By Lloyd Marcus
July 12, 2014NewsWithViews.comI am considering joining a new gym closer to my home.
The gym markets itself as a friendly place for people who simply wish to get into shape, unlike other gyms where overzealous muscle-heads harass, bully and judge them.In my twenty years at various gyms,
I have never witnessed the scenario this gym claims is such a problem. As a matter of fact, working out among serious bodybuilders has proven beneficial. At home, my max bench press was my 110 pound set of weights.
Thus, I thought that was the most I could safely bench press. Upon joining a gym, I saw a guy half my size pressing far more which opened my eyes to my potential. Working out where professionals were shooting for the moon helped me to at least land among the stars.The new gym near my home brilliantly created an enemy and a crisis which does not exist to attract clients.My fellow Americans, this is the evil modus operandi of our President Obama.
Chilling! Democrat Tells Religious Americans: You Must Choose Between Your Faith or Your Business… “In Schumer’s way of thinking, the solution for religious people is obvious: If you don’t want to disobey your religion, refrain from starting a business in America. At all. Ever.”
Pajamas Media ^ | 07/11/2014 | Bryan PrestonPosted on 7/11/2014, 11:11:20 AM by SeekAndFindProgressive Democrat Sen. Chuck Schumer NY admitted Thursday that he doesn’t even know what Hobby Lobby sells.
He tacitly admits that he doesn’t care that it is a family-owned business.Nevertheless, in announcing that the Democrats will pursue legislation to overthrow the Supreme Court’s decision of last week, Schumer explicitly ordered Americans to choose between our livelihoods and our religious beliefs.“Think of the difference,” Schumer says……..
Obama Is Going To Use More Executive Action! This Is The Coming Of The New World Order | Economics and Politics
Before It’s News
Obama and his pen!This pen and this idiot, are seriously the worst thing that has ever happened to this country.
Obama is now going to use more executive action to not only change laws on immigration, but also to override the decision by the Supreme Court on the Hobby Lobby decision! This is yet again outrageous, while all of this is going on, there is a chance that this is a distraction for him signing the gun confiscation bill.
That is always still in the cards, because he is feeling the heat from all sides. Obama knows he is going down soon, so what does a narrsasistic person do, bring the whole country to a stop before he goes down! Watch as a war unfolds in our country in the coming weeks if not days.
As he has said recently he is prepared to act unilaterally on gun confiscation modeling the Australian style gun grab. Hold on tight, the rides getting bumpy!
We’re Back to Nine People in Black Robes Deciding Our Fate,Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | June 30, 2014 | Rush LimbaughPosted on 6/30/2014, 4:07:43 PM by Kaslin
BEGIN TRANSCRIPTRUSH: We’re still back, however, to the thing that we’ve all talked about on this program for years. Here we have two cases Democrat, and everybody else breathlessly awaits what nine people who wear black robes are going to say.
And whatever those nine people say is final, fini, that’s it. And it’s awfully precarious. Somebody asked me today, “So are you expecting any Supreme Court vacancies this term,
Rush? Do you expect any of them to resign?”
Obama Likes Secrets, Including Yours
Townhall.com ^ | June 29, 2014 | Steve ChapmanPosted on 6/29/2014, 4:36:08 PM by Kaslin
The surprising thing about the Supreme Court’s decision on police searches of cellphones was its unanimity. Aligned on the same side of a major law enforcement issue were liberal and conservative justices who normally fight like cats and dogs. All agreed that it’s intolerable to let cops ransack the voluminous contents of mobile phones………
Obstructionism Is PatrioticTownhall.com ^ | June 27, 2014 | Michelle MalkinPosted on 6/27/2014, 7:58:06 AM by Kaslin
First, it’s a rebuke against arrogant White House power-grabbers who thought they could act with absolute impunity and interminable immunity.
Down With the Presidency –
May 4, 2014
Edit Leave a comment Go to comments
The presidency must be destroyed.
It is the primary evil we face, and the cause of nearly all our woes.
It squanders the national wealth and starts unjust wars against foreign peoples that have never done us any harm.
