Will American Soldiers Fire on U.S. Citizens?… “…But three percent was enough.But the big question is this: Are there still three percent of the American population with the courage and resolve to fight against an out-of-control, tyrannical government? My short answer is: I think so.”

Will American Soldiers Fire on U.S. Citizens?

clashdaily.com Blog ^ | 2 May 2013 | By Skip CoryellPosted on Monday, May 06, 2013 4:57:18 PM

by True Grit

English: Barack Obama delivers a speech at the University of Southern California (Video of the speech) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I was doing a radio interview this morning and the host asked me why the Department of Homeland Security needed 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition. The easy answer for me was, “They don’t.” Of course the follow-up question for him was,

“Then why are they buying it?”And that’s the billion-dollar question isn’t it. What is the federal government going to do with all that ammo? Why do they need it? Why are they buying it? It’s unprecedented. Are we on the cusp of physical domination by the United States Federal Government? And, if so, how will the American people react?

The talk show host also asked me, “If the people were to rebel, how could they ever possibly hope to prevail against a government so big, so huge, so powerful and so ruthless?”He had a good point.I mean, let’s face it: they have Predator drones, spy satellites, and sophisticated online surveillance and communication systems.

Glenn Beck Shoots Down Rand Paul: If Police Get Drones, ‘The 2nd Amendment Is Absolutely Dead’

Glenn Beck Shoots Down Rand Paul

• Rand Paul – Caricature (Photo credit: DonkeyHotey)

 If Police Get Drones, ‘The 2nd Amendment Is Absolutely Dead’

Mediaite ^ | April 27, 2013 | Matt WilsteinPosted on Sunday, April 28, 2013 2:09:54 PM by 2ndDivisionVet

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Senator Rand Paul‘s media tour following his “misunderestimated” statements on drones brought him to Glenn Beck‘s radio show Friday, where the two men discussed the prospects of a terrifying future where police cars have “robotic firing arms” that take down criminals with the push of a button.

obamadash (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

(GyG: As Always, See Reader Responses…) ~ Listen Up: Here Is Proof That Native-Born Citizens And Natural-Born Citizens Are Separate

Listen Up: Here Is Proof That Native-Born Citizens And Natural-Born Citizens Are Separate

 

http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45077/0-0-0-48575.html ^

 

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

Posted on Tuesday, April 02, 2013 12:04:27 PM by Cold Case Posse Supporter

 

rprprprp (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

The Immigration and Naturalization Service:

 

“Interpretation 324.2 Reacquisition of citizenship lost by marriage.”

 

Interpretation 324.2(a)(7):

 

“(7) Restoration of citizenship is prospective . Restoration to citizenship under any one of the three statutes is not regarded as having erased the period of alienage that immediately preceded it.

 

 

 

 

 

The words “shall be deemed to be a citizen of the United States to the same extent as though her marriage to said alien had taken place on or after September 22, 1922″, as they appeared in the 1936 and 1940 statutes, are prospective and restore the status of native-born or natural-born citizen as of the date citizenship was reacquired.”

 

Did the Department of Justice Say that the Government Would NOT Assassinate Americans????? | Washington’s Blog

mussobama (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

EXCERPT…..

What Holder is saying, in substantive terms, is that the President does have the supposed authority to use a drone to kill an American who is engaged in “combat,” whether here or abroad.

“Combat” can consist of expressing support for Muslims mounting armed resistance against U.S. military aggression, which was the supposed crime committed by Anwar al-Awlaki, or sharing the surname and DNA of a known enemy of the state, which was the offense committed by Awlaki’s 16-year-old son, Abdel.

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Under the rules of engagement used by the Obama Regime in Pakistan, Yemen, and Afghanistan, any “military-age” male found within a targeted “kill zone” is likewise designated a “combatant,” albeit usually after the fact [update: children too]. This is a murderous application of the “Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy,” and it will be used when — not if — Obama or a successor starts conducting domestic drone-killing operations.

Holder: No drone strikes on American citizens ‘not engaged in combat’

Holder: No drone strikes on American citizens ‘not engaged in combat’Yahoo News ^ | 7 Mar 2013 | Chris MoodyPosted on Thursday, March 07, 2013 7:28:02 PM by mandaladon

 

English: Eric H. Holder Jr. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

 

 

Attorney General Eric Holder has responded to Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul‘s question about whether the federal government can legally use a drone strike against an American citizen on U.S. soil if the person is “not engaged in combat”:

 

 

 

 

Earlier this week, Holder wrote in a letter to Paul that the president has the authority to order militarized drone strikes on American citizens within the United States, but only in “an extraordinary circumstance.”In protest,…………

 

» It’s now clear: Obama intends to use drone strikes to kill American journalists and political enemies Alex Jones’ Infowars: There’s a war on for your mind!

President Obama plans to use military drones in the skies over the United States to assassinate journalists, patriots and critics of his administration. That’s the inescapable conclusion from the emerging pattern of evidence now publicly available — keep reading for details.

English: This is a picture I took. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Front and center in this pattern of evidence is the 16-page memo that was just released by Obama’s lawyers in the Department of Justice. This memo puts forth a “legal justification” for the President to order the drone assassination of any American citizen he names — anytime, anywhere, for any reason. This new power claimed by the President has no basis in federal law or the Constitution. It is an invented power of absolute tyranny that puts the power to decide who lives and who dies in the hands of one man. This document essentially legalizes the President acting as a serial murderer.

