Liberalism vs. Conservatism – What Difference Does It Make?… “More and more, conservatism is being voiced by the people who lean more to the libertarian side of the political spectrum. Many of us want nothing more than to be simply left alone. We do not desire the government to be in our homes or in our lives and we see much of the federal government as an unneeded and unwanted intrusion into our personal lives. “
Political Realities ^ | 10/10/13 | LD Jackson
Posted on Thursday, October 10, 2013 6:44:04 AM by LD Jackson
There is a great divide in America. On one side, you have liberalism, voiced by a group of progressive Democrats that believe in greater government control of almost every aspect of our daily lives. On the other, there is conservatism.
More and more, conservatism is being voiced by the people who lean more to the libertarian side of the political spectrum. Many of us want nothing more than to be simply left alone. We do not desire the government to be in our homes or in our lives and we see much of the federal government as an unneeded and unwanted intrusion into our personal lives.
http://moralmatters.org ^ | April 5, 2013 | Nathan M. Bickel
Posted on Tuesday, April 09, 2013 1:31:07 PM by Yooperman
Rush Limbaugh another Obama enabler: Moralmatters.org reader says Limbaugh is a political prostitute April 5, 2013
Limbaugh talks big, but falls short in conveying the reality about Obama. He, like Hannity, Levin, Laura Ingraham and a host of (so-called) “Conservative” talk show hosts continue to whine and wring their hands over Obama’s political actions and agenda. But, when it comes down to brass tacks, these self-proclaimed “Conservatives,” fall woefully short.
They will not expose Obama for his identity frauds and forgeries, even though now, it has been legally evidenced that Obama’s (needed and required) documentation for the office of president has been found to be (felony) fraudulent.
Rush: Why Draw the Line at Couples?… “RUSH: You don’t have to worry, the Republican Party’s moving in that direction, it is.”
Why Draw the Line at Couples?
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | March 26, 2013 | Rush Limbaugh
RUSH: Here’s Art in Windsor, Connecticut, as we go back to the phones. Hello, sir.
CALLER: Rush, how you doing?
RUSH: I’m fine, sir. Thank you.
CALLER: Look, I just think, you know, there used to be laws that said black people can’t marry white people. I don’t think this is any different. I mean, if you’re gay and you want to marry somebody who’s gay, marry somebody who’s gay. That’s your business. What is the business of the state government or the federal government telling me who I can and can’t marry?
RUSH: You are serious with this? You want to equate interracial marriage to homosexual marriage?
CALLER: Yeah, I think that a person should be able to make their own personal decision. I think actually this should be something the Republican Party should be in support of. It’s individual rights, you can marry whoever you want.
RUSH: You don’t have to worry, the Republican Party’s moving in that direction, it is.
Few issues highlight the gaping philosophical divide between libertarians and modern conservatives more starkly than the issue of guns. This might seem counterintuitive, because libertarians and modern conservatives often stand shoulder to shoulder against liberals and progressives to defend individual gun rights. The convenient alliance between modern conservatives and libertarians in the political trenches, however, conceals a fundamental and serious philosophical disagreement.
In order to fully grasp the division between libertarians and modern conservatives on this issue, it is important to understand why libertarians and conservatives think gun rights are so important. At the most general level, both libertarians and modern conservatives agree that all men have a natural right to defend themselves against aggression. More specifically, every man has a natural right to repel with violent force any unjust aggression against his life or his property.
Libertarians and modern conservatives do not defend individual gun rights out of some bizarre and loony obsession with a 200-year-old piece of parchment called “The Constitution.” On the contrary, they hold that the Constitution of the United States merely articulated something about man’s nature that has always been and always will be true.
The logical implication of this, both libertarians and modern conservatives agree, is that individuals have a natural right not just to defend their lives and their property against aggression from individual murderers and thieves, but that they have a natural right to defend themselves from unjust aggression by government. Hollow indeed would be the right to self-defense if it did not include the right to defend oneself against aggression by government – including one’s own government, because governments have killed and robbed exponentially more people than have private criminals.
