Home > Uncategorized > » Why The Elite Would Lose a Civil War Alex Jones’ Infowars: There’s a war on for your mind!

» Why The Elite Would Lose a Civil War Alex Jones’ Infowars: There’s a war on for your mind!

Manufacturing mass social unrest would be a foolish mistake

 

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones

 

English:

English: (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

 

 

Infowars.com

 

February 14, 2013

 

Despite the fact that the banking elite wants to generate riots and stir social disorder in order to collapse the U.S. economy so they can buy up real assets on the cheap, if such chaos was to spill over into a full blown civil war, the consequences for the technocrats would be disastrous.

 

Image: Wikipedia Commons

 

In part one we explored why the elite routinely generate civil unrest in countries as a tactic of driving down confidence, scaring away investors and setting themselves up as the saviors in order to loot what’s left of the economy for next to nothing.

 

We also documented how authorities in America are clearly in a preparatory phase for mass civil unrest to break out within the next 5-10 years.

 

 

 

 

However, basic figures, along with the lessons of recent history, clearly suggest that should such disorder spiral into a new civil war, which many suggest is the very outcome federal agencies are gearing up for (the DHS alone has purchased enough bullets to wage a 30 year conflict), the result for the elite is inevitable failure.

 

gophum

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

It is imperative to stress that ordinary Americans do not want a civil war. This is not something we or anyone we associate with is actively calling to initiate. This is simply a warning to the power structure that their policies are setting the stage for this very outcome – and it’s not going to end well for them.

 

Al Sharpton recently suggested that Americans should accept government regulation of the Second Amendment because the primary reason the founders put the right to bear arms in the constitution – to defend against government tyranny – is no longer applicable. Sharpton brazenly implied that the government would just be able to drone strike all Americans who resisted being disarmed.

 

“First of all, if the government were to come to disarm you, you would not be able to use an automatic weapon to defend yourself. Let’s be serious. We’re in a world of drones now so the Second Amendment would not help you in that area. It is absurd to try to cite that,” said Sharpton.

 

In reality, even if a tiny minority of armed Americans chose to resist government oppression – the odds would be stacked hugely in their favor.

 

big

big (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

Consider the fact that there are almost 100 million gun owners in the United States, who in total own over 300 million firearms and rising.

 

There are only around 1.4 million active duty personnel in the entire US military – that includ…………….

 

 

 

 

EXCERPT!!!!!

 

via » Why The Elite Would Lose a Civil War Alex Jones’ Infowars: There’s a war on for your mind!.

 

IS THIS MAN, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF...

IS THIS MAN, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD, MENTALLY ILL? (Photo credit: SS&SS)

 

 

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,086 other followers