Archive
David Petraeus: The VP for Rick Perry in 2016
David Petraeus: The VP for Rick Perry in 2016
The Hill ^ | March 27, 2013 | Bernie Quigley
Posted on Sunday, March 31, 2013 2:24:03 AM by 2ndDivisionVet
If as has been widely suggested, CPAC 2013 marked a paradigm change, a generational change, a new direction of conservatism, it is possible to speculate that someone who fits the new paradigm could be president in 2016. Among them: Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Sarah Palin, all of whom starred at the Conservative Political Action Conference. For any one of these, the perfect choice for vice president should be David Petraeus.
Ron Paul: Secession Is an American Principle…



Ron Paul‘s Video Updates / Ron Paul: Secession Is an American Principle
Ron Paul: Secession Is an American Principle
266 Responses
By RonPaul.com on November 13, 2012
Ron Paul: This weekend I got a couple of calls from the media asking me questions about Rick Perry, our governor here in Texas and the statements he made about possible secession.
Congressman Ron Paul at an event hosted in his honor at CPAC 2011 in Washington, D.C. Please attribute to Gage Skidmore if used elsewhere. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Now, he didn’t call for secession, but he was restating a principle that was long held and at least in the original time of our country, and that is that there was a right to secession.
Actually, after the Civil War, nobody believes there is a so-called right to secession, but it is a very legitimate issue to debate because all of the states that came into the Union before the Civil War believed they have a right to secede and New England in the early part of the 19th century actually considered it, and nobody questioned them about whether they had the right to do it or not.
Rick Perry’s Letter to Obama
Dear Secretary Sebelius:
In the ObamaCare plan, the federal government sought to force the states to expand their Medicaid programs by — in the words of the Supreme Court — putting a gun to their heads. Now that the “gun to the head” has been removed, please relay this message to the President: I oppose both the expansion of Medicaid as provided in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the creation of a so-called “state” insurance exchange, because both represent brazen intrusions into the sovereignty of our state…

WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 03: Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius testifies before the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Health Subcommittee on Captiol Hill March 3, 2011 in Washington, DC. Sebelius testified on the HHS FY2012 budget and the implementation of health care reform laws, including the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. (Image credit: Getty Images via @daylife)
Gov. Perry Responds to Health Care Decision
Gov. Perry Responds to Health Care Decision
KCENTV.com ^
Posted on Thursday, June 28, 2012 2:02:02 PM by wk4bush2004
(KCEN) — Shortly after the Supreme Court handed down their ruling on the health care bill, Texas Gov. Rick Perry released a statement with his reactions to the Court’s decision.
Perry said, “This ruling will be a stomach punch to the American economy. It is a shocking disappointment to freedom-loving Americans desperate to get our country back on track. Obamacare is bad for the economy, bad for health care, bad for freedom. Americans have made clear their overwhelming opposition to its convoluted, burdensome and overreaching mandates.”
Rick Perry Was Correct by Andrew P. Napolitano
When Texas Gov. Rick Perry, then in the early stages of his short-lived quest for the Republican presidential nomination, referred to Social Security as “a Ponzi scheme,” he was excoriated by the press, left and right, and by his fellow Republicans, as well. Earlier this week, government actuaries revealed that Perry was correct.
Governor Rick Perry of Texas speaking at the Republican Leadership Conference in New Orleans, Louisiana. Please attribute to Gage Skidmore if used elsewhere. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
That revelation, which was greeted with a ho-hum by the media, basically announced that by 2033, 21 years from now, the so-called Social Security trust fund will be empty.
The only reason this was even announced is because we are approaching a presidential election campaign, and in response to Perry’s much-derided claim, the government’s actuaries, who originally told the Obama administration and the public that the fund would be solvent until 2036, re-examined their numbers and concluded that it will be in the red three years earlier than they thought.
Israeli Spying and 9/11: Carl Cameron’s Spiked FOX News Story
Part 1 – Original FOX News Webpage – VideoNote in the first segment of the article that a highly placed US investigator states, “evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It’s classified information.”
