Originally posted on THE MILLSTONE DIARIES:
Obama tries to position himself as the second coming of Lincoln
by Scott Ryan
After witnessing the effrontery of Barack Obama against the states and our constitution, it is apparent this man has come here for the sole purpose of fomenting a civil war. From day one of his campaign he has made efforts to position himself as a pseudo-Lincoln. From his campaign announcement in front of the Illinois state capitol where Lincoln served (with a Lincoln banner behind him), to his announcement of Biden as his running mate (in front of a Lincoln banner), from his quoting of Lincoln (in specious contexts) to his insistence upon swearing in on the same Bible upon which Lincoln was sworn in and even having the exact same MENUE as Lincoln’s inauguration.
Originally posted on vineoflife.net:
Obama’s “radical transformation” of America is here
Obama has always promised that he would “radically transform” America. He has not ever promised to preserve the Union or work to restore America to the values of the Constitution it was founded on. Now, as we grit our teeth and prepare to enter into year #5 of Obama’s reign (the number 5 in the bible is the number of death and destruction), we see the long-expected arrival of American storm troopers to patrol our nation.
Please keep in mind that this story is zero percent “conspiracy theory”, and 100% actual breaking news. The photo used below is a shot of a martial law team currently operating in Oregon. This story of armed soldiers patrolling civilian streets is taken from the website of the town the story takes place in – Paragould, Arkansas. Just be patient and wait your turn…your town will be next.
From PDP: In response to a recent increase in crime, Paragould Mayor Mike Gaskill and Police Chief Todd Stovall offered residents at a town hall meeting Thursday night at West View Baptist Church what could be considered an extreme solution — armed officers patrolling the streets on foot.
Stovall told the group of almost 40 residents that beginning in 2013, the department would deploy a new street crimes unit to high crime areas on foot to take back the streets.
“Police are going to be in SWAT gear and have AR-15s around their neck,” Stovall said. “If you’re out walking, we’re going to stop you, ask why you’re out walking, check for your ID.”
Stovall said while some people may be offended by the actions of his department, they should not be. ”We’re going to do it to everybody,” he said. “Criminals don’t like being talked to.” Gaskill backed Stovall’s proposed actions during Thursday’s town hall. He said the police would follow where crime was taking place in order to snuff it out.
Normally, police would not stop individuals for simply walking on the street, but Stovall said the level of crime in certain areas and concerns from residents gave his officers the right to institute the actions announced at the town hall event.
“This fear is what’s given us the reason to do this. Once I have stats and people saying they’re scared, we can do this,” he said. “It allows us to do what we’re fixing to do.” Stovall further elaborated on the stop-and-ID policy Friday morning, claiming the city’s crime statistics alone met the threshold of reasonable suspicion required to lawfully accost a citizen.
“To ask you for your ID, I have to have a reason,” he said. “Well, I’ve got statistical reasons that say I’ve got a lot of crime right now, which gives me probable cause to ask what you’re doing out. Then when I add that people are scared…then that gives us even more [reason] to ask why are you here and what are you doing in this area.”
Stovall said he did not consult an attorney before announcing his plans to combat crime. He even remained undaunted when comparing his proposed tactics with martial law, explaining that “I don’t know that there’s ever been a difference” between his proposals and martial law.
Stovall said task force members would not even be required to be looking for a specific suspect before stopping citizens on the street. ”Anyone that’s out walking, because of the crime and the fear factor, [could be stopped],” he said.
Should an individual not produce identification, Stovall said his officers would not back down. Individuals who do not produce identification when asked could be charged with obstructing a governmental operation, according to Stovall.
“I’m hoping we don’t run across [any] of that,” Stovall said. “Will there be people who buck us? There may be. But we have a right to be doing what we’re doing. We have a zero-tolerance. We are prepared to throw your hind-end in jail, OK? We’re not going to take a lot of flack.”
On Friday, however, Gaskill retreated from the severity of the plan he and Stovall offered to citizens at the town hall. ”The only people who are really going to be impacted by this are mostly the unknowns,” Gaskill said.
The mayor said the street crimes unit would not be positioned to cause problems for law-abiding residents.
“We just want to make a presence out there for the criminal element,” Gaskill said. “And we want to make a presence for the people who are concerned and give them a sense of security.” Gaskill added he was not concerned about potential profiling by the police department. Even though Stovall had said police would enter neighborhoods with the highest crime rates, Gaskill said officers would respond to where they received calls.
