Archive
Who wins if Hillary doesn’t run in 2016? Some Dems crossing fingers that Clinton sits this one out

IS THIS MAN, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD, MENTALLY ILL? (Photo credit: SS&SS)
Who wins if Hillary doesn’t run in 2016? Some Dems crossing fingers that Clinton sits this one out
The Week ^ | May 2, 2013 | Keith Wagstaff
Posted on Sunday, May 05, 2013 3:52:02 AM by 2ndDivisionVet
A new Quinnipiac poll comparing potential Democratic candidates for 2016 comes to a familiar conclusion: Hillary Clinton, if she decides to run, would absolutely dominate the competition.
The poll has 65 percent of potential Democratic voters picking Hillary Clinton as their presidential nominee in 2016. That’s in line with multiple recent polls — including from Gallup, PPP, and PublicMind — showing Clinton as the overwhelming favorite in a Democratic primary.
Is Justice Kennedy finally waking up?
For conservatives who revere the constitutional separation of powers, it’s an understatement to say this Ronald Reagan appointee has been a disappointment.
Considered a “swing vote” on the court, he often swings the wrong way. He’s something of a switch-hitter – sometimes swinging right and sometimes swinging left depending on who’s pitching.
But he made a statement earlier this month that was somewhat encouraging.
Who’ll Rule Us? The Crips or the Bloods?: A transcript of the Lew Rockwell Show episode 289 with Jesse Ventura
Listen to the podcast
ROCKWELL: Well, good morning. This is the Lew Rockwell Show, and what an honor to have as our guest today, Mr. Jesse Ventura. Jesse is, of course, the former Independent governor of Minnesota. He’s a former U.S. Navy SEAL, former professional wrestler.
He’s a movie actor, visiting fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government – where I’m sure he shook them up, as they should have been shaken up – of course, a New York Times best-seller, and the host and the executive producer of the wonderful TruTV series, Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura.
And Jesse’s last book, which I loved – and we’ll link to, of course, all his books and his web sites and so forth – was 63 Documents the Government Doesn’t Want You to Read.
Is Martial Law Coming? Obama’s New America…
Is Martial Law Coming?
March 7, 2013 by Kris Zane 5 Comments
inShare2
When the Obama administration during its “War on Women” propaganda campaign was parading Sandra Fluke—the so-called “contraception girl”—on the red carpet leading to the White House, the Leftist blog Think Progress was leading the charge to take Obama’s Public Enemy Number One Rush Limbaugh off the air because of his Sandra Fluke “whore” comments.
Obama’s attack dog Media Matters then began literally feeding the mainstream media its talking points, all to ensure Obamacare would not be derailed by the “noise” of federal funding of contraception and abortifacients.
Did YOU Think Your TEA Party Membership Was THIS? … “No longer is the TEA party a loosely organized group of concerned citizens, it is the adopted child of Ron Paul who proudly proclaims to be its father.” – BluegrassBulletin.com
When Rick Santelli called for a new TEA party from the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange in February 2009 TEA party groups around the nation began to spring up. Mostly made up of people tired of the big government bailouts and those calling for fiscal restraint, the TEA party became home to many fiscal conservatives.
Congressman Ron Paul at an event hosted in his honor at CPAC 2011 in Washington, D.C. Please attribute to Gage Skidmore if used elsewhere. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Over time (as I have said many times on this blog) the Ron Paul movement began to infiltrate the organizations and take over the TEA party. Not all original members stayed. Some who were looking for a vehicle by which to let Washington hear from angry taxpayers soon saw an effort to convert the TEA party into a libertarian organization. And of course to many conservatives, libertarians were really just “liberals-light”.
Over time the TEA party concept morphed into a Ron Paul support organization.
On the Elimination of Natural Leaders: JFK Jr. – henrymakow.com
January 22, 2013

