Archive
The Founders’ Great Mistake… ““The creation of the presidency was [the Framers’] most creative act.” That may be true, but it wasn’t their best work. ” !!!!! – Garrett Epps – The Atlantic
The historian Jack N. Rakove has written, “The creation of the presidency was [the Framers’] most creative act.” That may be true, but it wasn’t their best work. The Framers were designing something the modern world had never seen—a republican chief executive who would owe his power to the people rather than to heredity or brute force.
RPREVOLU (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)
The wonder is not that they got so much wrong, but that they got anything right at all.
According to James Madison’s Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787, the executive received surprisingly little attention at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. Debate over the creation and workings of the new Congress was long and lively; the presidency, by contrast, was fashioned relatively quickly, after considerably less discussion.
One important reason for the delegates’ reticence was that George Washington, the most admired man in the world at that time, was the convention’s president.
gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)
Every delegate knew that Washington would, if he chose, be the first president of the new federal government—and that the new government itself would likely fail without Washington at the helm. To express too much fear of executive authority might have seemed disrespectful to the man for whom the office was being tailored.
Constitutional Scholar Defines Natural Born Citizen(Obama, Jindal, Cruz, Rubio Don’t Qualify)
Constitutional Scholar Defines Natural Born Citizen(Obama, Jindal, Cruz, Rubio Don’t Qualify)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 ^
Posted on Monday, March 11, 2013 3:15:07 PM by Cold Case Posse Supporter
mussobama (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)
Respected constitutional scholar and lawyer Herb Titus sits down to explain what a true Constitutional Article 2 Section 1 natural born Citizen is. Herb Titus credentials are impeccable when it comes to the matter of Constitutional Law and our founders original intent, especially on the subject of the presidency.
Titus gives a clear understandable meaning of why the founders wanted to have a natural born Citizen ONLY for the presidential requirement to hold the executive office of the United States. It is clear after listening to Herb Titus in the two part video that you will understand why Bobby Jindal, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and Barack Obama are not constitutionally eligible to hold the office of the presidency.
barbflag (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)
“WHAT IS THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF TAKING AN OATH OR AFFIRMATION AND BEING BOUND BY OATH OR AFFIRMATION?” ~ EDRIVERA.COM – United States America Organic Law Taxes Property Jurisdiction Constitution : EDRIVERA.COM
3
WHAT IS THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF TAKING AN OATH OR AFFIRMATION AND BEING BOUND BY OATH OR AFFIRMATION?
Filed Under Article II Section 1 Clause 8, Electoral College, IMPEACHMENT, Oath of Office, ORGANIC LAWS, Presidential Elector, PRESIDENTS | Leave a Comment
big (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)
When one has a question about the Constitution of September 17, 1787, ask George—George Washington. The hero of the American Revolution was President of the May 25, 1787 Constitutional Convention and the first President of the United States of America to be elected by Article II Section 1 Clause 2 Presidential Electors. George Washington was the first President of the United States of America to take the Article II Section 1 Clause 8 oral oath for the Office of President of the United States.
“George, why would you take the oral oath for the Office of President of the United States, on April 30, 1789, when you had been elected to another Office, President of the United States of America on April 6, 1789?” Washington never admitted or explained what he did or why he did it.
Rejection of Obama by Electoral College | Veterans Today
EXCERPT!!!!!!
gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)
Article 2 of the US Constitution seems to me to be clear enough. To be eligible for the presidency a candidate presented to the Electoral College has to be an American Citizen, born in the United States. It is a matter entirely for them but I see no reason why the Electors could not ask for evidence of Barack Obama’s eligibility. That applies to all candidates of all races from all parties by the way.
I don’t accept that Senator McCain was eligible to be sworn-in, as in my opinion he was born in a hospital in downtown Colon, in Panama. It wouldn’t matter if he were born on Coco Solo Marine Corps Air Base, as he claims, as that was not in the United States. Quite where on the base he was born is a moot point, since the hospital was not built for another five years. I don’t accept that Senator Goldwater qualified for the presidency either – his eligibility was queried at the time, as he was born in a territory, not a state.