Judge, Jury, EXECUTIONER

Judge, Jury, EXECUTIONER

 

The Final Conflict ^ | 3/6/2013 | Thurifer the Censer

 

Posted on Wednesday, March 06, 2013 2:41:22 PM by Thurifer the Censer

 

English: Eric H. Holder Jr. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

 

 

With the stroke of a pen Attorney General Eric Holder has not only undone 200 years of Constitutional protections but almost 800 years of English Common Law. In response to Rand Paul‘s letter asking whether “the President has the power to authorize lethal force, such as a drone strike, against a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil, and without trial,”

 

What’s Obama’s real objective? … “And now, as if to underscore my theory, he’s coming after your guns and moving quickly to extend a “a pathway to citizenship” for perhaps tens of millions of foreigners who jumped ahead of the line of millions of other would-be immigrants who followed the laws of the land in their efforts to come to the greatest country the world has ever known. Obama isn’t stupid. Obama is at war with America. ..”

I write this column with a certain amount of trepidation, knowing the subject not only believes he has the power to order targeted assassinations of American citizens, but has actually already misused that perceived authority.

 

English: Barack Obama delivers a speech at the University of Southern California (Video of the speech) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

So here goes.

 

I have come to the conclusion that nearly everything Barack Obama does under the color of his authority as president is designed to weaken our country economically, militarily and morally.

 

I don’t think I could ever make that statement about any of his predecessors – and there have been some real bad ones.

 

Let’s begin with his economic policies. It’s not that those policies have not worked as intended. The problem is that they have worked exactly as intended. As he told us while campaigning in 2008, it’s about redistributing the wealth. That’s what he thinks his job is. That’s what he believes he was elected to do. That’s what he thinks he has the power to do, and he fully intends to use it as he has through his first term.

 

» Nobel Peace Prize Nominee: Obama Asks Military Leaders If They Will “Fire On US Citizens” Alex Jones’ Infowars: There’s a war on for your mind!

Shock claim purported to come from “one of America’s foremost military heroes”

Paul Joseph Watson

Infowars.com

January 22, 2013

mussobama (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

2009 Nobel Peace Prize nominee Jim Garrow shockingly claims he was told by a top military veteran that the Obama administration’s “litmus test” for new military leaders is whether or not they will obey an order to fire on U.S. citizens.

Garrow was nominated three years ago for the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize and is the founder of The Pink Pagoda Girls, an organization dedicated to rescuing baby girls from “gendercide” in China. Garrow has been personally involved in “helping rescue more than 36,000 Chinese baby girls from death.” He is a public figure, not an anonymous voice on the Internet, which makes his claim all the more disturbing.

“I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. “The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not”. Those who will not are being removed,” Garrow wrote on his Facebook page, later following up the post by adding the man who told him is, “one of America’s foremost military heroes,” whose goal in divulging the information was to “sound the alarm.”

The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried. | Save America Foundation « AMERICAN BLOGGER: GUNNY.G ~ WEBLOG & EMAIL

…..Let’s examine whether the Joint Chiefs have committed a court-marshall offense worthy of death.They have supported a man who is clearly a usurper, as if he were the President of the United StatesThis fact is manifest and notorious.

 

English: General Martin E. Dempsey, USA, 18thC…

 

RPREVOLU (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

English: General Martin E. Dempsey, USA, 18thChairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

There is one thing certain about Obama, and the Joint Chiefs know it: his father was a British subject. Four Supreme Court Cases declare that to be a natural born citizen, both parents must be U.S. Citizens. The Constitution clearly states in Article II, section ii, paragraph 5, that “No person except a natural born Citizen . . shall be eligible to the Office of President” The Joint Chiefs have been duly informed by many letters from military personnel, and from lawyers, such as Dr. Orly Taitz.

 

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

The Joint Chiefs have the opportunity and aide of the best legal counsel.The Joint Chiefs therefore have knowingly sided with a usurper to the Presidency, and given him obedience as if he were the President………

 

U.S. Terrorism Agency to Tap a Vast Database of Citizens (Big Brother lives)

Top U.S. intelligence officials gathered in the White House Situation Room in March to debate a controversial proposal. Counterterrorism officials wanted to create a government dragnet, sweeping up millions of records about U.S. citizens—even people suspected of no crime.

 

obamadash (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

~ snip ~

 

The rules now allow the little-known National Counterterrorism Center to examine the government files of U.S. citizens for possible criminal behavior, even if there is no reason to suspect them.

 

rprprprp (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

That is a departure from past practice, which barred the agency from storing information about ordinary Americans unless a person was a terror suspect or related to an investigation.

 

Gunny G: Via Email: New gun legislation needed…

New gun legislation needed Second Amendment Committee liberty89@libertygunrights.com
to undisclosed recipients

New law which should be proposed.  Do you agree?  Please reply.

