Archive
(EXCERPT !!!!!) ~ THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ACCORDING TO GOOGLE – EDRIVERA.COM : EDRIVERA.COM
EXCERPT!!!!!
My “Basic Course in Law and Government,” the legal education course I devised to teach the written law and government, explains how George Washington took over government and caused the English common law to be replaced by government created written law.
How did Washington pull this off? Very simply, George Washington invented the “inauguration” as a presidential coronation. This is what Washington did: First, he got himself elected to the highest office created by the Constitution of September 17, 1787, the Office of President of the United States of America. Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 vests the executive power of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 in that office: “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows”
“WHAT IS THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF TAKING AN OATH OR AFFIRMATION AND BEING BOUND BY OATH OR AFFIRMATION?” ~ EDRIVERA.COM – United States America Organic Law Taxes Property Jurisdiction Constitution : EDRIVERA.COM
3
WHAT IS THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF TAKING AN OATH OR AFFIRMATION AND BEING BOUND BY OATH OR AFFIRMATION?
Filed Under Article II Section 1 Clause 8, Electoral College, IMPEACHMENT, Oath of Office, ORGANIC LAWS, Presidential Elector, PRESIDENTS | Leave a Comment
When one has a question about the Constitution of September 17, 1787, ask George—George Washington. The hero of the American Revolution was President of the May 25, 1787 Constitutional Convention and the first President of the United States of America to be elected by Article II Section 1 Clause 2 Presidential Electors. George Washington was the first President of the United States of America to take the Article II Section 1 Clause 8 oral oath for the Office of President of the United States.
“George, why would you take the oral oath for the Office of President of the United States, on April 30, 1789, when you had been elected to another Office, President of the United States of America on April 6, 1789?” Washington never admitted or explained what he did or why he did it.
ELECTORS OF PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT MET TODAY TO GIVE THEIR VOTES ~ EDRIVERA.COM – United States America Organic Law Taxes Property Jurisdiction Constitution : EDRIVERA.COM
ELECTORS OF PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT MET TODAY TO GIVE THEIR VOTES
Filed Under CONGRESS, Electoral College, Oath of Office | Leave a Comment
Those persons who registered so they could vote on November 6, 2012, for United States Senators and Representatives in the United States House of Representatives, also, qualified to vote for one of the candidates for President. All the candidates for the Offices of President and Vice President were the nominees of the political parties who qualified for the Offices of President and Vice President created by the Twelfth Amendment. Federal voters are not electors they vote for a President by voting for the Presidential Electors pledged to vote for that candidate.
Meaningless Words in Politics by Ron Paul (“When You Hear a Politician Think of George Orwell.”)
Listen to Ron Paul
As we enter the fall political season, we will hear a great deal of rhetoric from both major political parties and their
Congressman Ron Paul at an event hosted in his honor at CPAC 2011 in Washington, D.C. Please attribute to Gage Skidmore if used elsewhere. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
many candidates for office. It’s important for us to remember, however, that words can be made meaningless by misuse or overuse. And when we as citizens allow politicians to obscure the truth by distorting words, we diminish ourselves and our nation.?
Why the ‘Strategists’ Are Wrong About a Brokered Convention.
Why the ‘Strategists’ Are Wrong About a Brokered Convention.Breitbart.com ^ | March 17, 2012 | Frank SalvatoPosted on Saturday, March 17, 2012 11:34:10 PM by true believer forever
Along with the realization that Conservatives can win in a Conservative-leaning country, comes the ugly truth that the “establishment” Republican apparatus is – just like the Chicago politician – more concerned with maintaining power and “selecting” candidates than doing the hard work of administering to a bottom-up organization – such as the Republican Party was chartered to be.
Today’s Republican establishment is, for all practical purposes, a mirror or converse image of the Democrat Party; an organization structured from the top-down.
This power-hoarding of the hierarchy is evidenced by the ridiculous move to award convention delegates proportionately, a move more in line with the abolition of the Electoral College than with the preservation of the Republic.
Delegate Training for Ron Paul: ronulans planning on stealing election through delegates!
Delegate Training for Ron Paul: ronulans planning on stealing election through delegates!
Delegate Training for Ron Paul ^ | 01/22/2012 | numerous
Posted on Sunday, January 22, 2012 8:59:21 PM by RaceBannon
The only way for Ron Paul to become President is if he gets the GOP nomination; The only way for Ron Paul to get the GOP nomination is if we become delegates. As delegates, we’ll be voting to pick the GOP nominee just like the electors in the electoral college vote to pick the President; Delegates determine and decide who the GOP nominee it’s that critical!
There hasn’t been a brokered convention for more than 60 years! And the good news is that Ron Paul doesn’t have to win a single state to get the GOP nomination; He just needs to win the delegates! So your delegate vote will count that much more; In other words, Ron Paul can secure the GOP nomination with your vote!
Two Bad Presidential Election Ideas Require Rejection
Nix the “national popular vote,” and keep states’ winner-take-all electoral voting
When one loses a contest perceived to have been “unfair,” the natural human instinct is to try to change the rules. That instinct is perilously close to harmfully affecting the conduct of our presidential elections.