The NY Times: We Are Too Stupid To Act Without the State…
Image of Lew Rockwell (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Lew Rockwell Blog | The NYT declares today that “A Big Storm Requires Big Government,” and everyone knows that the NYT only speaks wisdom and truth.
The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried. | Save America Foundation
EXCERPT!!!!!
RPREVOLU (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)
…..Let’s examine whether the Joint Chiefs have committed a court-marshall offense worthy of death.They have supported a man who is clearly a usurper, as if he were the President of the United StatesThis fact is manifest and notorious.
English: General Martin E. Dempsey, USA, 18thChairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
There is one thing certain about Obama, and the Joint Chiefs know it: his father was a British subject. Four Supreme Court Cases declare that to be a natural born citizen, both parents must be U.S. Citizens. The Constitution clearly states in Article II, section ii, paragraph 5, that “No person except a natural born Citizen . . shall be eligible to the Office of President” The Joint Chiefs have been duly informed by many letters from military personnel, and from lawyers, such as Dr. Orly Taitz.
Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., JD — The Constitution Limits the President Even as “Commander in Chief”
Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.
February 20, 2006
NewsWithViews.com
obamadash (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)
Amidst the flood of propaganda these days on behalf of what must be the most breathtaking expansion of Presidential power since Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal, especially glaring are the assertions of self-styled “conservative” media personalities that nothing is amiss, because: (i) the President is “Commander in Chief;” (ii) in that capacity he supposedly enjoys “inherent” power to take whatever actions he may deem necessary to protect this country from “terrorism;” (iii) assertion of this Presidential power is especially vital now, with this country engaged in a “war on terror;” and (iv) in any event, Congress has broadly authorized the President to use “force” in “the war on terror.” None of these contentions can withstand even cursory scrutiny.
The Evidence Is In: America Is Under Foreign Control!
alk radio host Carl Gallups reveals evidence, analysis, and a challenge to the naysayers who believe our president is a natural born citizen!
GyGRet (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)
Bypass the Mass Media: Get Articles Just Like This Straight To Your Inbox!
The Constitution, Vattel, and ‘Natural Born Citizen’: What Our Framers Knew
The Constitution, Vattel, and ‘Natural Born Citizen’: What Our Framers Knew
American Clarion ^ | July 18, 2012 | Publius Huldah
Posted on Wednesday, July 18, 2012 5:31:08 PM by WXRGina
English: Detail of Preamble to Constitution of the United States Polski: Fragment preambuły Konstytucji Stanów Zjednoczonych (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
(Col Sellin: Winning Elections Requires Throwing the Constitution Under the Bus) Family Security Matters
In a video recently posted on the internet, Congressman Paul Gosar(R-AZ) states that fifty percent of the American people do not believe in the Constitution and individual rights and if you principally fight to defend the Constitution, you will lose.
GyGRet (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)
Rep. Gosar has seemingly forgotten that he takes an oath to “support and defend” the Constitution. Apparently he thinks that adhering to the Constitution is an impediment to winning elections. He seems to be promoting the proposition that obtaining power is more important than upholding the rule of law.
The opinions expressed by Rep. Gosar are not unique, but represent the prevailing attitude in Congress. The Constitution limits the powers of the federal government and federal office-holders who want unlimited power.
WHAT CONSTITUTION DID GEORGE WASHINGTON SWEAR TO “PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND”? ~ EDRIVERA.COM – United States America Organic Law Taxes Property Jurisdiction Constitution : EDRIVERA.COM
LAS VEGAS, NV – MAY 17: U.S. Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) and his video image (R) are reflected in glass covering a supporter’s large copy of the United States Constitution as Paul speaks to members of the Clark County Republican Party at the Silverton Casino Lodge May 17, 2011 in Las Vegas, Nevada. Paul announced last week that he is seeking the 2012 GOP nomination for president. (Image credit: Getty Images via @daylife)
Supremes asked: Who is ‘natural born citizen?’