Recognizing this fact, libertarians and modern conservatives agree that the natural right to self-defense must include a right to defend oneself against unjust government aggression, and that doing so usually requires more than simply a stick or a slingshot. A population armed with modern guns is not easily cowed, robbed, or massacred unless governments resort to wildly immoral and indiscriminate tactics or weapons of mass destruction.
So far so good. Libertarians and modern conservatives agree that…..
What Lies Beneath… “It is a known fact that the policies of the government today, whether Republican or Democrat are closer to the 1932 platform of the Communist Party than they are to either of their own party platforms in that critical year.”
The Event ^ | 03/09/2013 | Jay Pounder
Posted on Saturday, March 09, 2013 8:50:32 PM by jaypounder
What lies beneath… “It is a known fact that the policies of the government today, whether Republican or Democrat are closer to the 1932 platform of the Communist Party than they are to either of their own party platforms in that critical year.”
As we are watching the nation rip itself to shreds over a 2.3% cut in the over spending of money that we don’t have, I hope that you my reader are asking yourself… why. Why is there so much controversy over such a small cut?
Liberal Education – Rotten To The Core… “Have you ever stopped to wonder why conservative ideology is having such a hard time gaining traction with our younger generations?”
Liberal Education – Rotten To The Core
Political Realities ^ | 03/04/13 | LD Jackson
Posted on Monday, March 04, 2013 7:47:06 AM by LD Jackson
Have you ever stopped to wonder why conservative ideology is having such a hard time gaining traction with our younger generations?
Many of you will know where I am headed with this, but I believe it is time we took a long and hard look at the education system in this country. Could it be we have abdicated our rights as parents and leaders of our community to educate our children as we see fit? It may be happening in places where we would least expect it.
Please note the excellent piece of art (The Gathering Storm) that is shown above.
When the storm finally hits (and it will), those of you who supported the Obama administration will be affected as well. It won’t just be us gun owners or Flat Taxers, or Pro-Lifers that get hit. You’ll be right there next to us.
You see, you all thought the Conservatives were nut cases. You know, all of us who believe in God, small government, the Second Amendment, etc. And you thought you could just go back to sleep after the election was over. In your world, America will continue as before. You’ll still have the same rights, the same nice house, the same big screen television – it’s all good. After all, your high school football team won and the other team lost – go team! Even if you have bothered to look up from the daily grind since Nov 4th, you dismissed everything that has occurred as “politics as usual” – “the same old stuff”.
In the end, it’ll all be OK won’t it?
Not this time. There are a growing number of citizens in the US that are ready to fight to shut down the government’s grab of personal freedom, it’s blatant abuse of the constitution, and it’s attempt to replace the American way of life with socialism. You have to listen carefully to hear them, but they are there. I won’t start that fight, but when it goes down I will join it.
Flopping Aces ^ | 12-10-12 | Michael Henkins
Posted on Monday, December 10, 2012 11:34:02 AM by Starman417
Despite its own insistence that it is very much alive, the Republican Party has now joined the crowd invisible.
The sad pathetic truth of its demise is that those who once believed in it, and cared deeply for it, are no longer around to bury it with dignity. Its corpse has now become the dancing play thing of Washington D.C. consulting firms and lobbyist.
UN Secret Meeting Set to Capture Internet Control (““If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” ― George Washington”) – Patriot Update
Well, here they come again. The UN has devised yet another plan to strip away a little more freedom from those who use the Internet. This time they come to seize more control of the online experience. They want to decide who has the right to see what’s on the Internet. And here’s a shocker. There may be some taxes involved.
Another disturbing aspect of the Summit is that it will be held in secret sessions. The meeting itself is, of course, public knowledge, but what will take place behind closed doors is not.
The summit supposedly is focused on revising an older treaty that was approved in 1988 called the International Telecommunications Regulations (ITRs). This was ratified before the Internet became what it is today.
But why? Worrying about debt and default and entitlements is for the responsible people.
Responsibility is for the people who believe in the “responsible self,” the notion developed a couple of millennia ago during the Axial Age. Responsibility is for the bourgeoisie.