“Any state or federal senator, or other governmental representative, who votes in favor of any treaty or other legislation which prohibits essential firearms from the possession and ownership of law-abiding American citizens, should be held as a violator of his oath of office, and be immediately and automatically discharged of his rank and duty, and his related vote is to be disallowed.”

http://libertygunrights.com/documents.html

Sen. Rand Paul Renews Fight Over Indefinite Detention of US Citizens

Sen. Rand Paul Renews Fight Over Indefinite Detention of US Citizens

The Hill ^ | Nov. 25, 2012 | Jeremy Herb

Posted on Sunday, November 25, 2012 9:22:47 AM by VitacoreVision

Sen. Rand Paul renews fight over indefinite detention of US citizens

The Hill

Nov. 25, 2012

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is bringing a new — and more aggressive — approach to a longstanding debate over the Defense authorization bill, threatening to filibuster the bill to get a vote on his amendment limiting indefinite detention.

W.H. Petition Calls for Stripping Citizenship and Exile for Anyone Who Signs Petition to Secede

A White House petition gathering force calls for citizenship to be stripped and exile for anyone who signs a petition in favor of a state’s secession.

“Mr. President, please sign an executive order such that each American citizen who signed a petition from any state to secede from the USA shall have their citizenship stripped and be peacefully deported,” the full petition reads.

The title of the petition is, “WE PETITION THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO: Strip the Citizenship from Everyone who Signed a Petition to Secede and Exile Them.”

As of this writing, 2,205 have signed the petition; 22,795 more signatures are needed for the issue to be addressed by the White House.

obamadash (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

‘Renounce Citizenship’ Is Now One of the Fastest-Growing Search Terms in Google by Simon Black

Is it any wonder? Millions of people are disconcerted, dismayed, or outright disgusted at President Obama’s victory, and they sense a continued decline of civil libertiesand economic opportunities.

 

obamadash (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

The frustration and apprehension is understandable. I can’t begin to tell you how many emails we’ve received over the last few days, mostly from US citizens who reached their breaking points, asking “where can I get a second passport?”

 

The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried. | Save America Foundation

 

EXCERPT!!!!!

 

RPREVOLU (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

…..Let’s examine whether the Joint Chiefs have committed a court-marshall offense worthy of death.They have supported a man who is clearly a usurper, as if he were the President of the United StatesThis fact is manifest and notorious.

 

English: General Martin E. Dempsey, USA, 18thChairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

There is one thing certain about Obama, and the Joint Chiefs know it: his father was a British subject. Four Supreme Court Cases declare that to be a natural born citizen, both parents must be U.S. Citizens. The Constitution clearly states in Article II, section ii, paragraph 5, that “No person except a natural born Citizen . . shall be eligible to the Office of President” The Joint Chiefs have been duly informed by many letters from military personnel, and from lawyers, such as Dr. Orly Taitz.

 

Scalia flummoxed about natural born citizenship

 

[SNIP]Last week, I had the occasion to cross paths with

 

Antonin Scalia – Caricature (Photo credit: DonkeyHotey)

 

“revered” Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. Scalia has been for many years the darling of conservatives, a judge who they believed had the guts to enforce the Rule of Law and the Constitution in the face of corrosive influences, foreign and domestic.

 

Prison Planet.com » I Will Stand Up For You If You Stand Up For Me

 

I Was Silent When They Came for You … So There Was No One Left to Help When They Came for Me

RPREVOLU (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Washington’s Blog

August 22, 2012

First they tortured a U.S. citizen and gang member …

I remained silent;

I wasn’t a criminal

Then they tortured a U.S. citizen, whistleblower and navy veteran …

I remained silent;

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

I wasn’t a whistleblower

Then they locked up an attorney for representing accused criminals …

I remained silent;

I wasn’t a defense attorney

Then they arrested a young father walking with his son simply because he told Dick Cheney that he disagreed with his policies …

I remained silent;

I’ve never talked to an important politician

obamadash (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Then they said an entertainer should be killed because she questioned the government’s version of an important historical event …

I remained silent;

Was Obama’s Communist Mentor His Father?

 

Arizona’s Joe Arpaio, known as “America’s Toughest Sheriff” for his treatment of criminals, has been sued by the Obama Administration but is running for re-election this year. He may already have had the last laugh, as his investigators probing President Obama’s birth certificate have come up with sure-fire proof that the document has been tampered with.

 

Barack Obama addressing a joint session of Congress (State of the Union-like) on the night of February 24, 2009. Standing in front of Vice President Joe Biden (left) and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (right). (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

The evidence shows that the identification of Obama’s father as “African” was not on the original document.

 

Arpaio says the tampering may represent a “national security threat,” a reference to the fact that, if Obama’s birth certificate is fraudulent, foreigners seeking entry into or citizenship in the United States could similarly obtain phony documents. He is asking Congress to investigate.

Prison Planet.com » Video: Man Refuses To Comply With Internal Checkpoints

Using the excuse of attempting to apprehend illegal immigrants, Border Patrol agents have set up a network of unconstitutional checkpoints inside the United States. In this video clip, informed citizen Steven Anderson provides a sterling example of how to stand up for your rights and prove that such checkpoints are unenforceable because they violate the 4th amendment.

Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin was a U.S. taxpayer, not a traitor

Eduardo Saverin, the co-founder of the social network and Facebook Inc., stands accused of violating the social contract — the idea that government is based on an agreement among its citizens to ensure mutual protection of person and property.