An announcement is expected sometime in the fall on whether the U.S. Supreme Court will decide just exactly who is a “natural born citizen” as required by the U.S. Constitution for all those who would be president.
Obama Will Go Scot Free – Compliments of Complicit Cowardly Politicans « moralmatters.org
Obama Will Go Scot Free – Compliments of Complicit Cowardly Politicans
June 16, 2012 Nathan M. Bickel Leave a comment Go to comments
Dr. Col Lawrence Sellin
How Barack Obama avoids prison – by Dr. Col. Lawrence Sellin – english.pravda.ru/opinion/
“A political deal will be struck to save the Democrat Party from total collapse and protect the Republican Party from revelations of complicity in the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people.
English: Barack Obama delivers a speech at the University of Southern California (Video of the speech) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
If We Took the Constitution Seriously, Obama Would Be Impeached
If the citizens of this Republic still took the Constitution seriously, Obama would be impeached for his decision to unilaterally grant amnesty to certain illegal aliens.
English: Barack Obama delivers a speech at the University of Southern California (Video of the speech) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Article 1, Sec. 8 of the Constitution, which enumerates the power of Congress, states that “Congress shall have the Power To… establish an [sic] uniform Rule of Naturalization.”
JB Williams — Romney, Rubio, McCain and Natural Born Citizen
The recent release of my previous column titled Rubio Can Lock the Election for Obama resulted in numerous reader emails that demonstrate a continuing confusion over the indisputable definition and application of the term Natural Born Citizen. This follow up column is written to remove all confusion from the topic, once and for all.
Sadly, most of the people concerned with this topic believe they each know the truth, even though they do not agree on what the truth is. Most opinions are based upon second source or third hand information, most of it motivated by political agenda.
My objective is to establish through first source evidence the true meaning of the term Natural Born Citizen as used by our Founders in Article II of the Constitution, and spread the truth, no matter who it helps or harms in the political arena. I have written on this subject extensively and my only loyalty here is to the truth, no matter who it serves.
The true definition of Natural Born Citizen…..
isdees (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)
(“It’s no secret that Barrack Hussein Obama is NOT a Natural Born Citizen of the United States, even though everyone in a position of power is pretending to not notice while working around the clock to alter the definition of the term via precedent”) JB Williams — Rubio Can Lock the Election for Obama
…..It’s no secret that Barrack Hussein Obama is NOT a Natural Born Citizen of the United States, even though everyone in a position of power is pretending to not notice while working around the clock to alter the definition of the term via precedent.
English: Official portrait of US Senator Marco Rubio of Florida. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Because Marco Rubio has a résumé almost as blank as Obama’s in terms of actual accomplishments, I must conclude that the primary interest in running Rubio on the ticket with Romney is nothing more than one more attempt to forever alter the definition of Natural Born Citizen.
Members of Congress have tried on at least eight occasions to officially alter the definition of Natural Born Citizen or eliminate the requirement from Article II of the Constitution altogether.
All of those efforts failed. However, allowing a foreigner like Obama to hold the highest office in our land for one full term is setting a precedent that anyone from anywhere in the world can be president of the United States, and nobody in the United States is going to do anything about it. Putting another foreigner with dual or divided loyalties in the White House would seal the deal.
Text Of Schwartzenegger For Pres Bill In Congress
JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to make eligible for the Office of President a person who has been a United States citizen for 20 years.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States:
“ArticleSec. –
“Section 1. A person who is a citizen of the United States, who has been for 20 years a citizen of the United States, and who is otherwise eligible to the Office of President, is not ineligible to that Office by reason of not being a native born citizen of the United States.
Col. Lawrence Sellin | Teri O’Brien – America’s Original Conservative Warrior Princess
Joe Biden und Barack Obama in Springfield, Illinois, right after Biden was formerly introduced by Obama as his running mate (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
…..As we watch the disgusting spectacle of an unaccomplished, unqualified, affirmative-action assisted empty suit occupying the Oval Office and masquerading as a leader, we can only hope our long national nightmare will soon end.
