We Don’t Need Obama’s Birth Certificate (Mystery Solved?)
Posted on Sunday, April 07, 2013 10:40:14 AM by Cold Case Posse Supporter
We can drop this debate over his birth certificate because we have something even more valuable. We have his mother’s passport files.
When Obama was young, children traveled as an addition to their parents’ passports.
Passport regulations required a photo of parent and child together, as well as a certified copy of a hospital birth certificate. State-issued IDs came much later.
If Obama was born in the United States, as everybody says, then there should be a photo of little Barack Obama with his mother, as well as a certified copy of his Hawaiian birth certificate in her file.
Surprise. There are no photos of little Barack Obama in the file. And of course, there is no birth certificate from any hospital in Hawaii.
The obvious question is, who took him through US Customs and Immigration and helped him board the plane in Hawaii? And who brought him back?
How many U.S. Presidents do you know, who came up with a calendar “Born in America”, which Orly Taitz wouldn’t like? Really??? | Obama Birthplace Controversy
(Before It’s News)
About a year ago Obama’s deputy campaign manager attacked me personally through a press release after I testified before the NH Ballot Law Commission and she asked people to buy mugs with the picture of Obama’s forged birth certificate, that he posted on line. Even I got one as a present.
Attorney Larry Klayman has warned Robert Bauer, the General Council to the Democrat National Committee, that members of the “Democrat Party or state elections officials certifying Obama’s eligibility for the 2012 election could become the targets of election-fraud charges.” (1)
Exclusive: Joseph Farah spotlights irony of Obama campaign’s response to Romney joke
TAMPA, Fla. –
In rapid response to Mitt Romney’s joke to a crowd in his home state of Michigan, that “No one ever asked me for my birth certificate,” Barack Obama’s campaign put out a 15-second TV spot to declare, “America doesn’t need a birther-in-chief.”
WND ^ | August 27, 2012 |
Posted on Tuesday, August 28, 2012 2:47:31 AM by Perseverando
President’s campaign cashes in on Romney’s quip
Why did resident 0bama’s grandmother say he was born in a village in Kenya?
Because he was?
That explains why such effort has gone into concealing 0bama’s original birth certificate.
In my previously published article “Secrets Revealed,” I concluded that what President Obama is concealing on his genuine long-form birth certificate (not the digital PDF forgery released to the public) is that his mother signed her maiden name.
In my first American Thinker article on the Obama long-form birth-certificate forgery, “Oblivious to the Obvious,” published on April 10, I wrote: We start with the known facts: that 1 the “birth certificate” is fake, and 2 the president has said it’s his birth certificate. It is up to researchers to work backward from the known facts to establish why the president was unable or unwilling to release a genuine one.
(“The presidential candidate was born in the United States, and his father was not”) Romney’s birth certificate evokes his father’s controversy(released today! evokes O’s BC)
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Finally, there is definitive proof: The presidential candidate was born in the United States, and his father was not.
Birtherism — the belief that Barack Obama was born in Kenya, not in the United States — pretty much died last year when the White House released a copy of the president’s long-form birth certificate showing he was born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961. After that, the number of Americans who doubted Obama’s place of birth dropped dramatically.
But not to zero.
Secretary of State Ken Bennett said Tuesday evening that he has received an e-mail from officials in Hawaii, which he believes contains the information he sought to verify President Barack Obama’s birth certificate.
“By requesting the verification I can now report to thousands of constituents that we did what can be done and he is qualified to be on the ballot,” Bennett said.
Received via email…
Read this article now because it will never appear in your evening fishwrapper which you charitably refer to as a “newspaper.”
http://m.examiner.com/article/obama-officially-ineligible Sent from my iPhone *****
A crushing situation is emerging for, not only Barack Obama, but also for the American people as a landmark statement has been made by the Obama administration that is going to turn the entire 2012 Presidential race and potentially much more on its head.
