PJ Lifestyle ^ | 2-6-2014 | Leslie Loftis
Posted on Sunday, February 09, 2014 10:06:16 AM by Sir Napsalot
This week Ann Coulter “defended” Chris Christie. The governor is not a bully, as the papers suggest; he is only a weak-willed politician:
(Col Sellin) ~ Amnesty: Politicians Put Their Mouth Where Their Money Is, by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD…Family Security Matters
HOME :: PUBLICATIONS :: Amnesty: Politicians Put Their Mouth Where Their Money Is, by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD
Amnesty: Politicians Put Their Mouth Where Their Money Is
by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD February 7, 2014
News Flash – Republicans and Democrats do not work for the American people.
For the most part, the US government is a racket, a service that is fraudulently offered to solve a problem that may not exist, would not be affected if it did exist, or only exists due to the actions of government itself.
American politicians exploit the racket to run a swindle, taking money or property from someone by using lies or tricks.
One could successfully argue that many of those operating within our present political environment are in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act (18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968) enacted into law on October 15, 1970.
In general, Republicans and Democrats con voters into giving them the power to use the voters’ own money (taxes) for the purpose of rewarding themselves and the wealthy donors, who fund their political campaigns and provide them with post-government employment.
PopModal Videos ^ | September 9, 2013 | Jeffers Dodge
Posted on Tuesday, September 10, 2013 7:04:05 AM by PopModal
Are you ready for another Ann Coulter media blitz? Stay Tuned at PopModal Videos.
DrewsMusing ^ | 08.13.13
Posted on Wednesday, August 14, 2013 8:32:18 AM by Perdogg
Yes, Cruz’s story is a little unique but it’s not even remotely complex.
Ann Coulter | May 22, 2013
At first I thought the IRS scandal was leaked to distract from the Benghazi scandal. But that didn’t make sense because the IRS scandal is a more obvious abuse of power than the White House lying about the murder of four Americans in Libya.
Before I had resolved which scandal was distracting from which, we found out the Department of Justice was spying on The Associated Press — not to protect national security, but to prevent the AP from scooping the White House. Then, this week, it broke that the Department of Justice was also spying on Fox News for reasons that remain unexplained.
Posted on Thursday, March 21, 2013 5:39:24 PM by JohnPDuncan
Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) appeared on America‘s News room this afternoon and declared: “I’ve got a news flash for those who want to call people names on amnesty – what we have now is de facto amnesty,” Paul shot back. “We have 11 million people here that have been here, some of them for a decade or more. No one is telling them to go home. No one is sending them home.”
Coulter, a Conservative writer often featured as a political pundit on news programs, is known for her abrasive personality and ability to promote her ideals despite extreme opposition. She was once attacked during a speech at a college with a violent hit in the face with a pie. Tonight, her poor choice of a word may cost her some valuable alliances.
While her use of the “r” word, as people politely refer to the term in modern society, probably reflects the way the term was used in everyday society in her formative years; it was commonly used in school and everywhere else in a teasing sort of way until 10 or 15 years ago.
audio @ 1:25:
“It has nothing to do with Obama being black. It has to do with his father being here on a student visa.
…..In 1995 the CIA released decoded Soviet communiqués known as the Venona cables which turned
out to be most revealing. After decades of liberals savaging the reputation of Senator Joseph McCarthy, almost no one other than authors Ann Coulter and M. Stanton Evans are talking about the Venona discoveries which vindicate McCarthy.
You Tube ^
Posted on Monday, August 06, 2012 4:22:36 PM by rocco55
DEMOCRATS’ IDEAL VOTER: ILLEGAL ALIEN, CONVICTED FELON
Posted on Wednesday, July 18, 2012 7:27:30 PM by robowombat
Contrary to most that has been written since Thursday’s enactment of RobertsCare, Chief Justice John Roberts did not change. He has always been that way. Eight years ago, when John Roberts was nominated, we were warned that he was a liberal jurist appointed by a RINO president, just as liberal David Souter was appointed by the previous RINO president. Two articles in July 2005 by Ben Shapiro and Ann Coulterforetold the Souter-like liberal jurisprudence of Justice Roberts. We now know that Shapiro and Coulter were 100% correct.
President Bush‘s Roberts Pick Disappoints was written by Ben Shapiro on 7/20/5. Pull quote: “Roberts is not an originalist. There is nothing in his very short jurisprudential record to indicate that his judicial philosophy involves strict fidelity to the original meaning of the Constitution.”