The desperation in the Obama campaign is obvious, from their doubling down on deceptive campaign ads about his profligate spending, to their unabashed playing the race card to appeal to the emotionally-driven perpetual adolescents who continue to support him, but is liberalism really kaput? That’s the thesis of the latest book from conservative icon, and founder of the American Spectator, R. Emmett Tyrell, in his new book, The Death of Liberalism. Is it too soon to celebrate? And what connection does he have to Chicago’s infamous Haymarket riot?
We’re also delighted and honored to have (Ret.) Colonel Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D, columnist for Family Security Matters stop by to reflect on Memorial Day from the perspective of one who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, and who questions Barack Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of president because he is not an Article II “natural born citizen.”
How did that fact affect his service in the military? Why does what he calls “possibly the greatest constitutional crisis since the Civil War” continue to be at best mocked, and at worst, ignored by the vast majority of the media, including supposedly conservative outlets?
Thus Always to Tyrants (“Why The Word “Tyrant” Accurately Describes Obama”)
“Sic Semper Tyrannis”, latin for “Thus Always to Tyrants,“ is the rallying cry against tyranny dating back to the Roman Empire with the utterance of this phrase by Marcus Junius Brutus upon the assassination of Julius Caesar. This simple phrase has been used by countless European nationals as a cry to arms for independence from their oppressive monarchs, as well as others down through the ages since first spoken two thousand years ago.
drronpaulrev (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)
English: Abraham Lincoln, the sixteenth President of the United States. Latviešu: Abrahams Linkolns, sešpadsmitais ASV prezidents. Српски / Srpski: Абрахам Линколн, шеснаести председник Сједињених Америчких Држава. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
To give an American context to this phrase, John Wilkes Booth immortalized it as he leapt to the stage from the Presidential Box after mortally wounding Abraham Lincoln at Fords Theater 147 years ago, and it is the motto for the state of Virginia.
Throughout history, man has always sought self-determination as a God-given or natural right as they struggled against the rule of man through kings, royalty, and monarchs. This nation was founded upon the principle that man, given the ability, the will, and means to do so, could flourish under self-rule and the rule of law. Flourish, we have; the amount of economic growth and wonders this nation has seen in its short existence of only 236 years is astounding and has not been rivaled in history.
The New Media Journal | Obama’s Contempt for the US Constitution by Joan Swirsky
Print Email Archive
Recent Articles
Fems Love Abortion-on-Demand, Hate Sarah Palin
In Palin-Gibson Throwdown, Gov Gets A, Media F
My Mother’s Birth Certificate…And Obama’s
Obama’s Birth Certificate…Still Missing
Obama’s Contempt for the US Constitution
About Joan Swirsky
Joan Swirsky, is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal. A New York-based author and journalist, she was formerly a longtime health-and-science and feature writer for The New York Times Long Island section. She is the recipient of seven Long Island Press Awards…
Joan Swirsky
Obama’s Contempt for the US Constitution
November 1, 2008
On February 10, 2007, Senator Barack Obama stood outside the Old State Capitol building in Illinois and announced his intention to run for the presidency.
Barack Obama (Photo credit: jamesomalley)
“I recognize there is a certain presumptuousness, a certain audacity, to this announcement,” Obama said. “I know I haven’t spent a lot of time learning the ways of Washington. But I’ve been there long enough to know that the ways of Washington must change.”
Of course, that depends on what his definition of “been there long enough” is. Actually, after he took office in November 2004, he spent a total of 143 days “on the job” – the number of days the senate was in session – before beginning his campaign for President of the United States. So now we know that, to Obama, “been there long enough” means that four months and change is quite enough preparation to be not only president but also the Commander in Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces, chief executive of the federal government, and leader of the free world.
At least he got the “audacity” part right.
In responding to disparagement from his opponents about the three years he spent as a community organizer in Chicago, Obama explained – with startlingly unselfconscious narcissism – that it was a good preparation for the top job in the world because it helped in “understanding where I’m coming from, who I believe in, who I’m fighting for and why I’m in this race.”