It wrecks our families, tramples on our rights, invades our communities, and spies on our bank accounts.
It skews the culture towards decadence and trash. It tells lie after lie.pattonpolpattonpol
Teachers used to tell schools kids that anyone can be president. This is like saying anyone can go to Hell. It’s not an inspiration; it’s a threat.
But there’s big news in a dissent that accompanied this denial, declaring that big change is underway for religious liberty.
By: DevvyJune 1, 2014
It is alleged Chief Justice John Roberts wrote both opinions for the decision for what’s known as Obamacare or the false official title: Affordable Care Act: How Roberts Was Blackmailed To Support ObamaCare.
That particular piece covers the likely illegal adoption of two infants, a boy and a girl by Roberts and his wife from Ireland in 2000. Marriage is always a good cover Under Ireland’s adoption laws, it appears Roberts’ and his wife ran afoul of the law. Roberts was confirmed to the high court, September 29, 2005.
Then, there are those who believe John Roberts, a strict Catholic is a closet sexual deviant. According to two people I know who work in downtown DC in the legal field, Roberts’ sexual preference has been the talk all over town since he became Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. In the mid-90s while my husband and I lived in Colorado, there was a huge war over a constitutional amendment pertaining to sexual deviants:”Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 1996, is a landmark United States Supreme Court case dealing with sexual orientation and state laws.
Attorney Michael Peroutka — Supreme Court Decision on Prayer is a Disaster, Not a Deleverance… “Crazy, you say? I agree. But this is exactly the conclusion the Supreme Court maintains through a “legal fiction” they call the “Incorporation Doctrine”.”
By Attorney Michael Peroutka
May 21, 2014
Many Christians and Christian groups and even churches and church leaders are celebrating the recent Supreme Court ruling in a case known as Town Board of Greece, New York v. Galloway.
It seems to be the conventional wisdom among these folks that the Supreme Court did a “good thing” in holding that the Town Board of Greece (and by implication, other legislative bodies) may pray before the commencement of their public functions.
By Gary Mauser Sunday, May 11, 2014
“I am,” she answered crisply, “a Second Amendment absolutist.” Growing up in Birmingham, Ala., in the early 1960s, when racial tensions rose, there were, she said, occasions when the black community had to exercise its right to bear arms in self-defense, becoming
if you will, a well-regulated militia.—Dr. Condolezza Rice, August 6, 2000.
What comes to mind when thinking about guns and Afro-Americans? The media typically portray blacks as either criminals or anti-gun activists. Here is a glimpse into the real story.
HARRY TRUMAN: “…To Be A Piano-PLAYER In A ………. AND TO TELL THE TRUTH…” ~ Down With the Presidency…..
Down With the Presidency
The presidency must be destroyed. It is the primary evil we face, and the cause of nearly all our woes. It squanders the national wealth and starts unjust wars against foreign peoples that have never done us any harm.
Ref Above Pic !!!
It wrecks our families, tramples on our rights, invades our communities, and spies on our bank accounts.
It skews the culture towards decadence and trash. It tells lie after lie. Teachers used to tell schools kids that anyone can be president. This is like saying anyone can go to Hell. It’s not an inspiration; it’s a threat.
Alabama High Court Declares Unborn Children Have RightsCBN ^ | 4/24/2014 | CBNPosted on Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:51:06 AM by xzinsThe Alabama Supreme Court has ruled that the word “child” includes both the born and unborn.The decision comes in the case of a woman who was convicted for using cocaine during her pregnancy. Her baby tested positive for the drug at his birth.
Under Alabama law that is considered “chemical endangerment of a child.”The court ruled the state has a legitimate interest in protecting the lives of children from the earliest stages of their development.”God, not governments and legislatures, gives persons these inherent natural rights,” Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore and Justice Tom Parker wrote in their opinion.