This statement suggests that such evidence must exist, since there would be no need for classification if nothing had been found.
(AND SCROLL DOWN TO READER RESPONSES TOO!) Larry Flynt offers $1M for dirt on lawmakers, government officials
Larry Flynt offers $1M for dirt on lawmakers, government officials
By Vicki Needham – 03/04/12 01:28 PM ET
Larry Flynt is on the trail for any dirt on congressional lawmakers and government officials.
The Hustler magazine publisher placed a full-page ad in Sunday’s Washington Post, offering upward of $1 million for any information about “infidelity, sexual impropriety or corruption concerning a U.S. senator, congressperson or prominent government official.”
The ad says sources with documented evidence would be paid if Flynt publishes the “verified story.” He is asking for submissions by phone or email.
In September, Flynt went after former Republican presidential contender Rick Perry, offering a million-dollar bounty to anyone “who can document an illicit sexual encounter with the Texas governor.
Even If You Don’t Like Ron Paul You Should Watch This – Its only 1 minute | Veterans Today
Latest Posts: Even If You Don’t Like Ron Paul You Should Watch This – Its only 1 minute Top 10 Veterans Stories in Today’s News – February 18, 2012 UVA Students Go on Hunger Strike for Living Wage Sunday, February 19th, 2012 | Posted by Veterans TodayEven If You Don’t Like Ron Paul You Should Watch This – Its only 1 minute2
You can change the future. Stop the spending its bankrupting America! “Banned” Commercial: Ron Paul 2012 Unofficial With Commentary From Viewers In ChinaAlexander HigginsI had an email conversation with an American who lives in China and I asked him about what the Chinese thought of our “Banned” Commercial: Ron Paul 2012. Here is his reply which is quite moving:Well I showed it to my wife who is Chinese. The translations don’t match 100%, I saw the original afterwards and was like “okay that’s better”. But, I’ll actually share something with you very true.When I first came to China I lived in a place called XiaoShan a rich district of Hangzhou and made a few friends with business owners. Last month I met up with them at a convenient store and on the TV there was talk about U.S. politicians.
Ron Paul Can’t Win; Heck, He Doesn’t Even Want To Become President of the U.S. « LewRockwell.com Blog
The latest entry into this sweepstakes is the War Street Journal. They opine that Dr. Paul “He knows he can’t win, but he wants to use his delegates to hold the Republican Party hostage to his views on national security and presidential power.”
How come no one in the mainstream media says that Donald Trump can’t win? That Michelle Bachman can’t win? That Rick Perry can’t win? That Jon Huntsman can’t win? That Herman Cain can’t win? That Mitt Romney can’t win? That Newt Gingrich can’t win? That Rick Santorum can’t win?
Why is it that ONLY Ron Paul can’t win? Lookit, when there are almost a dozen initial candidates, all but one “can’t win.”
Let me assure the War Street Journal: Not only CAN Ron Paul win, not only does he WANT to win, but, stick this in your pipe and smoke it, he WILL win.
Firebrand Free Republic Founder Endorses Newt Gingrich With Epic Call to Action
Firebrand Free Republic Founder Endorses Newt Gingrich With Epic Call to Action
Fox News ^ | January 19, 2012 | Fox News
Posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 10:57:08 AM by true believer forever
I’m officially endorsing Newt Gingrich for president today. Was going to wait until after Florida, but see no reason to delay. We need Newt to win in South Carolina and Florida to stop any possible momentum building up for the establishment big government, statist, abortionist RINO!!
Prison Planet.com » Media Cover-up: Ron Paul’s Standing Not Discussed in Iowa Vote Reshuffle
Republican officials in Iowa today said that there was no clear winner in the caucus held there on January 3. Party officials said results from eight of the 1,774 precincts were missing when they conducted the vote certification process, meaning they likely will never know what the final tallies were for the candidates.
