Home > Uncategorized > The Daily Bell – Jettison the Constitution?

The Daily Bell – Jettison the Constitution?

Let’s Give Up on the Constitution … As the nation teeters at the edge of fiscal chaos, observers are reaching the conclusion that the American system of government is broken. But almost no one blames the culprit: our insistence on obedience to the Constitution, with all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions …

RPREVOLU

RPREVOLU (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Our obsession with the Constitution has saddled us with a dysfunctional political system, kept us from debating the merits of divisive issues and inflamed our public discourse. Instead of arguing about what is to be done, we argue about what James Madison might have wanted done 225 years ago. – New York Times

Dominant Social Theme: We need a new approach and strong leaders.

Free-Market Analysis: Our trends for 2013 featured the advance of German-style National Socialism in the US, and this probably qualifies along those lines.

gophum

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

The Times article unapologetically makes the argument for doing away with the US Constitution but what is to be substituted and how it is to work is not made clear.

The argument itself is an obvious one, especially as hardly a shred of the so-called Constitution remains, in any case. The Supreme Court routinely defies it, Congress ignores it and the executive branch simply steps around it as necessary.

One can even make the argument that the Constitution was a big step backward from Articles of Confederation that somehow were seen as not “strong enough” for a growing nation. Nonetheless, the Constitution – an entirely illegitimate document within the context of its creation – was launched out of a legislative conference that gathered under strict orders NOT to draft a new document.

As usual, Alexander Hamilton – a man who believed in a strong federal state – was one of the biggest backers of the document, which was purposefully written in a vague way apparently and was in many ways authoritarian in scope simply because it left so much not clarified. The final document created such an uproar that a “Bill of Rights” was finally attached to strengthen it.

The author of this OpEd in the Times has a meaningful point when considered from this vantage point. Louis Michael Seidman is a professor of constitutional law and he has studied the US’s dysfunctional Constitution and simply advises that we scrap the document. Here’s some more from the article:

Consider, for example, the assertion by the Senate minority leader last week that the House could not take up a plan by Senate Democrats to extend tax cuts on households making $250,000 or less because the Constitution requires that revenue measures originate in the lower chamber. Why should anyone care? Why should a lame-duck House, 27 members of which were defeated for re-election, have a stranglehold on our economy? Why does a grotesquely malapportioned Senate get to decide the nation’s fate?

As someone who has taught constitutional law for almost 40 years, I am ashamed it took me so long to see how bizarre all this is. Imagine that after careful study a government official — say, the president or one of the party leaders in Congress — reaches a considered judgment that a particular course of action is best for the country. Suddenly, someone bursts into the room with new information: a group of white propertied men who have been dead for two centuries, knew nothing of our present situation, acted illegally under existing law and thought it was fine to own slaves might have disagreed with this course of action. Is it even remotely rational that the official should change his or her mind because of this divination?

Constitutional disobedience may seem radical, but it is as old as the Republic. In fact, the Constitution itself was born of constitutional disobedience. When George Washington and the other framers went to Philadelphia in 1787, they were instructed to suggest amendments to the Articles of Confederation, which would have had to be ratified by the legislatures of all 13 states. Instead, in violation of their mandate, they abandoned the Articles, wrote a new Constitution and provided that it would take effect after ratification by only nine states, and by conventions in those states rather than the state legislatures.

This is what we meant when we wrote above that the Constitution was created via an illegitimate process. What is usually even less discussed than the illegitimacy of the Constitution is WHY those who created this document acted the way they did. Some would submit that the Constitution was simply a way for European banking powers to begin the process of re-establishing control over “these States.”…….

EXCERPT!!!!!

via The Daily Bell – Jettison the Constitution?.

IS THIS MAN, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF...

IS THIS MAN, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD, MENTALLY ILL? (Photo credit: SS&SS)

Enhanced by Zemanta
  1. No comments yet.
  1. January 5, 2013 at 8:51 AM
  2. January 5, 2013 at 7:27 PM
  3. January 5, 2013 at 7:27 PM
  4. January 9, 2013 at 1:00 PM
  5. January 24, 2013 at 9:24 AM
  6. January 24, 2013 at 2:47 PM
  7. January 24, 2013 at 2:47 PM
  8. January 31, 2013 at 7:28 PM
  9. January 31, 2013 at 7:58 PM
  10. February 1, 2013 at 5:23 PM
  11. February 3, 2013 at 3:13 PM
  12. February 3, 2013 at 5:38 PM
  13. February 4, 2013 at 7:50 AM
  14. February 4, 2013 at 8:14 AM
  15. February 4, 2013 at 8:29 AM
  16. February 4, 2013 at 8:42 AM
  17. February 4, 2013 at 9:22 AM
  18. February 4, 2013 at 9:47 AM
  19. February 4, 2013 at 11:37 AM
  20. February 4, 2013 at 12:40 PM
  21. February 5, 2013 at 1:52 AM
  22. February 5, 2013 at 2:39 PM
  23. February 6, 2013 at 9:23 AM
  24. February 6, 2013 at 9:40 AM
  25. February 6, 2013 at 2:23 PM
  26. February 6, 2013 at 2:45 PM
  27. February 6, 2013 at 6:50 PM
  28. February 8, 2013 at 8:25 AM
  29. February 8, 2013 at 10:22 AM
  30. February 8, 2013 at 6:12 PM
  31. February 15, 2013 at 8:16 AM
  32. February 15, 2013 at 9:23 AM
  33. February 19, 2013 at 11:59 AM
  34. February 19, 2013 at 4:33 PM
  35. February 19, 2013 at 11:41 PM
  36. February 20, 2013 at 8:50 AM
  37. February 21, 2013 at 10:58 AM
  38. February 22, 2013 at 5:52 PM
  39. February 25, 2013 at 3:04 PM

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,246 other followers