…..Some might read this and find a disturbing lack of loyalty to the state. It sounds seditious. Professional jingoists like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, or almost anyone around the Washington Beltway go white with rage when they hear talk like this. My kind-of friend Ann Coulter sent me a copy of her last book, endorsed with the words “Stop promoting treason.” (I sent her back an email: “Well, maybe Obama will make us cellmates in a few years.”) But the fact is that loyalty to a state, just because you happen to have been born in its bailiwick, is simply stupid.
GOP WHISTLING PAST THE END OF AMERICA … Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Dot Com ^ | 30 May 2012 | Ann Coulter
Posted on Thursday, May 31, 2012 5:21:06 AM by Rummyfan
An election almost as important as the presidential election will be held next Tuesday, and conservatives aren’t making a big deal of it, just as they didn’t make a fuss over the 2008 Minnesota Senate election as Al Franken stole it from under their noses. (Gov. Tim Pawlenty: “Minnesota has a reputation for clean and fair and good elections. We’ve got 4,100 precincts run by volunteers. They do a good job, and we thank them.”)
The public sector unions are trying to oust Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker from office for impinging on their princely, taxpayer-supported lifestyles. If Walker goes down, no governor will ever again suggest that snowplow operators work when it snows. No governor will dare try to deprive public school teachers of their Viagra. Forget about ever firing self-paced, self-evaluated, unnecessary government employees.
Always leading the nation, California has already been bankrupted by the public sector unions. That’s the country’s future if Walker doesn’t win, and it’s not going to matter who’s in the Oval Office.
Democrats know what’s at stake. They’re treating this election like the Normandy invasion. Meanwhile, Republicans are sitting back, complacently citing polls that show Walker with a slight lead.
Polls don’t register passion.
Let’s get a few things straight here. As much as we all loved Andrew Breitbart’s moxie, he, like virtually every other national Conservative who was or is a part of the “establishment” (read, those who have established themselves financially, and been acknowledged by their peers) had avoided the issue of the Constitutional eligibility of the president of the United States.
“President Obama is not going to lose the black vote no matter what he does,” he added.
…..First Amendment activist group Media Coalition has written to Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, urging her not to sign the legislation into law.The letter notes that the terms used in the bill are not defined in the statute or by reference, and thereby the law could be broadly applied to almost any statement.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
“H.B. 2549 would make it a crime to use any electronic or digital device to communicate using obscene, lewd or profane language or to suggest a lewd or lascivious act if done with intent to ‘annoy,’ ‘offend,’ ‘harass’ or ‘terrify,’” the letter notes. … ‘Lewd’ and ‘profane’ are not defined in the statute or by reference.
‘Lewd’ is generally understood to mean lusty or sexual in nature and ‘profane’ is generally defined as disrespectful or irreverent about religion or religious practices.”“H.B. 2549 is not limited to a one to one conversation between two specific people. The communication does not need to be repetitive or even unwanted. There is no requirement that the recipient or subject of the speech actually feel offended, annoyed or scared. Nor does the legislation make clear that the communication must be intended to offend or annoy the reader, the subject or even any specific person.” the letter continues.In this respect the law could even technically be applied to someone posting a status update on Facebook.“Speech protected by the First Amendment is often intended to offend, annoy or scare but could be prosecuted under this law.”The Media Coalition letter continues.
“A Danish newspaper posted pictures of Muhammad that were intended to be offensive to make a point about religious tolerance. If a Muslim in Arizona considers the images profane and is offended, the paper could be prosecuted. Some Arizona residents may consider Rush Limbaugh’s recent comments about a Georgetown law student lewd. He could be prosecuted if he intended his comments to be offensive.
Similarly, much general content available in the media uses racy or profane language and is intended to offend, annoy or even terrify.”“Bill Maher’s stand up routines and Jon Stewart’s nightly comedy program, Ann Coulter’s books criticizing liberals and Christopher Hitchens’ expressions of his disdain for religion, Stephen King’s novels or the Halloween films all could be subject to this legislation. Even common taunting about sports between rival fans done online is frequently meant to offend or annoy, and is often done using salty and profane language.”This type of legislation is far from unprecedented. Last year, former president Bill Clinton proposed a law to censor internet speech. “It would be a legitimate thing to do,” Clinton said in an interview that aired on CNBC.