President Obama is above all that. Liberal politics in general is above all that. Their politics is about war, not about nice comfortable entitlements. President Obama’s War? He’s fighting a war on “inequality.” Even the Washington Post‘s Zachary Goldfarb is willing to admit to that.
Feder’s Rules For Conservatives (Part I)… (“Understand that the left intends to destroy you. Your opponent isn’t a nice guy or a misguided idealist. He’s a dogmatist cut from the same cloth as Robespierre and Lenin — a storm trooper waiting to be fitted with jack boots and issued a truncheon.”)
Some on the right are now recommending Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” as a handbook for us. The recommendation usually begins with, “I know Alinsky was thoroughly evil… but there’s a lot we can learn from him.”
Obama is reelected with 9 million fewer votes than in 2008, against a pathetically weak opponent (whose most memorable line from the debates was “I agree with the president on that”), and suddenly the Marxist Machiavelli is the political equivalent of Sun Tzu. Here’s a guide for conservative victories based on conservative values:
Understand that the left intends to destroy you. Your opponent isn’t a nice guy or a misguided idealist. He’s a dogmatist cut from the same cloth as Robespierre and Lenin — a storm trooper waiting to be fitted with jack boots and issued a truncheon. Look at the way the left runs academia, where it’s achieved near total dominance: brainwashing, rigid censorship and draconian punishment for thought crimes.
This is what it’s planning for the rest of America.
Coulter, a Conservative writer often featured as a political pundit on news programs, is known for her abrasive personality and ability to promote her ideals despite extreme opposition. She was once attacked during a speech at a college with a violent hit in the face with a pie. Tonight, her poor choice of a word may cost her some valuable alliances.
While her use of the “r” word, as people politely refer to the term in modern society, probably reflects the way the term was used in everyday society in her formative years; it was commonly used in school and everywhere else in a teasing sort of way until 10 or 15 years ago.
Go read the Wikipedia article on Gary Johnson and you will be impressed. | Peace . Gold . Liberty | Revolution
Yeah, yeah, I know… its Wikipedia. And people can edit that.
And he formed a REAL business – not something in vulture capital.
Tell me this guy isn’ the most qualified candidate (except for Ron Paul of course) out there.
29 Sep 12 Reply Retweet Favorite
Remember when Sarah Palin was ridiculed as an alarmist nut job for suggesting Obamacare would usher in “death panels”? The New York Times called the “false ‘death panel’ rumor” a “boogey-man spell” that “resonated with some impressionable folk.”….
Contra Dick Morris, Mitt Romney is not winning this election. At least Mitt Romney is not winning the election right now. Conservatives are obsessing over every poll, the turn out models used, and the media biasthat is on ful display.
The Attitude of an Anarchist (“You Might Be an Anarchist… If you have the right attitude, says Tom Finnigan.”)
Anarchy is about attitude as much as philosophy. Below is a contrast between a conservative attitude toward government and the anarchist’s attitude toward government. Do you have the attitude of an anarchist?
Why Are Conservatives Covering Up the John Boehner Knuckle Dragger Comment?RantPolitical.com ^ | 8-16-2012 | PolitiJim @politiJimPosted on Thursday, August 16, 2012 10:06:27 AM by rightjbAlthough
I’ve been attacked by fellow conservatives, FINALLY someone is speaking the truth about Paul Ryan lack of true fiscal conservatism. And John Boehner’s reply –
together with complicit cover ups by some conservatives – had better damn well wake the rest of you up who are partying as if the Ryan nomination means the election is over.The entire 50 second video is here, but I will paraphrase it:Greta Van Susteren: Ryan’s supposed to be a fiscal hawk. How does he explain his vote for the stimulus in ‘08, the auto bailout, and TARP?Speaker John Boehner:
By Sher Zieve
10 August, 2012
Dear Governor Romney:
We have a problem. Unfortunately the problem seems to be with you and your campaign. Your opponent — despite his now-proven illegal status to even occupy OUR White House — is the sitting president of the United States. This, of course, gives him almost unlimited resources to squash and destroy — by whatever means necessary — his opponents. As the Obama syndicate could find virtually nothing legitimate with which to destroy you (as he has done to every other opponent against whom he has ever run), his campaign has eagerly chosen to move the their first choice of attack — lies, lies and more lies.