This appears to be the consensus arrived at by many of our country’s on line bloggers. “Obama’s failure to come up with a real, long form Birth Certificate in a timely manner and his expenditure of a vast amount of money in legal fees in my opinion is a 100% indication something is rotten in Denmark. I don’t know what that something is, but something is fishy,” states one commenter.
Another asks, “Why would Obama spend so much money when all he has to do is show his BC? . .think about it. . .he can’t show it because if he does, it’ll admit it’s fake” says another blogger.
Tom Ballantyne Jr., author of “Oh Really, O’Reilly?“, went to a meeting of the Red Mountain Tea Party in Arizona on Tuesday, April 3, 2012. Although cameras were not allowed into the meeting, Tom was able to sneak in a recording device.
In the video Ballantyne asks Arizona Republican Congressman (and Senate hopeful) Jeff Flake about his views on ForgeryGate, the controversy revolving around Barack Obama’s forged birth certificate and selective service card that the mainstream media on both sides seeks to hide.
The results aren’t pretty…
Barack Obama Foreign Student – American Media Threatened into Silence
Pravda ^ | March 29, 2012 | Dianna C. Cotter
Posted on Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:09:32 PM by Smokeyblue
On March 7th, 2012, Pravda called out the U.S. press for its deliberate neglect of the largest scandal in modern American history. Maricopa County, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio released credible forensic evidence that Barack Obama, presumed President of the United States, presented to the world a forged Birth Certificate on April 27th, 2011.
Since then, the scandal has only expanded. Former United States Postal Service worker Allen Hulton has recently come forward with compelling testimony given under Oath, which leads to only one conclusion: Barack Obama attended College in the United States as a Foreign Student.
In the summer of 2008 the presidential primary season was winding down, and America could not help but note the fervor a significant number of media personalities expressed while supporting the candidacy Barack Obama. Indeed, it was collectively decided within the liberal media, that Obama’s associations with racist pastors and violent domestic terrorists was to be suppressed.
We need to slam these conservative talk shows this week with this information.
If the pressure is not on them.. They will not let other know.
TAKE A STAND PEOPLE! It is our time
Spread this video!
Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County today defended the work of his volunteer Cold Case Posse from charges by reporters at a news conference that he was accusing Barack Obama of forgery and that his investigation overlooked the “work” of the 50 states where Obama already was investigated.
“I’m not accusing him of lying or a crime,” Arpaio said, “We have documented evidence of violations of the law. We’re investigating those crimes.”
The news conference presented the preliminary findings of the Cold Case Posse’s work into Obama’s eligibility to be president. The team believes there is probable cause that the document released by the White House last year as Obama’s birth certificate is a computer-generated forgery.
Arpaio confirmed the investigation will continue, but he could not say exactly where it will lead. He suggested a congressional investigation would be appropriate.
NOTE: In case you missed the news conference of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s “Cold Case Posse,” WND plans to have the entire event available within 24 hours of the news conference at this online location.
The investigative team has asked Arpaio to elevate the investigation to a criminal probe that will make available the resources of his Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office.
Gingrich meets eligibility attorney ~ Encourages Orly Taitz to hound Obama for actual birth certificate…
In a Southern California campaign appearance, presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich encouraged California attorney Orly Taitz to continue her campaign to question Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to hold office.
Taitz, who has filed several lawsuits aimed at securing Obama’s certified birth certificate and introducing evidence of his ineligibility for office, rose to her feet to address Gingrich in Pasadena. She suggested his lagging campaign could only be lifted by raising the issue publicly.
OPINION –Opponents of Barack Obama have long questioned the legitimacy of his citizenship. They claim that Obama’s birth may have taken place outside of the United States. If Obama were born in Kenya, as some claim, he would be in violation of the Constitution’s requirement in Article 2 Section I that a candidate for president must be “natural born citizen” of the U.S.
To this end, the so-called “birther” movement has spent much of the last four years demanding that Obama provide his original birth certificate as definitive proof that he was actually born in the U.S. After inexcusable foot-dragging, the Obama administration last April released a copy of the president’s certificate of live birth from the state of Hawaii.
