But let’s stick with the topic of Who Are They Looking For?
TSA is omnipresent. Trains, planes and automobiles. Now railroads and buses. Next it will be dog walkers and model airplanes.
Homeland Security peers through every remote camera and surveillance platform. The federal decision to see and record everything is approaching total coverage. You’re even recorded and surveilled in many national parks.
Who, or what, are they looking for? If Al-Qaeda is now our surrogate shadow-military so the US Department of State can pretend to clean hands, who is all this surveillance for? It looks like Washington has targeted you and me as the mission of surveillance. I mean, if the Al-Qaeda boogey-man is now inside the tent, who is Washington looking for?
The Bastard Barrack Has Hijacked The Country, I don’t like being raped, I don’t like being Robbed, I don’t like being Hijacked, Whatever Happen To COMMON SENSE, You are a damn idiot, Can I paint a picture, Some Islamic Terrorist, I am supposed to be happy about this, Obama has Jackass supporters, Muslims like to kill the Infidel, I am not paying to die, Obama is a Communist, I don’t want to crash land…………..
Early American leaders and thinkers were endowed with deep appreciation and unique knowledge of global history, international relations, ancient cultures, ideologies and religions. They spoke and wrote candidly about global threats, including the Islamic threat.
In 1830, New York University Professor George Bush, the great-granduncle of George H. W. Bush, considered one of the most profound American scholars of the mid-19th century, published “The Life of Mohammed.” He was not concerned about political correctness, was low on delusion and top-heavy on realism. His 1830 reference to the Islamic threat was consistent with the 2012 state of intra-Muslim atrocities, hate-education, tyranny, anti-U.S. stormy Arab winter, intolerance of criticism, global Islamic terrorism in general and suicide bombing in particular.
Flashback: Who Is Abdurahman Alamoudi And Why Is Obama Trying To Set Him Free? (Blind Sheik…) (“So what if the blowback means releasing an admitted terrorist upon an unsuspecting public?”)
July 18, 2011 – San Francisco, CA – PipeLineNews.org –
In a previous article Muslim Outreach? Team Obama Moves To Release Convicted Al-Qaeda Financier Aldurahman M. Alamoudi From Prison we highlighted the Obama Administration’s effort to free [or seriously reduce the long prison sentence of] this terrorist Muslim Brotherhood
[Note his first name has been variously spelled in official documents as, Abdur Rahman, Abdurahman, Abdulrahman and Aldurahman. We have settled on the convention of using Abdurahman, the phonetic spelling used on Alamoudi's checks during this period of time - see below.]
Identified in government documents as a member of the Muslim Brotherhood [see, U.S. vs. Holy Land Foundation, List of Unindicted Co-conspirators and/or Joint Venturers, Attachment A, page 8 heading, "The following are individuals/entities who are and/or were members of the US Muslim Brotherhood] Alamoudi led what has been termed “…one of the most successful Brotherhood influence operations…in America in the 1990s…”
As [former Federal Prosecutor] Andy McCarthy presciently observed in 2004, “Whether Alamoudi will actually serve the 23 years is questionable. His plea agreement contemplates cooperation with the government. If he provides truthful information or testimony that helps the government further investigations – particularly terrorism cases – he could become eligible for a significant reduction. Time will tell…” [see, Andy McCarthy, Alamoudi, National Review, http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/87680/alamoudi-andrew-c-mccarthy%5D
We have reason to believe that there was no cooperation by Alamoudi with the Feds through the late 2000s, so the question remains as to what key information such a dedicated Islamic terrorist would possibly provide at this late date, that would force his release from prison and thus [since he remains an American citizen] place him right back on the front lines of the Muslim Brotherhood’s stealth jihad?
What do we have here?
Alamoudi undergoing an unbelievably radical change of heart? Are we going to be asked to believe that he no longer supports Hamas, or Hezbollah; that he’s turned against the Muslim Brotherhood, al-Qaeda and the myriad of groups totally committed to Islamic supremacy and the establishment of a world-wide caliphate by any means?
That seems doubtful, much more believably, this is pure political groveling by Team Obama. Given the administration’s now public courting of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood what would serve that cause better than the release of one of its previous go-to guys in America?
The Shores of Barbary- A republic that will not defend its citizens will not last long
The American Spectator ^ | September 13, 2012 | Rober Kaplan
Posted on Thursday, September 13, 2012 7:20:36 AM by Cincinatus’ Wife
They are murderers and, yes, they are Muslim murderers.