Clinton suggested the government should set-up an agency that monitors all media speech for supposed factual errors.“That is, it would be like, I don’t know, National Public Radio or BBC or something like that, except it would have to be really independent and they would not express opinions, and their mandate would be narrowly confined to identifying relevant factual errors” he said. “And also, they would also have to have citations so that they could be checked in case they made a mistake.
Ann Coulter was up next on Hannity where the two of them played out a charade that almost looked rehearsed. Coulter was just fawning over the very thought of Romney saying how we “should all be celebrating because we have a conservative candidate” and she even blasphemously compared Romney to Reagan. There’s a hole in Ann’s theory. Maybe Mitt can smile like Ronald Reagan and even make a half decent speech. The problem is that Ronald Reagan was not a pretentious bullshitting socialist.
I guess Ann figures she has made enough money because she is all-in with this modern day Elmer Gantry and her career will forever be linked to this impetuous infatuation along with her honorary board chairmanship of “GoProud”.
Ann was also bragging to Sean tonight about how she accosted Romney after a fund raiser and told him “you owe me”! Talk about a “slobbering Love Affair”. I’m sure Bernie Goldberg didn’t have Ann Coulter in mind when he wrote his book but that is exactly what we are witnessing here. Ann is demonstrating the same type of delusions as we witnessed in 2008 from people like Oprah, Chris Matthews & Joy Behar over Obama.
Ann Romney may want to keep an eye on these two before Mitt ends up moving them to Mexico like his Grandfather did so they can all be married together. Well, on second thought, Mexico really needs a good “turn around specialist” of their own. It might be a better fit.
Nevertheless, I am TIRED of hearing these whining sell-outs tell us we shouldn’t be exposing Romney’s socialist governmental record. It’s the only record he has so those of us who are not susceptible to crushes are going to point out the fact that the GOP is pushing a socialist all the way to the convention against the will of the MAJORITY of the party.
“Oh but the 11th Commandment… wahhhh, wahhhhh” Let me be clear: The venerable President Ronald Reagan was the greatest president of the 20th Century – but he was not God incarnate nor did he make any such pretense. He was right about most things but nobody is right about EVERYTHING.
Judging by the results of the past 24 years of my entire voting life in which I ALWAYS voted for the establishment candidate since turning 18 in 1988 – I’m going to say that THE “11TH Commandment” is at least –one- thing that President Reagan got wrong and if he saw the unmitigated abandonment of basic sense that I’m seeing by this cult-like Romney worship – I think President Reagan would agree that the 11th Commandment – NO LONGER APPLIES to this generation.
On that note let me conclude by saying that my resolute line-in-the-sand is not a scenario of “if you don’t support MY CANDIDATE, I’m going to take my toys and go home”. This is about the fact that I will NEVER debase my country or my honor by knowingly voting for a statist like Mitt Romney. There are three other candidates in this race besides Romney and I will gladly vote for ANY ONE OF THEM if they are nominated.
It is the choice of the GOP and the Moderate Murdoch Media if they want to cram this guy who according to them (about 100 times on Sunday alone) “already looks like the nominee…” down our throats and help this liberal hi-jack the party as they did with John McCain – it is THEY WHO ARE ELECTING BARACK OBAMA because they are warned with ample time and they are swimming against the stream of all basic sense in pushing this unacceptable candidate.
Rebellion is no longer “brewing”; rebellion is HERE.
Bill O’Reilly show – no link to her rants ^ | 1/023/2012 | STOCKPIRATE VANITY HELP
Posted on Wednesday, January 25, 2012 9:26:57 AM by stockpirate
THERE’S A THREAD I POSTED HERE ON THE RANT BUT WE STILL NEED TO HAVE EVERYONE SEE HER COME UNHINGED
Posted on Tuesday, December 20, 2011 7:17:57 AM by radioone
I have often thought of myself as a staunch conservative. However, over the past five weeks I have come to realize, thanks to a solid majority of the conservative chattering class and their vitriol against Newt Gingrich, that I am, per Glenn Beck, a “closet Progressive”; per Ann Coulter, “not a real conservative”; per George Will, “a Marxist“; and per National Review, and numerous other so-called conservative publications, “unfit to represent the conservative movement.”
PJ Media ^
Posted on Friday, December 16, 2011 1:18:39 PM by mnehring
1. Paul’s intellectual mentor Murray Rothbard was the founder of anarcho-capitalism and opposed the legitimacy of all nation-states, including ours.