Unborn child has ‘inalienable’ right to life ‘at all stages of development’: Alabama Supreme Court
LifeSite News ^ | April 22, 2014 | Colin Kerr
Posted on Wednesday, April 23, 2014 12:19:53 PM by lilyramone
Attorney Jonathan Emord — A Lot More Than a Smidgeon… “Obama told Bill O’Reilly of Fox News that there is not even a “smidgeon” of evidence to support the existence of an IRS scandal whereby IRS unlawfully discriminated against Tea Party groups seeking tax exempt status. It looks like Obama is deserving of another four Pinnochios…”
President Obama told Bill O’Reilly of Fox News that there is not even a “smidgeon” of evidence to support the existence of an
It looks like Obama is deserving of another four Pinnochios from the Washington Post.
Alexander Hamilton on impeachment
Facebook ^ | March 7, 2014 | Tara Ross
Posted on Friday, March 07, 2014 9:27:14 PM by gitmo
On this day in 1788, Federalist Paper No. 65 is published. Publius discusses the Senate’s role in impeachment/conviction of executive officers. Why do I suspect just a few of you are interested in this paper?!
Did Supremes just ‘make violent revolution inevitable’? ‘It is fruitless to expect federal government to control the lust for tyrannical power’… | Investor Discussion Board: IDB…..
Did Supremes just ‘make violent revolution inevitable’? ‘It is fruitless to expect federal government to control the lust for tyrannical power’…
A gun-rights leader is warning “the natives are beyond restless. They are at the stage of collecting torches and pitchforks and preparing to head for the castle gates en masse.”
Alas, he says, a chance to defuse Americans‘ growing anger has been lost because the Court refused to do this one thing …
Obama’s War on the First Amendment… “When President Barack Obama said he planned to “fundamentally transform” the United States, he wasn’t referring only to spreading the wealth around or even to conforming our foreign-trade regulations to the dictates of globalist busybodies.”
Obama’s War on the First Amendment
Townhall.com ^ | February 18, 2014 | Phyllis Schlafly
Posted on Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:42:33 PM by Kaslin
When President Barack Obama said he planned to “fundamentally transform” the United States, he wasn’t referring only to spreading the wealth around or even to conforming our foreign-trade regulations to the dictates of globalist busybodies.
He is also working openly and covertly, through administrative regulations and supremacist judges’ decisions, to transform us into a sanitized secular nation.
The Daily Caller ^ | 2-4-14 | Rachel Stoltzfoos
Posted on Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:55:00 PM by afraidfortherepublic
The town of Campbell, Wis., is facing a federal lawsuit challenging ordinance 9.12, which bans the display of banners or flags on or near the town’s pedestrian overpass.
Cruz lays out indictment of Obama encroachment on Texas\’ rights
Dallas News ^ | 04 February 2014 06:07 AM | TODD J. GILLMAN
Posted on Tuesday, February 04, 2014 10:35:23 AM by SoConPubbie
On Tuesday, he\’s releasing a six-page report on \”The Obama Administration\’s Assault on Texas,\” highlighting some of the legal friction points between the state and federal government and warning that Obama has sought to expand federal power at the expense of states, especially Texas.
By Kevin “Coach” Collins
Monday, without comment (because he could not make a coherent one), Chief Justice John Roberts denied a request by the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons and the Alliance for Natural Health USA for a stay in the implementation of Obamacare.
The groups had made their application last Friday arguing that since the bill had been declared a tax by the Supreme Court with Justice Roberts himself the deciding vote, and it had originated in the Senate where the Constitution says revenue bills may not originate, the law was therefore unconstitutional and implementation of Obamacare should at least be stayed pending further examination.
(Before It\’s News)
Within the upper echelons of our military there still remain men and women who are committed to the fundamental laws of the land. But assuming that all members of our military will be there to support the Constitution of the United States when our nation needs them most would be a mistake.
Understand this: There are those within their ranks who would turn on their oaths and forcibly seize the very rights our Founders fought so hard to preserve without giving it a second thought.
Comrades! \”Voluntary Roadblock\” added to NewSpeak Vocabulary!
The Backwoods Engineer Blog ^ | 21 November 2013 | The Backwoods Engineer
Posted on Thursday, November 21, 2013 11:08:57 AM by backwoods-engineer
Man, this kind of stuff gets my hillbilly back up.
