Gunny G: What “The Folks” Are Wondering ‘Bout??? ~ What Justice will swear in 0bama on Jan. 20 2013

What Justice will swear in 0bama on Jan. 20 2013Me | 12 / 8 / 2012 | Lionheartusa1Posted on Saturday, December 08, 2012 11:39:03 AM by Lionheartusa11

Can anyone tell me which Supreme Court Justice will swear 0bama in in the proposed private swearing in ceremony .

 

GyGRet (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

Press fear Obama private swearing in

The White House Correspondents Association is strongly urging the Obama administration to allow press access to the president’s official swearing-in ceremony on Jan. 20, following indications from inauguration committee officials that the event could potentially be closed to the press.

 

realobam (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

“Mindful of the historic nature of this occasion, we expect the White House will continue the long tradition of opening the President’s official swearing-in to full press access, and we as an organization are looking forward to working with the administration to make that happen,” Ed Henry, the Fox News correspondent and president of the White House Correspondents Association, said in a statement.

 

Obama to Hold ‘Private’ Swear-in Ceremony for Second Presidential Term

Obama to Hold ‘Private’ Swear-in Ceremony for Second Presidential Term

 

Something is not right in America, take 2. By Shepard Ambellas theintelhub.com November 20, 2012

 

One month from now on January 20, 2013, President Obama will be required by law to be sworn-in for his second presidential term by noon. However, something mysterious is happening again with the ceremony raising the eyebrows of some. Since the 20th falls on a Sunday, a private ceremony will be held signifying the possibility of fraud as the “public” ceremony will be held the following day.

 

English: Barack Obama delivers a speech at the University of Southern California (Video of the speech) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

Military Oaths Are Meaningless by Roger Young

 

Members of the US military often point to the oaths they take upon enlistment as proof they will never violate the rights of Americans. They insist they are committed toward “defending” the Piece of Paper (also known as the US Constitution)

 

GyGRet (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

and thereby also defend the individual rights that this document claims to protect. But is it wise for the free individual to rely on such an oath being kept?

 

MILITARY OATHS ARE MEANINGLESS ~ Dr Jimmy T. LaBaume FlyOverPress.com…

 

Liberty Knows No Compromise Dr. Jimmy T. LaBaume drjimmytlabaume@landandlivestockinternational.com   Donate today to help defray the costs of this important free newsletter   Click to Subscribe to Our Daily News Service or Contact Us I came to realize the truth of this during my Great Awakening. That is why I did not re-enlist in the Marine Corps with less than two years to go to a good “retirement.” I would have had to raise my right hand and solemnly swear to “protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” I just couldn’t tell that lie any longer.   Most of the members of today’s military are just like I was–dupes. At every stage of life, from kinder-garden to the university, from church to sporting events they are bombarded with statist propaganda with the purpose of training them “to be obedient tools of the ruling class, easy to manage and quick to unthinkingly obey. The goal of the system was (and still is) to “fashion” the person in such a way that he ‘simply cannot will otherwise.’“   My guess is that at least 99% of them have not even read the constitution. How can they solemnly sweat to uphold it? — jtl, 419 Military Oaths Are Meaningless by Roger Young   Previously by Roger Young: Personal Secession – Reactions and Suggestions   Members of the US military often point to the oaths they take upon enlistment as proof they will never violate the rights of Americans. They insist they are committed toward “defending” the Piece of Paper (also known as the US Constitution) and thereby also defend the individual rights that this document claims to protect. But is it wise for the free individual to rely on such an oath being kept?

“The press will not help. Even many in the conservative blogosphere will not help. Some are even taking pot shots at the veterans for their willingness to make a stand on 11.11.11… but that will not weaken the resolve of these veterans, not on 11.11.11 or any other day…”

Press Ignoring Veterans’ Call for Impeachment

There will be no campaign speeches, no pleas for donations, no sale of tee-shirts or hats and if anyone performs, they will do so on a volunteer basis, not for pay.

The group comes in peace, and they call upon all American veterans and patriots to do the same, leaving the event grounds in better shape than they find it. The event is not the end, but rather marks the beginning of an ongoing effort to enforce the Declaration to Restore the Constitutional Republic. The veterans have never lost the will to stand by their oaths to protect and defend, and they never will.

Nobody has to pay them to come; they come of their own free will, not to start a war, but in an effort to avoid another Civil War, demanding that all elected officials begin to live by their oaths as well.

Violating His Oath of Office?

“I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”That is the oath of office taken by President Barack Obama, and every other President of the United States, as provided in Article II, Section I of the Constitution.

The question I want to ask is can you “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” without “preserving, protecting, and defending” the United States?President Obama’s Iran Disgrace