“They haven’t talked about the fact that I was a civil rights lawyer;” Obama added. “They haven’t talked about the fact that I taught constitutional law…”
Why They Still Call Him …?????
Why They Still Call Him President
Right Side News ^ | 5/3/2012 | JB Williams
Posted on Friday, May 04, 2012 11:22:04 AM by IbJensen
Some still call Barack Obama president out of pure ignorance, but others brilliantly call him President with a very specific agenda in mind. It’s all over but the crying now… as Article II of the U.S. Constitution is officially dead.
Since the nobody Senator from nowhere rose to DNC fame during the 2004 DNC Convention and was subsequently hustled into the highest office in our land despite his blank résumé and invisible past, people have been desperately searching for an honest forum in which to ask – Who is this yahoo, where did he come from and how the hell did he become America’s first openly Marxist White House resident?
Barack Obama delivers a speech at the University of Southern California (Video of the speech) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Why isn’t there a single honest journalist or court anywhere in the country willing to even entertain the litany of obvious questions which the Marxist-in-Chief has effortlessly dodged since 2004?
Rubio, Amnesty and Article II (“…there is a reason why members of congress tried to alter the Natural Born Citizen requirement at least eight times in the run-up to Obama’s fraudulent election in 2008 – why leftists insist that the founders meant “anchor baby” when they required that only Natural Born Citizens of the United States could hold the highest offices in our land – and that Marco Rubio would make the perfect VP selection for Mitt Romney in 2012…./In short, the reason is — kill the constitution”)
However, there is a reason why members of congress tried to alter the Natural Born Citizen requirement at least eight times in the run-up to Obama’s fraudulent election in 2008
Official portrait of US Senator Marco Rubio of Florida. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
– why leftists insist that the founders meant “anchor baby” when they required that only Natural Born Citizens of the United States could hold the highest offices in our land – and that Marco Rubio would make the perfect VP selection for Mitt Romney in 2012….
JB Williams — Rubio, Amnesty and Article II
I realize that many Tea Party folks have fallen for leftist tricks aimed at keeping the current Article II constitutional crisis off the table, but just how far are they willing to fall in the name of political agendas?
Real “constitutionalists” are as concerned about Article II as they are any other constitutional text, maybe even more so since the current Muslim-n-Chief is a one-man constitutional crisis of monumental proportions. Faux “constitutionalists” are those who cherry-pick which parts of the founding document to take issue with, based on their individual political agenda.
Many Tea Party folks seem to not care whether or not we uphold Article II constitutional requirements for the offices of President and Vice President. Others seem perfectly happy to accept fraudulent definitions of the term “Natural Born Citizen” so long as it suits their political agenda.
However, there is a reason why members of congress tried to alter the Natural Born Citizen requirement at least eight times in the run-up to Obama’s fraudulent election in 2008 – why leftists insist that the founders meant “anchor baby” when they insisted that only Natural Born Citizens of the United States hold the highest offices in our land – and that Marco Rubio would make the perfect VP selection for Mitt Romney in 2012….
In a word, the reason is AMNESTY by any means.
Barack Hussein Obama Jr. is without any reasonable doubt, a total fraud, and ineligible for the office he currently holds. Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen of the United States and neither is Marco Rubio.
So, to keep Obama in office, leftists must eliminate the true meaning of the term Natural Born Citizen and the best way to do that is to get Republicans to put their own ineligible candidate on the ticket with Romney… enter Marco Rubio.
Simply stated, a Natural Born Citizen is a citizen via the bloodline of the natural birth father. Obama’s natural birth father was a no time in his life, a legal citizen of the United States. He was at all times a legal citizen of Kenya and as such, could only pass Kenyan citizenship to Barack Hussein Obama II.
Official photographic portrait of US President Barack Obama (born 4 August 1961; assumed office 20 January 2009) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
The Dirty “little” Secret Of The Natural Born Citizen Clause Revealed.
The Dirty “little” Secret Of The Natural Born Citizen Clause Revealed.