Despite the ambiguity, Rick Santorum was quick to declare a “virtual tie” in the race and the establishment media obliged him on the claim while ignoring how the change effected Ron Paul’s standing.
Media Cover up: Ron Paul’s Standing Not Discussed in Iowa Vote Reshuffle
Rick Santorum claims he is in a “virtual tie” with declared winner Mitt Romney.
According to the Iowa Caucus website, the certified results of 1,766 precincts made public Thursday show Santorum with 29,839 votes, followed by Romney with 29,805, Ron Paul in third with 26,036, and Newt Gingrich with 16,163, Rick Perry with 12,557, Michele Bachmann with 6,046 and Jon Huntsman with 739. Party officials said 121,503 votes were certified.
The admission of voting irregularities and uncounted votes in the state adds more weight to the argument that the race was fixed in order to discount Ron Paul and push him to the periphery in a concerted effort to minimize his popularity among voters and upstage the handpicked establishment candidates.
On January 4, we reported on the Republican establishment’s decision to conduct the vote count in secret after vague threats issued by the shadowy Anonymous hacker group and protests planned by Occupy the Iowa Caucus.
“Also abusing suddenly lax ID registration may have created many fake votes for neocons Santorum and Romney,” Brad Funkhouser wrote.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
In addition to ID problems, the Clinton County Republican Women’s Club reported mysterious “computer glitches” during the vote.
“This is the biggest fraud since Kennedy stole the West Virginia Primary,” Funkhouser said.
If, as Santorum claims, he is virtually tied with Romney in Iowa, that would mean Ron Paul came in second, not third. The establishment media has neglected to report this fact. Instead, it has ignored Paul and continued its campaign to portray Romney and Santorum as the only viable candidates wrestling to gain the nomination.
Moreover, a reshuffling of the vote will change the dynamics on delegates as the front-runners head into the Republican national convention in Tampa, Florida during the week of August 27, 2012.
Perry under pressure to bow out, endorse another conservative
READER RESPONSE: Gunny G…
In my kindness, I had him pegged as the lessor of evils of the herd at best….but even so…I prefer he not grab over and bend his ankles for the likes of these phony Rs !!!!!
he’s better than that!
Semper Watching!
Rick Perry: Americans should be ‘unhinged’ by decision to reject Keystone pipe path
Rick Perry: Americans should be ‘unhinged’ by decision to reject Keystone pipe pathFox News ^ | January 18, 2012 | Nick KalmanPosted on Wednesday, January 18, 2012 12:46:14 PM by Cincinatus’ Wife…”It doesn’t surprise me but it’s again — the president’s focused more on the next election than on the next generation.”Getting this country independent of foreign sources of crude from countries that are not our friends is really problematic.
So this Canadian oil, there’s a possibility we could lose it to China with that decision so I hope Americans will really become unhinged with that decision because it is a really bad decision for our country, for energy independence and sends a horrible message at a time that were headed to $4 and $5 oil or excuse me $4 or $5 gasoline, to have a neighbor who’s willing to sell us crude that is available.
Prison Planet.com » It’s Over – Only Two Republican Candidates On Virginia Ballot
In the Commonwealth, real change candidate and Champion of the Constitution Ron Paul will face down establishment flip-flopper Mitt Romney
LAKE JACKSON, Texas – 2012 Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul, the constitutionally-observant candidate of real change, will face down establishment candidate and notorious flip-flopper Mitt Romney in a head-to-head matchup in the Virginia primary.
The Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied four candidates’ appeals to appear on the ballot after their glaring failure to comply with the Commonwealth’s stringent, but widely-known, ballot access requirements.
Former candidate Jon Huntsman and Rick Santorum did not file signatures with the Virginia State Board of Elections at all. Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich did file signatures, but fell short of qualifying. Rick Perry then brought a suit against the state challenging the ballot-access requirements to which all candidates were held, and others failing to qualify joined the suit. When the suit was struck down, an injunction was filed in part to reconcile whether and when paper ballots would be printed, and today the final decision was handed down.
