I’ve been an enthusiastic student of 9/11 Truth for several years now. The evidence that no Boeing airliners crashed at any of the four sites is very compelling. One of the big questions that arises when you suggest this idea to someone is “What happened to the passengers?” The facts suggest that there were far fewer passengers than even the surprisingly short and unrealistic passenger manifests presented.
Flights are not usually carried out with such low load factors. Many of the names don’t seem to correspond to positively identifiable people. Additionally, at least seven of the alleged hijackers were seen alive after 9/11. Sadly, we may not ever know exactly who was on the planes.
5 Of the 12 Deadliest Gun Massacres In US History Have Taken Place Under Obama’s 1st Term
Wednesday, September 5th, 2012
The Excavator: In Defense of “9/11 Truth” Speech: Put Us All In A Psych Ward (“When did telling the truth become a sign of madness in America? Was it on September 12, 2001? How about November 23, 1963?”)
“Many sociologists and mental health professionals say that those who believe the official version without any questioning are the ones suffering from psychological defense mechanisms.” -
Washington’s Blog, “Former Marine Indefinitely Detained In Psychiatric Ward Over 9/11 Facebook Posts.”
“They call me mad, while they are all mad themselves.” – Plautus.
When did telling the truth become a sign of madness in America? Was it on September 12, 2001? How about November 23, 1963?
UFO Invasion At Olympics 2012 Is Y2K-Style Hysteria
The BBC is focusing its new documentary about “conspiracy theorists” around the premise that aliens will invade London during the Olympics. This entire meme is clearly being pushed by the establishment to discredit the truth movement.
Olympics 2012 Conspiracies & The BBC – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2Qv3ufYhMI
The BBC isn’t interested in this very credible scandal….
By Captain Eric H. May
The article below is my revision and republication of an article by Dr. James H. Fetzer, originally published in Scholars for 9/11 Truth on February 2, 2008. Its many qualities are his, and any deficiencies are mine.
In 2006 a former Army intelligence officer detected evidence that a false flag nuclear operation would be carried out against the British Petroleum refinery in Texas City, Texas, part of Ron Paul’s Congressional district, on January 31, 2006.
Captain Eric H. May, a former NBC editorial writer whose political and military essays had appeared in The Wall Street Journal, The Houston Chronicle and Military Intelligence Magazine, issued a series of warnings through alternative media interviews and articles. The mainstream media at first ignored them, but were compelled to report them when a day-after nuclear response team arrived and set up operations in Paul’s district on February 1, 2006 – the day after Captain May’s predicted attack date.
Galveston County Daily News reporter T.J. Aulds had long been suspicious of the repeated explosions at the BP refinery, the nation’s most toxic industrial site. In Nuclear attack warning story dismissed, published on February 2, 2006, he wrote:
If you are reading this, you survived a predicted nuclear attack on Texas City. Recent weeks have seen the city mentioned as the subject of rampant Internet and e-mail claims suggesting that emergency management officials were preparing for some form of attack.
Officials with several agencies said those reports are false. Shauna Dunlap, a spokesman for the FBI, said that there are “no credible or corroborated threats to the area.”
That attack was to have taken place Tuesday, based on those reports. A report filed on the Arctic Beacon web site as well as the site owner’s Internet radio show had warned of a pending nuclear attack on the city — not from terrorists, but the federal government.
Basing his information on a report from a man claiming to be a former U.S. Army intelligence officer, show host Greg Szymanski reported that the area was likely the target for a government-led nuclear attack. The report quickly made the rounds via e-mail and blog sites.
Among the most fascinating aspects of 9/11 research has been the on-going controversy over whether the absence of evidence that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon should or should not be publicized within the movement, especially by Jim Hoffman, who has published several articles maintaining that the physical evidence as well as the witness reports supports a Boeing 757 having hit the building.
One of the more bizarre aspects of his defense of the “official account” of the Pentagon attack is to cite the Sandia test, in which an F-4 was strapped onto a rail car frame and run at around 500 mph into a nuclear-resistant concrete barrier. The plane blew apart into millions of tiny pieces, implying that that was what ought to have been expected of the Boeing 757 at the Pentagon. The building consists of 12 inches of concrete, 8 inches of brick, and a facade of 4 inches of limestone, which is a very porous stone. Even Major Gen. Albert Stubblebine, USAF (ret.), concluded that no Boeing 757 had hit the Pentagon for the obvious reason that he could discern no imprint of the wings on the building.
Stubblebine, of course, was the NSA’s signals intelligence image analyst, but that has not deterred Jim Hoffman, who has also argued that discussing the Pentagon “might be a trap”, since the Pentagon might release some of the more than 80 videos it possesses that would show “what really happened” as opposed to the five frames it has released, one of which shows the image of a small plane that is about half the size of a Boeing 757.