When President Jefferson decided to send a naval expedition to Tripoli to rescue American seamen and punish the Barbary pirates, the opposition to him was practical: did we have the naval vessels and if not did we want to raise taxes to pay for them? Did we have allies with whom to embark on such a difficult campaign? Assuming success, what were we supposed to do next to insure the pirates did not lie low, regroup, begin their trade as soon as we looked the other way?
Prison Planet.com » Terrorism Anxiety Disorder: How The Irrational Response To 9/11 Paralyzed America And The West
“The failure to investigate 9/11 has bankrupted America financially and morally, and has allowed us to stand idly by
while our liberty has been destroyed.” – Washington’s Blog, “The Failure to Investigate 9/11 Has Bankrupted America.”
“Freedom from fear” could be said to sum up the whole philosophy of human rights.” – Dag Hammarskjöld, a Swedish diplomat, the second United Nations Secretary-General, and a Nobel Peace Prizerecipient.
The war on terror shifts its focus
extremists and re-aligned to target politically active, conservative and libertarian Americans.
Meet The New Terrorists: Conservative Americans tea party protest
The latest salvo comes in the form of an ABC Studios drama which demonizes a Texas militia group as dangerous right-wing extremists, lifting its story from last year’s arrest of Hutaree militia members in Michigan who despite being charged with planning to kill police officers were later acquitted.
When George W Bush decided to invade Afghanistan, outwardly he pretended that the purpose was to avenge 9/11 attacks allegedly perpetrated by Osama bin Laden led al-Qaeda based in Afghanistan and to free the world from the menace of terrorism and to prevent 9/11 like attacks to recur. The US hidden motives were however altogether different.
Posted on Saturday, July 14, 2012 10:15:47 AM by Dartman
I know this has happened to you. You’ve been watching a newscast and there is a story about a terrorist plot being busted. You hear all about the plot, you know how many people were arrested, what they were generally attempting to do, but there is something the police seem to be avoiding.
The M word or the I word.
A new study funded by the Department of Homeland Security characterizes Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right-wing” terrorists.
Homeland Security Report Lists Liberty Lovers As Terrorists 0704TeaParty1
The U.S. military is guilty of political correctness toward domestic Islamic terror, according to a congressional report made public Wednesday that concludes al Qaeda is using U.S.-based Muslim radicals to plan mass casualty attacks.
Rick Perry: Americans should be ‘unhinged’ by decision to reject Keystone pipe pathFox News ^ | January 18, 2012 | Nick KalmanPosted on Wednesday, January 18, 2012 12:46:14 PM by Cincinatus’ Wife…”It doesn’t surprise me but it’s again — the president’s focused more on the next election than on the next generation.”Getting this country independent of foreign sources of crude from countries that are not our friends is really problematic.
So this Canadian oil, there’s a possibility we could lose it to China with that decision so I hope Americans will really become unhinged with that decision because it is a really bad decision for our country, for energy independence and sends a horrible message at a time that were headed to $4 and $5 oil or excuse me $4 or $5 gasoline, to have a neighbor who’s willing to sell us crude that is available.
The Hitman Cometh: America to be ‘War Zone’
American Thinker ^ | December 19, 2011 | John Griffing
Posted on Monday, December 19, 2011 4:39:44 AM by neverdem
An old adage reads, “If it quacks like a duck, then it’s probably a duck.” The push by the Obama Administration to progressively strip Americans of basic liberties in the pursuit of political objectives has now taken on more draconian overtones, and no one seems to have noticed.
While the media quibbles over Romney versus Gingrich, the Occupy movement, and other diversions, President Obama continues to undermine law and order, dismantling the US Constitution piece by piece. When public officials seek to limit freedom, it can be concluded that these officials want to rule instead of govern. Cloaking seizures of power in clever misnomers does not validate the abuse of public office. What else can we conclude when Obama claims the illegal power to assassinate citizens at his whim? If citizen assassination were the only example of executive malfeasance emanating from Washington, Americans could breathe easier, except that citizen assassination, e.g. Awlaki, has opened the floodgates for a barrage of new power seizures. The ground softened, the first brick laid, Obama can now proceed unchallenged.