It burns me up to see these city folk acting like sheep, when armed policemen pull them over, under color of law, and — Lord have mercy! — \’ask\’ them for BLOOD and TISSUE SAMPLES!
During Mises University in July, Judge Napolitano taught what David Gordon described as a “conference within the conference” and “a masterful survey of how the Supreme Court has interpreted the commerce clause, from Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) to the present.”
This summer, the Mises Institute spoke briefly with Judge Napolitano about the Constitution and the American political system.
America at War Against its Citizens… “Yes indeed, the American government, from presidents, to Congress even the Supreme Court have been waging relentless and frequent wars against the American people and been doing it for decades. ” | Veterans Today
While Israel may sends its drones over American cities and towns at the invitations of NSA and DHS, it is unlikely that the US government will use chemical weapons, napalms, Agent Orange or fires cruise missiles at cities like Gary, Youngstown, Oakland, Detroit and St. Louis.America Government needs not sends its army, it sends brigades of Wall Streeter’s, lobbyists, AIPAC, Harvard and Stanford MBA’s, the Feds and, members of Congress, as its army and in its wars against the American people.Yes indeed, the American government, from presidents, to Congress even the Supreme Court have been waging relentless and frequent wars against the American people and been doing it for decades.
Levin to the Rescue….. “Only those happily trampling on the last vestiges of freedom will deny that our federal government as a constitutional republic has ceased to function. The president can no longer control (nor does this one want to control) the enormous and ever-expanding bureaucracy functioning as a government by fiat. The legislative branch, so corrupted, so drunk by the allure of power, so disdainful of its constituents, is unable to stop its bankrupting ways. The judiciary is perhaps the worst. The Supreme Court is openly rejecting the authority of the Constitution itself.”
Levin to the Rescue
Townhall.com ^ | August 14, 2013 | Brent Bozell
Posted on Wednesday, August 14, 2013 2:11:07 PM by Kaslin
Only those happily trampling on the last vestiges of freedom will deny that our federal government as a constitutional republic has ceased to function. The president can no longer control (nor does this one want to control) the enormous and ever-expanding bureaucracy functioning as a government by fiat. The legislative branch, so corrupted, so drunk by the allure of power, so disdainful of its constituents, is unable to stop its bankrupting ways. The judiciary is perhaps the worst. The Supreme Court is openly rejecting the authority of the Constitution itself.
If the federal government refuses to adhere to the enumerated powers of the Constitution, what can the citizenry do about it? The events of the past five years (more, actually) prove this. It has become virtually impossible to stop the agenda of a radical Chief Executive who brazenly uses the federal government as his personal political machine. It is almost impossible to defeat an incumbent member of Congress with all the advantages it has awarded itself. For all intents it is impossible to replace a member of the Supreme Court.
Down With the Presidency –… “The presidency must be destroyed. It is the primary evil we face, and the cause of nearly all our woes. It squanders the national wealth and starts unjust wars against foreign peoples that have never done us any harm. It wrecks our families, tramples on our rights, invades our communities, and spies on our bank accounts. It skews the culture towards decadence and trash. It tells lie after lie. Teachers used to tell schools kids that anyone can be president. This is like saying anyone can go to Hell. It’s not an inspiration; it’s a threat. The presidency — by which I mean the executive state — is the sum total of American tyranny. The other branches of government, including the presidentially appointed Supreme Court, are mere adjuncts. The presidency insists on complete devotion and humble submission to its dictates, even while its steals the products of our labor and drives us into economic ruin. It centralizes all power unto itself, and crowds out all competing centers of power in society, including the church, the family, the business, the charity, and the community. I’ll go further. The U.S. presidency is the world’s leading evil. It… “
[contact-form][contact-field label='Name' type='name' required='1'/][contact-field label='Email' type='email' required='1'/][contact-field label='Website' type='url'/][contact-field label='Comment' type='textarea' required='1'/][/contact-form]
The presidency must be destroyed. It is the primary evil we face, and the cause of nearly all our woes. It squanders the national wealth and starts unjust wars against foreign peoples that have never done us any harm. It wrecks our families, tramples on our rights, invades our communities, and spies on our bank accounts. It skews the culture towards decadence and trash. It tells lie after lie. Teachers used to tell schools kids that anyone can be president. This is like saying anyone can go to Hell. It’s not an inspiration; it’s a threat.