Not surprisingly, birthers are dismissing the Hawaiian birth certificate as a fraud and have redoubled their demands for clear proof of the president’s eligibility to hold office.
Now a judge in the state of Georgia has given the controversy a new twist by agreeing to hear a case challenging Obama’s ability to appear on the ballot in several states unless he proves his eligibility. Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had earlier labeled the hearing as “baseless, costly and unproductive.” During the packed hearing in a Georgia courtroom on Jan. 27, 2012, the defense table was conspicuously empty as neither the president nor his attorneys were present.
The case is noteworthy for a couple of reasons:
First, the birth citizenship question is not as remarkable as the allegation that the president initially exerted considerable pressure on the Georgia Secretary of State to drop the matter, then openly ignored the subpoena summoning him or his legal counsel to the Georgia courtroom. The question this raises is whether the president is still subject to the laws of the land or whether he can simply ignore the legal process at his whim.
Secondly, the mass media has shown a clear reluctance to lend any degree of legitimacy to the issue, by refusing to cover it at all. This may be one of the strongest indicators yet of how the press increasingly exists to sell the agenda of the political class rather than informing the public. The questions around Obama’s birth citizenship could be examined thoroughly and objectively without creating a bully pulpit for the president’s detractors. But the silent treatment on the part of the press serves to raise more questions than it puts to rest.
There is far more important question that deserves serious consideration; what if both the president and the birthers are wrong?
(“Court says he fears that even if the U.S. Supreme Court declared Obama unqualified, he’d simply ignore the ruling and continue issuing orders.”) accused of disrespecting court, state, Americans
One of the attorneys who fought a court case over Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court says he fears that even if the U.S. Supreme Court declared Obama unqualified, he’d simply ignore the ruling and continue issuing orders.
But those who observed a court hearing today in Atlanta say it could be the beginning of the end for the Obama campaign, because of the doubt that could surge like a tidal wave across the nation.
The comments came today from Leo Donofrio, who led the pack in filing lawsuits over Obama’s 2008 election and his subsequent occupancy of the White House.
Barack Obama has announced through his attorney that he will boycott the administrative hearings scheduled tomorrow in Georgia to review evidence of whether he legitimately is a candidate for the presidency, prompting an attorney for one set of the plaintiffs to describe the nation’s commander-in-chief as acting like a “5-year-old brat.”
A letter apparently from his lawyer, Michael Jablonski, was posted today on the website for California attorney Orly Taitz, whose determined pursuit of Obama’s eligibility documentation has taken her to courts across the nation, including the U.S. Supreme Court.
He said, “At issue in these hearings are challenges that allege that President Obama is not eligible to hold or run for re-election to his office, on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements.”
Jablonski said the judge – who previously rejected Obama’s demand to quash a subpoena for him to appear and bring with him his birth records documenting his status as a “natural-born citizen” – has “exercised no control” over the proceeding.
An influential Minuteman PAC is weighing in on the argument over Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, with a call for concerned citizens across the country to flood their state secretaries of state offices with requests that Obama be removed from the 2012 ballot.
There have been dozens of leaders, politicians and personalities who have expressed concern that Obama likely does not meet the constitutional requirement of being a “natural born citizen” to be president.
The Founders likely understood that to mean the offspring of two citizen parents and an 1875 Supreme Court decision suggested the same. But Obama, by his own admission, could not qualify under those circumstances because his father never was an American.
In a new statement released by the Minuteman Pac, officials there said, “Obama needs every vote he can get in 2012 – if we can get just one state to remove his name from its ballot, he does not stand a chance.
“To do this, though, we need tens of thousands of messages overwhelming the offices of every single secretary of state, since they are the ones who are ultimately responsible for determining who qualifies to be on the ballot – and, of course, who doesn’t,” the organization’s statement said.