As I warned repeatedly in multiple articles over the last two years, the machinery put in place to thwart Islamic terrorism could be turned against citizens for political purposes, due to the broad constructions used in terror definitions. Only no one could have imagined the speed at which these things would come to pass:
eurekalert.org ^ | 11-15-11 | David Ruth
Posted on Thursday, November 17, 2011 7:28:33 AM by bayouranger
Sixty percent of people arrested for Islamic terrorist activities between January 2009 and April 2011 were American citizens, according to a new report from Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The study of 104 people who were arrested included U.S. and non-U.S. citizens living in America or abroad.
The report, “Analyzing the Islamic Extremist Phenomenon in the United States: A Study of Recent Activity,” was authored by Joan Neuhaus Schaan, fellow in homeland security at the Baker Institute. Jessica Phillips, an intern with the Baker Institute’s homeland security and terrorism program, provided research support for the study.
In this new era of political correctness, the U.S. Army has published a special handbook for soldiers that appears to justify Islamic jihad by describing it as the “communal military defense of Islam and Muslims when they are threatened or under attack.”
We are in a long war against radical Islamic terrorism. The struggle seems almost similar to the on-again/off-again ordeals of the past — such as the French-English Hundred Years War of the 14th and 15th centuries, or the Thirty Years War between Catholics and Protestants in the 17th century.
In these kinds of drawn-out conflicts, final victory will go to the side that responds best to new challenges. And we’ve seen a lot of those since 9/11, when the United States was caught unaware and apparently ill-equipped to face the threat of radical Islamic terrorists hijacking our passenger jets.
Even when we adjusted well to…..
If you want to understand why the same police who have no trouble cracking heads at left wing and right wing protests—will occasionally turn into pussycats when a racial group takes to the streets, this is why. The doctrine they are operating under says that cracking down on racial violence will only lead to a bigger explosion. So will talking about it.
The same guidelines are in place for Islamic terrorism and the latest counter-terrorism strategy out of the White House applies the absurdities of community policing, with its emphasis on partnerships with the community responsible for the violence, to the Jihad. Again there are numerous warnings about the dangers of radicalizing Muslims through overly strong law enforcement.
In the name of social stability laws go unenforced and two systems of justice take hold. One for groups that are notorious for perpetrating violence—and the other for everyone else. And the violence only increases.
The United States has been going through this wringer for half a century. Calls for tough on crime laws warring with social appeasement strategies. Tough on crime is the official approach after the public made it clear that politicians who took the “Blame Society” line would pay a price at the ballot box. But social appeasement hasn’t gone away, it’s just less open.
New White House plan to fight violent extremism:
The strategy pointedly does not focus on threats from Muslim extremism.
(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org …”
Posted by Gunny G at Wednesday, August 03, 2011
After initially urging caution in presuming it was Islamic terrorists at the root of the mayhem, when reports came in of Islamic groups claiming credit, we noted that Norway has pursued anti-Israel policies, and that anti-Israel boycotts are popular among certain groups in Norway. I remain skeptical about Brevik, just as I remain skeptical of the narrative that Timothy McVeigh was a “right wing Christian” terrorist. (See Jayna Davis’s extraordinary work debunking the official narrative of McVeigh, a cover-up of dismaying effectiveness in this country.)
Mike Baehr adds:
Mike Baehr adds:
The narrative of a blond-haired, blue-eyed Christian fascist attacking his own country is entirely too convenient.
I have no doubt that he’s the shooter, given the witnesses and the fact that he was arrested at the scene. But an attack like yesterday’s took months of planning and probably quite a bit of training. Not just anyone is capable of building explosives that will remotely (or were they timed?) detonate successfully in a major downtown.
One also does not knock the ruling party from power by murdering 80 of its up-and-coming in a horrific attack. If anything, that’s a good way to keep them in power for the next 20 years. I would count on Labour to milk this for all it’s worth.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com …
Rep. Peter King Demands Answers
Rep. Peter King Demands Answers
Fox News ^ | April 23, 2011
Posted on Sunday, April 24, 2011 8:21:21 PM by T.L.Sink
In the course of a discussion about the new Terror Alert System, Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) makes it very clear that Attorney General Holder and the Obama administration are NOT acting upon legal evidence to prosecute CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations)despite its intimate commection with Islamic terrorist operatives and subversive factions.
To date, the administration has offered no serious or adequate explanation for what Rep. King calls being blatantly remiss in our national responsibility for aggressively prosecuting the war against terrorism.