Prison Planet.com » Pentagon Armies of Paid Trolls

An amendment added to a defense authorization bill in Congress will legalize “psychological operations” aimed at American citizens.

Prison Planet.com » Re-Education Camp Manual Also Describes Forced Labor

A shocking U.S. Army manual that describes how “political activists,” including American citizens, are to be indoctrinated in re-education camps also includes rules on forced labor and separating political prisoners by confining them in isolation.

Bret explains “natural born citizen” requirements for president and vice president

Bret explains “natural born citizen” requirements for president and vice president

Fox News ^ | 5/1/2012 | Bret Baier

Posted on Tuesday, May 01, 2012 12:32:22 PM by GregNH

Here’s the deal…

Many legal analysts and scholars agree with this take– and until the Supreme Court weighs in.. this is how the law is interpreted:

The Constitution requires that the president be a “natural born citizen,” but does not define the term. That job is left to federal law, in 8 U.S. Code, Section 1401. All the law requires is that the mother be an American citizen who has lived in the U.S. for five years or more, at least two of those years after the age of 14. If the mother fits those criteria, the child is a U.S. citizen at birth, regardless of the father’s nationality.

Prison Planet.com » Another Bait and Switch? Obama Opposes CISPA. Yeah, Right

Even as drones are deployed domestically to spy on American citizens, Barack Obama is posing as a champion of privacy and civil liberties by threatening to veto the CISPA web snooping bill, just as his administration pretended to be hostile to the National Defense Authorization Act before signing it anyway.

Barack Obama delivers a speech at the University of Southern California (Video of the speech) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Prison Planet.com » IRS Implements Mark of the Beast Control System

…These IRS-based bans only extend the existing and growing powers of the blacklist itself. While some in society will be barred from travel, all will increasingly be forced to submit their credentials for permission to board transportation or cross borders.

Not only that, but now, $50k in back taxes is basically like being labeled a terrorist! Obama authorized the killing an American citizen without due process because he was an (accused) terrorist. Then, Obama authorized the indefinite detention of American citizens without due process under NDAA in the event that they might be a terrorist. And the protection of individual rights slip away from there into total tyranny.

The no fly watch list after 9/11 brandished many people with unwarranted suspicion and barred them from travel. Bizarrely, legal attempts to remove the names of many ordinary travelers, including children, from the watch list have ended only with frustration and little explanation. Former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel bragged to the Brady Center that the ‘No Fly’ list would be used to bar citizens from rightfully purchasing firearms, putting travelers who’ve received no due process or been charged with any crime on a binding ‘No Buy’ gun list. How far will it go? They’ve already eyed authorization lists for bank accounts, jobs, alcohol purchases, alimony dads, and more.

GOP ‘superstar’ for VP faces eligibility questions

Sen. Marco Rubio is mentioned more than any other as a potential GOP vice presidential candidate, a document found in the National Archives raises questions about whether the popular U.S. senator is actually qualified constitutionally to serve as president or vice president.

Official portrait of United States Senator (R-FL). (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The Petition for Naturalization on behalf of Mario Rubio, the senator’s Cuban father, has been retrieved from the National Archives and posted online by the PixelPatriot website, confirming that Marco Rubio was about four years old when his parents became U.S. citizens. Specifically, Mario Rubio was naturalized as an American citizen in 1975, based on the Sept. 9, 1975, date on the petition; Marco Rubio was born in 1971.

Will U.S. Troops Fire On American Citizens? :

…Who would believe that in the year 2012, one would have to ask if the U.S. Military would fire on American Citizen’s?

The question of troop involvement in an upcoming Martial Law scenario that is being predicted is no imaginary possibility – nor is it a ‘conspiracy theory’.

Other tough questions are being discussed such as, “Will the U.S. government confiscate Gold and Silver in an economic collapse?” and “Will there be a round-up of American Citizens to be put into FEMA Camps?”

Many believe that the United Nations will be tasked to step in to keep the peace in any civil unrest or economic collapse – this is a strong possibility.

Readers should be familiar with the term ‘Hidden In Plain Sight’. How this applies to the United Nations is simple…..

Federal Precedence Over The States | revisedhistory

by Al Benson Jr.

Reviewing the infamous 14th Amendment in a nutshell, we can see that it accomplished certain ends that were entirely consistent with Northern revolutionary aims for both the War of Northern Aggression and for the revolutionary period after that war. We might as well get used to referring to the war as a revolution, for, in truth, it was the real American Revolution. It was a revolution in which God-given liberties were exchanged for “privileges and immunities” granted by an all-powerful federal government in Washington–the same as today.

After the shooting phase of that revolution was over, the United States played the part of Esau on a national scale. We had traded our God-given rights for a mess of federal pottage, and now we weep, as did Esau, because we do not have God’s blessing. We don’t have that blessing now because, in our apostasy, we don’t deserve it now.

Instead of enjoying God’s blessing, we now labor under such apostate vehicles as Thaddeus Stevens’ inglorious 14th Amendment.

I have heard conservatives and patriots defend the 14th Amendment and I can only wonder what public brain laundry they were “educated” in. How many realize that the 14th Amendment redefined citizenship in this country? Up until the War, a man was a citizen of the United States due to being first a citizen of a particular state. A man was a U.S. citizen because he was first and foremost a citizen of Texas or Louisiana, or New Jersey. His state citizenship gave him status as a U.S. citizen.

