead chose to support the Constitutionalists Virgil Goode, feeling I had to vote for someone after doing so for 32 years now, which was intended to be a no vote all the way around after Bachmann and then Newt were ran out by the GOP elitist and Rinos vying for a Romney ticket, not to mention the damn Independent Tea Party butt wipes…
    I have to admit though, I sure wish I had looked into Ron a might more, I loved a lot of his ideas but was a big time follower of Rep. Bachmann and loved her tenacity and fight against the GOP…
    But the fact that we have been Jew slapped is one that also angers me to no end, I have many Jewish friends upset over Romney’s nomination and more so of the Jewish support for Obama, and seen him too as a threat, they also liked and even supported Paul, but were offended by the many Jew bashing parades going on within the Paul camps, hopefully if he runs again, that can be reasonably and fairly toned down some.

  1. November 11, 2012 at 11:11 AM | #1
  2. November 11, 2012 at 11:12 AM | #2
  3. November 15, 2012 at 6:17 PM | #3
  4. December 9, 2012 at 8:38 AM | #4
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 677 other followers