Townhall.com ^ | December 23, 2011 | Hugh Hewitt
Posted on Saturday, December 24, 2011 9:14:24 AM by Kaslin
Columnist-to-the-World Mark Steyn and I chat on air almost every week. The transcript of those interviews are always posted, both at HughHewitt.com and SteynOnline.com. Here’s a lengthy excerpt from yesterday’s conversation about Ron Paul, which begins as I play a tape of a question asked of the would-be Iowa upset winner about 9/11:
Q: Okay, and one more question. Why don’t you come out and tell the truth about 9/11?
RP: Well, I can’t handle the controversy. I have the IMF, the Federal Reserve to deal with, the IRS to deal with, because no, I just have more, too many things on my plate, because I just have too much to do.
HH: “Why won’t you come out on 9/11? Ron Paul?” He has too much controversy, Mark Steyn, too many things on his plate. What do you think about that?
MS: Yeah, I mean, that is a very cowardly answer. One of the rare occasions on which I’ve applauded Bill Clinton was 2008, four years ago. He was in Keene, New Hampshire, and some Ron Paul supporter asked him about the truth about 9/11 being an inside job. And Clinton slapped that guy down, as he well should have. This, by the way, is not an irrelevant thing, because it gets to the heart, to the most disfiguring aspect of Ron Paul’s campaign, leaving aside his unpleasantness to Michele Bachmann the other night, and all the rest of it, which is this stunted parochialism. Let’s say, for a moment, that 9/11 was an inside job. Does that also mean, then, that the Bali nightclub bombing was an inside job, that the Madrid train bombings was an inside job, that the Beslan school shootings were an inside job, that the London Tube bombings were an inside job? Because in that case, that’s one hell of a sum to be hiding somewhere within the darkest recesses of Dick Cheney’s non-specific line items. So we’re getting here into what is the problem with Ron Paul, which is the sheer stupid, half-witted parochialism of his view of what’s going on out in the planet. And that’s why this is so pathetic. This is a kind of utopian isolationism that fantasists on the right have embraced. And at its darkest side, it meets the left coming round the other way in 9/11 truther conspiracy theories.
HH: Now can someone, do you think it’s right for someone to go to the Iowa Caucus and say I agree with Ron Paul on the Fed, so I’m going to put aside this nuttery, and I’m going to ignore his newsletters, and I’m going to ignore his other baffling and incoherent positions on issuing letters of mark and reprisals and all the rest of it because I want to make a statement? Is that a right way to conduct yourself, Mark Steyn?
The Absurdity of the No-Planes-in-New York Theory | Veterans Today (via ~ BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984+ ~ (BLOG & EMAIL))
Regrettably, the TV and cable stations that broadcast the New York events, live, and also obtained amateur videos for later transmission, have refused to make high-quality digital copies available for closer examination, but there are several reasons why I think that most of the videos that I have seen are genuine, because, for example, as a professional cameraman with many years of practical experience, I think that it would be most unlikely that even a TV professional, let alone an amateur could—at least on Take One, and there were no second chances—pan a camera across a predetermined area of New York scenery, including an empty stretch of sky, at an exact speed so as to end up framing the WTC at the precise moment when the South Tower exploded, so that a plane could then be superimposed onto that video to make it appear that a real plane had caused the explosion. And to suggest that it might have been planned to be done—one-chance-only—from a few helicopters, for a live TV broadcast is quite beyond my realm of comprehension.
Apparently Caught Unawares
In non-TV station videos, where the cameraperson seems to be concentrating on the burning North Tower, they appear to have been caught unawares by the appearance and sound of the plane. But, according to the no-plane-in-New York theorists, the plane would not have appeared in the sky or in their viewfinders, because it was to be overlaid, later on. So why has no one ever commented on, let alone explained why—if these people were expecting something to happen—their camera technique fell apart at the crucial moment? Nor has it ever been revealed, by those who insist that the videos are fakes, exactly where these videos without a plane on them, were taken to have the missing plane added. Just as significantly:
Not one (genuine) video has ever appeared in which the building explodes, without any evidence of a plane appearing to hit it, excluding, of course, those videos which were shot from the opposite side to the impact…………………………..
Given my background in the history and the philosophy of science and as a professional scholar, I founded Scholars for 9/11 Truth for the purpose of promoting collaborative research on the events of 9/11 by creating a web site, issuing press releases, archiving old research and supporting new research, sponsoring conferences, announcing public presentations, and making efforts to reach out to the public with the results of our investigations. The most intense conflicts in relation to the 9/11 Truth movement, however, turn out to come from within and between research groups, which have all too often found themselves at odds and severely attacked and even denounced one another.