I have emphasized the word “little” because the truth of the law on this issue is very simple, folks. So simple that the mystery is deciphered by application of one of the most clear, concise and undeniable rules of law; the code of statutory construction governs, and therefore, “natural born Citizen” must require something more than being born in the United States.
Let me put it to you in appropriately simple language:
GUNNY G: ANOTHER WRITER TO THE DEFENSE OF DR RON PAUL AGAINST ATTACKS BY NEO-CON (PSEUDO-CONSERVATIVE) WRITERS!
Image via Wikipedia
GUNNY G: ANOTHER WRITER TO THE DEFENSE OF DR RON PAUL AGAINST ATTACKS BY NEO-CON (PSEUDO-CONSERVATIVE) WRITERS!
J.B. William’s article attacking Ron Paul, released on December 30, 2011 on NewsWithViews.com, perhaps deserves (I use the word loosely) a response. Williams’ assumes a lot and qualifies virtually nothing. He takes for granted the meaning and understanding of words like “conservative” and “liberal” and uses them to pigeon hole politics and pit people against Ron Paul. It is this kind of miniscule attention to detail that spreads misinformation and disinformation masqueraded as “fact.”
Let us consider Williams’ attacks on Ron Paul in order, and I will offer a critique for the sake of integrity in journalism and truth in politics.
2012 Presidential Candidates – One Question Only| The Post & Email
“AN OVERT ACT OF TREASON”
by JB Williams
Will any of the candidates for President face the eligibility matter, or will they all pretend it doesn’t exist?
(Sep. 20, 2011) — As the 2012 election cycle heats up, the most pressing issue facing our nation today is the reinstatement of the U.S. Constitution as the Law of this Land, and the survival of our constitutional republic, complete with sovereign borders, the rule of law, states rights and a republican form of government guaranteed every citizen by the Constitution. There is no more pressing issue in America today…
As reinstating the U.S. Constitution is the highest priority of the 2012 election, and the fact that reinstating Article II requirements for the office of president is first and foremost in the effort to reinstate the constitution as the supreme law of this land, all presidential candidates must face the most vital question of the day.
Before being entrusted with the most powerful political office in our land and the world for that matter, I have only ONE question for every candidate seeking the office of President of the United States……………………
MORE…..
via 2012 Presidential Candidates – One Question Only| The Post & Email.
Abolish the Presidency. It’s a Useless Job. by James Altucher
Here’s my question: What does the President even do? Do we need one?
In fact, one step further: I think the institution of the Presidency has largely ruined my life and the lives of most other people.
My proposal: We don’t need a President of the United States. In fact, he’s useless.
First off, the Constitution doesn’t even address the powers of the Presidency until Article II. The Founders clearly thought the legislative branch was more important, i.e. the actual branch that creates laws, declares wars, etc.
But, in a prior post I’ve already written that there’s no longer a need for a legislative branch the way the Founders conceived it. Times have changed and technology has driven away all of the initial reasons for a republic-based legislative branch so we can have a true democracy commanded by a much more informed electorate:
Just to summarize my prior post: The only original reasons the founding fathers had for an elected legislative branch (a republic instead of a democracy) were:
A) there was no way to transmit information quickly to the voters (now we have the internet so everyone can actually vote and be informed)
B) the founding fathers figured only rich landowners could afford to be congressmen (still mostly true) so that their interests above all would be represented (again, not a true democracy but more a bastardized distortion of one).
So now, we could:
A) save the $4bb in costs that is the budget of congress each year
B) save the trillion or so in costs that are all the “you vote for my bridge and I’ll vote for yours” pork that happens
C) save the 10s of billions in lobbying costs each year (not it would cost 100s of billions to do the same lobbying via advertising instead of just taking a congressman out for dinner)
D) avoid all the fear-mongering and partisanship that was caused by the debt ceiling argument and other similar meaningless arguments
E) actually have mothers vote on whether or not to send their kids to war.
Ok, enough on that. [See also, why I don't vote: "Politics is a Scam"]
So what’s the Presidency for? According to the Constitution:……………………
via Abolish the Presidency. It’s a Useless Job. by James Altucher.