Jerome Corsi and Mara Zebest Debate John Woodman About Obama’s Forged Birth Certificate
BirtherReport.com ^ | January 22, 2012 | Jerome Corsi John Woodman
Posted on Monday, January 23, 2012 2:18:00 AM by Seizethecarp
JUDGE ORDERS OBAMA to APPEAR to Testify
Atlanta Admin Court ^ | 1/20/2012 | Judge Malihi
Posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 1:57:39 PM by GregNH
Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.
JUDGE SUBPOENAS OBAMA AND MULTIPLE DOCUMENTS
politicalvelcraft ^ | 14 Jan 2012 | Volubrjotr
Posted on Monday, January 16, 2012 9:46:53 AM by WellyP
by Martha Trowbridge, ©2012, blogging at Martha Trowbridge Terrible TruthCopyright © 2012 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved.This work is protected by United States Copyright Law.
PLEASE REFER TO THE REPRINT/QUOTATION POLICY LINK HEREJan. 13, 2012 — America, there seems to be no end – and no limit – to what is done to protect and defend the synthetic identity “Barack Obama”.It’s living, breathing, evil.Once you’ve read this post, I sense you’ll agree.
The impetus for this recent evil act: Truth has been making inroads. It’s now in hot pursuit of lies.And the liars know it.The night before last, in a rare moment of leisure, Dean Haskins’ story about the missing birth record of baby girl Virginia Sunahara caught my eye.
Some may have seen the clip, run by at least one network – CBS – showing John McCain campaigning for his “good buddy” Mitt Romney in New Hampshire on Wednesday, January 4 – the day following the Iowa caucuses.
How ironic, considering.Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, United States Constitution, requires that candidates for the office of president be natural born defined by Vattel’s Law of Nations as being born on the soil of the country of parents who are citizens of that country. In terms of the United States, that would mean the candidate would have to be born on American soil of parents who were both Americans.
“IT’S JUST OUR CONSTITUTION”
by Dr. Laurie Roth, Presidential Candidate
Why do the current presidential candidates not address the “natural born Citizen” question?
(Dec. 15, 2011) — ‘It is as if a ‘plague of fear, intimidation and cowardice,’ has swept over the hearts and mouths of our Political leaders and most media. As a Mom, I know kids love to play games but those currently running for President are the biggest gamers ever! Our current political crop and most media are stuck on ‘hide and go seek.’ Desperate for votes and power, they run for cover at the mere notion they might be called a racist or have that other dreaded disease, ‘birtherythmia.’
Donkeys are running around whinnying while Elephants are stampeding, and all the while an ineligible President sits in our White House and we aren’t supposed to notice. ‘Politically expedient,’ ‘bigger fish to fry,’ birthers are annoying,’ ‘Obama showed his birth certificate, that is good enough for me.’
Despite his continued assertions that Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery, billionaire Donald Trump has refused to contribute financially to Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio‘s law-enforcement investigation into Obama’s eligibility to be president.
Michael Cohen, executive vice president and special counsel to Trump, told WND it was “highly unlikely” Trump would be making a financial contribution to the Cold Case Posse conducting the investigation under Arpaio’s direction.
Brian Reilly, the member of the Tea Party of Surprise, Ariz., who initiated the request for an Obama investigation, shared with WND six emails he sent to Trump asking for a financial contribution.
Freshly updated! Find out what Obama’s story truly is, in “Where’s the REAL Birth Certificate?” by Jerome Corsi.
NFL fans wonder where REAL birth certificate is Nationally televised football game features surprise for Obama ~ “NFL fans wonder where REAL birth certificate is… “
Tonight’s NFL matchup between the Dallas Cowboys and New York Giants had more than just football on the schedule.
It included a special message for the man who calls himself president of the United States.
A special message for President Obama flying over Cowboys Stadium in Arlington, Texas, Dec. 11, 2011
A banner asking “Where’s the real birth certificate?” took to the skies above Cowboys Stadium in Arlington, Texas, to let everyone within eyeshot know there are serious questions about the authenticity of Barack Obama’s purported record of birth.
The banner was originally set to fly above the same stadium during the Cowboys’ annual Thanksgiving Day game, but had to be postponed due to inclement weather.
