January 27, 2013
(President Obama, wiping a non-existent tear, over Sandy Hoax massacre.)
(Obama at a campaign rally. “You love me. You really love me.”)
Inconsistencies, upbeat demeanour and bad acting suggest Sandy Hook was sold to participants as a “training exercise.” The ensuing controversy over whether a massacre actually took place may be intended to create confusion and division.
By Melanie Lamport
(“R you Sandy or R you Hooked?”, abridged& edited by henrymakow.com)
James Tracy, a tenured professor from Florida Atlantic University, is suggesting the deaths at Sandy Hook may have resulted from a training exercise. Tracy says that “crisis actors” may have been employed in a conspiracy to shape public opinion in favor of gun control. [NO these mass shootings are not about taking away your AK-47 hunting rifle]
By Andrew McGregor (with Jim Fetzer)
When asked whether he believed in conspiracy theories, filmmaker Michael Moore replied, “Only those that are true.” The problem is telling the difference.
The two major difficulties we confront with Sandy Hook is figuring out exactly what went down and then making what we have found accessible to the public. Because I am retired from the University of Minnesota Duluth and James Tracy holds an appointment at Florida Atlantic–and we have both spoken out about Sandy Hook–he and I have become the targets of considerable attention. Perhaps the worst of the lot has been an attack on James Tracy by Anderson Cooper on CNN.
This was very odd, since Tracy’s article about Sandy Hook has to be among the most responsible in print. While none of us has an serious doubt that the Sandy Hook hoax was contrived to induce hysteria in the public and promote an anti-gun agenda, there are indications that those efforts are falling flat, as multiple sources are reporting in “Gun groups predict assault weapons ban will fail in Congress” and “Gun lobby: Congress doesn’t have the muscle to pass gun control”
YouTube – Veterans Today -
During Tuesday’s post-debate coverage on CNN, as the panel discussed moderator Candy Crowley giving cover to President Obama’s attempt to defend his initial flawed response to the Benghazi terrorist attack, CNN correspondent John King blamed former Governor Mitt Romney for giving Crowley the opening to undermine the GOP candidate’s criticism of Obama for taking so long to recognize that the attack was a premeditated act of terrorism.
When Barack Obama was elected to office in 2008, there was talk of a post-racial America. It seemed as though racism was on an exit route out the back pipe of American society. As the years passed, it became more obvious that this was all just a fantasy.
We Can Be Breitbart, Slowly: Vetting Obama
Brain ^ | 05/02/12 | Self
Posted on Wednesday, May 02, 2012 12:11:54 PM by Yaelle
In the thread about Justice Kagan, I started thinking aloud how important it is to finish Breitbart’s job and fully vet Barack Obama. No media person asked him about Kagan’s ties to communism. I didn’t know this until today.
How to get the mainstream media to be even slightly accountable about serious questions a candidate (let alone the sitting President) should answer? Why not start slow and focused? One important question, asked by all of us, to one mainstream news personality.
I picked as the first question “Did Obama enter college as a foreign student?”. I picked as the recipient Anderson Cooper. I deliberately did not choose a Fox person because they have not been very trustworthy of late. Though Cooper is liberal, I believe he considers himself thorough and good, and the question is a fair one for us to have answered.
Here is the form to ask Cooper to find out whether Obama entered Occidental College as an American or not. Ask in your own words. Don’t be afraid to sign your name and info; this is a fair question.
This is what I wrote; be concise and polite.
Dear Mr. Cooper,
Since CNN broadcasters seem so intent on looking back decades into promo letters and newletters put out by one of Ron Paul‘s organizations,when everyone admits Ron Paul did not write the letters, lets take a look at the background of some of those affiliated with CNN. It’s as elitist as you can get, with strong ties to the CIA recruiting ground, Yale University.
The Debate Circus
Townhall.com ^ | November 12,2011 | Hugh Hewitt
Posted on Saturday, November 12, 2011 8:31:07 AM by Hojczyk
The world economy is watching with a great deal of alarm as Europe struggles to a resolution of its many crises. Iran is revealed to have the ambitions for nukes all the serious people have known about but the MSM either scoffed at or doesn’t understand, and the EPA is poised to issue rule after rule that are killing thousands of jobs but it is too complicated for the designated questioner to grapple with. And Obamacare continues its deadly roll-out, suffocating jobs, driving up premiums and crushing employment, but the media wizards don’t know how to or don’t care to try to open the floor to a sustained, detailed conversation on what to do next, after the repeal which must come.
