Archive

Posts Tagged ‘US Constitution’

By Sher Ziev: USA now under Full Dictatorship…Congress Continues 3 Monkey Policy

January 16, 2014 3 comments

…..For some time now, Obama has been methodically nullifying the power of Congress and SCOTUS as co-equal branches of the US Federal Government.

obampoint

obampoint (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

Now, he appears to be very close to making it official. Since Obama took the office as US President, he has been actively diminishing both the Legislative and Judicial branches of the federal government.

barbflag

barbflag (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

He bypasses Congress with his own Executive Orders (many of which are patently illegal as they contradict the US Constitution and other US laws) and he and his Department of [In] Justice now regularly and often refuse to follow decisions rendered by the Supreme Court of the United States if they disagree with them. The Obama syndicate members also refuse to follow and uphold any and all laws they don’t like…and those that thwart their ongoing criminal activities.

gophum

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

Read more…

Obama Administration Proposes 2,300-Page ‘New Constitution’ by CHARLES HUGH SMITH October 12, 2013 …

October 13, 2013 3 comments

by CHARLES HUGH SMITH October 12, 2013

*****

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/obama-administration-proposes-2300-page-new-constitution

*****

The U.S. Constitution leaves too many areas open to interpretation; a New Constituion of 2,300 pages (+ 200 redacted secret pages) is the solution.

Read more…

Go Back to the Original Constitution? –… “The State in America was brought into being in 1789 by a coup d’état.”

July 16, 2013 41 comments

By Michael S. Rozeff

July 16, 2013

EmailPrintFacebookTwitter

Share

English: Cover of the 2009 print of Jefferson ...

English: Cover of the 2009 print of Jefferson by Albert Jay Nock (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

A great many Americans who are dissatisfied with various facets of America’s political system, laws, rights, and justice system think that a solution is somehow to go back to the original Constitution. They do not understand that the original Constitution is a major cause of the present woes and troubles. One man who recognized and explained this and related developments many years ago is Albert Jay Nock in his 1935 book, Our Enemy the State.

My intent in what follows is to present a few of Nock’s important ideas in brief statements. All occasional observations of my own are placed in brackets.

Every increase in State power necessarily accompanies a decrease in social power.

[Social power means voluntary and private social relations, including associations and economic exchange.]

Increases in State power reduce the disposition among people to use social power and indoctrinate the idea that social power is no longer called for.

Read more…

Against the World – Against the World… Re Conspiracy In Philadelphia (Gary North) … “I SMELL A RAT!” – Conspiracy in Philadelphia

July 7, 2013 1 comment
Gary North speaking at the Mises Institute aft...

Gary North speaking at the Mises Institute after receiving the Institute’s Rothbard Medal (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

5:48

View count

1,976

Date posted

 

 

 

 

 

Jul 22, 2011

http://store.nicenecouncil.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=1084

English: Painting, 1856, by Junius Brutus Stea...

English: Painting, 1856, by Junius Brutus Stearns, Washington at Constitutional Convention of 1787, signing of U.S. Constitution. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

 

 

Join host and president of NiceneCouncil.com Jerry Johnson as he presents exactly how the U. S. Constitution came about and who and what the founding fathers were opposed to in it’s draft.

 

 

 

 

In this new book from NiceneCouncil.com Conspiracy in Philadelphia: The Broken Covenant of the U.S. Constitution Dr. Gary North, in nearly five hundred pages with thousands of footnotes rehearses the story of the deeply theological origins and implications of that coup against the God of the Bible and His people, the Church of the Lord Jesus!

 

Read more…

Dick Durbin: Are bloggers and tweeters entitled to constitutional protection?… “Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin has in the past had a very subjective and abstract view of the Constitution, and on Fox News Sunday he once again wondered which people might be “entitled” to constitutional protections and which people might not…”

May 26, 2013 3 comments

Dick Durbin: Are bloggers and tweeters entitled to constitutional protection?

http://michellemalkin.com ^

U.S. Senator Richard Durbin, of Illinois.

U.S. Senator Richard Durbin, of Illinois. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Posted on Sunday, May 26, 2013 7:57:16 PM by Sub-Driver

Dick Durbin: Are bloggers and tweeters entitled to constitutional protection?

Share By Doug Powers • May 26, 2013 05:53 PM

**Written by Doug Powers

Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin has in the past had a very subjective and abstract view of the Constitution, and on Fox News Sunday he once again wondered which people might be “entitled” to constitutional protections and which people might not:

“You’ve raised an important point and I heard Sen. Graham call for special counsel,” Durbin said. “I’m not ready to do this at this moment. I would like to know if Holder has any conflict in here beyond what we heard when it comes to the Fox case.”