2. Paul openly proclaims himself a revival of the Old Right, the movement which opposed our entry in World War II. He and his followers proudly reject the New Right tradition established by William F. Buckley Jr., Ronald Reagan, and Barry Goldwater.
Posted on Friday, December 09, 2011 8:56:49 PM by katiedidit1
Silver doesn’t quite go so far as to say that it makes a brokered convention or a late-breaking establishment candidate likely, but I’m willing to go that far. There’s just no way the Republican establishment lets Gingrich become their nominee. As Andrew Sullivan pointed out today, you’re already seeing the anti-Gingrich mobilization among conservative thought leaders: Here’s George Will, Charles Krauthammer, David Brooks, Ross Douthat, Tom Coburn and Ann Coulter, just for starters. There’s this Politico story about all the Washington Republicans who hate Gingrich.
Just as I was preparing to write a column critical of Newt Gingrich and wonder at his apparent surge from obscurity to a virtual tie with Mitt Romney in the Republican presidential primary race, darned if Ann Coulter didn’t get one into print before I could. And if ever there was an analogous story to the elephant and the mouse, Jerry McConnell vying with Ann Coulter might be it.
Ann Coulter Book “Demonic” Predicted Tactics Of OWS… And What’s Next
Posted on Saturday, November 19, 2011 12:10:47 PM by MindBender26
Like her or not, there can be no argument that Ann Coulter didn’t predict the actions, tactics and results of the Occupy Wall Street movement in her book “Demonic.”
In her very well written history of the real story of the insanity and mob-driven French Revolution, she could easily be describing the actions of the current OWS movement. The similarities between OWS and the Arab Spring movements to install radical Islamic theocracies are also well illustrated.
DAVID AXELROD‘S PATTERN OF SEXUAL MISBEHAVIOR
November 9, 2011
So it’s curious that all the sexual harassment allegations against Cain emanate from Chicago: home of the Daley machine and Obama consigliere David Axelrod.
Just how far are the media willing to go to get Barack Obama reelected?
As conservative author Ann Coulter told Fox News’s Sean Hannity Friday evening, “He will have the entire mainstream media bucking for him and they will lie about the economy. ‘Oh, it’s a turnaround, don’t stop him now'” (video follows with transcript and commentary):
ANN COULTER: I mean, Wall Street gave its biggest donation in world history to Obama. Why don’t they protesting Obama? They don’t know what they’re protesting. They’re brainless. They’re brainwashed and yes, there is always the possibility of violence with the mob.
SEAN HANNITY, HOST: All right. Did you ever give Chris Christie his inhaler back?
COULTER: I did because I’m now looking at Romney-Cain.
HANNITY: Wait a minute. Excuse me. His breathalyzer back.
COULTER: That was for non-regular Hannity viewers, they referenced to a mistake made by Obama.
COULTER: And I want you to leave Obama alone, give the poor guy a break. He’s still in grief over the cancellation of the first two weeks of the NBA season. Just back off.
HANNITY: I’m sorry if I’m going after the president. Well, it’s getting cold, he can’t play golf so he must be really upset. All right. But here’s what I want to ask you, very simple. Now, who do you support?
COULTER: Romney-Cain, 2012.
HANNITY: OK. Romney-Cain, not Cain-Romney?
COULTER: Only because Cain has never held elective office before. And I’d really want to defeat Obama. And I think it’s very dangerous around someone who’s never held elective office. But I must say, you and I are just saying before we went on, every one of these candidates, even the nut candidates, are better than John McCain. Forget about how much better they are than Obama, the current occupant of the White House. So, I’d be happy with any of them. I think Romney has been magnificent in these debates. You have to go with what you have.
HANNITY: As bad as Obama’s numbers are, can he make a comeback? In other words, could Republicans get overconfident and say, oh, unemployment is nine percent, he’s in the 30s in terms of his popularity, 50 million Americans in poverty.
COULTER: To some extent. Yes. And you have to remember that he will have the entire mainstream media bucking for him and they will lie about the economy. “Oh, it’s a turnaround, don’t stop him now.” But he doesn’t understands the economy. He’s done exactly the opposite of everything Ronald Reagan did and he’s gotten the opposite results. I mean, you could turn around by becoming the reincarnation of Ronald Reagan. What do you think the odds of him doing that? And by the way, that one could turn the economy because once President Romney and Vice President Cain get into office, it’s going to take 18 months to work through this.
COULTER: And then we are going to bring in Chris Christie as Mariano Rivera, he’s getting closer, eight years out, and he will clean-up anything Romney and Cain left be find.
