THE American media is OUTRIGHT LYING about today’s Fergusion Press ConferenceCspan ^ | August 16th 2014 | Understand the StimulusPosted on 8/16/2014, 8:03:31 PM by Understand the stimulushttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riIBGTEf6gothis is real press conference in Missouri they recut the conference to cut out the truthAND the MSM has taken down the links to the original press conference
Rand Paul and the Politics of Parts
News Virginian ^ | 5-7-14 | Ken Adams
Posted on Thursday, May 08, 2014 11:28:55 AM by Oak Grove
Rand Paul and the Politics of Parts
Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky spoke at Harvard University on Friday, April 25th. In his address, Senator Paul repeated a theme he has used in several recent speeches. He said that the Republican Party needs to be the party of parts. Body parts.
In March of 1836, a young man of twenty-three years of age took his sword out of its scabbard and drew a line in the sand in front of an old mission outside of San Antonio, Texas, and called on the men defending that mission who were willing to stay on the ramparts and face an opposing army more than ten times their number to signify their commitment by stepping across the line.
It is generally supposed, by most Americans, that the Constitution is the founding document of this nation. It is not. In fact, the United States of America was founded with the ratification of our original constitution, the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union (Articles of Confederation, for short) on March 1, 1781.
This document was written to secure a union between the original thirteen states and it was written by the states, for the states. In other words, the states created the central government, which consisted of nothing more than a very weak unicameral Congress, composed of not less than two and no more than seven representatives from each state.
The original intent, as laid out in the Articles, was “a firm league of friendship with each other, for their common defense, the security of their liberties, and their mutual and general welfare, binding themselves to assist each other, against all force offered to, or attacks made upon them, or any of them, on account of religion, sovereignty, trade, or any other pretense whatever.”
““Patrick Henry is widely known as a major figure at the beginning of the Revolution. His name was synonymous with radicalism and dissent by colonist and English alike. It is said that his Stamp Act Resolutions were the first shots fired in the Revolution. His dissent did not end with the winning of freedom though. Henry’s concern for individual liberties and state sovereignty made him the chief dissenter…during the debate concerning the Constitution.”So why did Patrick Henry refuse to addend the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia? And why did he state his reason for not attending with the words “Because I small a rat”?”…..Conspiracy in Philadelphia | Planet Infowars
Conspiracy in Philadelphiaby Jerry Johnson, President,NiceneCouncil.comThomas Jewett writes, “Patrick Henry is widely known as a major figure at the beginning of the Revolution. His name was synonymous with radicalism and dissent by colonist and English alike. It is said that his Stamp Act Resolutions were the first shots fired in the Revolution. His dissent did not end with the winning of freedom though.
Henry’s concern for individual liberties and state sovereignty made him the chief dissenter…during the debate concerning the Constitution.”So why did Patrick Henry refuse to addend the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia? And why did he state his reason for not attending with the words “Because I small a rat”?On May 25th, 1787, a group of 55 men gathered for a closed meeting in Philadelphia.
Officially, it was being convened to discuss alterations to the constitution of the United States of America: the Articles of Confederation. Some state legislatures had authorized their representatives to attend the meeting only on this basis, explicitly prohibiting them from considering a new constitution.However, as soon as the meeting opened, the outline of a new constitution was submitted. Three more plans were submitted within days. There were no discussions at any time of a revision of the Articles.
The Articles would simply have to be replaced.To make certain that the general public did not find out about the nature of this conspiracy, the convention members swore an oath not to discuss any proceedings with the public…for the rest of their lives. The only first-hand accounts of the proceedings were published several years later after the death of the last survivor, James Madison, in 1836
Devvy Kidd — NSA snooping: who to blame and what to do… “Did anyone doubt the Marxist impostor president wouldn’t push the constitution killing “laws” on the books to fight the manufactured “war on terror” until someone finally got fed up with seeing what’s been going on and leaked the information which is now another full blown scandal?”
June 9, 2013
“We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts.” —Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775
This past week has been another tsunami of articles on the Internet over the NSA snooping scandal. Talk radio burning up the airwaves and politicians posturing during hearings. Some of them seem so shocked. Many of them voted for the damnable “Patriot” Act, so I can’t understand why they are suddenly shocked at the brazen data mining that’s been going on for years.