Based upon my experience, I can report with confidence that the three most controversial issues within the 9/11 Truth movement are these:
(3) the demolition of the Twin Towers, especially, how it was done, the dominant theory being that they were destroyed using nanothermite as the principal mechanism, which I address here.
Image and video hosting by TinyPicThese are questions that can be………………………….
Alex Jones – The Man, The History ~ * The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones’ Facebook Infowars store Updated biographical information for Alex Jones…
Alex Jones – The Man, The History ~ * The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones’ Facebook Infowars store Updated biographical information for Alex Jones…
Alex Jones – The Man, The History
The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones’ Facebook Infowars store
Updated biographical information for Alex Jones
Alex Jones – The Man, The History 260411top
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Internationally recognized veteran broadcaster, documentary filmmaker, and investigative journalist Alex Jones has been featured as a prominent figure of the 9/11 Truth Movement in such publications as The New York Times, Vanity Fair, Rolling Stone Magazine and Popular Mechanics. He has appeared on Good Morning America, The View, 20/20 Downtown, 60 Minutes, The Discovery Channel, The History Channel, Fox News, CNN, TalkSport (UK), Russia Today, Channel 4 (UK), A&E, America’s most widely listened to late night radio show, Coast to Coast AM, C-Span, and many other venues. Patrick Beech of the Austin-American Statesman has described Jones as “an absolutely riveting television presence.”
A 2011 Rolling Stone article described Jones as “a giant in America’s conspiracy subculture,” with a subsequent in-depth profile adding that he made Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh, “sound like tea-sipping NPR hosts on Zoloft.”
via Gunny G: BLOGGER 1984 +: Alex Jones – The Man, The History ~ * The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones’ Facebook Infowars store Updated biographical information for Alex Jones….
Free RepublicBrowse · Search Pings · Mail Bloggers & PersonalTopics · Post ArticleSkip to comments.
Birthers arent like truthers
Althouse blog ^ | 02/16/11 | Ann AlthousePosted on Thursday, February 17, 2011 11:51:13 PM by freespirited
There’s a new poll showing that a majority of Republicans doubt that President Obama was born in the United States. Are they paranoid-type thinkers, like the 9/11 Truthers, looking for things to connect up and suspecting that conspiracies lie underneath things that other people think are as they’ve been presented in the media?I think we need to see that they are not. They have one issue. One question.
They have suspicion about one thing, and that suspicion notably hasn’t led them into other theories. There’s one factual issue — the immensely important matter of the President’s qualification — that hasn’t been nailed down to their satisfaction.It’s perfectly rational to take as your working theory that evidence that isn’t produced would run counter to the interest of the party who could produce it and does not.
In legal cases, if a party fails to produce a document requested in discovery, the judge can deem that the fact is established to be what the party seeking discovery is trying to prove. See Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37b2Ai.All I’m saying is that it’s not paranoid to answer the question the way the majority did in that poll. I haven’t followed the so-called “birthers” that much. Presumably, some of them branch out into other theories and cross over into conspiracy thinking and paranoia.
But it’s absurd to read the poll results as a sign that the GOP is full of folks like that. If you really wanted to gauge the nuttiness of Republicans, you could do a much more fine-grained poll about what Republicans believe and how strongly the birther issue correlates to other beliefs.
Nearly a decade after the 9/11 attacks, the media’s continual silence on the worldwide grassroots campaign to launch a new investigation into those attacks demands an explanation that is different from the criticism that we usually hear from 9/11 truth activists, a lot of which fails to address the feelings of shame and guilt in journalists and reporters about not exposing the destructive lies earlier, knowing that if they had done so they could have potentially stopped two criminal wars in the Middle East that have caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people.Journalists, like doctors and soldiers and members of other professions that serve the public, take their jobs seriously, so much so that they put their lives on the line to get the truth out about certain situations and events, which explains why many of them feel shame and guilt when they find out that the narrative they’ve repeated for so long – that Al Qaeda attacked America on 9/11 – is actually false.
AE911truthNovember 15, 2010Geraldo Rivera surrenders his attitude against AE911Truth and BuildingWhat on building 7.BuildingWhat campaign is discussed on Geraldo Nov 13 2010.His guests are Bob McIllvaine and Tony Szamboti.Geraldo Rivera who for so long has vocally opposed 911Truth has changed his mind.
And it is a war which we may lose if we do not identify the enemy. “The enemy has already occupied the most powerful seat in the world…see
posted on Sunday, October 17, 2010 4:09:57 PM by himno hero
Posted By admin On October 15, 2010 @ 10:05 am In Featured Stories, News In Focus, Steve Watson Articles | 29 Comments
Second Series of Conspiracy Theory airs tonight
Oct 15, 2010
Former Governor of Minnesota, ex-Navy SEAL and retired pro-wrestler Jesse Ventura raised some important unanswered questions regarding the 9/11 attacks in a heated exchange on national television yesterday.