Here is a memo/wake-up call to Occupy Wall Street:
1.) Obama‘s former White House COS Rham Emanuel: Did not have an MBA or prior banking experience, yet made $16.2 million dollars as a banker according to Wikipedia. New White House COS Daley: former big banker.
2.) Obama supported the TARP bill.
3.) Obama promised that his administration would be bereft of corporate lobbyists; yet at least 16 former lobbyists of some super-sized corporations apparently were hiding at the back entrance to the White House, because as soon as Obama took office they slipped into his administration.
4.) Obama received boatloads of campiagn cash bundled to him from big banks and “Wall Street.” Ann Coulter is correct on this. Democrats often make Republicans look like amateurs when it comes to this, and yet so many Democrats are duped into believing otherwise.
5.) Read Jane Hamsher‘s online article “Fact Sheet: The Truth About The Health Care Bill.” It is Progressives who say that Obama’s HCR bill was a sell-out to, as they like to call them, “Big Insurance” and “Big Pharma.”
Moveon.org, George Soros, Big Union and others (according to more than one media outlet) are connected to or behind getting Occupy Wall Street off the ground. OWS may have some true believers in it, but it appears to be largely astroturf. Sad but true.
Paradigm Shifter: Remember, these are some of the people the Department of Homeland Security has been warning certain law enforcement officials about (along with military veterans, pro-lifers, people who show the Gadsden flag, and Sovereign Americans who speak out about our Popular and National Sovereignty). One of them, Walter Fitzpatrick, has already been jailed on trumped up charges, and only after months, released. Another, Theresa Cao, has faced prosecution for public demonstration of the kind from which Code Pink and others skate.
These are the people who somehow seem to make Barack Obama nervous, as big money is spent on his eligibility defense, while his astroturfers attempt to ridicule and persecute. Especially in light of the evidence, of the actual meaning of the Constitution and of birth certificate fraud, it is too bad that conservatives (of what, our Constitution?) such as Glenn Beck, Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, and Michael Medved, among others, join in with such adversaries of America’s authorized self governance.
Somewhere, this editor has read something about fear of man vs. fear of the God of all truth.
GLENN BECK VS. THE MOB
June 29, 2011
Of all the details surrounding the liberal mob attack on Glenn Beck and his family in New York’s Bryant Park last Monday night, one element stands out. “No, it won’t be like that, Dad,” his daughter said when Beck questioned the wisdom of attending a free, outdoor movie showing in a New York park.
People who have never been set upon by a mob of liberals have absolutely no idea what it’s like to be a publicly recognizable conservative. Even your friends will constantly be telling you: “Oh, it will be fine. Don’t worry. Nothing will happen. This place isn’t like that.”
Liberals are not like most Americans. They are the biggest pussies on Earth, city-bred weaklings who didn’t play a sport and have never been in a fight in their entire lives. Their mothers made excuses for them when they threw tantrums and spent way too much time praising them during toilet training.
I could draw a mug shot of every one of Beck’s tormentors, and I wasn’t there.
Beck and his family would have been fine at an outdoor rap concert. They would have been fine at a sporting event. They would have been fine at any paid event, mostly because people who work for the government and live in rent-controlled apartments would be too cheap to attend.
Only a sad leftist with a crappy job could be so brimming with self-righteousness to harangue a complete stranger in public.
A liberal’s idea of being a bad-ass is to say vicious things to a conservative public figure who can’t afford to strike back. Getting in a stranger’s face and hurling insults at him, knowing full well he has too much at risk to deck you, is like baiting a bear chained to a wall.
They are not only exploiting our lawsuit-mad culture, they are exploiting other people’s manners. I know I’ll be safe because this person has better manners than I do.
These brave-hearts know exactly what they can get away with. They assault a conservative only when it’s a sucker-punch, they outnumber him, or he can’t fight back for reasons of law or decorum.