“But here is the bottom line — the media shield law, which I am prepared to support, and I know Sen. Graham supports, still leaves an unanswered question, which I have raised many times: What is a journalist today in 2013? We know it’s someone that works for Fox or AP, but does it include a blogger? Does it include someone who is tweeting? Are these people journalists and entitled to constitutional protection? We need to ask 21st century questions about a provision that was written over 200 years ago.”

Read more…

Gunny G: As A Matter of Fact: It’s Just What We Need The Least !!!!!

May 23, 2013 1 comment

America Doesn’t Need A President
By J.D. Longstreet Full Story

English: Then President of the United States o...

English: Then President of the United States of America, George W. Bush invited then President-Elect Barack Obama and former Presidents George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and Jimmy Carter for a Meeting and Lunch at The White House. Photo taken Wednesday, Jan. 7, 2009 in the Oval Office at The White House. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

By now we all recognize that the current occupant of the Oval Office is definitely NOT a type “A” personality.

******

Read more…

Breaking: IRS Targeted Conservative Groups That Taught US Constitution

May 13, 2013 1 comment

 

obamadash

obamadash (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Breaking: IRS Targeted Conservative Groups That Taught US Constitution

 

The Gateway Pundit ^ | May 13, 2013, 6:49 AM | Jim Hoft

 

 

 

 

Posted on Monday, May 13, 2013 9:03:36 AM by Texas Fossil

 

The IRS not only targeted conservative Tea Party groups and Jews… They also targeted conservative groups that taught the US

 

ayersflag

ayersflag (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

Constitution.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Washington Post reported:

 

>snip

 

On Jan. 15, 2012 the agency decided to target “political action type organizations involved in limiting/expanding Government, educating on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, social economic reform movement.,” according to the appendix in the IG report, which was requested by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and has yet to be released.

 

 

 

Read more…

(Gunny G: What Some of The Folks Out There Are Now Saying…But Will It Sink In ??? ) ~The Good Guys Are Not Coming To Save Us…..

April 27, 2013 31 comments
big

big (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

The Good Guys Are Not Coming To Save Us

Zero Hedge (originally published at Free Man’s Perspective) ^ | April 23, 2013 | Paul Rosenberg

Posted on Saturday, April 27, 2013 11:32:13 AM by Starboard

realobam

realobam (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

A lot of Americans know that the US government is out of control. Anyone who has cared enough to study the US Constitution even a little knows this.

Still, very few of these people are taking any significant action, and largely because of one error: They are waiting for “the good guys” to show up and fix things.

ayersflag

ayersflag (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Read more…

The Good Guys Are NOT Coming To Save Us…

April 25, 2013 3 comments

The Good Guys Are NOT Coming To Save Us

 

Free-Man’s Perspective ^ | 4/23/13 | Paul RosenbergPosted on Thursday, April 25, 2013 2:03:45 PM by kreitzer

 

Cropped screenshot of John Wayne and Angie Dic...

Cropped screenshot of John Wayne and Angie Dickinson from the trailer for the film Rio Bravo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

 

 

A lot of Americans know that the US government is out of control. Anyone who has cared enough to study the US Constitution even a little knows this. Still, very few of these people are taking any significant action, and largely because of one error: They are waiting for “the good guys” to show up and fix things.Some think that certain groups of politicians will pull it together and fix things, or that one magnificent politician will ride in to fix things.

 

 

 

rprprprp

rprprprp (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

Others think that certain members of the military will step in and slap the politicians back into line. And, I’m sure there are other variations.There are several problems with this. I’ll start with the small issues:It doesn’t happen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A lot of good people have latched on to one grand possibility after another, waiting for a good guy to save the day, and it just doesn’t happen. Thousands of hours of reading, writing and waiting are burned with each new “great light” who comes along with a promise to run the system in the “right” way, and give us liberty and truth. Or whatever.

 

mussobama

mussobama (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

Read more…

JB Williams — Our Rights Shall NOT Be Infringed…

April 7, 2013 1 comment

NewsWithViews.com

 

Political leftists with global ambitions, who fear the wrath of a free people, have been trying to disarm American citizens for more than a hundred years now. Although Americans have been quite tolerant of past overreaches of political authority at the federal, state and local level, the silence of the people should not be misinterpreted as their consent. Far from it…

 

gophum

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

In the end, our rights shall NOT be infringed! PERIOD!