Ventura was appearing on Eric Bolling’s Fox Business News show, “Follow The Money”, to promote the second series of his extremely popular Conspiracy Theory show which begins on Tru TV tonight at 10pm.
“The Gulf of Tonkin Incident never happened. Well 58,000 of my generation died over something that was a lie… this one’s a lie too.” an irate Ventura told Bolling following the interview in reference to the 9/11 attacks.
As Bolling attempted to dismiss Ventura’s questions, the former Governor simply repeatedly asked “how much study have you done on 9/11?”
The interview turned heated as Ventura was defending the constitutional right for the establishment of a mosque at ground zero in New York.
Bolling, clearly agitated by Ventura’s position, stated “3000 people died there on 9/11″.
“And who really killed them? WHO REALLY KILLED THEM?” Ventura interjected.
“How can you go there?” Bolling replied, demanding Ventura explain his position on 9/11.
Ventura reached into his pocket, pulled out an image of the crumbling World Trade Center towers from 9/11 and asked “You tell me, is that a building collapsing or a building exploding?”
“What I saw at certain moments and in certain places … is very disturbing!”He never handed them over to the authorities and has been persecuted ever since. Kurt Sonnenfeld lives in exile in Argentina, where he wrote « El Perseguido » the persecuted.
His recently-published book tells the story of his unending nightmare and drives another nail into the coffin of the government’s account of the 9/11 events. Below is an exclusive interview by Voltairenet.
The book’’s ISBN is 978-950-49-2057-1 and it seems to be available Spanish only here:
The official website for the book is here:
Last week various activists successfully managed to generate publicity for 9/11 truth:
Along with that, local press conferences were also held by people throughout the world, presenting the same evidence.
On 9/11/10 Richard Gage, 9/11 victim family member Manny Badillo, and others shined a third beam of light into the sky over New York City in a symbolic representation of Building 7 to accompany the traditional two beams that shine every year for the Twin Towers.We Are Change held successful protests in New York City around the anniversary of 9/11, as it does every year, along with various speaking events.
One of them featured anti-war hero Cindy Sheehan, who said that she now thinks the 9/11 attacks were an inside job. Nine years after the attacks, having suffered the plunder of their wealth by Wall Street, seeing the wars continue under Obama, and recognizing more clearly the endless stream of disinfo and lies that their government and mainstream media are feeding them, more and more Americans are slowly begining to look at 9/11 and the improbable collapse of the 3 buildings in New York with a more critical eye.
9/11 Truthers aren’t the only ones who recognize this. Enter Bill O’Reilly.
EXCERPT ONLY ~ CONTINUES @ LINK BELOW…
The Corbett ReportWednesday, September 8, 2010With the ninth anniversary of the events of September 11, 2001 fast approaching, The Corbett Report has released an in-depth audio/visual exploration of where the 9/11 Truth Movement stands and where it is heading.
Drawing on the thoughts and opinions of Dr. Bob Bowman, Richard Gage, AIA, Aidan Monaghan, Kevin Ryan, Anthony Flammia and many others, “9/11 Truth is Still the Issue” attempts to consolidate the 9/11 Truth movement’s gains and ponder the best way forward for 9/11 researchers and activists.
Download an mp3 audio version of the report by clicking here or watch the Youtube video version in the player below:From the introduction:9/11 Truth is the issue for-ending the wars of aggression that have wreaked such havoc on the world and so far resulted in the loss of thousands of Americans and over a million Iraqis, not to mention the scores of Afghanis and Pakistanis that the Western media finds too unimportant to even tally.9/11 Truth is the issue for exposing one of the largest swindles in history, the 2.3 trillion dollars that Donald Rumsfeld pronounced “missing” from the Pentagon’s coffers on September 10, 2001, the day before the attack on the most heavily defended building in the world that left the very office that was investigating those missing trillions smoking in ruins.9/11 Truth is the issue for unraveling decades of manipulation of foreign “terrorist assets” in calculated strategies of tension that have left thousands of dead bodies in their wake, all directly attributable to the machinations of intelligence agencies and their cohorts.
9/11 Truth is one of the few issues that gives any hope at striking at the true root of the system that has acted so concertedly against the interests of the people and resulted in the erection of a control grid to watch over the populace for the benefit of the plutocrats, the well-connected and the bankstersIn short, 9/11 Truth is one of the most important issues with which we can possibly hope to press forward, even now, 9 years after those horrific events unfolded.