“It would be based on where people have called us and said things are going on in our neighborhood,” he said.
Gaskill made clear Friday that when residents called about problems in their neighborhoods, they needed to provide police with information. ”Give us a description — what kinds of clothes they’re wearing, [license] plate number. We’ll be looking for descriptions,” he said. City Attorney Allen Warmath echoed Gaskill’s statements on Friday.
“It is my understanding that if they get a call in an area and they go to an area because of some calls of suspicious activity, they’ll make contact,” Warmath said. Warmath said while he had not directly spoken to Stovall, he understood that the street crimes unit would actually be less confrontational than Stovall let on.
“If they have a call that there’s some problems in the area, they’re at least going to talk to you,” he said. “Maybe that person walking their dog saw something. It gives them some information and some leads to find out what’s going on.”
As for having IDs, he said citizens wouldn’t have to worry about that, either. He said the police would not arrest residents solely for failing to produce identification when asked.
Attorney Curtis Hitt of the law firm of Hitt and Kidd said officers were allowed to engage in “consensual questioning” with citizens, though if any circumstances arose that led to an arrest, a judge would have to look at the “totality” of those circumstances.
“The bottom line is it would have to be determined on a case by case basis,” he said.
Hitt said he had a high regard for Stovall and the Paragould police. He said he felt their intentions were in the right place, which he believed was preventing crime and making Paragould a safe community.
“At the same time, as an attorney who reads police reports and keeps up with the law, I certainly will be careful of that for any of my clients.”
Thursday’s town hall meeting was the second of four meetings Paragould officials will host to discuss crime statistics in different parts of town. Officials will meet with residents Tuesday at Center Hill Church of Christ and Thursday at the Paragould Community Center. Both meetings begin at 7 p.m. source – Paragould Daily Press
(NaturalNews) Obama, in the wake of the Sandy Hook massacre, stated that mental-health services must be made more available, presumably to stave off future killers.
Of course, this is monstrously wrong, since so many killers have acted under the compelling influence of SSRI antidepressants and other brain meds. The drugs are known to induce violence.
More mental health means more murders.
Now we hear that Joe Biden‘s presidential task force on gun control is meeting with psychiatrists. Here is what they’re discussing:
Databases. They want to tighten background checks on people who buy guns, and the checks could include discovering whether applicants have ever been under psychiatric care, and if so, what diagnosis(es) was made.
But let’s stick with the topic of Who Are They Looking For?
TSA is omnipresent. Trains, planes and automobiles. Now railroads and buses. Next it will be dog walkers and model airplanes.
Homeland Security peers through every remote camera and surveillance platform. The federal decision to see and record everything is approaching total coverage. You’re even recorded and surveilled in many national parks.
Who, or what, are they looking for? If Al-Qaeda is now our surrogate shadow-military so the US Department of State can pretend to clean hands, who is all this surveillance for? It looks like Washington has targeted you and me as the mission of surveillance. I mean, if the Al-Qaeda boogey-man is now inside the tent, who is Washington looking for?
Democratic strategists will not let Hillary Clinton or her blood clot stop them from getting a woman on the 2016 presidential ticket, Politico reports. Even if Clinton sticks to her word and does not run for president — something no one seemed to believe until her recent health scare — activists are still hoping to leverage the 2012 gender gap into a female nominee.
“After the roles Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin played in the 2008 campaign,” Politico writes, “it would be hard for many to accept another cycle like the 2012 presidential race, which featured two all-male national tickets.”
Especially when one notes how many strong female contenders there have been in the Republican party, like South Carolina’s Nikki Haley, New Hampshire’s Kelley Ayotte, and former VP nominee Sarah Palin. The head of the Center or American Progress, Neera Tanden, told Politico:
If They Come for Your Guns, Do You Have a Responsibility to Fight? (“I feel that a lot of American citizens feel like they have no choice but to surrender their guns if the government comes for them. I blame traditional media sources for this mass brainwash and…”)
If They Come for Your Guns, Do You Have a Responsibility to Fight?
The D.C. Clothesline ^ | 1/3/2013 | Dean Garrison
Posted on Monday, January 07, 2013 4:38:55 PM by EBH
I feel a tremendous responsibility to write this article though I am a little apprehensive. Thinking about the possibility of rising up against our own government is a frightening thing for many of us. I am not Johnny Rambo and I will be the first to admit that I do not want to die. The reason I feel compelled to write this, however, is simply because I don’t think the average American is equipped with the facts. I feel that a lot of American citizens feel like they have no choice but to surrender their guns if the government comes for them. I blame traditional media sources for this mass brainwash and I carry the responsibility of all small independent bloggers to tell the truth. So my focus today is to lay out your constitutional rights as an American, and let you decide what to do with those rights.