Read More »
Ann Coulter appeared on Fox Business Network’s America’s Nightly Scoreboard with some advice for Republican primary voters. Coulter told them they “need to concentrate on Governors” in the race, because even though she likes Michele Bachmann and Herman Cain a lot, she doesn’t think either have the necessary credentials or experience to go all the way. Coulter also spent some describing how environmental groups are “fanatics” and wondered “couldn’t we save a lot of money getting rid of the EPA?” Yet her harshest remarks were saved for the mainstream media, as she
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com …
What’s So Hard to Understand About Ron Paul?: “Watching Paul’s appearance on The View, one could already see this dynamic in action. While the ladies on the show were very gracious to the congressman, Whoopi Goldberg took the lead in asking some policy questions and demonstrated the liberal take on Paul perfectly. She first stated that she agreed that she would like to see the wars end, but wanted to know how Paul could get us out of them (a concern that never would have arisen with a Republican running the empire). After Paul gave his customary answer, “we marched right in there, we can march right out,” Goldberg then challenged Paul on his position that healthcare is not a right. She truly looked baffled that any politician could be both anti-war and anti-entitlement.
On the conservative side, media figures have been doing the opposite routine with Ron Paul for years. Glenn Beck (pre-blackboard) routinely had Paul on during the economic crisis and always emphasized his agreement with Ron Paul’s economic positions and his disagreement on foreign policy. Ann Coulter has also weighed in on Paul in this way, as have countless other media figures.”
Posted by Gunny G at Monday, June 27, 2011
Ann Coulter: OBAMA: HOPE, CHANGE, AND THE OCCASIONAL SEX DREAM (Ewwwwwww!)
Ann Coulter: OBAMA: HOPE, CHANGE, AND THE OCCASIONAL SEX DREAM (Ewwwwwww!):
“In Part One of my new book — released this week! — ‘Demonic: How the Liberal Mob Is Endangering America,’ I demonstrate that liberals have all the earmarks of mob psychology.
Their myths, slogans, demands for immediate action, messianic goals, demonization of opponents, creation of political idols and occasional resorts to violence — all this is classic herd behavior.
Because mobs are irrational, immature, subject to wild passions and infatuations, they cannot be reasoned with. And they are always dangerous.
The mob attributes of liberals we will review this week are a crowd’s inability to perceive contradictions and its tendency to form an infatuation for an individual.
When Liberals Kill
When Liberals Kill
Vanity | 2 May 2011 | areukiddingme1
Posted on Monday, May 02, 2011 9:20:58 AM by areukiddingme1
It reminds me of an Ann Coulter quote; “Here the country had finally given liberals a war against fundamentalism and they didn’t want to fight it. They would have, except it would put them on the same side as the United States.”
Do the liberals realize that they have now crossed over to our side in rooting for the US to win in the war on terrorism — How can they stand it, I bet they feel dirty.
Isn’t it ironic that everything that the Bush administration had put in to place to protect and defend the US is coming full circle…under a liberal president. The Patriot Act, Gitmo, and no civil trials for terrorists…all previously denounced by then candidate obama.
Posted: February 14, 2011
1:00 am Eastern
I hate to say, “I told you so.”
It’s rather cliché.
But I did try very hard to warn the conservative movement what it was doing by embracing a group of homosexual activists promoting a radical social agenda while masquerading as “conservatives.”
I don’t know if I was the first to warn about the infiltration of GOProud and how its tentacles would sow seeds of division and strife among conservatives. But I’m quite sure I was among the loudest.
Suffice it to say, few listened to the warnings. It has cost me friendships, long-time alliances and a good name among many who don’t know me except through the caricatures drawn by others making their livings under the bright lights of TV cameras accusing me of being a “publicity whore” and a “fake Christian.”
Today, more people see the truth about a group they once saw as merely a group of “conservative gays.”
Sometimes it takes a little political experience and sophistication, maybe only the kind that can come from being around long enough.
When I tried to point out to Ann Coulter that she was making a mistake by performing at a fundraiser for GOProud at the very moment it was attempting to establish its conservative bona fides, she did not take it well. Neither did many other conservatives…………
Ann Coulter wrote in her 2008 book Guilty immediately after John McCain picked Sarah Palin as his running mate in August 2008, the entire press corps was air-dropped into Alaska to dig up dirt on the governor and her family. In June 2010 Journalist Joe McGinnis rented the house next door to Sarah in Wasilla, Alaska to continue invading her privacy and stalking the family. Have these pimps in the media no shame?Leonard Pitts, Jr., columnist for The Miami Herald, wrote about how Joe, the Journalist, was able to see into Sarah’s daughter’s bedroom and how it was a streak of luck when he just happened to find a house next door to the Palin home when he moved to Wasilla for the summer to do his research.Pitts writes Palin is second only to the president himself, the most compelling figure in American politics – and the most polarizing. He writes, “For some she is the folksy, straight-talkin’ avatar of conservative principles, while for others, she is the leader of an intellectually incoherent movement that has no idea where it’s going but seems in a hurry to get there.”Stephen F. Hayes, senior writer at The Weekly Standard and a FOX News Contributor wrote in the July/August 2010 Imprimis, a publication of Hillsdale College in Michigan where many “intellectually incoherent” send their children, “There were millions of conservatives, independents, disaffected Republicans, and many of them stayed home on election day because of the GOP’s choice of appeaser John McCain as its presidential contender.
