FlyOverPress.com... ~ Parting Company...

FlyoverPress.com “There is no truth existing which I fear, or would wish unknown to the whole world.” Thomas Jefferson The concepts expressed on this web site are protected by the basic human right to freedom of speech, as guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and reaffirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 26, 1997 as applying to the Internet. Support FlyoverPress Donate To check out the old FlyoverPress.com Please Click Button Above

Liberty Knows No Compromise Donate today to help defray the costs of this important free newsletter Click to Subscribe to Our Daily News Service or Contact Us “Lincoln said that the soldiers sacrificed their lives ‘to the cause of self-determination – that government of the people, by the people, for the people should not perish from the earth.’ (H.L.) Mencken says: “It is difficult to imagine anything more untrue. The Union soldiers in the battle actually fought against self-determination; it was the Confederates who fought for the right of people to govern themselves.” And we have lived unhappily as an occupied territory ever since. Yours for freedom in our lifetimes. — jtl, 419 Parting Company by Walter E. Williams Recently by Walter E. Williams: Democracy and Majority Rule For decades, it has been obvious that there are irreconcilable differences between Americans who want to control the lives of others and those who wish to be left alone. Which is the more peaceful solution: Americans using the brute force of government to beat liberty-minded people into submission or simply parting company? In a marriage, where vows are ignored and broken, divorce is the most peaceful solution. Similarly, our constitutional and human rights have been increasingly violated by a government instituted to protect them. Americans who support constitutional abrogation have no intention of mending their ways.   Since Barack Obama’s re-election, hundreds of thousands of petitions for secession have reached the White House. Some people have argued that secession is unconstitutional, but there’s absolutely nothing in the Constitution that prohibits it. What stops secession is the prospect of brute force by a mighty federal government, as witnessed by the costly War of 1861. Let’s look at the secession issue. At the 1787 constitutional convention, a proposal was made to allow the federal government to suppress a seceding state. James Madison, the acknowledged father of our Constitution, rejected it, saying: “A Union of the States containing such an ingredient seemed to provide for its own destruction. The use of force against a State would look more like a declaration of war than an infliction of punishment and would probably be considered by the party attacked as a dissolution of all previous compacts by which it might be bound.” On March 2, 1861, after seven states had seceded and two days before Abraham Lincoln’s inauguration, Sen. James R. Doolittle of Wisconsin proposed a constitutional amendment that said, “No State or any part thereof, heretofore admitted or hereafter admitted into the Union, shall have the power to withdraw from the jurisdiction of the United States.” Several months earlier, Reps. Daniel E. Sickles of New York, Thomas B. Florence of Pennsylvania and Otis S. Ferry of Connecticut proposed a constitutional amendment to prohibit secession. Here’s my no-brainer question: Would there have been any point to offering these amendments if secession were already unconstitutional? On the eve of the War of 1861, even unionist politicians saw secession as a right of states. Rep. Jacob M. Kunkel of Maryland said, “Any attempt to preserve the Union between the States of this Confederacy by force would be impractical, and destructive of republican liberty.” The Northern Democratic and Republican parties favored allowing the South to secede in peace. Just about every major Northern newspaper editorialized in favor of the South’s right to secede. New York Tribune (Feb. 5, 1860): “If tyranny and despotism justified the Revolution of 1776, then we do not see why it would not justify the secession of Five Millions of Southrons from the Federal Union in 1861.” Detroit Free Press (Feb. 19, 1861): “An attempt to subjugate the seceded States, even if successful, could produce nothing but evil – evil unmitigated in character and appalling in content.” The New York Times (March 21, 1861): “There is growing sentiment throughout the North in favor of letting the Gulf States go.” There’s more evidence seen at the time our Constitution was ratified. The ratification documents of Virginia, New York and Rhode Island explicitly said that they held the right to resume powers delegated, should the federal government become abusive of those powers. The Constitution would have never been ratified if states thought that they could not maintain their sovereignty. The War of 1861 settled the issue of secession through brute force that cost 600,000 American lives. Americans celebrate Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, but H.L. Mencken correctly evaluated the speech, “It is poetry, not logic; beauty, not sense.” Lincoln said that the soldiers sacrificed their lives “to the cause of self-determination – that government of the people, by the people, for the people should not perish from the earth.” Mencken says: “It is difficult to imagine anything more untrue. The Union soldiers in the battle actually fought against self-determination; it was the Confederates who fought for the right of people to govern themselves.” November 27, 2012   Walter E. Williams is the John M. Olin distinguished professor of economics at George Mason University, and a nationally syndicated columnist. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page. Copyright © 2012 Creators Syndicate, Inc. The Best of Walter E. Williams *Note: We hold no special government issued licenses or permits. We don’t accept government subsidies, bailouts, low-cost loans, insurance, or other privileges. We don’t lobby for laws that hurt our competitors. We actively oppose protectionism and invite all foreign competitors to try to under price us. We do not lobby for tariffs, quotas, or anti-dumping laws. We do not support the government’s budget deficits: we hold no government or agency securities. E-mail To Subscribe to our daily e-mail alert service, send an e-mail with the word “subscribe” on the subject line.

Support FlyoverPress Visit Our Advertisers Email for Advertising Rates

© Flyover Press All Rights Reserved.

Related articles

• Time To Part Company?
• You’re Not Free
• Doug Casey on the America That Was – Now the United (Police) State of America… (“At the beginning. America was founded as a confederation of independent countries – that’s what a state is. Or was,”)
• The Real DiLorenzo A ‘Southern Partisan’ Interview…. (“SEE ALSO: Dr DiLorenzo’s comments regarding secession, etc.”) ” AMERICAN.BLOGGING ~ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL.1984+
• Chuck Baldwin – The Man Who Should Be President ” CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL ” CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ THE.GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL
• Pravda: Communists won in America… (“President Vladimir Putin could never have imagined anyone so ignorant or so willing to destroy their people like Obama much less seeing millions vote for someone like Obama”)
• Obama Topples Top Coup Leader After Washington Gunbattle ~ The European Union Times – gunnyg@gmail.com – Gmail
• Ron Paul: Secession Is an American Principle…
• Chuck Baldwin – Farewell To A Giant…
• Doomed From the Start? by Thomas DiLorenzo | Zero Gov