jfkjr.jpeg
“The one thing the conspirators did not want to happen was for civilians to discover the plane and the evidence of the explosion.”
by L.C. Vincent
(henrymakow.com)
The story of the “elimination” of John F. Kennedy Jr. was laid out in an outstanding publication entitled Media Bypass (before taken over and subverted by the CIA, much as they did to Popular Science) .
According to their research, there was a meeting in Bill Clinton’s Oval Office. In attendance were Bill and Hillary, George H. W. Bush, and the head of the FBI, along with an unnamed agent of the Mossad. The meeting was held to discuss and decide the best way to eliminate John F. Kennedy Jr. All of the participants had their “reasons.”
Sheriffs called out to fight the law (resisting gun confiscation)
Sheriffs called out to fight the law (resisting gun confiscation)
WND ^ | 1/2/2013 | Michael Carl
Posted on Wednesday, January 02, 2013 8:19:46 AM by RoosterRedux
A high-profile former sheriff who once sued the U.S. government over its gun regulations – and won – says it’s the local sheriff who will have to defend Americans when and if the feds start banning and confiscating guns.
Richard Mack, a former sheriff in Graham County, Ariz., joined with then-Ravalli County Sheriff Jay Printz in a lawsuit against Washington when Bill Clinton demanded sheriffs enforce provisions of the Brady Bill gun-control law.
He won. And since then he’s been at the front of a movement that highlights the responsibility of local sheriffs.
Lynn Stuter — Crocodile tears for the cameras… (“That usurper, now occupying the Oval Office, with the calculated catch in his voice and the crocodile tears invisible to the camera, is a hypocrite of the first order! As is Mayor Bloomberg of New York City, and every other…”)
And through hours and hours and hours of coverage, not one talking head put a finger on the true cause, and not one talking head put a face to those truly responsible.
But I’m going to.
What is causing these incidents is systems education implemented in this nation, part and parcel, under Goals 2000, School to Work, the Workforce Investment Act, and peripheral laws at both the state and federal level.
Following Orders: The Death of Vince Foster, Clinton White House Lawyer
…..While it might have initially appeared that the deputy counsel to the president of the United States was taking a nap in a park—lying neatly face-up on a steep embankment with his feet pointing down—Vincent W. Foster Jr. was not napping.
He was dead. Dressed in expensive trousers and a white dress shirt, less than eight miles from the White House, he was lying dead. A single gun-shot wound to the head. Dead. Some of the blood on Foster’s face was still wet, but starting to dry. A trail of blood flowed upwards from his nose to above his ear.
The man who found his body said there was no gun, but after he left to notify police, a gun appeared in Foster’s hand. It was July 20, 1993. President William Jefferson Clinton’s Arkansas childhood friend, and First Lady Hillary Clinton’s Rose Law Firm partner, and White House confidante was dead.
Gunny G: The “R” Party, Secession, Etc.. (Excerpts)
The Real DiLorenzo
A ‘Southern Partisan‘ Interview
EXCERPTS!!!!!
***
What will become of the Republicans?
The way I see it is that the Republican Party is returning to its Lincolnian roots. For the whole nineteenth century, the Republican Party was the party of big government! For the last half of the nineteenth century, the Jeffersonians were all Democrats. That’s why Southerners were all Democrats until about 20 years ago.
That all changed with Woodrow Wilson, when he became a hyper-interventionist. Then FDR, of course, totally destroyed the Democratic Party as the party of limited government.
It’s ironic. Someone runs for president on a particular platform, then does the exact opposite when he gets in office. Lincoln, before the War, said, “I’m going to be hands off with the slavery issue.” Then he was the biggest interventionist ever. FDR ran, actually, on lower taxes —
A balanced budget, yeah.
Petraeus vs. Clinton. Do Sexual Affairs Threaten National Security?
The sudden departure of a compromised CIA director hasn’t been an episode of Showtime’s espionage drama Homeland, but it could be.
English: Official White House photo of President Bill Clinton, President of the United States. Русский: Президент США Билл Клинтон,официальное фото Белого Дома. Ελληνικά: Επίσημη φωτογραφία Λευκού Οίκου του Προέδρου Μπιλ Κλίντον, Προέδρου των ΗΠΑ (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
The story of David Petraeus’s resignation is evolving, and we may know more soon enough. But for now, he is said to have resigned because he committed marital infidelity in a way that could have exposed the U.S. to harm. Greta van Susteren of Fox News says his jobs as a general and CIA director made him “very vulnerable to blackmail from those with very bad intentions against the United States.”
Do the debates unfairly shut out third parties?
The presidential and vice presidential debates are sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates, a nonprofit corporation that mandates that a candidate have at least 15 percent support in national polls to participate.
Since the CPD took over running the debates in 1988, only once has a third party candidate been allowed to participate: In 1992, when Ross Perot joined Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush on the debate stage.
The dominance of the two major parties at the debates has critics charging that the system is effectively rigged to shut out other voices. Gary Johnson, the Libertarian Party nominee for president and former New Mexico governor, has sued on anti-trust grounds to be included this year. The CPD, he said in an interview, is designed “to protect the interests of Republicans and Democrats.”
Prison Planet.com » Another Obama Executive Order Allows Seizure of Americans’ Bank Accounts
Bob Adelmann
New American
Oct 13, 2012
The latest executive order (EO) emanating from the White House October 9 now claims the power to freeze all bank accounts and stop any related financial transactions that a “sanctioned person” may own or try to perform — all in the name of “Iran Sanctions.”
Titled an “Executive Order from the President regarding Authorizing the Implementation of Certain Sanctions…” the order says that if an individual is declared by the president, the secretary of state, or the secretary of the treasury to be a “sanctioned person,” he (or she) will be unable to obtain access to his accounts, will be unable to process any loans (or make them), or move them to any other financial institution inside or outside the United States.
In other words, his financial resources will have successfully been completely frozen. The EO expands its authority by making him unable to use any third party such as “a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, subgroup or other organization” that might wish to help him or allow him to obtain access to his funds.





































Recent Comments