These are the people who form the heart of the Tea Party movement now. A National Review poll found the Tea Party was five percent black and 11 percent Hispanic and not ‘all white,’ as Chris Matthews claimed. Perhaps some will say it was the work of a right-leaning polling firm and a conservative magazine but they can’t say that about the New York Times and CBS. Their poll, which has a long history of over-sampling Democrats, found that Tea Partiers are wealthier and better educated than average voters.
It also found that 20 percent of Americans – one in five- supports Tea Parties. That’s an awfully big fringe.”
Bill O’Reilly’s motto is “The spin stops here,” but he won’t touch the eligibility issue ~ TV TALKING HEADS ARE ALL TALK AND NO ACTION by Tom Deacon…
TV TALKING HEADS ARE ALL TALK AND NO ACTION
by Tom Deacon
(Sept. 30, 2010) — I am amazed and dismayed as day after day passes with an ineligible person in the office of president. No birth certificate is required to make that determination, yet the media continues to pretend there is “no problem.” How did the left lock the eligibility issue down so securely that Fox News and their talking heads, supposedly the one place for fair and balanced information among the “main stream” media outlets, has zipped up on the issue? The highly paid Fox entertainers only rarely mention it, and then only to insult the millions (58% by a recent CNN poll), of Americans who say they are not sure Obama was born in the U.S.A., let alone a natural born citizen. These people want a “fair and balanced” discussion, instead they get an attempt at humor at their expense for having the audacity to demand proof of eligibility from the putative president and commander-in-chief.
America being held hostage to the “race card” so completely that THE ONE in power and his many enablers can only be criticized in ways that will not directly remove them from their positions of power, or possibly send them to jail? Those who disapprove of almost everything the Obama regime does, people such as Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin, for example, call those who just want a discussion of “natural born citizen” unflattering names they think will get the best laugh in the rare instance they mention the issue at all. These people will not even discuss the case of an American hero, LTC Terry Lakin, because they fear it will force discussion of Obama’s eligibility, or lack thereof.
Is the possibility of this headline:
EXCERPT ONLY ~ CONTINUES @ LINK BELOW…
POSTS ADDED 24/7…
JUST CLICK LINK BELOW”’
R. W. “Dick” Gaines (Gunny G)
The “G” WebLog @Network54
FOR Gunny G E-Mail UPDATES…
WE ARE BEHIND “ENEMY WITHIN” LINES, SURROUNDED, Our ‘Novembers’ Are Gone!…So Few Can Grok this!
“But if we don’t do this right, anger will explode in the Muslim world. If we don’t do things correctly, this crisis could become much bigger than the Danish cartoon crisis [over images depicting the Prophet Mohammed], which resulted in attacks on Danish embassies in various parts of the Muslim world.
And we have a much bigger footprint in the Muslim world.”-Faisal Abdul RaufThe flim flam imam ought to run for congress. It’s just a matter of time before the Democrats recruit him.
He’s a natural master of doublespeak. Rauf issued his warning about inflaming the normally peaceful and tolerant Muslim world right after assuring us that had he the slightest inkling that building a Victory Mosque at Ground Zero would cause upset, he never would have proposed such a thing.Of course, if the Victory Mosque doesn’t go forward, we will be severely punished. Be nice to the jihadis and maybe they’ll behead you last.The alleged constitutional scholar, Barack Obama, is demanding a complete and unconditional surrender to Muslim extremism. Rauf’s right to build a Victory Mosque 600 feet from the 9/11 massacre is absolute and protected by the Constitution.
Presumably, he means the U.S. Constitution. The right of a private citizen in Florida to toss a few Korans onto the barbeque is, however, hate speech and is not only intolerable and offensive, but will cause Islamoterrorists to quit baking cookies and join the jihad.Is there something that won’t inflame the Muslim world and be used as a recruitment tool for jihad? Ann Coulter got it right:”This is what liberals say whenever we do anything displeasing to the enemy — invade Iraq, hold captured terrorists in Guantanamo, interrogate captured jihadists or publish Muhammad cartoons.