Most precariously, in response to the arguably most despicable and false campaign AD in US history — that of actually calling you a murderer — your campaign leaders had virtually nothing to say except to bring up the health care program when you were Governor of Massachusetts. Some of us are now wondering if you — as did McCain — have been chosen to take the proverbial dive; in order to give Obama the final 4 years he needs to completely eviscerate the United States of America.
To The Proverbial Sleeping Giant/Drunk…Go Back To Sleep, It’s Likely Too Late By Now Anyway…And the politicians will go back undercover…..
There just is No limit to the crap you’ll take. Thanx for nothing!
(Col Sellin) Hitler’s Generals and American Politicians – English pravda.ru (See Related Articles, The Joint Chiefs of staff Should be Worried, Etc…)
By Lawrence Sellin
At the end of World War Two, German Army generals denied any knowledge of the Holocaust and the massive atrocities committed on the Eastern front.
They were lying.
Between 1942 and 1945, British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) recorded no fewer than 64,427 private conversations between captured German generals and other senior officers while held in the comfortable accommodations of Trent Park house in the north London suburb of Cockfosters.
You may have noticed–unless you’re one of them yourself–many of those calling themselves Conservatives, patriots, etc. are not.
Here are some young conservatives who aren’t, unlike RINOs and other liberals, embarrassed to be identified with the traditional values that made America the greatest nation of all time. They are Resistance 44.
They don’t consider themselves “too sophisticated” to be seen embracing the ideals which separate us from every other nation in the world, or opposing those philosophies which would tear down all that we hold dear…………..
For centuries the alleged ideal of communism had come to the world as a messianic and millennial creed. Various seers, notably Joachim of Fiore, had prophesied the final state of mankind as one of perfect harmony and equality, one where all things are owned in common, where there is no necessity for work or need for the division of labor.
In the case of Joachim, of course, problems of production and property, indeed of scarcity in general, were “solved” by man no longer possessing a physical body. As pure spirits, men as equal and harmonious psychic entities spending all their time chanting praise to God, might make a certain amount of sense. But the communist idea applied to a physical mankind still needing to produce and consume is a very different matter. In any case, the communist ideal continued to be put forward as a religious, millennial doctrine. We have seen in volume I its enormous influence on the Anabaptist wing of the Reformation in the 16th century. Millennial and communist dreams also inspired various fringe Protestant sects during the English Civil War of the mid-17th century, particularly the Diggers, the Ranters, and the Fifth Monarchy Men.
The most important forerunner of Marxian communism among these Civil War Protestant sectarians was Gerrard Winstanley (1609–60), the founder of the Digger movement and a man much admired by Marxist historians.
Liberals accuse conservatives of using secret signals that only conservatives can hear — dog whistles — to send racist messages. These accusations are in reality a reflection of what liberals think rather than accurate assessments of what conservatives are saying, like the pimpled teen who thinks that nearly everything is a dirty joke.
Liberals, on the other hand, constantly have to hide what they believe in order to get votes — getting rid of blacks by making abortion easily available in minority neighborhoods and advocating socialism are not winning campaign positions these days. That’s why almost every liberal runs for re-election as a conservative.
Fortunately, liberals are sufficiently un-self-aware as to let their true beliefs show through their verbiage on occasion — an unconscious dog whistle, if you will.