Virginia is the nation’s 12th-largest state and its primary election takes place on March 6th – Super Tuesday. The absence of any other candidates on the ballot aside from Paul and Romney, including serial hypocrite Gingrich and counterfeit conservative Santorum, is sending ripple effects throughout key early voting states including South Carolina where Palmetto State voters now are concerned about how their vote will affect the nominating process going forward.
In or Out? Perry Counts on Strong S.C. Vote to Stay in Race [Santorum: I can win if they drop out]
GUNNY G RESPONSE…
SEE ARCHIVE, READER RESPONSEs, Etc…..
Perry may well be the lessor of evils, yet to prove himself as much more—I don’t know—but wait-n-see!Semper Watching!Gunny G
Semper Watching!
via In or Out? Perry Counts on Strong S.C. Vote to Stay in Race [Santorum: I can win if they drop out].
Related articles
- In or Out? Perry Counts on Strong S.C. Vote to Stay in Race (blogs.wsj.com)
- (Gunny G Response…) Romney: The Castor-Oil Candidate – Republicans are finding the prospect of nominating Mitt… (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
- Perry, Santorum Make Conservative Pitch (abcnews.go.com)
- (READER RESPONSE: Gunny G) The Ron Paul Factor (Why he’s surging even as others are stagnant or stumbling) (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
- Evangelical Leaders Back Santorum, Unaware They’re Irrelevant (outsidethebeltway.com)
The Choice
The Choice
Human Events ^ | January 10, 2012 | Rick Perry
Posted on Saturday, January 14, 2012 5:44:53 PM by SaveOurRepublicFromTyranny
Big government conservatives will never truly overhaul Washington because they need the status quo in place to accomplish their objectives. They don’t want to rebuild the machine; they simply want to change the people pulling the levers.
But that is not what the American people want. There is such deep and widespread discontent that nothing short of a complete overhaul will satisfy their justifiable demands.
The American people expect changes equal to their concern, which is the highest it’s been in at least a generation, and I am the only candidate with a vision that is as strong and sweeping as the public is angry.
While others promise to tinker with the status quo, I am the outsider who will overhaul Washington. Others talk about trimming the bureaucracy; I will eliminate the Departments of Commerce, Energy and Education, gut the activist EPA, freeze bureaucrat salaries and make Congress part-time. Others talk about cleaning up the tax code; I say let Americans throw the whole thing out and pay a simple flat tax instead.
In Defense of Libertarians (being libertarian and being Republican are not mutually exclusive)
In Defense of Libertarians (being libertarian and being Republican are not mutually exclusive)
American Thinker ^ | 01/12/2012 | Rachael Williams
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 7:55:31 AM by SeekAndFind
Throughout the primary election season there’s been a group unfairly villainized by the rest of the Republicans. Not the establishment (they can’t be villainized enough for giving us McCain and trying to keep folks like Rand Paul from getting elected in 2010) — I mean libertarians.
Republicans like to villainize libertarians for infiltrating their party — but refuse to acknowledge that being libertarian and being Republican are not mutually exclusive. I wish someone had told me, but apparently all self-identified libertarians are the same caricature of Ron Paul supporters who refuses to debate and instead just shouts “Neo-con! Neo-con!” at everyone with whom he disagrees.
I’m not what you’d call a “Ron Paul libertarian”; I don’t think he’s the end-all, be-all personification of what a libertarian is or what libertarians must believe to fit the title. Love him or hate him — which seem to be the only two options — I’d like to believe that everyone on the right can admit that Ron Paul has brought the mainstream of the far right a little closer to libertarian beliefs. Without Ron Paul, you wouldn’t have candidates like Rick Perry and Rick Santorum pushing for trillions of dollars in spending cuts, nor would they be promising to outright eliminate regulatory agencies.
Why eligibility doesn’t matter to politicians
Like most other states, the commonwealth of Virginia has election laws designed by the legislature to ensure only qualified candidates get ballot positions.