 

The subject of our inalienable rights, protected by the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights and State Constitutions, is simple. – “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

 

Why? – Because, a well-regulated Militia is necessary to the security of a free State and a free people.

 

 

 

 

 

RPREVOLU

RPREVOLU (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

A Free State

 

A state which is subservient to any supreme central power is not a “free state.” Our Founders created a Constitutional Representative Republic, not a democracy. The thirteen original colonies and the balance of the states by ratification, created a federal government via a compact known as the U.S. Constitution, and further protected states and individual rights via the Bill of (inalienable) Rights.

 

 

 

The people, via their states, assigned certain specific and limited duties to the federal government they created, along with the limited authority to carry out those duties.

 

Read more…

The U.S. Constitution: The 18th Century Patriot Act…

March 21, 2013 Leave a comment

You are here: Home / Constitution / The U.S. Constitution: The 18th Century Patriot Act

The U.S. Constitution: The 18th Century Patriot Act

December 11, 2009 By Tom Mullen 83 Comments

At some point in the past, the American ethos was centered on suspicion of government –whether liberal, conservative, or otherwise. For most of America’s first two centuries, Americans were taxed less, regulated less, and left more alone by their government than any other people in the world. These conditions resulted in an explosion of innovation, wealth, and culture unsurpassed at any time in human history.

As that trend seems to have reversed, Americans look to their past to try to establish where we have gone wrong and what we can do to solve our problems. Increasingly, some Americans point to the U.S. Constitution and our abandonment of its “limits on government” as the reason for our downfall. It is generally argued by “strict constitutionalists” that the purpose of the U.S. Constitution was to limit the power of the government. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Cover of "Hamilton's Curse: How Jefferson...

Cover via Amazon

Don’t get me wrong. If our government were limited to the powers granted it in that document, the United States of America would be far freer, far more prosperous, and likely not facing any of the monumental problems that it is facing now. However, that does not change the facts about why the Constitutional Convention was called or why the Constitution itself was created. If you are astounded that any Republican can still claim that George Bush was “pro-freedom” or that any Democrat can claim that Barack Obama is “anti-war,” you should be equally surprised that anyone can claim that the U.S. Constitution limited the powers of the central government.

Read more…

Exposing Washington’s TREACHERY while Making the Case for the Restoration of the Confederate Republic that was Never Surrendered…- VIDEO! – gunnyg@gmail.com – Gmail

February 25, 2013 220 comments

Exposing Washington‘s TREACHERY while Making the Case for the Restoration of the Confederate Republic that was Never Surrendered…- VIDEO!

big

big (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Read more…

Forget Guns…How About More ‘Congress Control’? (GyG: How Bout Back To Our First Constitution, The Articles of Confederation !!!!!)

February 25, 2013 2 comments

Part 1 – A Look Behind the Curtain

 

Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters.
- Daniel Webster

 

obampoint

obampoint (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

Every elected federal official in the U.S. must take an oath of office. The first Congress swore the oath in 1789; it was revised during the Civil War and the current version was enacted in 1884: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

 

barbflag

barbflag (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

Read more…

Where Have All Of Our Generals Gone? (Gunny G: Has PC Now Systematically “Weeded” The Ranks???)

February 14, 2013 1 comment

It is stunning to me that over the course of the past four years, our military generals are being eliminated for one reason or another. This ongoing list includes:

 

big

big (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

Gen. David Patraeus

 

Gen. William Ward

 

Gen. David Mc Kiernan

 

Gen. Stanley Mc Crystal

 

Gen. Carter F. Hamm

 

 

obampoint

obampoint (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

Well, there is five right off the bat. What do these brave men all have in common? They have all served under the Obama regime and have all been either fired, forced to resign, or forced to retire for one reason or another.

 

 

 

 

Knowing that these men all have held top positions in the military, and that they would have the means to remove an ineligible President by force if necessary, is it possible that the Obama regime wanted these potential threats out of the way in preparation for any future policy decisions that he may be planning to make?

 

Read more…

(SEE READER RESPONSES!!!!!) ~ Is Obama Pushing for a Civil War?… “Obama wants to control everything down to school lunches, individual medical care, what kind of cars we can drive, who can own a weapon and what kind, attacking cigarette smokers while trying to legalize, regulate and tax marijuana, as his fellow Marxists discuss how to “re-educate” Citizens that just don’t want to go along to get along.”

February 8, 2013 1 comment

Is Obama Pushing for a Civil War?