*****”Conservative radio host: ‘You’re just pissing us off!’”
This Is The Face Of Tyranny.town Hall ^ | 1/09/12 | Skip MacLurePosted on Monday, January 09, 2012 4:37:27 PM by kathsuaIf I was a total stranger who had never seen or heard of Barack Hussein Obama, I would say he was stoned when that picture was taken. As far as I’m concerned, the picture speaks for itself. It is the face of self-indulgence. It is the face of dissipation. Soon to become the face of desperation.In medieval times, he would have been given a name such as ‘Obama the Usurper’, or ‘Obama the Destroyer’. Most likely though, the appellation that would stick would have been given to him not by his cronies but by ‘the little people’. And that nomenclature would be ‘Obama the Weak’.Judged objectively, the last three years under Barack Hussein Obama will go down in history as three of the worst years in our history. We’ve been suffering under the depredations of the Obama crowd long enough. It’s time to take the fight against the enemies of freedom to the next level.There has been much speculation about the Tea Party having had its high tide mark with the 2010 takeover of Congress and the wholesale wipe-out that was handed to the Congressional DeMarxists. As a result, the liberal spin meisters on both sides of the aisle have been working overtime to portray the Tea Party Patriots as passé, while endlessly tauting the anointed choice of the liberals and ‘moderates’ who are just another description of liberal, as far as Conservatives are concerned.Wednesday, January 4th saw the advent of what may well turn out to be the final straw for the estimated 60% of Americans who identify themselves as “very conservative” or “somewhat conservative”. Americans have an unusually high tolerance for abuse. I wish it wasn’t so. I think it stems from our indefatigable concept of ‘fairness’. I also think that America’s quotient for political chicanery has reached its limit with Barack Hussein Obama’s usurpation of power not granted to the office of the Chief Executive. With Obama’s violation of Section One, Article Five of the Constitution, we have been given an insight and preview of what another four years of his ‘enlightened’ leadership would be.
Coulter is, of course, right – but she only dare hint at the real problem. The fact is that halting illegal migration will do nothing to forestall the socialist electoral shift to which she refers.
Question: Do you really think the demographic earthquake that turned the Golden State blue was mainly the result of illegal migration?
Victory is within sight, an incompetent Marxist can’t keep from making monumental errors and the economy continues to tank. For all our efforts to defeat the Obama Myth, we could hardy keep us with his misadventures and determination to defeat himself. Consequently, Americans have grown weary of empty promises and dubious claims of recovery.
We were relentless in our attacks and we stood virtually alone, the Republican Party leadership followed Obama like loyal sycophants sniffing at the Obama Swine Trough to see what scraps might be thrown their way from the Obama Stash, a delightful euphemism describing American taxpayer funds. The Great Political Redistribution Bill, otherwise known as the Stimulus Con, had to be passed to help unemployment and keep America solvent, Republican Leaders fell for it like children believing in Santa Claus. The greatest scam in the world passed without debate at Obama’s direction and the American taxpayer was forced into virtual slavery for generations so that Obama could consolidate his political base.
His health care monstrosity was then forced on America against the will of the people and again the “Go along to get along” Republicans figured maybe it was what America wanted.
The mid-term election of 2010 made Republicans realize there was a serious movement among the people, they were registering their revulsion of Obama Marxism. All of a sudden, they figured it was in their best interest to pay attention to this Conservative movement among the people. These are the same people who ignored us and followed Obama with their noses secured to hind end of his trousers.
Will they sell us out? If Brian, a poster who claims to have been an integral part of the Rubio campaign (a fact that will be confirmed or disproven) is any indication of the inside people of the Republican Party, they have already sold us out as indicated by his rude anti-Semitic rhetoric.
The Obama battle was easy. Most of the RINOs and Obama Republicans are still in Washington. We must now either defeat the RINOs and Obama Republicans within the Republican Party or if the Republican Party is overly riddled with bigoted, obnoxious fools like Brian, we will need a third party to achieve victory.
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net…
TheDC Exclusive: Conservatives hit Beck for taking content without attribution
Daily Caller ^ | April 18, 2011 | Matthew Boyle
Posted on Monday, April 18, 2011 8:41:49 AM by ejdrapes
TheDC Exclusive: Conservatives hit Beck for taking content without attribution
By Matthew Boyle – The Daily Caller 5:52 AM 04/18/2011
A number of conservative activists and bloggers say they’re furious at media magnate Glenn Beck for what they call content theft. Over the past several years, Beck has relied on video, audio and written content from others to fill his radio and television shows, as well as his websites. Often he has credited his fellow conservatives for their work. Yet in many other instances say dozens of conservative journalists who spoke to The Daily Caller, he has not, often taking elaborate steps to cloak the origins of the material.