In the GOP primary election of 2012, only Ron Paul and Mitt Romney qualified by following the procedures, which include getting enough petitions signed in every county of the state.
In short order, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, a resident of the state, and even states-rights champion Rick Perry were filing U.S. lawsuits challenging Virginia’s power to run elections the way its lawmakers wanted to run them.
Meanwhile, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, normally a constitutionally minded lawyer, announced he would file emergency legislation that would allow any presidential candidate receiving federal matching funds or qualified to receive them to get on the ballot.
In other words, the rules for the election are changing in the middle of the game. The state created legislation that was noted by two candidates who took the trouble to comply – presumably at some expense and effort. The others did not.
Now, using federal lawsuits and last-minute changes in legislation, those who didn’t take the trouble to comply with eligibility standards are being provided with an exception.
I have a problem with that.
It’s not because I favor Ron Paul or Mitt Romney. In fact, neither of them would be my choice for the Republican nomination – and I, too, am a Virginia resident and registered voter. I would like the opportunity to vote for someone who more closely represents my views.
I just happen to believe eligibility standards are important – and should be observed, enforced and amended only through normal political processes, not federal court rulings. Neither should election rules be changed in the middle of a campaign…..
GOP Presidential Debate Tonight…
GOP Presidential Debate Tonight
Brevard Times ^ | January 6, 2012
Posted on Saturday, January 07, 2012 9:34:48 AM by Cincinatus’ Wife

The first New Hampshire Republican Presidential Primary Debate will be held tonight, January 7, 2012, at 9 a.m. E.S.T. in Manchester, New Hampshire. The debate is will air on ABC.
Rick Perry betrays the right, stays in
Rick Perry betrays the right, stays in
The Hill ^ | January 4, 2012 | Brent Budowsky
Posted on Thursday, January 05, 2012 2:56:32 AM by 2ndDivisionVet
If Rick Perry was a legitimate conservative (which I always warned he was not) he would have dropped out of the campaign today and endorsed Rick Santorum, Ron Paul or Newt Gingrich. Yet “Pay-for-Play” Perry stays in, and heads for South Carolina. So what’s the deal?
The big winner of Perry staying in, by far, is Mitt Romney. The big loser is the conservative movement and the candidates who appeal to that movement. Keeping in mind my long-held view that Perry is not conservative, just a “pay-for-play” guy, what is in it for Perry?
1. Perhaps Romney offered Perry a position in his administration, such as undersecretary of Agriculture.
2. Perhaps Romney offered Perry a diplomatic post suited to his talents, such as United States Ambassador to Bolivia.
3. Perhaps Perry spent more of his money than we realize, and Romney offered to go to his 1 percent wealthy fundraisers and raise for Perry a little more dough to sweeten the pie.
American Wealth Eroding by Bill Sardi
Today’s Presidential campaign sounds more like a horse race.

“The horses are entering the starting gate. Jockeys to watch are top-tier picks Romney, Gingrich and Perry, sporting 6-to-1, 5-to-1 and 4-to-1 odds respectively. But there’s a slight delay. Perry’s horse, a Texas stallion, is kicking and the stewards are having a difficult time getting him into the gate.
In final Iowa push, Perry aims to set himself apart as ultimate outsider
In final Iowa push, Perry aims to set himself apart as ultimate outsider
The Dallas Morning News ^ | December 29, 2011 | Todd J. Gilman
Posted on Thursday, December 29, 2011 12:44:46 PM by altura
RelatedCRESTON, Iowa — Rick Perry began his final push in the Iowa Republican caucuses Tuesday by sharpening his claim to be the sort of leader the country badly needs, and which his rivals decidedly are not.
“You need to ask yourself: If we replace the Democrat insider with a Republican insider, is that going to change Washington, D.C.? No, it’s not,” he told 150 or so Iowans crammed into a coffee shop a week ahead of caucuses likely to winnow the presidential field. “I will go to Washington to be an anti-establishment outsider.”