Two separate efforts, the “national popular vote” (NPV) movement and Pennsylvania’s recent attempt to implement congressional district-based electoral voting (which I will call “CEV”), have gained traction. Both ideas recall a pithy phrase attributed to Ben Franklin in 1787 shortly after the Constitution’s adoption. When asked whether the Founders’ handiwork represented a republic or a monarchy, Franklin responded: “A republic, if you can keep it.” I contend that his response would have been the same if the question’s alternatives had been a republic or a democracy. Both NPV and CEV represent dangerous movements towards the latter at the expense of the former.
more ~ much more…..
Devvy Kidd — 2012 Presidential Race: A Principled American for Our Republic
I expected emails defending Ron Paul with the request I change my mind and support him. I will not. I will not excuse the actions of any public servant who I feel has done enormous harm to our country even though I have supported the efforts of that individual in the past.
As I said in my column: I will not vote for any incumbent in the Outlaw Congress who refused to stand up for the U.S. Constitution and their oath of office, January 9, 2009, and stop the electoral college vote.
While it matters little to Libertarians, Ron Paul’s vote to sanction bowel movement sex for sodomites in our military is beyond destructive. He voted to use our military as more social experimentation to force acceptance of what God called an abomination: men having sex in each other’s feces.
The other problem I have with Ron Paul is his age. Now, don’t throw rocks at me just yet. I watched him in an interview the other day on Neil Cavuto‘s show on The FOX Network.
In all honesty, he looked frail, like it was an effort to give the interview. More so than the week before when I saw a short interview with him; he looked so worn out.
That man has been on a mission for decades to get rid of the unconstitutional “Federal” Reserve Banking System which is his job as a member of Congress, as well as a being a full time doctor when not serving in Congress…………………..
via Devvy Kidd — 2012 Presidential Race: A Principled American for Our Republic.
Devvy Kidd — (Re Ron Paul) …Will Americans Vote for Another Puppet President in 2012?
Ron Paul recently voted to condone bowel movement sex for our military; allowing sexual deviants to openly serve.
This is one of the most destructive votes ever affecting our military; second to Bill Clinton’s success in getting ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell‘ shoved down our throats.
I always give credit where credit is due, but I will not excuse any incumbent for cowardice when it comes to making tough decisions or votes promoting filthy, dirty and immoral behavior in our military.
At considerable cost, Worldnetdaily has made their latest issue of Whistleblower Magazine available free on line. Read what some of our highest decorated soldiers and active duty have to say about sexual deviants openly serving. Perhaps Ron Paul should take the time to read it.
He might learn facts such as sodomites are three times more likely to sexually prey on fellow service members; just the one of the problems with allowing sodomites to openly flaunt their filthy sexual preferences. As a medical doctor, Ron Paul, knows men having sex in each other’s feces is not healthy.
I will not vote for any incumbent in Congress who was there on January 9, 2009. That is the day that will go down as one of the greatest acts of cowardice by the U.S. Congress in history.On that day, despite the massive public outcry over Obama/Soetoro’s ineligibility to run as president, not a single male or female in that entire body had the guts to stand up and stop the electoral college vote count.
Not one and that includes Ron Paul…………………..
GyG Posts…TodaY…So FAR…
*****

You are subscribed to this blog (manage).
Recent Posts
- Obama, Now — and Then
- New Book Reveals How Obama Helped Al Quida Terrorists On His 3d Day In Office !
- REACTOR-CORE PRESENTS PLUTONIUM FOR AIR WARRIORS
- The President Who Hates His Country By: Joan Joan Swirsky (via ~ The GUNNY “G” BLOG & E-MAIL ~)
- And Just Where In Hell Did Sociology Come From? (via ~ The GUNNY “G” BLOG & E-MAIL ~)
- FREEDOM’S DESTRUCTION BY CONSTITUTIONAL DE-CONSTRUCTION ~ By Chuck Baldwin’s Son: Timothy Baldwin (via ~ The GUNNY “G” BLOG & E-MAIL ~)
- POPULATION EXTERMINATION How It Will Be Done By: Alan Stang (via ~ The GUNNY “G” BLOG & E-MAIL ~)
- James Webb’s Fight Against Political Correctness by Thomas DiLorenzo (via ~ The GUNNY “G” BLOG & E-MAIL ~)
- Why Is There No Justice In America Dr Eduardo Rivera… (via ~ The GUNNY “G” BLOG & E-MAIL ~)
- Gunny G: Sources of Info Regarding Constitutional Issues by Dr Eduardo M. Rivera… (via ~ The GUNNY “G” BLOG & E-MAIL ~)
- Electoral College Designed To Preclude Political Parties? (via ~ The GUNNY “G” BLOG & E-MAIL ~)
- The Battle of Athens 2 AUGUST 1946 (via ~ The GUNNY “G” BLOG & E-MAIL ~)
- Terrorist Who Trained London Bombers Was Working For US Government
- Marsha West — Christian “watchbloggers” under fire
- Eugene J. Koprowski, Esq. — Obama’s new genetics experiments with veterans raising questions
- The Real DiLorenzo A ‘Southern Partisan’ Interview…. (via ~ The GUNNY “G” BLOG & E-MAIL ~)
- Have Patience, People, the New Kids on the Block in Congress Are Coming Around
- Obama & The Human Stain: Or How Political Correctness Gave America a Con-Man President
- Obama’s fake Christianity?