After the adoption of the 14th Amendment, however, a man became foremost a citizen of the United States. His state citizenship was, to all intents and purposes, secondary at best and beneath notice at worst. This and the mindset it produced was consistent with Northern revolutionary aims and opened the door for future federal intervention in the various states, in areas the federal government had no business being in, such as education, and today, health care and oversight of school lunches and all manner of programs so dear the the hearts of those who run the Nanny State.

((“ACLU: “Nothing short of chilling”) Torture Architect Argues For Indefinite Detention of Americans

ACLU: “Nothing short of chilling”

Torture Architect Argues For Indefinite Detention of Americans 140px AbuGhraibScandalGraner55

In the aftermath of Barack Obama’s Presidential Policy Directive which forbids controversial provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act from being used against lawful residents, a former architect of the infamous Bush torture program today testified in favor of indefinite detention for US citizens.

Following the release of a White House “fact sheet” which announced that “Section 1022 does not apply to U.S. citizens, and the President has decided to waive its application to lawful permanent residents arrested in the United States,” Steven G. Bradbury, former head of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) in the United States Department of Justice under the Bush administration, testified today that the law should be applied to American citizens in order to deal with “homegrown terrorists”.

In his position as OLC head, Bradbury is widely acknowledged as one of the primary architects of the Bush torture program, having provided legal opinions that justified the kind of abuse that came to light in the aftermath of the Abu Ghraib scandal, which included torture by hanging, beating prisoners to death, raping women, and sodomizing detainees with batons and phosphorescent tubes.

Bradbury told a Senate Judiciary Committee that legislation which would limit the arbitrary application of indefinite detention provisions, the Due Process Guarantee Act, was dangerous because it would prevent US citizens labeled “enemy combatants,” from being interrogated by the military.

“If we capture on our soil a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident who is such an enemy recruit and has been actively involved in carrying out or otherwise aware of an unfolding plot by a foreign power against the United States, this proposed legislation could seriously impede our ability to gather critical intelligence from that combatant through military questioning,” Bradbury told the committee. “By requiring that criminal charges be brought against the detainee as a condition of this continued detention, the [Due Process Guarantee Act] would threaten to disrupt the practical opportunity to conduct such intelligence gathering.”

In response, Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.), who voted against the NDAA, requested that Bradbury’s involvement with the Bush torture scandal be included in the record.

“It’s nothing short of chilling that the Senate Judiciary Committee would have as a witness one of the architects of the torture program,” American Civil Liberties Union legislative counsel Chris Anders told Raw Story. “This is a person who wrote several memos that provide legal justification for the torture program during the Bush administration, and wrote memos on how to try to circumvent legal protections that Congress had put in place to block the use of torture and abuse of detainees.”

Prison Planet.com » Lawsuit Filed Against Government Over Assassination Of U.S. Citizens

The American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit this week against the Department of Justice, the Department of Defense, and the CIA, demanding the release of any information pertaining to the deaths of three American citizens resulting directly from drone missile strikes in 2011.

Details regarding the deaths of accused Al Qaeda leaders Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Kahn, both American citizens, have been kept under wraps. Both men were reportedly killed in targeted drone attacks last year in Yemen.

The third US citizen to be killed was Awlaki’s 16-year-old son, Abdulrahman, who was killed in a drone attack two weeks after al-Awlaki and Kahn.

At the time Obama described the death of Awlaki as a “significant milestone” in the war on terror.

“Our government’s deliberate and premeditated killing of American terrorism suspects raises profound questions that ought to be the subject of public debate,” Nathan Freed Wessler of the ACLU writes.

“Congressman indefinitely detained by Activists…”

Gunny,

Yesterday we reported that Rhode Island is considering a resolution
to reject the President’s unconstitutional authority to
indefinitely detain American citizens without charges or due
process.

Then we reported that Congress is considering a bill that would
allow for an American to be stripped of their citizenship without
due process.

Today we are pleased to report that people are not taking this
lying down.

On the first day of the Occupy Congress protests, protesters
stormed the office of Sen. Carl Levin and held a mock arrest of
this treasonous public servant…

Video:

Mitt Romney not a natural-born citizen?

Amid ongoing challenges to Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility, some have raised questions about the constitutional status of the leading candidate for the Republican nomination, Gov. Mitt Romney, contending he was born in Mexico or that his father was not an American citizen at the time of his birth…..

How Congress Is Signing Its Own Arrest Warrants in the NDAA Citizen Arrest Bill by Naomi Wolf

I never thought I would have to write this: but – incredibly – Congress has now passed the National Defense Appropriations Act, with Amendment 1031, which allows for the military detention of American citizens.

Image via Wikipedia

The amendment is so loosely worded that any American citizen could be held without due process. The language of this bill can be read to assure Americans that they can challenge their detention – but most people do not realize what this means: at Guantanamo and in other military prisons, one’s lawyer’s calls are monitored, witnesses for one’s defense are not allowed to testify, and one can be forced into nudity and isolation. Incredibly, ninety-three Senators voted to support this bill and now most of Congress: a roster of names that will live in infamy in the history of our nation, and never be expunged from the dark column of the history books.