Paul and Perry Are Poised to Punk Romney and Gingrich in Iowa
Paul and Perry Are Poised to Punk Romney and Gingrich in Iowa
Yahoo News ^ | Dec. 21, 2011 | Sherry Tomfeld
Posted on Thursday, December 22, 2011 10:19:22 AM by stillafreemind
Besides Paul’s top position, Perry is now third or fourth in most of the polling. Pundits say Iowa is irrelevant if Paul wins, as he is a one-trick pony. Could a win in Iowa ignite the Paul ground teams in other states? Paul is a force to be reckoned with because of his staunch supporters. Maybe candidates should be reaching towards Paul instead of running away from him.
Perry, on the other hand, could be the dark horse in this race. If not nationally, at least he appears to be set to come from behind in Iowa. Why are people giving Perry a second look? His supporters do not mind that he is not the best debater.
Rick Perry vs. Newt Gingrich: Which Candidate Will Kill ‘Big Daddy’ Government?
Rick Perry vs. Newt Gingrich: Which Candidate Will Kill ‘Big Daddy’ Government?
The Stir – CafeMom ^ | December 19, 2011 | Lori Ziganto, Homeschooling Mom and conservative blogger
Posted on Tuesday, December 20, 2011 2:43:55 AM by Cincinatus’ Wife
The South Carolina Republican Presidential Primary is on January 21, 2012. I live in South Carolina, so the Republican Presidential candidates have just about a month to convince me of one thing: that he or she will help cure the disease and not just the symptoms…..
EXCERPT
via Rick Perry vs. Newt Gingrich: Which Candidate Will Kill ‘Big Daddy’ Government?.
Related articles
- A Time For Choosing: Rick Perry for President (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
- Rick Perry, Mitt Romney internals show Newt Gingrich slippage, sources say (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
- A Rick Perry comeback? It all rides on Iowa now. (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
- Romney, on Letterman show, jokes about hair, Newt Gingrich (politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com)
- Rick Perry rebound in Iowa: Assisted by veterans? (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
A Time For Choosing: Rick Perry for President
A Time For Choosing: Rick Perry for President
Big Government ^ | 12-19-2011 | Mike Flynn – OP/ED
Posted on Monday, December 19, 2011 2:23:46 PM by smoothsailing
December 19, 2011
A Time For Choosing: Rick Perry for President
Mike Flynn
Yes, I’ve seen the debates. And, yes, I’ve watched the “oops” moment probably a dozen times. While he has steadily improved, Rick Perry is not a skilled debater. Seeing him debate is like watching a high-wire act, where each moment is tense with the fear that the performer could slip and fall. I get it. But, when did debate performance become our sole criteria for picking a President? When did the RNC decide to team up with the legacy media and turn the nomination contest into an almost unwatchable reality TV spectacle? Is this really a sane way to pick a nominee?
Gallup Daily GOP Tracking Poll: not updated for 2 days
Gallup Daily GOP Tracking Poll: not updated for 2 days
Gallup.com ^ | 12/17/2011 | staff
Posted on Saturday, December 17, 2011 8:34:21 AM by Notwithstanding
The Gallup website says:
“GALLUP DAILY: GOP Ballot Tracking, Among Republican Registered Voters; Updates daily at 1 p.m. ET”
But there have been no updates since Wednesday, and today is Saturday.
A Rick Perry comeback? It all rides on Iowa now.
A Rick Perry comeback? It all rides on Iowa now.
The Christian Science Monitor ^ | 12/15/2011 | Amanda Paulson
Posted on Thursday, December 15, 2011 11:09:38 AM by wolfman23601
At this stage, that seems unlikely. But Politico is reporting that internal polls from both Mr. Perry and Mitt Romney find significant slippage in Newt Gingrich‘s Iowa standing. And Perry is one of the beneficiaries. “I believe [Ron] Paul can trip up Newt here, and that’s great news for Romney because Newt is done if that happens,” one Iowa caucus-watcher told Politico. “Watch Rick Perry. He’s going for a top-three finish, and that could be to Romney’s expense.” How well do you know Rick Perry? Take our quiz Perry’s strategy amounts to betting everything on Iowa, where he’s making a major push, despite being stuck in the low double digits in the polls.