Publisher Andrew Breitbart has seen a number of his stories surface on various Beck media properties over the past few years. While he describes himself as “grateful for the many times he has credited me and my sites,” Breitbart says that “sometimes he also uses other peoples’ work without crediting them, making it appear as though it were his own. But especially since adopting ‘The Truth Has No Agenda’ slogan – and trying to deliberately re-position himself as the pious conscience and judge of many of those he took content from – he has exposed himself to his new motto’s unforgiving standard.”
By any standard, Beck seems unusually reliant on the work of others, and unusually reluctant to credit it. In an interview with TheDC, Roger L. Simon, CEO of Pajamas Media, suggested that Beck has committed the journalistic equivalent of a notorious crime. “It is not a question of just doing it right the majority of the time. It is a question of doing it right always,” Simon said. “Doris Kearns Goodwin is forever a fraud in my estimation because she has been caught plagiarizing once. If you rob a bank once, you still robbed a bank.”……………….
” If the “birthers” are nuts — as Establishment pooh-bahs like George Will profess to believe — how come the so-called “certificate of live birth” released online by the Obama team in 2008 doesn’t list the name of the Honolulu hospital at which the future president is said to have been born.
My birth certificate lists the hospital. Doesn’t yours? Have you ever seen a birth certificate that doesn’t include the hospital’s name?
And when lawyers in Kenya trying to track down anyone who might have a claim on the estate of Barack Obama Sr. contacted Obama’s mother for the usual birth-certificate information about her son, how come she couldn’t provide it?
By the way, Cashill pulls this troubling, but little-noticed incident, right out of Dreams.
Also interesting — or is “explosive” the better word.
Posted: February 14, 2011
1:00 am Eastern
I hate to say, “I told you so.”
It’s rather cliché.
But I did try very hard to warn the conservative movement what it was doing by embracing a group of homosexual activists promoting a radical social agenda while masquerading as “conservatives.”
I don’t know if I was the first to warn about the infiltration of GOProud and how its tentacles would sow seeds of division and strife among conservatives. But I’m quite sure I was among the loudest.
Suffice it to say, few listened to the warnings. It has cost me friendships, long-time alliances and a good name among many who don’t know me except through the caricatures drawn by others making their livings under the bright lights of TV cameras accusing me of being a “publicity whore” and a “fake Christian.”
Today, more people see the truth about a group they once saw as merely a group of “conservative gays.”
Sometimes it takes a little political experience and sophistication, maybe only the kind that can come from being around long enough.
When I tried to point out to Ann Coulter that she was making a mistake by performing at a fundraiser for GOProud at the very moment it was attempting to establish its conservative bona fides, she did not take it well. Neither did many other conservatives…………
Browse · Search
|Pings · Mail||Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article
Posted on Wednesday, January 26, 2011 3:20:41 PM by publana
Now that Drudge has a link to the BC issue, it should go viral. Why is all this coming out now, right before time to gear up for 2012 campaigns?
Tinfoil Hat Mode: ON
Hillary and Obama may have made a deal back during the 2008 campaign. Hillary couldn’t pull the rug out from under Obama with the birth certificate issue, because she would lose the black vote then and forever; thus Hillary would never be POTUS. Instead, she became Secretary of State, a position that she could distance herself from Obama. Keeping Hillary out of the VP slot also prevented her from pulling out the BC to take over the presidency sooner when and if the BC issue was raised.
Obama was supposed to only be a one term POTUS, but Hillary and O’s socialist policies were so unpopular that it became doubtful that she could pull off a win in 2012. Even if she did, she probably would not regain the House and might still lose the Senate. The Republicans have refused to raise the issue knowing the repercussions with the minority vote, even with plenty of liberals and Hillary supporters taking over Conservative sites to lead the way. What do do?