They may have supported this bill because – although it’s hard to believe – they think the military will only arrest active members of Al Qaida; or maybe, less naively, they believe that ‘at most’, low-level dissenting figures, activists, or troublesome protesters might be subjected to military arrest. But they are forgetting something critical: history shows that those who signed this bill will soon be subject to arrest themselves.

Newly Revealed Evidence-Madison Admin Req. Citizen Parents – Native-Born Persons – U.S. Citizenship.

Newly Revealed Evidence-Madison Admin Req. Citizen Parents – Native-Born Persons – U.S. Citizenship.

naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com ^ | 12/28/2011 | Leo Donofrio

Posted on Wednesday, December 28, 2011 8:34:17 PM by rxsid

Image via Wikipedia

“THE PUBLIUS ENIGMA: Newly Revealed Evidence Establishes That President James Madison’s Administration Required Citizen Parentage To Qualify Native-Born Persons For U.S. Citizenship.

I was recently forwarded an incredibly amazing article from the October 10, 1811 edition of The Alexandria Herald newspaper. RXSID of Free Republic sent it with a brief note, stating, “Check out this case.” The Herald article is entitled, The Case of James McClure. The author is…PUBLIUS.

Publius was the pseudonym used by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, for their anonymous authorship of The Federalist Papers. By 1811, Hamilton was dead and Jay retired. My research leads me to believe that the article was written by James Madison, but this has not been conclusively established yet. Regardless of authorship, Madison was President at the time the article was written, and it discusses the official position of his administration denying U.S. citizenship based upon simple birth in the country.

Anchor Baby: A Term Redefined as a Slur

Anchor Baby: A Term Redefined as a Slur

The New York Times ^ | December 8, 2011 | By JULIA PRESTON

Posted on Saturday, December 10, 2011 12:13:40 AM by moonshinner_09

What does the term “anchor baby” mean? If you were to look it up in the American Heritage Dictionary, you would find a new definition since last week.

The term was among some 10,000 new words and phrases in the fifth edition of the dictionary, published in November. It was defined as: “A child born to a noncitizen mother in a country that grants automatic citizenship to children born on its soil, especially such a child born to parents seeking to secure eventual citizenship for themselves and often other members of their family.”

Do Not Consent: The Path to American Freedom » Musicians for Freedom

“Dulocracy. A government where servants and slaves have so much license and privilege that they domineer.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 501

While he leaves the question open, the Judge implies that Leviathan, the Beast, aka, the U.S. government, is a force to be reckoned with via collective means such as voting rather than by a personal decision not to consent to its jurisdiction. On the contrary, we would encourage activists to dump their U.S. Citizen status, which, according to Rule 13 (d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, prevents them from suing the govt. Then, they can file a counter claim for monetary damages when their rights are violated. Check out How to Make and File a Fee Schedule for Protection Against Corporate Abuse.

Also, the Constitution is not necessarily “the problem,” as the Judge implies. In the same way that a coin has two sides, heads and tails, the Constitution can be viewed from two perspectives, depending on whether you are a servant of the people, or the people being served. Imagine walking up to the counter at McDonald’s, and the clerk says, “May I help you?” If you say, “Give me a hamburger,” then the clerk recognizes you as a customer. But if you say, “I’m here for my first day of work,” then the clerk hands you a broom and an apron and tells you to sweep up in the back.

In our opinion, the majority of people in America have been so thoroughly dumbed down and propagandized by the corporate-controlled lamestream media, that virtually NO ONE is on the customer side of the counter anymore!

Similarly, there are are two mutually exclusive political jurisdictions in America: de facto, for U.S. Citizens who are “public officers,” with the govt.; and de jure for me and you, the People. In the first jurisdiction, the people work for the govt.; In the latter, the govt. works for Us. So, unless you actually WORK for the govt., you’re not obligated to do anything its officers tell you to do. The only way you can be separated from your rights against your consent is by the judgement of a jury of your peers in a court of law. Learn more about your unalienable rights…………..

MORE…..VIDEO…..

via Do Not Consent: The Path to American Freedom » Musicians for Freedom.

The Truly American Policies we ought to adopt

CONCERNING THE FOUNDING DOCUMENTS:

“WE THE PEOPLE,” in our founding documents means “CITIZENS of the United States.” American CITIZENS decided all, like-minded American citizens are equal. No foreign subject is equal to an AMERICAN CITIZEN, nor deserving of, nor entitled too, under any circumstances, the benefits or protections of our FOUNDING DOCUMENTS, unless and until they renounce their allegiance to all other countries, jurisdictions and belief systems, and become American CITIZENS.

At that point, they are EQUAL CITIZENS, afforded all the protections of the founding documents.

The mere presence on American soil does not an American Citizen make, nor does presence in the United States automatically transfer any rights or privileges of American CITIZENSHIP onto anyone.

CONCERNING FOREIGN POLICY

American foreign policy…….. One run-on sentence should cover it all: The United States will do no business with, nor trade with, nor accept any immigrants from, nor give foreign aid or support of any type to, any country, or group, that does not accept any other peaceful country, or peaceful peoples, right to exist, or calls for the destruction of any peaceful country, or peaceful people, or has in it’s “constitution” or “founding documents” such declarations, or whose leaders make public declarations to that effect; nor any country that gives aid to, or supports in any way, any country, or group, fitting that description.