“This flyover is another manifestation of our national billboard campaign that began three years ago, asking simply, ‘Where’s the birth certificate?’” explained Joseph Farah, founder of WND. “The question today is, ‘Where’s the REAL birth certificate?’ since Jerome Corsi’s new e-book on the subject completely discredits its validity. We have used billboards because the rest of the media refuses to address seriously the problems of Obama’s eligibility. And we will continue to use other creative efforts to address one of the most serious constitutional questions facing our country, namely, ‘Is Obama actually eligible for office?’”
The Post and Email ^ | December 9, 2011 | Sharon Rondeau
Posted on Sunday, December 11, 2011 12:50:48 AM by Seizethecarp
On December 5, 2011, Presidential Candidate John Dummett of California recently traveled 789 miles to Maricopa County, AZ and back to meet with Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who has been conducting an investigation into questions surrounding the presidential eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama.
“Arpaio was intrigued by Van Irion’s and my approach of going after the DNC and not attacking Barack Obama or asking any court to decide Obama’s eligibility. He told us things that I still have to hold in confidentiality. I can say, because it has already been released to the press and I can verify it, that he will produce a report in February, and it will be devastating. I can’t say what it is, but I know what it is.”
When we asked Dummett if the “devastating” part of Arpaio’s future report was communicated in written or verbal form, he was not at liberty to answer.
Maverick Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio says his “Cold Case Posse” investigating Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility will release a preliminary report in February of its findings, which he expects to be “controversial.”
“This is a serious law enforcement investigation, and our findings are going to be controversial but based in facts,” the Maricopa County sheriff told WND. Arpaio said a comprehensive report will be issued shortly after the February preliminary report.
“The investigators on the Cold Case Posse are doing a great job,” Arpaio told WND. “They are all law enforcement professionals, and they are all volunteers putting in a lot of hours at no taxpayer expense.”
Arpaio confirmed that the Obama investigation has broadened beyond an examination of whether or not the birth certificate made public by the White House on April 27 is an authentic document. The probe, he said, is examining Obama’s history in regard to his eligibility to be president under Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.
The birthers press on
Renew America ^ | November 23, 2011 | Peter Lemiska
Posted on Thursday, November 24, 2011 8:19:52 PM by STE=Q
In a belated response to the birther movement, earlier this year the White House released Barack Obama’s “long form” birth certificate. Everyone believed it would finally silence the birthers; and it did — for a while. But since then, various independent researchers, as well as experts in graphics, computer software, and scanning equipment, have examined the document and now allege that it shows signs of tampering.
…..I hope my letter/complaint exhibits Barack Obama by his own release of his long form B.C. showed all of us, he was not eligible by the standards of a Natural Born Citizen showing his father is not a Citizen of the United States but is listed as an “African Citizen” at the time of Obama’s birth.
Four New Hampshire Legislators Call Obama’s Documents “Forged”
HEARING SCHEDULED TO BEGIN AT PRESS-TIME
by Sharon Rondeau
I am going to toss out a theory here; a theory that explains why even though Obama was born here in Hawaii why there has been obfuscation over the birth certificate. The theory involves a minor scandal Obama needed hidden, yet was too trivial to be of use to either Hillary Clinton or John McCain during the 2008 campaign.
TEA PARTY FIGHTS BACK: #OCCUPYORLANDO FORCIBLY REMOVED FROM SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO EVENT
BREITBART ^ | Nov 13,2011 | swampsniper
Posted on Sunday, November 13, 2011 10:35:52 AM by SWAMPSNIPER
Former liberal activist/turned tea party conservative Brandon Darby and Sheriff Joe Arpaio were featured speakers at the Choose Liberty 2012 event sponsored by the Eastern Orlando Tea Party. As Sheriff Arpaio took the podium, Darby called security over to point out Occupy Orlando activists were in the audience of the private event preparing to cause a disruption. When the activists tried to interfere with Arpaio’s right to speak and the tea party’s right to peaceably assemble, Darby and Chad Biddinger of Libertylink.com escorted the trespassers out in an emphatic way. Video at link.