Obama’s ineligibility: Prepare to defend America – Take down Obama and the rogue government
Obama’s ineligibility: Prepare to defend America – Take down Obama and the rogue government |
|
Share |  | (2) Comments | Subscribe | Back to full Article | Contact Us |
|
By Lawrence Sellin Thursday, August 11, 2011 If wanting to uphold the Constitution, restore the rule of lawand save our country from destruction is now considered terrorism or even treason; then count me among the guilty.When a government stops listening to the voice of the people; then count them among the tyrants that patriotic Americans have always stood against.
Deceitful and arrogant political leadership has made the entire federal government culpable of obstruction of justice and dereliction of duty. Ignoring our Constitutional crisis and the endemic corruption of the political establishment will, without a doubt, lead to the end of the United States. There is no doubt that Barack Hussein Obama was illegally elected to the Presidency according to Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the Constitution and the Supreme Court binding precedent of Minor and Happersett. |
The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried…| The Post & Email (via ~ BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984+ ~ (BLOG & EMAIL))
The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried…| The Post & Email (via ~ BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984+ ~ (BLOG & EMAIL)) (via ~ BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984+ ~ (BLOG & EMAIL))
The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried…| The Post & Email (via ~ BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984+ ~ (BLOG & EMAIL))
The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried…| The Post & Email (via ~ BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984+ ~ (BLOG & EMAIL))
The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried…| The Post & Email
They have supported a man who is clearly a usurper, as if he were the President of the United States
This fact is manifest and notorious. There is one thing certain about Obama, and the Joint Chiefs know it: his father was a British subject. Four Supreme Court Cases declare that to be a natural born citizen, both parents must be U.S. Citizens. The Constitution clearly states in Article II, section ii, paragraph 5, that “No person except a natural born Citizen . . shall be eligible to the Office of President” The Joint Chiefs have been duly informed by many letters from military personnel, and from lawyers, such as Dr. Orly Taitz. The Joint Chiefs have the opportunity and aide of the best legal counsel.
The Joint Chiefs therefore have knowingly sided with a usurper to the Presidency, and given him obedience as if he were the President of the United States.
In doing so they have violated their oaths to uphold the U.S. Constitution, and committed treason.
A Usurper of the office of the Presidency is the greatest enemy of the Republic
Emmerich de Vattel, the renowed political philosopher, whose treatise, The Law of Nations, was the guiding legal authority of our Founding Fathers, when crafting the Constitution, described in succint and poignent words, the importance of the Constitution of any Republic, in Book I, chapter 30 of his work:
To attack the constitution of the state and to violate its laws, is a capital crime against society; and if those guilty of it are invested with authority, they add to this crime a perfidious abuse of the power with which they are instrusted. The nation ought constantly repress them with its utmost vigor and vigilance, as the importance of the case requires………..
MORE…………………
via The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried…| The Post & Email.
Let the Vetting Process Begin| The Post & Email
Let the Vetting Process Begin| The Post & Email
Let the Vetting Process Begin| The Post & Email: “* �
Let the Vetting Process Begin
Share 0diggsdigg
WILL AMERICA MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE AGAIN?
by One Pissed-off Vietnam Vet
Whose job is it to enforce Article II of the Constitution which deals with presidential eligibility?
(Jul. 29, 2011) — Just because America was forced to endure the first term of an unvetted candidate who deceived the public, with the able assistance of all fifty secretary of states, doesn’t necessarily follow that we should be forced to endure yet another four years watching our country being dismantled day by day, line by line of the Constitution.
America was once a country of laws, laws that were enforced by government workers (our employees).
Every employee of the United States government, from the President to the PFC at Ft. Hood, must answer, in some way, to civilian authority, we still believe.”…………….
MORE…
Posted by Gunny G at Saturday, July 30, 2011
via BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984(+): Let the Vetting Process Begin| The Post & Email.