Defending American Principles Is Now a Revolutionary Act… “The liberal elite is still in shock that six Americans resisted the relentless pressure of its hack politicians, slavering mainstream media mediocrities and progressive hustlers in order to acquit George Zimmerman. Consciously or not, the jurors’ verdict was an act of rebellion against the progressives who wants to jettison our most sacred principles.”
Defending American Principles Is Now a Revolutionary Act
Townhall.com ^ | July 22, 2013 | Kurt Schlichter
Posted on Monday, July 22, 2013 7:21:17 AM by Kaslin
The liberal elite is still in shock that six Americans resisted the relentless pressure of its hack politicians, slavering mainstream media mediocrities and progressive hustlers in order to acquit George Zimmerman. Consciously or not, the jurors’ verdict was an act of rebellion against the progressives who wants to jettison our most sacred principles.
The case was a joke, but you wouldn’t know that if you only listened to the mainstream media. The media’s rank speculation, mischaracterization of the evidence and outright lies were designed to replace the strict adherence to law and the rules of evidence that for a thousand years have protected the accused from the mindless fury of the mob.
Civil Liberties and the Civil War… “Actually, the Bill of Rights is intended to protect American citizens and American states from the federal government, which was understood to be the greatest threat to civil liberties. After the Civil War, the Supreme Court invented out of whole cloth the “Incorporation Doctrine” by which the Bill of Rights in the Constitution was deemed to apply to states as well as the federal government.”
…..This myth has been so potent that when the Supreme Court ruled this June that the “preclearance” provisions of the Voting Rights Act no longer applied to suspect jurisdiction, which included nearly all of the South, self-anointed “civil rights” leaders warned of great dangers. Even among many conservatives there is the false understanding of the Bill of Rights was intended to protect our liberties from government.
Actually, the Bill of Rights is intended to protect American citizens and American states from the federal government, which was understood to be the greatest threat to civil liberties. After the Civil War, the Supreme Court invented out of whole cloth the “Incorporation Doctrine” by which the Bill of Rights in the Constitution was deemed to apply to states as well as the federal government.
A Guide to Our Times
July 8, 2013
For reasons of voume and poor vision I cannot answer much of my email. I know that it is offensive to write and not get a response, but I can’t help it. My apologies.
In 1950 America was conservative, prosperous and, superficially anyway, happy. The war had been won. America had no competition of any kind anywhere. Calm prevailed. The races lived separately with little conflict. Men went to work and women stayed home to raise the kids. The schools saw their job as teaching reading, grammar, spelling, and arithmetic.
Divorce was almost unheard of, bastardy—as it could then be called—close to zero. Drugs, pornography, free love and perversion—as homosexuality was then said to be—were at most distant rumors. Perhaps they could be found in Paris and New York, where such exotics as William Burroughs and Henry Miller abode. These things were mere frissons around the edges.
Who Would Trust Them After This?… “Judge Andrew Napolitano called the situation “a fishing expedition on the grandest scale we’ve ever seen in American history.” The government is looking for a select group of people, and instead of obeying the Constitution and simply getting a search warrant for their phones, the judge says, “They got a search warrant for a 113 million phones!”” | Tenth Amendment Center Blog
The government is looking for a select group of people, and instead of obeying the Constitution and simply getting a search warrant for their phones, the judge says, “They got a search warrant for a 113 million phones!”
“Who would trust them after this?
The Constitution doesn’t trust them!” Napolitano told Shepard Smith.
The clearly impassioned judge shouted, “This is just a shortcut to make it easier for America’s spies to spy on Americans.
Repressing “Un-American Activities”: The Historical Roots of Today’s Homeland Surveillance State | Global Research
By Greg Guma
Global Research, June 07, 2013
Excerpts from Vanguard Press feature story, April 29, 1980
Political rights are so easily taken for granted – until they’re threatened or curtailed by repressive laws. In the United States, they are usually most vulnerable when people are anxious about some outside threat.