Capitol Hll Outsider ^ | 2/8/2013 | JB Williams

Posted on Friday, February 08, 2013 7:50:28 AM by IbJensen

obamadash

obamadash (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Over the last four years, the Obama administration has violated nearly every Article of the US Constitution and every Amendment in the Bill of Rights. They have worked to ignite racial tensions, class warfare, religious confrontations and political divisions far worse than those that led to the first American Civil War.

ayersflag

ayersflag (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Over 70% of Americans oppose ObamaCare… so of course, Obama rammed ObamaCare through in an unprecedented misuse of executive power that shut out the entire legitimate legislative process, as spineless Republicans sat quietly on their hands watching it all happen. The people said “no more deficit spending…and no more raising the debt ceiling…” so, Obama ignored the debt ceiling and ran up the federal debt by more than 60% in one term.

Read more…

JB Williams — Evidence Broadens Obama Natural Born Conspiracy… “The effort to remove the natural-born citizen requirement from the U.S. Constitution actually began in 1975 “

February 4, 2013 3 comments

EXCERPT!!!!!

 

…..But there was a major hurdle that had to be overcome – the U.S. Constitution, in this case, Article II – Section I – Clause V specifically, which requires that “no person except a natural-born citizen of the United States” can hold the office of President. – Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States…and may not even be a legal citizen of the United States. So, how can he be President?

 

This column focuses upon the period 2003-2008 and the political maneuvers that took place in order to make way for America’s first unconstitutional resident of the White House.

 

realobam

realobam (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

Efforts to Eliminate the Natural Born Requirement (2003-2005)

 

Proving that the players involved knew the correct definition of natural born citizen borrowed from the Law of Nations by our founders –

1) those born in the country, of parents who are citizens;

2) those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights;

 

 

 

3) The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; 4) in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen. – that they knew Barack Hussein Obama II did not meet that definition as a foreign or dual citizen via his father’s British citizenship and that they worked feverishly to find a way around this constitutional requirement for office, as Obama was about to become president…

 

Read more…

The U.S. Constitution: The 18th Century Patriot Act

February 4, 2013 Leave a comment

At some point in the past, the American ethos was centered on suspicion of government –whether liberal, conservative, or otherwise. For most of America’s first two centuries, Americans were taxed less, regulated less, and left more alone by their government than any other people in the world. These conditions resulted in an explosion of innovation, wealth, and culture unsurpassed at any time in human history.

 

mussobama

mussobama (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

As that trend seems to have reversed, Americans look to their past to try to establish where we have gone wrong and what we can do to solve our problems. Increasingly, some Americans point to the U.S. Constitution and our abandonment of its “limits on government” as the reason for our downfall. It is generally argued by “strict constitutionalists” that the purpose of the U.S. Constitution was to limit the power of the government. Nothing could be further from the truth.

 

Read more…

The Abuse, Abandonement and Planned Replacement of the American Soldier | Veterans Today

February 3, 2013 Leave a comment

HAS THERE BEEN A SECRET 100 YEAR PLAN TO ABUSE, ABANDON AND EVENTUALLY REPLACE THE AMERICAN SOLDIER WITH ROBOTS AND AUTOMATED WAR MACHINES ?

 

by Preston James

 

The American Soldier has been the greatest war-fighter in the world.

 

big

big (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

Is the Secret Shadow Government (SSG) now engaged in a long term plan to abuse, abandon, debase and replace the American Soldier with fully Automated Fighting Machines ?

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjiq44DgDf0&feature=player_detailpage

 

 

 

 

 

YouTube – Veterans Today -

 

THE AMERICAN SOLDIER—THE GREATEST SOLDIER IN MODERN HISTORY

Read more…

Obama pushing American people closer to armed resistance… (“The atrocities of the current US government and its leaders are truly too many and too vast to itemize here. However, my own columns since 2008 to the present have warned what would happen”)

January 31, 2013 2 comments

Each and every day now Obama and his syndicate government are pushing harder and harder for the removal of all of our liberties, in order to place us into slavery and create a permanent police state. Even the most dense on the far Left are now aware – some only vaguely – that things are not as they should be. However, the further Left one goes, the more perverse and unstable one becomes. Luciferianism – Marxist, Nazi, Fascist or otherwise – is and has always been the End Goal of the power-maddened once-human would-be masters and oppressors of the human race. And nation by nation, they have been practicing this tyranny for a very long time.

 

obamadash

obamadash (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

 

Read more…

The U.S. Constitution: ‘A Mere Thing of Wax’

January 17, 2013 Leave a comment

The Tea Party‘s greatest strength has been at the state level. Instead of changing Washington, its interests are better served changing state legislatures. Instead of requiring candidates for state office to sign anti-tax pledges, Tea Party support should be predicated on their signing pledges calling for a Constitutional Convention.