(Nov. 3, 2011) — The Supreme Court is the only court of competent jurisdiction over the State of Hawaii to which Sheriff Joe has access.
On November 2, 2011, ThePaidTroll wrote to Mrs. Sharon Rondeau at The Post & Email:
According to [Tuesday's] WND, Sheriff Arpaio”s Posse has determined that in order to come to any conclusion, they must first obtain Obama’s original Birth Certificate or a Certified copy from the State of Hawaii.
Since Hawaii will not release the Birth Certificates of any of its citizens without the permission of the birth subject and since neither Sheriff Arpaio nor his posse have [any] authority whatsoever to force Hawaii to release Obama’s Birth Certificate, what WND is saying is that Sheriff Arpaio’s investigation is dead in the water.
Sheriff Joe Arpaio came up with the idea to demand the original microfilm of Obama’s birth certificate after he saw evidence from his Cold Case Posse in Maricopa County, Ariz., that the White House apparently released to the public three different versions of the long-form birth certificate.
“Show me the microfilm, not the copies the White House released,” Arpaio has insisted.
Arizona‘s maverick Sheriff Joe Arpaio promised surprises in his jurisdiction’s investigation of Barack Obama’s eligibility for the presidential ballot and his Cold Case Posse is delivering – raising questions that touch on the authenticity of the long-form birth certificate issued last April and the possibility Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security Number.
Sources close to the investigation say the posse has decided it needs to see original birth records before it can conclude whether Obama should be eligible for the presidential ballot in 2012, not an electronic file or scanned copies.
The sources say the panel needs to examine the microfilm documenting Obama’s birth, as well as the ink-and-paper original 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health is holding in its vault.
The PDF file and various scanned copies of the birth certificate that the White House released April 27 are simply not good enough, the posse has determined.
“The posse wants to see the entire microfilm roll containing Obama’s birth certificate, not just a microfilm copy of Obama’s long-form birth certificate in isolation,” Corsi explained. “An individual microfilm copy could be forged, but forging the entire microfilm reel on which Obama’s birth certificate is in sequence would be almost impossible.”
A New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama’s occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court has published a report revealing that references to a U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the definition of “natural-born citizen” were scrubbed at one of the key online resources for legal documents.
The Minor v. Happersett case is significant because it is one of very few references in the nation’s archives that addresses the definition of “natural-born citizen,” a requirement imposed by the U.S. Constitution on only the U.S. president.
That case states:
The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”
Jerome Corsi’s New York Times best-seller, “Where’s the Birth Certificate?”, which addresses Obama’s Social Security Number and a host of other disputes, is now available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore
In the dispute over Obama’s eligibility, dating back to before his election, it has been argued that the Minor case does not apply. Some have argued that it applies only to voting rights.
But now Leo C. Donofrio, whose original Donofio v. Wells against the New Jersey Secretary of State alleged Obama does not meet the Constitution’s Article 2, Section 1 “natural-born citizen” demand for presidents because of his dual citizenship at birth, has released research suggesting that even as Obama was preparing to be the Democratic candidate for president in 2008, someone was scrubbing court records of that case.
“New evidence conclusively establishes that 25 U.S. Supreme Court opinions were sabotaged then republished at Justia.com during the runup to the ’08 election,” he reported
(Story continues below)
Inside Africa: Near pristine image of Barack Obama’s 1961 baby footprint has surfaced in 2011| The Post & Email
by Lucas Daniel Smith, ©2011, blogging at WasObamaBorninKenya
Thirty-two months have passed since I exited Africa with a certified (2009) copy of Barack Obama’s 1961 Coast Province General Hospital (CPGH), Mombasa, British Protectorate of Kenya, Certificate of Birth. Said certificate of birth contains an image of a baby footprint. Said footprint is located in the lower left corner of the certificate. A close-up of the footprint is pictured below:
Team Obama sells Birth Certificate mugs
Washington Examiner ^ | October 18, 2011 | Charlie Spiering
Posted on Tuesday, October 18, 2011 11:24:09 PM by neverdem
President Obama is still bugging birthers by rubbing copies of his birth certificate into their faces. Now the campaign is selling “Made in the USA” coffee mugs for Obama supporters. The mugs cost $20.