Obama’s ineligibility: Prepare to defend America – Congress is inviting rebellion
Barack Obama is, according to the Constitution, an illegal President and has committed multiple felonies both in and out of office
Obama’s ineligibility: Prepare to defend America – Congress is inviting rebellion
| Share27 | |
| (3) Comments | Subscribe | Print friendly | Email Us |
- Lawrence Sellin Saturday, July 16, 2011
I do not know how I can state it any clearer.
The American people are victims of the greatest fraud and the deepest and widest conspiracy in the history of the United States. This fraud and conspiracy stretches throughout our government and the main stream media.
It is now widely known that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that Barack Obama is, according to the Constitution, an illegal President and has committed multiple felonies both in and out of office.
Members of Congress are deliberately hiding the truth from the American people. By doing so, every member of Congress is also committing a felony; know as “Misprision of felony.”
What are the citizens supposed to do when their government is committing crimes and considers itself above the law?
The republic is in grave danger because we now have a government of men, not of laws, and there is no longer any restraint against the commission of more extensive and intrusive criminal acts by those in power.
Our liberties are at risk.
We have elective despotism
We have elections, but we have members of Congress who feel absolutely no accountability to the electorate. We have elective despotism.
Obama is an illegal President according to Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the Constitution and the binding precedent of Minor vs. Happersett (1875).
Col SELLIN: THE BIG CON “MUST BE DEALT WITH BEFORE 2012 ELECTION”
–
**********
Hey, See the Reader Responses on each article,
they are gems in themselves!
**********
**********
Gunny G: BLOGGER 1984 +
http://gunnyg.blogspot.com
and…
http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/
**********
**********
**********
*****
YO, AMERICAN BLOGGERS! THE TIME FOR THE SLUMBERING GIANT TO AWAKEN IS LONG OVERDUE.
1984+PLUS IS UPON US!
AMERICAN BLOGGERS: AWAKEN THE BIG DUMMY -- DO IT NOW! !!!!!
*****
NO AINOs!!!!! "REAL" AMERICANS ONLY!
--Gunny G!
*****
CONTACT INFO:
GUNNYG@GMAIL.COM
*****
'FAIR USE' EXCERPTS
(BACK.LINKED TO SOURCE)
*****
THE "OTHER" GUNNY G BLOG!
(CLICK FLAG)
*****
*****
Stang: The GOP, Red From The Start....
*****
Thomas Dilorenzo...Our Republic Cannot Be Restored Until GOP Destroyed!
*****
COMMIE CHICAGO~ Al Benson
*****
MAD AS HELL AND...
FOOD FOR THOUGHT - Chuck Baldwin Archive
*****
Etc., etc…..
*****
BECAUSE THERE IS
A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND
*****
CLICK BUTTON ABOVE
*****
GREAT SITE!
GREAT ARTICLES!
www.strike-the-root.com/
Click Button Above,Please
*****
MUST READ!
FOR THE THINKING MAN!
Please Click Button Above
*****
THE Gunny G BOOKMARKS/One-Click Posts/Articles--CLICK HERE!!!!! (Diigo)
Gunny G: COUP d’ETAT! ~ BUT WHO’s COUNTING?
THE NEW Gunny "G" SITE!
Gunny "G" @ NETWORK54.com
Gunny G: HISTORY, MILITARY, ETC.
MAD AS HELL - NOT GONNA TAKE IT ANYMORE!
LEST WE FORGET
"A CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT ONCE CHANGED FROM FREEDOM, CAN NEVER BE RESTORED. LIBERTY, ONCE LOST, IS LOST FOREVER."
~JOHN ADAMS
*****"
"I WOULD REMIND YOU THAT EXTREMISM IN THE DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE! AND LET ME REMIND YOU ALSO THAT MODERATION IN THE PURSUIT OF JUSTICE IS NO VIRTUE!"
~ BARRY GOLDWATER
*****
WHY HAS THIS FLAG BEEN A WORLDWIDE SYMBOL OF OPPOSITION TO STATE TYRANNY?(CLICK-HERE!)
*****
Recent Comments