After World War II, for instance, dissent became risky as relations with Russia hardened into Cold War I. Hysteria about domestic Communist subversion led quickly to state and congressional investigations of “un-American activities.” And in 1951, a Supreme Court decision led to the imprisonment of eleven Communist leaders, not for any overt acts threatening national security, but rather for trying to organize a political party and teach Marxism.
Today the threats to political liberty are no less imminent.
By now we all recognize that the current occupant of the Oval Office is definitely NOT a type “A” personality.
Retail Parasites and the Online Sales Tax
American Thinker ^ | 5/14/13 | William A Levinson
Posted on Tuesday, May 14, 2013 12:09:31 PM by Winged Hussar
The Senate recently approved legislation that would allow states to require out-of-state businesses to collect and remit sales tax. The argument in favor of this legislation is “fairness” to brick and mortar retailers, who must collect sales tax in the states in which they are physically present.
Advocates of the Marketplace Fairness Act like to conjure the image of shadowy Internet businesses competing unfairly with the little Mom-and-Pop store on the street corner. The truth is, however, that these Internet businesses are far more likely to compete with entities such as Wal-Mart and Best Buy, all of which have their own websites but will not set their online prices so as to undercut in-store sales.
Selective Constitutional Deafness… “Meanwhile, the South Carolina House just passed a law criminalizing the enforcement of ObamaCare within its state borders, a move that critics will also attack with talk of the Supremacy Clause. Speaking of supremacy, AG Holder also told Brownback that the feds would litigate if necessary “to prevent the State of Kansas from interfering with the activities of federal officials enforcing federal law,” which means that the case would end up before the Supreme Court.”
Selective Constitutional Deafness
American Thinker ^ | 6 May 2013 | Selwyn Duke
Posted on Monday, May 06, 2013 9:15:11 AM by Politically Correct
Kansas governor Sam Brownback heard something recently. He received a letter from Attorney General Eric Holder stating that Kansas’ newly enacted legislation prohibiting government agents from enforcing federal gun laws in the state “directly conflicts with federal law and is therefore unconstitutional.” Unconstitutional, Eric? My, how antebellum of you.
Speaking of supremacy, AG Holder also told Brownback that the feds would litigate if necessary “to prevent the State of Kansas from interfering with the activities of federal officials enforcing federal law,” which means that the case would end up before the Supreme Court.
IMPEACHMENT OF U.S. PRESIDENT ALBERT GORE, Jr._REF: U.S. Supreme Ct_Case No. 00-949 | Veterans Today… “Only when America’s legally elected president, Al Gore, is returned to office and subjected to required impeachment proceedings, can constitutional authority in the United States be re-established. “
Constitutional Grounds for the Impeachment and Fraud Upon the Supreme Court, et al…
(Editor’s note: Only when America’s legally elected president, Al Gore, is returned to office and subjected to required impeachment proceedings, can constitutional authority in the United States be re-established. Toward that end, all actions of the Bush (43) presidency are to be declared “null and void,” all treaties abrogated, all executive actions declared unlawful and all actions including but not limited to the establishment of the United States as a criminal empire undone. The subsequent election of Barak Obama as president thus has no legal standing. Gordon Duff and Lee Wanta)
(Before It’s News)
An Open Letter to the Incoming Republican House Members of the 113th Congress
Dear GOP House Members and Members-Elect -
Congratulations to you all for surviving the absurd calamity of November 6th. You need to know what’s in store for you.
To put it bluntly, you have two years to live. Politically live as the House Majority, that is. You are going to be demonized and destroyed by the Chicago Gangsters who run the White House and the presstitutes of the CorruptMedia. Your chances of retaining your majority in 2014 are 0%.
Obama Eligibility Appeals Case Winds Up In Alabama Supreme Court With Established Birther Judges
Posted on Sunday, March 31, 2013 12:33:30 PM by Cold Case Posse Supporter
The case is called McInnish-Goode-v-Chapman. What is interesting about this case is that newly elected Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court is Roy Moore.