Rick Perry rebound in Iowa: Assisted by veterans?
Rick Perry rebound in Iowa: Assisted by veterans?
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2011/1214/Rick-Perry-rebound-in-Iowa-Assisted-by-veterans ^ | 12-14-2011 | Liz Marlantes
Posted on Wednesday, December 14, 2011 9:07:52 PM by smoothsailing
Rick Perry rebound in Iowa: Assisted by veterans?
Rick Perry, Mitt Romney internals show Newt Gingrich slippage, sources say
Rick Perry, Mitt Romney internals show Newt Gingrich slippage, sources say
Politico ^ | December 14, 2011 | MAGGIE HABERMAN |
Posted on Wednesday, December 14, 2011 2:26:05 PM by Cincinatus’ Wife
A weeklong blitz of negative ads from Ron Paul and “Restore Our Future,” the pro-Mitt Romney super PAC, have taken a toll on Newt Gingrich’s standing in Iowa, internal numbers from the Rick Perry and Romney camps show, according to multiple sources.
Sources didn’t provide specific numbers on how far he’s slipped, but it’s perceptible in both camps’ numbers, the sources said.
Perry has been inching up, the sources said – in part thanks to his faith-based push but largely because of his controversial anti-gay rights ad, and the big question is whether he draws at all from Romney and pushes him down out of the top three finishers in the state.
The person who is holding strong, according to the internal numbers, is Paul, who has a true shot of winning the caucuses, according to several Iowa Republican insiders surveying ground games and energy.
Gingrich, Paul Virtually Tied for First Place in Iowa (PPP POLL: Newt-22, Paul-21, Mitt – 16)
Gingrich, Paul Virtually Tied for First Place in Iowa (PPP POLL: Newt-22, Paul-21, Mitt – 16)
The Corner ^ | 12/13/2011 | Katrina Trinko
Posted on Tuesday, December 13, 2011 3:13:15 PM by TBBT
Results from Democratic firm Public Policy Polling poll of likely GOP caucus goers: Newt Gingrich (22 percent), Ron Paul (21 percent), Mitt Romney (16 percent), Michele Bachmann (11 percent), Rick Perry (9 percent), Rick Santorum (8 percent), Jon Huntsman (5 percent), and Gary Johnson (1 percent). The poll’s margin of error is 4.2 percentage points.
Down in the weeds, PPP notices a couple of factors that might be contributing to these numbers:
He’s [Gingrich] also seen a significant decline in his favorability numbers. Last week he was at +31 (62/31) and he’s now dropped 19 points to +12 (52/40). The attacks on him appear to be taking a heavy toll- his support with Tea Party voters has declined from 35% to 24%. Paul meanwhile has seen a big increase in his popularity from +14 (52/38) to +30 (61/31).
Perry’s new TV ad slams ‘political correctness’ in Washington (w/Video)
Perry’s new TV ad slams ‘political correctness‘ in Washington (w/Video)
The Hill ^ | 12-13-2011 | Alicia M. Cohn
Posted on Tuesday, December 13, 2011 1:41:29 PM by smoothsailing
December 13, 2011
Perry’s new TV ad slams ‘political correctness’ in Washington
By Alicia M. Cohn
Rick Perry hits political correctness in a new TV ad set to begin airing in Iowa and national cable on Tuesday.
“Washington is the capital of political correctness, where double-speak reigns and the truth is frowned upon,” Perry says to the camera in the new ad. The Texas governor continues to position himself as a “Washington outsider” looking to change things in the D.C. establishment.















Recent Comments