“There’s really no way to make the birth certificate conspiracy completely go away, so we might as well laugh at it — and make sure as many people as possible are in on the joke.” reads the description on the Obama 2012 website. “Get your Made In The USA mug today.”
This is the second in a two-part series of articles examining how researcher Ron Polland duplicated the Obama long-form birth certificate released by the White House April 27 to support his belief that the document is a forgery. The first article detailed the methodology Polland used to deconstruct the White House document for the purpose of constructing his forged version. This article examines Polland’s deductions about the alleged forger or forgers.
Researcher Ron Polland, who produced a duplicate of Barack Obama’s long-form birth certificate to bolster his argument, believes that the White House-released document was made by a professional forger who created a red herring, intentionally leaving anomalies that could be interpreted as signs of forgery but readily explained.
“The forger was not an amateur and releasing a PDF that looked like an obvious forgery was not an accident,” he said.
Polland, who believes there could have been more than one forger, has concluded that the primary forger had a specific appearance in mind for the document. Rather than hide the fact that the PDF was forged, the forger wanted it to be “discovered” initially by critics to be a forgery, he said.
“The forger wanted to create specific anomalies in the PDF that would be interpreted as evidence of forgery, [while] under certain circumstances these anomalies are actually predictable natural outcomes of the software being used,” he explained.
The intent, Polland explained, was to enable critics to point to the anomalies as evidence of forgery, so Obama supporters could refute the objections by explaining that the anomalies could be produced, for instance, by running various optimizing, sharpening and adaptive compression procedures resident in Adobe software.
To produce those anomalies, the alleged forger did not “flatten” the PDF file, a process that melds the layers and makes it appear to be a single-layer document.
Polland’s expertise includes computer graphics and the use of computer peripherals, such as printers and scanners to input digital images. He earned a Ph.D. in Instructional Systems from Florida State University in 1978 and a masters degree in Educational Research & Psychology from Florida State in 1972.
(Story continues below)
But Frank Fahrenkopf of the Commission on President Debates, during an interview on the Fox News Channel, did not mention the numerous questions surrounding then-Sen. Barack Obama‘s qualifications for the same office
And today, a spokeswoman for the organization flatly refused to comment to WND on the dispute over Obama’s eligibility.
The focus of the interview was the debates that soon are to be announced for the 2012 presidential campaign, presumably between Obama on the Democratic ticket and a still-to-be-picked candidate on the GOP side.
Fahrenkopf explained the private organization’s requirements for candidates to be included in the debates, stating that a candidate must be born in the United States.
(Story continues below)
By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WND
A New York Democrat has introduced a bill to Congress that would allow Barack Obama to keep secret his presidential documents after he leaves office, and one commentary already is speculating that the party is so worried about his 2012 election that preparations are being made for his status as a former president.
According to Judicial Watch, the Washington-based government corruption fighting organization, the proposal by Rep. Edolphus Towns of New York’s 10th District is “an obvious effort to protect President Barack Obama.”
“Ironically, Obama revoked a similar George W. Bush order in one of his first official acts as president. In 2001, Bush penned an executive order severely limiting public access to his presidential records. Shortly after swearing in, Obama killed it as part of his much-ballyhooed commitment to government transparency. At the time, the new president claimed that he was giving the American people greater access to ‘historic documents,’” Judicial Watch said.
“If the Democrats’ proposed measure (Presidential Records Act Amendments) becomes law, former presidents will be allowed to assert a new ‘constitutionally based privilege’ against disclosing records of their liking. Here is how it would work; the archivist of the United States would be required to notify the former president, as well as the incumbent, of intentions to make records public. Anything that either the former or current president claims should be kept private won’t be released,” the organization explained.
(Story continues below)
Print Print this page.