In the past, he has expressed doubts of where Obama was born. Also interesting is that another Alabama Supreme Court Justice named Tom Parker has gone on record arguing that McInnish’s charges of “forgery” on Obama’s ‘Short Form’ birth certificate and ‘Long Form’ birth certificate were legitimate cause for concern mainly due to Sheriff Joe Arpaio‘s Maricopa County Sheriff Office investigation conclusions. Justice Parker wrote on March 27, 2012:
For conservatives who revere the constitutional separation of powers, it’s an understatement to say this Ronald Reagan appointee has been a disappointment.
Considered a “swing vote” on the court, he often swings the wrong way. He’s something of a switch-hitter – sometimes swinging right and sometimes swinging left depending on who’s pitching.
But he made a statement earlier this month that was somewhat encouraging.
Scalia on Gay Marriage: ‘No Scientific Answer’ About Effects on Children (Audio)
CNSNews.com ^ | March26, 2013 | Perry Starr
Posted on Wednesday, March 27, 2013 1:41:46 AM by lbryce
During oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Tuesday over the constitutionality of a California law that reserves marriage as a union between one man and one woman, Justice Antonin Scalia said that the effects on children who are raised by same-sex couples is not confirmed by experts or science.
ANTONIN SCALIA: ‘When Did It Become Unconstitutional To Exclude Homosexual Couples From Marriage?’
Business Insider ^ | 03/26/2013 | Brett LoGiurato
Posted on Tuesday, March 26, 2013 5:41:44 PM by SeekAndFind
During oral arguments today at the Supreme Court, Justice Antonin Scalia and attorney Ted Olson had a pointed exchange over whether same-sex marriage is a fundamental right guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.
it was not done with the explicit intent of excluding gay and lesbian couples. “We don’t prescribe law for the future,” Scalia said. “We decide what the law is. I’m curious, when did it become unconstitutional to exclude homosexual couples from marriage? 1791? 1868? When the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted?”
WHEN WERE WE WRONG — THEN OR NOW?
boblonsberry.com ^ | 03/26/13 | Bob Lonsberry
Posted on Tuesday, March 26, 2013 8:34:25 AM by shortstop
In one regard, it will be a momentous decision.
In another, it will be completely meaningless.
Coach is Right ^ | 3/19/13 | Doug Book
Posted on Wednesday, March 20, 2013 12:11:08 PM by Oldpuppymax
In yet another testament to the corrupt if inventive workings of the liberal mind, Attorney General Eric Holder recently decided to defraud the United States Supreme Court in the hope of preventing sections of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) being ruled unconstitutional.
Section 5 of the VRA requires 9 Southern states and a number of jurisdictions in 7 others—all charged with a history of voting rights abuses–to obtain “preclearance” from the DOJ or the District Court of DC before making any changes to state election policies or procedures. Passed into law in 1965, Section 5 was enacted as an “emergency provision” designed to “promote full access to the voting process” and expire in 5 years. (1)
Did the Department of Justice Say that the Government Would NOT Assassinate Americans????? | Washington’s Blog
What Holder is saying, in substantive terms, is that the President does have the supposed authority to use a drone to kill an American who is engaged in “combat,” whether here or abroad.
“Combat” can consist of expressing support for Muslims mounting armed resistance against U.S. military aggression, which was the supposed crime committed by Anwar al-Awlaki, or sharing the surname and DNA of a known enemy of the state, which was the offense committed by Awlaki’s 16-year-old son, Abdel.
Under the rules of engagement used by the Obama Regime in Pakistan, Yemen, and Afghanistan, any “military-age” male found within a targeted “kill zone” is likewise designated a “combatant,” albeit usually after the fact [update: children too]. This is a murderous application of the “Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy,” and it will be used when — not if — Obama or a successor starts conducting domestic drone-killing operations.