(Excerpt) Read more at video.foxnews.com …
Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi says if Western leaders decide to attack his country, he’ll join with al-Qaida in a “holy war,” unleashing a flood of illegal immigrants into Europe and backing known terror fomenters, according to a report from Joseph Farah‘s G2 Bulletin.
Gadhafi originally had accused al-Qaida of creating the opposition to him inside his own country.But now he says his forces appear to be pushing the opposition onto the ropes inside Libya, and he doesn’t like the United Nations adopting a no-fly zone over Libya, or the fact Susan Rice, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, hinted in a speech that other military action may be forthcoming from the West .She did not specify what that would be.
The Obama administration has made it clear that it will not take unilateral action and insists on an international response if the decision is made to take military action against Libya.Previously, Gadhafi said his regime is opposed to Islamist extremists in the region, although he has a history of supporting terrorists, with Libyans constituting the single largest bloc of membership in al-Qaida outside the Saudis.Now Gadhafi has offered to help facilitate an al-Qaida sweep from the Middle East and North Africa that would then threaten Europe.
Story continues below
Has being born to a Muslim father made it more difficult for President Obama to deal with Islamic terror? The question must be asked.Prior to Barack Obama’s election, the conventional wisdom — not just among the left but a majority of Americans — was that America’s enemies in the Islamic world were motivated, fundamentally, by a hatred of George W. Bush.
Thus, the expiration of the 43rd president’s second term and the election of his successor, a young, black Democrat with an Islamic-sounding name, elicited ecstatic responses by legions of people in America and Europe who anticipated a virtual end to Western/Islamic hostilities.Interestingly, things have not only failed to pan out as predicted, evidence suggests that Islamic aggression toward America has actually risen under Obama’s watch. For example, Time — no conservative or right-wing publication — has reported that over one-third of the 32 terrorist-related events that America has endured since 9/11 occurred during just the first year of Obama’s presidency. And lest we forget the true nature of the Fort Hood massacre shooting of 2009, Obama also has the distinction of having presided over the first terrorist attack on American soil since that day of infamy almost a decade ago.That the Islamic terrorist has become significantly more emboldened during President Obama’s watch is indeed a phenomenon provoking no inconsiderable measure of curiosity. Republicans doubtless attribute it to the president’s lack of strength and seriousness with respect to “the evil of our time,” as Sean Hannity refers to the Islamic threat.
Obama, they insist, is an “appeaser,” and our enemies know it………………..
Free RepublicBrowse · Search Pings · Mail Bloggers & PersonalTopics · Post ArticleSkip to comments.
Has the Media Whitewashed the latest Islamic Terrorist Attack on the US?
Pundit Press ^ | 2/18/11 | Eric DonderoPosted on Saturday, February 19, 2011 5:44:25 PM by therightliveswithus
It happened in the early morning hours last Saturday. Full details are just now leaking out…Looking at all the various reports, eyewitness video, and from reading between the lines of mainstream media, it is now clear: San Diego was just the target of an Islamic extremist Terrorist attack.
Here’s how the NBC affiliate described the scene:At 1:54 a.m., an Emerald Cab driver jumped a curb and plowed through a group of people standing outside the popular Stingaree downtown nightclub… of what firefighters and police officers described as a “melee.”
“It was so scary when I realized what had actually happened,” said Guy Handy, a nearby resident.
A witness who wished not to be identified said “there were women and men just lying on the ground, just everywhere.”After the initial media flurry died down, his real name started to emerge: Osama Hassan El-Darandaly.But that wasn’t all. Many mainstream media reports described the scene as simply an accident, by a drowzy driver.
AP even reported “Cabbie out of hospital after crash that hurt 35″ implying that El-Darandaly himself was one of the ones “hurt” in the crash.
In actuality, we now know 36 San Diegans were injured, 22 of them seriously, 1 women from Encinitas critically injured. She had her leg completely torn off after El-Darandaly pinned her to the wall in his Cab…The suspect is “devoutly Muslim.
“Excerpt Read more at punditpress.blogspot.com …
Camouflaged and silent, the assault team inched toward a walled stone compound for more than five hours, belly-crawling the last 200 yards. The target was an old state prison in eastern Ohio, and every handpicked member of Red Team 2 knew what was at stake:
The current White House Administration is pro-Muslim and has ordered a stand-down against Islamic groups. The mission: Destroy the terrorist command post — or die trying. The fighters must go in “sterile” — without name tags or other identifying insignia — as a deniable covert force. “Anyone who is caught or captured cannot expect extraction,” the briefing officer said.At nightfall the raiders launched their attack. Short, sharp bursts from their M-16s cut down the perimeter guards. Once past the rear gate, the raiders fanned out and emptied clip after clip in a barrage of diversionary fire.