Period: no exceptions.

“… American leader would insist on nothing less, and the free countries and peoples of the world would rally around the United States under such a leader, and build mutual defense alliances against those that disagree.

CONCERNING A GENERAL “STRONG WEAPONS MAKES GOOD NEIGHBOR” POLICY

“…. I have determined the only sensible weapons policy this country should support is: … our advanced weaponry to leave our control..

(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com …

via The Truly American Policies we ought to adopt.

Barack Obama is NOT even a US Citizen – So Says the Law – Part 2| The Post & Email

Barack Obama is NOT even a US Citizen – So Says the Law – Part 2| The Post & Email

Barack Obama is NOT even a US Citizen – So Says the Law – Part 2| The Post & Email:

“‘TRUE AND FAITHFUL’ ALONE TO OUR GOVERNMENT”

by Nobarack08, blogging at Nobarack08′s Weblog

(Sep. 23, 2011) — Baracka Abdallah Husein Obama was under British Law and British jurisdiction at birth and not the United States. Therefore was Baracka Abdallah Husein Obama even a citizen of the United States?

“The Supreme Court’s in Elk v. Wilkins 112U.S.94, 5 S.CT. 41, 28 L.ED. 643 (1884), the court ruled that the words “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” the court held, mean “not merely subjct in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiance.” 100% jurisdiction required.

Per Tench Coxe (May 22, 1755 – July 17, 1824) was an American political economist and a delegate for Pennsylvania to the Continental Congress in 1788-1789. He wrote under the pseudonym “A Pennsylvanian.”

Written during the discussion of the United States Constitution

TO THE CANDID READER…………

MORE…..

via BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984+ NOW!: Barack Obama is NOT even a US Citizen – So Says the Law – Part 2| The Post & Email.

A Citizenship Primer for the Common Man | The Post & Email

DISPELLING A NATIONAL DELUSION BY UNDERSTANDING CITIZENSHIP

by Adrien Nash, ©2011

According to this document, who can be President, or Chief?

(Sep. 22, 2011) — Citizenship is a fundamentally simple thing. Individuals are a member of any group or nation by either of two options. These options can be stated in various ways.

Version 1. One is either a member by natural law, or one is a member by human law.

Version 2. One is either a member by right of inheritance, or one is a member by grant.

Version 3. One is either a member by birth to members, or by permission of members.

Membership by permission can include automatic membership at birth if certain conditions are met. Those who are members by permission, by law, fall into four categories, which are:………………………

MORE…..

via A Citizenship Primer for the Common Man | The Post & Email.

citizenship

citizenship

Posted on Friday, July 22, 2011 12:28:18 AM by me3free

American Citizen, or

U.S. citizen?

There appears to be general misunderstanding by people in general as to the difference between a natural person and an artificial person. This document will explain that difference.

John Joseph Smith, is a natural, flesh and blood, person, created by God.

JOHN JOSEPH SMITH, is a U.S. corporate artificial person, U.S. citizen, created by the government.

In basic English grammar, a name spelled in upper and lower case, such as John Joseph Smith, is indicative of a flesh and blood man, a natural person.

Failing Liberty 101 by Walter E. Williams

The National Assessment of Educational Progress reports that only 1 in 4 high-school seniors scored at least “proficient” in knowledge of U.S. citizenship. Civics and history were American students’ worst subjects. Professor Damon said that for the past 10 years, his Stanford University research team has interviewed broad cross sections of American youths about U.S. citizenship. Here are some typical responses: “We just had (American citizenship) the other day in history. I forget what it was.” Another said, “Being American is not really special. … I don’t find being an American citizen very important.” Another said, “I don’t want to belong to any country. It just feels like you are obligated to this country. I don’t like the whole thing of citizen. … It’s like, citizen, no citizen; it doesn’t make sense to me. It’s, like, to be a good citizen – I don’t know, I don’t want to be a citizen. … It’s stupid to me.”

A law professor, whom Damon leaves unnamed, shares this vision in a recent book: “Longstanding notions of democratic citizenship are becoming obsolete. … American identity is unsustainable in the face of globalization.” Instead of commitment to a nation-state, “loyalties … are moving to transnational communities defined by many different ways: by race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, and sexual orientation.” This law professor’s vision is shared by many educators who look to “global citizenship” as the proper aim of civics instruction, de-emphasizing attachment to any particular country, such as the United States, pointing out that our primary obligation should be to the universal ideals of human rights and justice. To be patriotic to one’s own country is seen as suspect because it may turn into a militant chauvinism or a dangerous “my country, right or wrong” vision.

via Failing Liberty 101 by Walter E. Williams.

“The Republican Party is Losing People’s Support”| The Post & Email

But at any given moment you must remember one of your most important obligations – to protect the Constitution of the United States – the greatest and most important document in our country.

In front of your eyes (or do you not see???) unfolds a flagrant disregard and violation of our Constitution. On April 27, 2011 Mr. Obama presented his supposedly ‘original Birth Certificate’. According to this document his father was citizen of Kenya and mother was too young to confer U.S. citizenship on Obama at birth. That means he does not meet Constitutional Requirements to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief.

I intentionally put aside any and all other alleged crimes he committed. This single violation is more than enough to start Congressional hearings and a full -cale criminal investigation.