- A Message to the SCOTUS: Stop Avoiding the Eligibility Issue
- The Freedom’s Phoenix Headline News Email Newsletter ……..
- The Real Tea Party by Charles Stampul
- Anti-Establishment History
- Congressman Ron Paul booted from conservative group for anti-war views
- Today’s Toons 2/14/11
- Read more…
DON’T TRY TO REPEAL OBAMACARE. INSTEAD, REVEAL THE TERRITORIAL LIMITATIONS OF ALL FEDERAL LAWS. : EDRIVERA.COM
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONGRESS, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, Electoral College, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Martial Law, Northwest Ordinance, OBAMA, ORGANIC LAWS, Oath of Office, Presidential Elector Federal law is made for the federal government, federal employees, federal territory and federal citizens.
The Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 sets forth the proposition that free people are free because freedom is defined by universal unwritten law and that law is above and superior to all written law.
Article IV of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 secures to the people their right to be free under unwritten law.The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 was the first attempt of the United States in Congress assembled to extend written legislative over all the people, by first making the settlers and inhabitants liable for the federal debt and federal taxes.The Constitution of September 17, 1787 allowed the newly created federal government under the Articles of Confederation and Northwest Ordinance to institute a government corporation to administer the territory owned and ceded to the United States of America. George Washington’s bloodless takeover of the federal government accomplished by his election to the Office of President of the United States of America and his taking of the oral oath of Office of President of the United States…
Repeal the Seventeenth Amendment
Joe Miller, Alaska’s Republican nominee for the United States Senate, recently expressed support for an idea that is rapidly gaining steam in Tea Party circles: the repeal of the Seventeenth Amendment. Miller subsequently backtracked from his statement, but he shouldn’t have: Repealing the Seventeenth Amendment would go a long way toward restoring federalism and frustrating special-interest influence over Washington.
Ratified in 1913, the Seventeenth Amendment replaced the election of U.S. senators by state legislators with the current system of direct election by the people. By securing the Seventeenth Amendment’s ratification, progressives dealt a blow to the Framers’ vision of the Constitution from which we have yet to recover.The Constitution did not create a direct democracy; it established a constitutional republic. Its goal was to preserve liberty, not to maximize popular sovereignty.
To this end, the Framers provided that the power of various political actors would derive from different sources. While House members were to be elected directly by the people, the president would be elected by the Electoral College. The people would have no direct influence on the selection of judges, who would be nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate to serve for life or “during good behavior.”
And senators would be elected by state legislatures.Empowering state legislatures to elect senators was considered both good politics and good constitutional design. At the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, the proposal was ratified with minimal discussion and recognized as the approach “most congenial” to public opinion.
Direct election was proposed by Pennsylvania’s James Wilson but defeated ten to one in a straw poll. More important than public opinion, however, was that limitations on direct popular sovereignty are an important aspect of a constitutional republic’s superiority to a direct democracy. As Madison observes in Federalist 51, “A dependence on the peo…
“A Republic, ma’am, if you can keep it”
“Except for a brief period during the Reagan years, America has been moving steadily toward becoming a social democracy rather than the republic our founders gave us. There is a very good reason why this is happening. Since 1933, Democrats have had complete control of government – Presidency, House and Senate – for 34 years.
Republicans, on the other hand, have had control of government for a total of four years 108th and 109th Congress. Democrats controlled both houses of Congress for 56 years, while Republicans controlled both houses for only 12 years. For 22 years, the Democrats had a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate; none for the Republicans.Clearly, Democrats have steered the ship of state since the Roosevelt era.
While Democrats loudly blame the Republicans for all the nation’s woes, it is the Democrats who must accept responsibility for the state of the nation.As bad as things are in the United States at the moment, the United States is in far better shape than most of the rest of the world.
But the nation is nowhere near as good as it would have been had the republic – and its free market – been allowed to prosper.The “Progressive” era that arose from the writings of Marx, Lenin, and others, embraced fully by Woodrow Wilson’s administration, infested the Democrat Party, and since Franklin Roosevelt, has promoted policies that advance Marxism and erodes the republican form of government designed by our founders. The republican form of government created by our founders consists of three primary pillars: the election of representatives who make policy; the election of a president through the Electoral College; and the election of Senators by state legislatures.All three of these pillars are under severe attack. Increasingly, state and local policies are being decided by direct vote of the people, instead of by representatives elected by the people.
This is direct democracy, not the way a republic functions. Our founders carefully avoided the possibility of a direct democracy, well aware of the inevitable anarchy that always follows democracy…”
EXCERPT ~ Continues @ Link….





















Recent Comments