Obama must pretend to run for a second term while Hillary claims all the while she is content as SOS and has no plans to run for 2012. The birth certificate must be brought to the forefront, but blame must be placed on the “evil racist” Conservatives, such as those in Arizona that will to force the issue by making Obama show his BC before being allowed on the 2012 ballot. To prevent any blame possibly being placed on Hillary, a solid Obama supporter must be found to “accidentally” bring out the issue, but the racists must run with it. The Governor of Hawaii fit the bill as he was an Obama delegate in the 2008 election. If public outrage, or at least minority outrage is high enough at the Arizona “racists” and their ilk (Can we say TEAParty) that are trying to block Obama from running, then Hillary could possibly pull off a Trifecta — POTUS, take back the House, and keep the Senate. After all, we can’t have racists blocking the presidency of the black Messiah, can we?
“It was supposed to be a day of peaceful protest, with students exercising their democratic right to demonstrate against soaring university fees,” reports the Daily Mail. “But anarchists hijacked the event, setting off the most violent scenes of student unrest seen in Britain for decades.
Militants from far-Left groups whipped up a mix of middle-class students and younger college and school pupils into a frenzy.”Back in the day anarchists would have criticized the very idea of state-run universities and would have denounced the act of stealing money from one segment of society to pay the tuition of another. Now balaclava-clad anarchists are the vanguard of those resentful of the fact the free lunch is over and the state cannot afford to continue this educational boondoggle.
So called anarchists apparently no longer support the philosophy that the authority of the state has no place in conduct of human relations, including education. Anarchism today translates into mindless property destruction by dim-witted hooligans.
It is used as justification by the state to attack “democratic” protesters and minimize their minor disagreements with the government and its institutions.
Mark Levin noted, during his radio show last week, an article from the The New England Journal of Medicine which lays out how ObamaCare can be dismantled after the victory of Conservatives last Tuesday: h/t Dave Ross [AUDIO AT SITE] A more serious possibility [than repeal] is that ACA opponents could deliver on another pledge: to cut off funding for implementation.
Here is how such a process could work ~~~ The ACA contains 64 specific authorizations to spend up to $105.6 billion and 51 general authorizations to spend “such sums as are necessary” over the period between 2010 and…
A warning to those who believe that electing a “conservative” government automatically will inspire tougher measures to fight radical Islam.A warning to those who believe that electing a “conservative” government automatically will inspire tougher measures to fight radical Islam: Canadians know from experience that this formula does not always work as planned.
When Canadian voters again rejected the nation’s “natural ruling party” — the Liberals — and handed the Conservatives their second minority government in the fall of 2008, Islamist Watch asked some prominent Canadians how Prime Minister Stephen Harper would tackle creeping Sharia and other manifestations of homegrown radical Islam.
Two years later, it is time to revisit those questions.
To explain the personal journey an individual takes from wide eyed liberal to level headed conservative, Winston Churchill once said “If you are not a liberal at 20, you have no heart. If you are not Conservative by 40, you have no brain.”
Experience proves this is true.One of the benefits of age is the wisdom that comes along with the gray hair.With a lifetime of experience the differences between liberal and conservative positions are easy to see and articulate. Having a growing family makes turning away from liberal ideas very easy because they don’t work. As the head of my family it is my duty to defend and protect them from all enemies as they become evident.With his baptism Sunday, we welcomed our fifth grandchild a happy and, by the grace of God, healthy baby boy into our Christian community.All of our grandchildren were with us and all of them joined us for a celebration afterward.
As I looked at the three girls and two boys ranging from 17 to newborn my joy was tempered by the reality that among them, they already owe more than 1.2 million dollars as their share of the national debt.None of them voted for any of the politicians who plunged them and us into this crushing debt. None of them has expressed support for giving illegal aliens healthcare or sending our tax money to Brazil so it can drill for oil where liberals forbid us to go.
Our grandchildren can’t vote, but they are our children’s children so it up to us to vote for them. Their parents feed and care for them, but we are the ones who must take to the streets to save their futures.