By not taking that action you give recognition to the usurper as a President and a legitimate candidate for next election cycle. The Republican Party and you, personally, will be GUILTY and will have to take full responsibility for giving legitimacy to Obama and this Regime.

via “The Republican Party is Losing People’s Support”| The Post & Email.

PRESS LIES ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY GET LOUDER By J.B. Williams

PRESS LIES ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY GET LOUDER By J.B. Williams

PRESS LIES ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY GET LOUDER

By J.B. Williams

April 27, 2011

NewsWithViews.com

[Disclaimer: The opinion expressed in this article are solely those of JB Williams and not necessary the opinion of NWV, it's staff or other writers.]

EXCERPTS

…Of course, this means that no matter where on earth Obama may have been born, he is not a natural born citizen and they all know this too. Obama’s stated natural birth father is Barack Hussein Obama of Kenya, who was at no time in his life a citizen of the United States. Since natural-born citizenship follows the bloodline of the father, Obama II cannot be a natural born citizen of the Unites States no matter where he was born.

This is why Obama and his press minions are desperate to keep the discussion limited to his birth place and the ongoing search for a mis

via BLOGGER: Gunny.G.1984.+: PRESS LIES ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY GET LOUDER By J.B. Williams.

Obama’s States His Father Served in WWII

Obama‘s father served in WW II. Really?

Of all the things I’ve seen or heard about Obama on the internet, NONE has hit me like this!! How can we not believe some of the charges about citizenship, religion, etc., after hearing what he says on this?

Obama said his father served in WW II? Barack’s father served in WW II? He said so in a speech. Here is an 18 second video:

CNN News clip : http://www.youtube.com/watchv=Fv4jnlkxOaw

Is he a compulsive liar? Were there no reporters who checked or double checked these statements and called the party on this? They did for everyone else. Why not him?

Like it or not, here are the facts:

via Obama’s States His Father Served in WWII.

World War II Vet Learns He’s Not a U.S. Citizen

CENTRALIA, WA – Imagine living in this country for nearly a 100 years only to learn you’re not a citizen.

It happened to a 95-year-old military veteran in Washington named Leeland Davidson.

Davidson knew he was born in Canada in 1916, but figured because his parents were American, he was automatically a U.S. citizen.

He was able to join the Navy and served in World War II, but when Davidson recently went to get the driver’s license he needed to go to Canada to visit relatives, he learned otherwise.

(Excerpt) Read more at myfoxphoenix.com …

SEE READER RESPONSES…

via World War II Vet Learns He’s Not a U.S. Citizen.

OBAMA NOT EVEN A UNITED STATES CITIZEN

Free Republic

Browse · Search Pings · Mail General/Chat

Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

 

OBAMA NOT EVEN A UNITED STATES CITIZEN

 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/17559086/Obama-Not-Even-A-United-States-Citizen-The-Case-Against-Obama-The ^ | July 2, 2009 | Paul Dunk

Posted on Sunday, February 13, 2011 6:34:00 PM by NoLibZone

OBAMA NOT EVEN A UNITED STATES CITIZEN!

THE CASE AGAINST OBAMA THE ILLEGAL ALIEN

His own website claims that Sen. Obama’s Kenyan citizenship did not expire until 1982. In 1980, Sen. Obama was not an American citizen and his legal name was Barry Soetoro. He has never shown evidence that he has naturalized as an American citizen, and he has never produced any document that indicates a name change from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama.

Obama Is Illegitimate Because Of

*His British Citizenship At Birth,

*His Kenyan Citizenship From Age 2, And

*His Indonesian Citizenship From Around Age 5 Until Now.

Justices turn aside another challenge over Obama’s citizenship

The Supreme Court has again cast aside an appeal that raised doubts about President Barack Obama’s U.S. citizenship, a grass-roots legal issue that has gained little legal or political footing, but continues to persist in the courts.

The justices without comment Monday rejected a challenge from Charles Kerchner Jr., a Pennsylvania man who sought a trial in federal court forcing the president to produce documents regarding his birth and citizenship.Kerchner’s attorney, Mario Apuzzo, had argued in a petition with the Supreme Court that Obama did not fit the definition of a “natural-born citizen” required for the nation’s highest office, as defined by Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution.

Justices turn aside another challenge over Obama’s citizenship

The Supreme Court has again cast aside an appeal that raised doubts about President Barack Obama’s U.S. citizenship, a grass-roots legal issue that has gained little legal or political footing, but continues to persist in the courts.The justices without comment Monday rejected a challenge from Charles Kerchner Jr., a Pennsylvania man who sought a trial in federal court forcing the president to produce documents regarding his birth and citizenship.Kerchner’s attorney, Mario Apuzzo, had argued in a petition with the Supreme Court that Obama did not fit the definition of a “natural-born citizen” required for the nation’s highest office, as defined by Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution.

The Framers Used Vattel, Not Blackstone to Define a “Natural Born Citizen” by: Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

The question which has gripped our nation is whether Barack Obama is eligible to be President and Commander in Chief. Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 provides that: “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

The proper question under this clause is not whether Obama is a “Citizen of the United States.” Rather, the correct question is whether Obama is a “natural born Citizen” thereunder.

Excerpt Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com …