“Yet another woman who has more cajones than Barack Obama, Angela Merkel, has had her fill of this insanity. Merkel just presented the 75 year old Kurt Westergaard with an award for what she called “freedom of speech.” Westergaard, whose head is still firmly attached to his body, published insulting cartoons depicting Mohammed in a less than reverent light. The Germans understand a thing or two about crazy cults.
Not having a copy of Mein Kampf handy, I may just toss a copy of Dreams From My Father onto the grill this weekend. And I promise not to behead anyone who buys a few hundred copies of Obamanutz to toss in the fire.
Joy Tiz is the author of Obamanutz: A Cult Leader Takes the White House.
The only evidence for Obama’s Christianity is that he faithfully attended the Rev. Jeremiah Wright‘s Trinity United Church of Christ for 20 years.Yes, the guy bellowing “God damn America!” is the one vouching for Obama’s Christianity. That’s like saying you got sober with the help of your A.A. sponsor Lindsay Lohan.
It is a fact that any non-retarded person thank you, Rahm Emanuel! sitting in the Rev. Wright’s church for 20 minutes, much less 20 years, does not believe in God. Even stepping inside Wright’s church for a moment to get out of the rain is borderline racist.Going to Trinity United Church of Christ is even stronger evidence of nonbelief than Bill Clinton returning from Sunday services to receive oral sex from Monica Lewinsky. This isn’t mere sin — everybody sins though some with more frequency and less remorse than others.
Attending Wright’s church is the conscious, calculated decision to immerse yourself in hate-filled demagoguery and call it “Christianity.
“But according to North Korean TV’s Chris Matthews, it is a provable, scientific fact that Obama is a Christian because he says so. “Everybody watching right now,” Matthews said to his several viewers last week, “gets credit for being of the religion you say you are. … We accept that in America. It’s called freedom of religion and respect for religion.”That would make professions of religious belief, unlike all other self-professions, unchallengeable. Liberals say conservatives don’t believe in civil rights. I say liberals are godless traitors.
Why is one statement debatable and the other not?Doesn’t anyone question the Christianity of Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker? How about the Satanists claiming to be Christians who stand outside soldiers’ funerals with signs that say “God Hates Fags”?And, for the record, the allegedly inviolate assertion of one’s own religious belief wasn’t so inviolate when it came to Ronald Reagan.Tip O’Neill used to question President Reagan’s Christianity all the time, taunting the president for not attending church regularly. Matthews might remember that: He was working for O’Neill at the time.
In fact, parading to church in front of the TV cameras carrying a 10-pound Bible — like a certain serial adulterer, impeached president I could name — is strongly discouraged by the creator of the universe. “Beware of practicing your righteousness before men to be noticed by them; otherwise you have no reward with your Father who is in heaven.” Matthew 6.1
Read more at Ann Coulter.Com
Conservative pundit Ann Coulter intensified her attacks on WND last night on Fox News Channel‘s “Red Eye” show, accusing those at the largest independent news site who dropped her from the “Taking America Back National Conference” in Miami of being “fake Christians.
“Coulter claimed she was never actually booked for the event, repeated her resentment over publishing her e-mail explanations to WND Editor Joseph Farah for appearing at GOProud‘s Homocon event and lashed out at WND for “pushing the birther thing,” which she said is not supported by any conservatives.
“These are fake Christians trying to get publicity,” said Coulter.Previously, Coulter called Farah a “publicity whore” and a “swine” for WND’s decision to drop her upon learning of her plan to speak to the homosexual Republican group.
EXCERPT ~ CONTINUES…
An intra-conservative war broke out this week between Ann Coulter and WorldNetDaily after the site disinvited the well-known writer from a conference it was hosting after it learned that she had agreed to speak at a similar event sponsored by gay conservatives.
Coulter had agreed to be a featured speaker at “Homocon 2010,” an event put together by GOProud, a group of conservatives and libertarians who are gay or support gay rights, a position which WorldNetDaily saw as improperly validating “a brand of materialistic libertrianism” according to the site’s editor Joseph Farah.
“Ultimately, as a matter of principle, it would not make sense for us to have Ann speak to a conference about ‘taking America back’ when she clearly does not recognize that the ideals to be espoused there simply do not include the radical and very ‘unconservative’ agenda represented by GOProud,” Farah said in a statement posted on WorldNetDaily’s website.