Police on Home Invasion: “You’re on Your Own”
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2013/03/06/police-on-home-invasion-youre-on-your-own-n1527007 ^ | Mar. 6, 2013 | Katie Pavlich
Posted on Wednesday, March 06, 2013 9:43:59 AM by EXCH54FE
Project Veritas is out with a damning video showing police officers from multiple departments saying “you’re on your own” when it comes to home invasions. The video focuses on New Jersey and New York, where it is nearly impossible to obtain a firearm. In New Jersey you must obtain a permit to purchase a Biden approved shotgun. Some officers are seen offering advice about how to fight off an intruder: throw bleach, yell, hide with your cell phone and call the police, etc.
Officers steered clear from suggesting the man in the video obtain a firearm to protect himself, his family and his property. The video also points out painfully long response times, sometimes over 30 minutes, of many police departments.
http://www.conservativedailynews.com ^ | february 18, 2013
Posted on Friday, February 22, 2013 6:19:19 PM by lowbridge
EVIDENCE OF EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES HIDING FROM JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT PLEADINGS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS AND ATTORNEYS, REMOVING CASES FROM THE ELECTRONIC DOCKET, EVIDENCE OF BOGUS CONFERENCES OF JUSTICES BEING REPORTED TO THE PUBLIC, WHEN NO SUCH CONFERENCES TOOK PLACES AND THE JUSTICES BEING CLUELESS ABOUT THE VERY EXISTENCES OF HE CASE, EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL COMPLICITY OF THE EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND TREASON IN THE MOST SERIOUS CASES DEALING WITH NATIONAL SECURITY.
“All the world should be taxed” —Caesar Augustus
The only difference between a tax man and a taxidermist is that the taxidermist leaves the skin. —Mark Twain
The power to tax is the power to destroy. —John Marshall – Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
On Thursday, February 14, 2013, Senator Lamar Alexander, Republican from Tennessee, joined fellow lawmakers in reintroducing a bill that would allow all states to require online retailers to collect sales tax just like their “Main Street” rivals.
The idea isn’t a new one. However, a 1992 Supreme Court decision stated that a business must have a physical presence within the state in order for the state to collect sales tax when someone purchases from that business.
We are proceeding with the demand for the hearing in the Judiciary committee: 5 justices never received the applications, none received the supplemental brief, no signatures anywhere… | Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire
Law offices of Orly Taitz
Attorney Orly Taitz continues with the demand for the Judiciary Committee to investigate the fact that 5 out 9 Justices of the Supreme Court never saw the casesupposedly heard in conference by the Supreme Court and all 9 never saw the supplemental brief filed with SCOTUS, as 5 original sets of briefs were sent back and all supplemental briefs were sent back and never docketed.
An order by the Supreme Court shows a notation after case 12A712 applications denied, which appear to relate to case 12A606, however evidence shows that the case was not heard at all as 5 out of 9 Justices never even got a packet with pleadings.
There are 7 other cases that are proceeding in other courts.
Supreme Court rules on Obama forgery case
Examiner.com ^ | February 16, 2013 | Marv Dumon
Posted on Monday, February 18, 2013 7:21:35 AM by sopwith
On Tuesday, Feb. 19, the Supreme Court of the United States will announce its decision on whether or not Barack Obama should have been placed on the California ballot during the 2008 presidential elections.
Supreme Court to conference on Obama eligibility today
Coach is Right ^ | 2/15/13 | Suzanne Eovaldi
Posted on Friday, February 15, 2013 12:09:12 PM by Oldpuppymax
Today, February 15, 2013, Attorney Orly Taitz brings her request to move the Obama eligibility challenge from conference to the oral hearing stage at the US Supreme Court. She is moving forward in spite of the fact that four African-American Supreme Court clerks refused to allow Taitz to see the signature of Justice Anthony Kennedy who denied her petition originally. “But I resubmitted to Justice Roberts, and he sent it to the conference,” Taitz said. (1)
The California attorney is asking “…how do we know that he (Kennedy) ever saw the brief?” In no uncertain terms clerk James Baldin told me that “I (Taitz) [was] not allowed to see the signature.” This denial of her right to see Kennedy’s signature “does not make any sense.” Perhaps her…