What a farce.
NEWSCASTERS OR POMPOUS PURVERYORS?
by Neil Turner
CNN broadcasts in over 212 countries around the world through U.S. and international divisionsFeb. 23, 2011 —
How can you two Pompous Purveyors of Parse call yourselves Newscasters or Investigative Reporters, when you can’t even read a cue card or a screen image that says:CERTIFICATION not CERTIFICATE of LIVE BIRTH;andNATURAL BORN CITIZEN not CITIZEN, or NATURALIZED CITIZEN, or BORN IN AMERICA?
The Factor Bill O’Reilly: “Here’s the deal. The issue doesn’t matter! Sane, clear thinking people understand that the President is not a Muslim. He wasn’t born in Indonesia, or whatever.”Juan Williams: Why all the State legislation to require eligibility be proven to be on the ballot?.
“Because they’re PINHEADS!
It’s just a Grandstand play by people who are looking for attention.”We The People: “Here’s the real deal, Mr. O.” The issue does matter to 180 million Americans who question his faith and his condition at birth. Sane, clear thinking people understand that:
1. If he is a Christian who converted from his documented muslim faith in his 20’s, there would be a fatwah on his ‘apostate’ head; a death sentence called for by all ‘good’ muslims worldwide. the silence is deafening here.
2. If he is a Christian, not still a muslim, he wouldn’t be reciting the muslim prayer at sunset, or saying that he will stand with them the muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction, or funding terrorist organizations like the Hamas ‘refugees’ from Palestine, or bowing down to muslim kings and potentates.
3. You don’t legitimize illegitimacy by:a. simply showing a proven-to-be-forged CERTIFICATION of LIVE BIRTH and calling it a CERTIFICATE;b. interchanging the words ‘natural born’ with ‘naturalized’ or ‘native born’ or ‘citizen’ or ‘American’;c. saying that the 14th Amendment defines or even mentions ‘natural born’.
It doesn’t;d. calling people ‘PINHEADS’, just because YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE
TRUTH! thank you, Jack Nicholson;
ANDERSON COOPER 360 DEGREES…Well, halfway into the Obama administration, and the birther movement will not go away…
Free RepublicBrowse · Search Pings · Mail News/ActivismTopics · Post ArticleSkip to comments.
ANDERSON COOPER 360 DEGREESCNN ^ | 2/15/2011 | Anderson CooperPosted on Wednesday, February 16, 2011 1:00:41 PM by jdoug666
Excerpt Read more at transcripts.cnn.com …
Big Media dig in on eligibilityWND ^ | 12/2/10 | Joseph FarahPosted on Thursday, December 02, 2010 3:22:38 AM by FTJM
I guess the lesson to draw from Anderson Cooper‘s hostile interrogation of Texas state Rep. Leo Berman is that the Old Media, which mishandled the eligibility story from the beginning, is now determined to ensure America never learns the truth at their expense.Berman’s offense was introducing a bill into the Texas Legislature that would require any candidate for president or vice president to provide a birth certificate to the Texas secretary of state to ensure constitutional eligibility before getting on the ballot.It’s a perfectly logical and reasonable and commendable action. It should involve no controversy whatsoever – unless you believe Barack Obama is above the law, as apparently CNN’s Anderson Cooper does.Cooper demonstrated his complete ignorance of the facts by beginning: “There’s a certificate of live birth, which is what the state of Hawaii sends out. Why isn’t that good enough?”Berman started out strong, explaining that “it’s not an original birth certificate.”
But here’s what he should have responded: “The document you are referring to, Anderson, is called a ‘certification of live birth,’ and it fails the test of proving Obama was born in Hawaii. There were and are several ways these documents can be obtained without a birth actually taking place in Hawaii. In addition, Hawaii has never released even the certification of live birth to anyone. The state refuses to do so. All we have in the way of a reputed certification of live birth is what the Obama campaign provided to select and privileged websites and journalists. Hawaii has never even confirmed that document that we’ve all seen on the Internet is an official, state-issued release.
So clearly that is wholly inadequate for any state determined to ensure ballot integrity.”
Excerpt Read more at wnd.com …