Exclusive – Dershowitz: ‘I Will Testify Against Hagel’ on Iran
Breitbart.com ^ | January 7, 2013 | Joel B. Pollak
Prof. Alan Dershowitz of Harvard Law School is a legendary defense lawyer, and the country’s foremost pro-Israel advocate. He is also a steadfast supporter of President Barack Obama. Breitbart News spoke to him in an exclusive interview today about the nomination of former Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE) as Secretary of Defense.
Sen. Hagel is controversial for his views on Israel, the Iraq War, Iran, and gays, among other issues. Dershowitz had, prior to Hagel’s nomination, urged President Obama publicly not to appoint Hagel to the position.
Originally posted on The Mad Jewess:
By David Ben Moshe:
I just talked to my mother-in-law on the telephone, (and father-in-law, a top shotgun target shooter in my state) They are taking their money out of Bank of America and moving it to another big-name bank. Our folks are well off. My father-in-law notified one of the top gun men, known by most target shooters describing what B of A was/is doing to gun dealerships. He is spreading the word all over the country.
Are Americans finally going to stand up for something??
Dan George as an Icon of Aboriginal Resistance. Dan George as Law Giver.
It is Boxing Day, 2012, as I begin this essay introducing Dan George’s speech at the Vancouver Coliseum on July 1st, 1967, the day billed as the main birthday celebration of Canada’s Centennial Year. By highlighting a First Nations perspective on law and legitimacy I seek to draw a contrast with the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Canada as articulated, for instance, in its rulings on the Sparrow and Van der Peet cases.
Dan George’s words have particular poignancy in this context because he was the head of the family that adopted Kwitsel Tatel after she was orphaned at the age of thirteen. I have been publishing in Veteran’s Today a running report on the case of Kwitsel Tatel, a proceeding that resumes in the Law Courts of Chilliwack British Columbia on January 14. Many of the major arguments being brought forward in this case of Kwitsel Tatel, which began in 2004, add background and depth to the major contentions of the Idle No More movement.
Originally posted on The Counter Jihad Report:
By Daniel Greenfield in FrontPage
To read and order Frank Gaffney’s pamphlet, The Muslim Brotherhood in the Obama Administration, click here.
November was just about done and Chris Matthews, the MSNBC host voted most likely by his own staff to have a poster of Barack Obama over his bed, was cheerfully coming to the end of his sideshow list. With the White House in the background, Matthews sneered about the “weak conspiracy” claim by Congressman Gohmert that the Obama Administration was taking advice on Middle East policy from a bunch of Muslim Brotherhood operatives.
EDRIVERA.COM – United States America Organic Law Taxes Property Jurisdiction Constitution : EDRIVERA.COM (“…..The first Organic Law the Declaration of Independence served written notice to the world that an oppressed people could declare themselves free of an ancient government. The second Organic Law established the Confederacy of the United States of America, which would prosecute the American Revolution to a negotiated peace with Great Britain.”)
…..The first Organic Law the Declaration of Independence served written notice to the world that an oppressed people could declare themselves free of an ancient government. The second Organic Law established the Confederacy of the United States of America, which would prosecute the American Revolution to a negotiated peace with Great Britain.
The third Organic Law of the United States of America, the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, is a direct refutation of the notion the Confederacy, the United States of America, was without the legislative power to tax or enact laws.
The Northwest Ordinance is proof at the Organic Law level the Confederacy possessed taxation and legislation power over the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America and no other.
The Basic Course in Law and Government, finally, shows how George Washington used the fourth Organic Law, the unadopted Constitution of September 17, 1787, to consolidate the power of the two Offices of President into the present day American Democracy.
The retirement of Congressman Ron Paul from the House of Representatives last week did not end the Texas libertarian’s influence in Congress. And if the first week of the new Congress is any indication, his influence has only multiplied.
Congressman Paul’s battles to audit and ultimately abolish the Federal Reserve Bank have been picked up by his former colleague Paul Broun of Georgia, who scored 92 percent on The New American‘s “Freedom Index” in the last Congress.
