Home > Uncategorized > Russian Military Intel Tells Kremlin Obama Fired Military Officers Because He ‘Fears a Coup’

Russian Military Intel Tells Kremlin Obama Fired Military Officers Because He ‘Fears a Coup’

According to (shadowy anonymous blogger) Sorcha Faal the Russian military’s GRU foreign intelligence unit presented a report to Kremlin leadership late last month that said Obama removed one of the United States Navy’s most powerful admirals from his command (in the wake of Benghazi 9/11) specifically because he fears a military coup is being planned against him.

 

RPREVOLU

RPREVOLU (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

On 9/11/2012, that officer -Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette, commander of Carrier Strike Group Three in the Middle East- apparently felt obligated to come to the aid of besieged US defenses at the Benghazi consulate, violating an utterly bewildering White House command he probably had a hard time believing was even being made. Gaouette was said to be attempting to help AFRICOM commander General Carter Ham, also purged by Obama for violating of an obstinate White House insistence to ‘stand down’.

 

Ham considered himself bound-by-duty to take action, but the story goes that his second-in-command -a likely Obammunist- promptly stepped-right-up and informed him he’d just been ‘relieved of his command’, effective immediately- General Ham was then physically apprehended/arrested.

 

gophum

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

Subsequently -and despite Navy claims that he was NOT ‘replaced’ due to Benghazi- Admiral Gaouette was otherwise inexplicably removed as Carrier Strike Group commander on October 27th…

 

Faal:

 

US news reports on Obama’s unprecedented firing of a powerful US Navy Commander during wartime state that Admiral Gaouette’s removal was for ‘allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment’ that arose during the strike group’s deployment to the Middle East.

 

GyGRet

GyGRet (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

This GRU report, however, states that Admiral Gaouette’s firing by President Obama was due to this strike force commander disobeying orders when he ordered his forces on 11 September to ‘assist and provide intelligence for’ American military forces ordered into action by US Army General Carter Ham, who was then the commander of the United States Africa Command (AFRICOM), against terrorist forces attacking the American Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

 

General Ham had been in command of the initial 2011 US-NATO military intervention in Libya who, like Admiral Gaouette, was fired by Obama.

 

And as we can, in part, read from US military insider accounts of this growing internal conflict between the White House and US Military leaders:

 

‘The information I heard today was that General [Carter] Ham as head of AFRICOM received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready.

 

General Ham then received the order to stand down.

 

His response was ‘screw it’, he was going to help anyhow.

 

Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command…’

 

OBEY or perish

 

Of course, the MSM press just parroted the dubious Administration line that Gaouette was removed from his post

 

(in mid-deployment, which is Moon-rock rare) because of an ‘ongoing investigation’ into ‘inappropriate leadership judgement’- say what?

 

In addition, Gen. Joseph Dunford -the Marine Corps’ 2nd in command- is also suddenly ‘stepping down’… maybe he too had a problem with just standing there while some Medieval savages rape and kill our ambassador and burn a US consulate to the ground.

 

I clicked over to Wikipedia to see what the left-leaning ‘reference’ site had to say about all this, yet even they can only come up with the most foggy, vague explanation.

 

Intentional obfuscation…? Keeping this one opaque only helps Barack Obama

 

Many believe this was a forced retirement due to General Ham speaking out of turn about the brewing Benghazi attack fiasco of September 11, 2012.

 

A Navy Admiral, Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette, was also apparently involved in this confusing event as he was relieved of duty “until the matter is resolved.”

 

Others caught-up in the recent Obama power-consolidation-and-truth-burying purge because they know too much (re. Benghazigate) -like Hillary Clinton and Gen David Petraeus-

 

are gone or on their way out as well.

 

Hey, Kim Jong Un is up to the same sort of ‘purge’ thing lately too- maybe Obama can ring him up and chat about purging, basketball, exchange tips on interrogation/guillotine techniques, etc.

 

But if you ask me, the idea of a coup plot sounds really kind of far-fetched- maybe it’s all just in Dear Leader’s (stoned) head, narcissists are known to be very, very paranoid……….

 

MORE!!!!!

 

via Russian Military Intel Tells Kremlin Obama Fired Military Officers Because He ‘Fears a Coup’.

 

 

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
  1. November 21, 2012 at 8:59 AM | #1

    Reblogged this on THE SURF REPORT.

  2. robertlaity
    November 21, 2012 at 9:36 AM | #2

    DUh!!

  1. November 21, 2012 at 9:53 AM | #1
  2. November 21, 2012 at 10:08 AM | #2
  3. November 21, 2012 at 10:20 AM | #3
  4. November 21, 2012 at 11:59 AM | #4
  5. November 21, 2012 at 2:10 PM | #5
  6. November 21, 2012 at 2:42 PM | #6
  7. November 21, 2012 at 4:13 PM | #7
  8. November 21, 2012 at 4:22 PM | #8
  9. November 22, 2012 at 8:26 AM | #9
  10. November 22, 2012 at 8:35 AM | #10
  11. November 22, 2012 at 9:04 AM | #11
  12. November 22, 2012 at 11:56 AM | #12
  13. November 23, 2012 at 3:48 PM | #13
  14. November 24, 2012 at 6:08 PM | #14
  15. November 26, 2012 at 7:13 AM | #15
  16. November 26, 2012 at 9:46 AM | #16
  17. November 28, 2012 at 3:45 PM | #17
  18. November 29, 2012 at 8:19 AM | #18
  19. November 30, 2012 at 9:23 AM | #19
  20. December 7, 2012 at 9:58 PM | #20
  21. December 13, 2012 at 5:32 AM | #21
  22. December 18, 2012 at 4:24 PM | #22
  23. January 1, 2013 at 10:25 AM | #23
  24. January 1, 2013 at 5:39 PM | #24
  25. January 3, 2013 at 10:41 AM | #25
  26. January 23, 2013 at 8:58 AM | #26
  27. January 23, 2013 at 9:29 AM | #27
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,071 other followers