Home > Uncategorized > (Col Sellin) ~ Does America stand for the preservation of rights or the perpetuation of power? ~ Family Security Matters …

(Col Sellin) ~ Does America stand for the preservation of rights or the perpetuation of power? ~ Family Security Matters …

by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD January 16, 2014

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/imgLib/20120212_Sellin.jpg

In numerous forums, I have argued that there is a Cold Civil War underway in the United States between the power of a one-party state represented by the entrenched Democrat-Republican political establishment and the rights of the American people.

obama-destruction1

obama-destruction1 (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

The Declaration of Independence states that certain rights are unalienable and endowed by the Creator. A one-party state believes that rights are granted by the government and, when deemed convenient, are revocable by politicians.

gophum

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

The first through ninth amendments to the Constitution enumerate the rights of citizens and the tenth restricts the role of a central government, as stated:

\”The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.\”

There is no ambiguity.

Nevertheless, the Democrat-Republican ruling class, which seeks an ever larger and more intrusive government, argues the opposite, that the rights and restrictions stipulated in the Constitution are unclear and that all powers not specifically delegated to the citizen are reserved for the government.

Barack Obama wrote in The Audacity of Hope, \”I have to side with Justice Breyer\’s view of the Constitution — that it is not a static but rather a living document, and must be read in the context of an ever-changing world.\”

Kevin Gutzman, author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution, has said, those who would offer us a \”living\” Constitution are actually giving us a dead one, since such a thing is completely unable to protect us against the encroachments of government power, for example, the misuse of executive orders.

As conservative radio host Mark Levin noted, Obama\’s announcement that he will assume lawmaking powers via executive orders violates the separation of powers clauses of the Constitution.

Yet no objection is raised by the majority Republicans in the House of Representatives, whose power Obama usurps.

Sadly, either through fear or self-interest, instances where members of Congress uphold their oath of office to \”support and defend the Constitution\” above political expediency are at best serendipity or at worst urban myth.

Not surprisingly, the politicians of America\’s one-party state view elections as little more than an opportunity for the redistribution of power among the political elite because the Democratic and Republican parties are not representatives of the people, but representatives of big government.

Members of Congress, once elected, become party foot-soldiers, whose sole purpose is to maintain the…………….

EXCERPT   !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

***

Continues @ Link Below…

via Family Security Matters.

***

isthisman

isthisman (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

via Family Security Matters.

***

jarrwin

jarrwin (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Enhanced by Zemanta
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,073 other followers