As defenders rushed to repel the small team, the main assault force struck from the opposite flank. Red Team 1 burst through a chain-link fence, enveloping the defense in lethal cross fire. The shooting was over in minutes. Thick grenade smoke bloomed over the command post. The defenders were routed, headquarters ablaze.
Al Qaeda attacked us on September 11, but they did so in the name of IslamAl Qaeda attacked us on September 11, but they did so in the name of Islam. And their precedent was over a thousand years of Muslim violence against non-Muslims. A violence that has its scriptural source in the words of the Koran. No individual Islamic terrorist attack or group can be detached from those words and precedents.
The history of the Middle East did not begin in 1917 or 1948 or 1992. But while liberals insist on talking about the context for terrorism, they are unwilling to listen to any context broader than their own local politics. And what they are most unwilling to hear is that Muslim regional and global violence predates anything relating to the United States or any European countries.
excerpt ~ continues @ link…
What legitimate religion would demand that its members either kill or convert people of other faiths? What legitimate religion is intent on imposing its own laws on the rest of the entire world? If Islam were just about praying to Allah and worshiping Mohammed and nothing more, we would not be having a problem with Islamism and Islamic terrorists. Islam has a global mission to take over and run the world according to Islamic Shariah law. How can we call that a religion?
What legitimate religion in this country comes with its own civil laws that take precedence over national, state, and local laws? No, Islam is not a religion. It is a governing doctrine that not only dictates religious beliefs, but also social behavior that includes laws, penalties and punishments, not by God, but by people if the laws are not obeyed. Islam is a form of government, not a religion. It does not belong here. We already have government under our Constitution sort of.As Muslims build their mega-Mosques in our nation – financed by Saudi Arabia – they laugh at the stupid Americans who are selling out their fellow citizens by allowing Islam to take over our country a little bit at a time. It is the same method used over decades by the Marxist Progressives who now have control of our government – take away our liberties one little piece at a time until full control and submission is achieved.
Question for Hollywood Liberals; Isn’t the new guy in the Oval office a cutout of the one you made a cottage industry out of hating?Walid Shoebat, a former Islamic terrorist, whose mother tongue is Arabic, is reported to be doing some extensive research in the Arabic speaking media on what Imam Rauf has been saying and writing in Arabic.
It matters so much more what radical Imam Rauf is saying in the Middle East. Americans, hearing how he said the U.S. has more blood on its hands than al Qaeda, will take their anger to the midterm election polls and do the same in 2012. How many more extremists hearing Imam Rauf in the Middle East strap themselves to suicide bombs? How many acts of terrorism will Imam’s words launch against the innocent?Meanwhile, we’re two weeks from the 9th commemoration of 9/11 when Obama and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg will, by their hypocritical official physical presence, mock the memory of the almost 3,000 souls who died on Sept. 11, 2001.
Walid Shoebat a former Islamic terrorist, whose mother tongue is Arabic as well as understanding the mindset of people from the Middle East has been doing extensive research in the Arabic speaking media on what Imam Rauf has been saying and writing in the Arabic.Wallid Shoebat states “Americans need to understand the level of deception and lies as well as the ends that Muslim clergy like Imam Rauf will go to advance their agenda of advancing Sharia law and Islamic domination in America”
In previous reports researched by the Walid Shoebat Foundation, it was revealed that Imam Rauf has made statements in the Arabic language – while appearing on Arabic media outlets – that completely contradict his somewhat moderate tone when speaking English, exposing him as a direct supporter of terrorism, both financially and verbally.NOW THIS!So who really was speaking on that historic day of June 4th 2009 in Egypt? President Obama or the Imam of the proposed Ground Zero Mosque, Feisal Abdul Rauf?The Shoebat Foundation has obtained a shocking audio recording of Rauf’s own voice boasting in Arabic that Obama’s historic speech in Cairo was provided by the Imam’s work with the Cordova Initiative in what the Imam called “The Blue Print” which, according to him, was the solution to the Islamic-American divide.
Rauf claimed that Chapter 6 of the Imam’s work engineered by the Cordova Initiative was the construct for the entire speech.