“I applaud Congressman Paul’s efforts. He was fighting for liberty,” Broun told The Hill newspaper, which covers Congress from Washington, D.C. The story, entitled “Georgia’s Broun keeps Ron Paul’s anti-Fed mission alive in new Congress,” details how Broun — like former Congressman Paul, a medical doctor — has continued the anti-Fed mantra of Ron Paul. “My plan is to pick up right where Congressman Paul left off,” Broun said on his congressional website, “I’m just going to stand on his shoulders and go forward in that same fight.”
by Doug Book, staff writer
Once cowed at the thought of provoking 2nd Amendment supporters, leftists will soon attempt to ban “assault weapons” (and much more) as legislation offered by Diane Feinstein makes its way to the Senate floor. It seems that DC liberals have finally become convinced that American gun owners are too cowardly, too lazy or too dependent upon the generosity of Big Brother to fight for their 2nd Amendment rights.
During the past 4 years, the gun banning left have watched as American buyers broke sales records in the purchase of semi-automatic rifles. Opting for these and other powerful, efficient weapons it is estimated that some 100 million private citizens are now in possession of over 300 million firearms. And these numbers continue to grow with each passing month.
Yet it’s against this backdrop of America’s unprecedented determination to assert the fundamental permanence of 2nd Amendment guarantees that Diane Feinstein, Michael Bloomberg, Barack Obama and others will choose to implement gun bans, demand the federal registration of firearms, even legislate outright confiscation.
Obama could sidestep Congress on gun controlradioaustralia.net.au ^ | January 7, 2013 | Lisa MillarPosted on Monday, January 07, 2013 10:05:22 AM by Tailgunner JoeUS president Barack Obama is reportedly considering implementing the most comprehensive gun control measures seen in decades.
US president Barack Obama is reportedly considering implementing the most comprehensive gun control measures seen in decades.A task force led by vice-president Joe Biden is reportedly considering wide-ranging proposals going well beyond simply reinstating a ban on assault weapons and high capacity ammunition.
Originally posted on The Mad Jewess:
Click this link first, Islamo-nuts rioted in FR on Dec 31, 2012-Just insane Muslims acting as they act BECAUSE of the leftists who kiss their asses: The Evil Stench of islam Floats Through France on The Smoke of Burning Cars Destroyed by The mooslim Vermin
I don’t feel well at all, I am really sick with the Obama-mandated Flu-but I could not pass this up. This Islamo-INSANITY made me pissed off. Why do western nations keep voting in these treasonous, open-border psychopath-maniacs? I am telling you, we need to send the leftist cancer to hell. America is SO finished because of leftists/progressives. They are destroyers. They need to just go die. May God put them out of their misery before we are forced to do so. You can blame the Muslims all day long, but it is the LEFT who completely enables these rat-bastards. The LEFT is to blame.
PAT BUCHANAN: There are three million ArmaLite rifles — those Bushmaster types — out there right now, and people are buying them like hotcakes. Every gun show, the sales are up enormously. Forty-one percent, they were up in December — for last December — which was a record year.
John, what is common though, Eleanor [Clift] is correct, the push is going to come on three things: grandfather in the assault weapons that are here now; to try to outlaw assault weapons, outlaw magazines that carry more than 11 or 12 bullets; and also background checks at gun shows.
Gunny G: 1953: On Southern Trash, and Lowdown Yankee Liars…
- 1. Shane 1953 Jack Palance – And where do you think you’re going? – YouTube
- 2. Shane Classic Gunfight – YouTube
Our National Security Illusion Built On Cover-ups and Americans forget too easily. The fact that the American people are being lied to concerning the motivation of the Islamic jihadists who attacked the U.S. diplomatic facilities in Benghazi and killed four Americans, the reason for the U.S. unpreparedness for the attack, and the governmental incompetence in responding to the attack is beyond question.
However, this incompetence and mendacity is not the only incompetence and mendacity that the regime of President Obama is covering up.
By Marinka Peschmann Monday, January 7, 2013
Click here for The Fix is in Part I, Part II and Part III
The best part of political theater, otherwise known as the ‘ah ha’ moment for truth seekers, can often be found when the show ends. In this epic tragedy, called the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations Hearing: Benghazi: The Attack and the Lesson Learned, held on December 20, 2012, starring Senator John Kerry (D-Mass), as the Chairman, it happened right after Kerry’s dramatic closing statement concluded. The lights dimmed, the press started packing up their gear, the stars/senators, in crisp suits, with their shine-free faces courtesy of heavy pancake make-up, exited stage left. It was a quick moment but a telling one. Did you catch it?