 

English: Painting, 1856, by Junius Brutus Stea...

English: Painting, 1856, by Junius Brutus Stearns, Washington at Constitutional Convention of 1787, signing of U.S. Constitution. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

 

 

Allow me to give one example: A Constitutional Amendment that declares states may individually nullify the imposition of congressional laws through state legislation (think ObamaCare). Furthermore, should two-thirds of the states do likewise; the national law is declared unconstitutional in its entirety. This preserves the integrity of republican government and ends the tyrannical stranglehold of Washington and the Supreme Court.

 

Read more…

Gil Gilbertson — Sheriff Will Not Obey Unlawful, Unconstitutional Orders

January 17, 2013 1 comment

Dear Mr. Vice President,

 

As the elected Sheriff of this County, I am saddled with the duty, as well as responsibility, to uphold the Constitution and protect those people who placed their trust in me to do what is right.

 

photograph of the justices, cropped to show Ju...

photograph of the justices, cropped to show Justice Scalia (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

 

 

I believe in our Constitution and all it stands for. We, you and I, are sworn to protect and defend our Constitution as required through the “Oath of Office”. This same Constitutional form of government provided us with the most privileged, and envied, country in world history.

 

Read more…

The Real Second Amendment… (“We must first understand that we did not invent the 2nd Amendment; we inherited it”)

December 9, 2012 11 comments

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed As simple as these word are, we have been arguing about what they mean for a long time. Part of the problem is that many people engaged in the argument do not interpret the 2nd Amendment with respect for its historical context, but rather in light of what they want it to mean in support of their purposes.

 

rprprprp

rprprprp (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

If we want to be honest about it, we must look to the origins of the amendment to understand it in the context of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, and only then can we consider it in our present context.

 

The issue is further complicated by the fact that an increasingly large proportion of the U.S. population has no experience in the use of arms; they see arms as irrelevant to their lives at best or a threat at worst.

 

This is important because the 2nd Amendment is always susceptible and becomes vulnerable when too many think it is an archaic artifact. We must first understand that we did not invent the 2nd Amendment; we inherited it……………

 

Read more…

Federalism D.I.Y. (Secession’s not the answer, Federalism is!)

November 14, 2012 Leave a comment

The federal government is tightening its control over the 50 states and the lives of every American. The U.S. Constitution, however, says states are supposed to be equal partners with the federal government. State sovereignty — allowing each state to control its own affairs — is the cornerstone of that equal partnership and critical to protecting Americans’ freedom.

Read more…

Rejection of Obama by Electoral College | Veterans Today

November 8, 2012 9 comments

EXCERPT!!!!!!

gophum

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Article 2 of the US Constitution seems to me to be clear enough. To be eligible for the presidency a candidate presented to the Electoral College has to be an American Citizen, born in the United States. It is a matter entirely for them but I see no reason why the Electors could not ask for evidence of Barack Obama’s eligibility. That applies to all candidates of all races from all parties by the way.

I don’t accept that Senator McCain was eligible to be sworn-in, as in my opinion he was born in a hospital in downtown Colon, in Panama. It wouldn’t matter if he were born on Coco Solo Marine Corps Air Base, as he claims, as that was not in the United States. Quite where on the base he was born is a moot point, since the hospital was not built for another five years. I don’t accept that Senator Goldwater qualified for the presidency either – his eligibility was queried at the time, as he was born in a territory, not a state.

Read more…

Civil War, the U.S. Constitution and History

November 1, 2012 2 comments

We should do our best to avoid another Civil War and the best way to do that is to insist upon faithful adherence to the U.S. Constitution.

An article entitled The U.S. Constitution and Civil War, posted at my blog on December 27, 2011, has received more “hits” than any other post there. It has received 14.66% of my total hits this year thus far; 33.10% of those hits came this October, more than in any previous month. Another article, Shall we Have Another Civil War posted on August 10, 2011, has also received many hits this year.

Read more…

A political deal will be struck to save the Democrat Party from total collapse and protect the Republican Party from revelations of complicity in the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people.

October 8, 2012 43 comments

Originally posted on moralmatters.org:

 

Dr. Col Lawrence Sellin

How Barack Obama avoids prison – by Dr. Col. Lawrence Sellin - english.pravda.ru/opinion/

“A political deal will be struck to save the Democrat Party from total collapse and protect the Republican Party from revelations of complicity in the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people.

A growing number of Americans are now learning that Barack Obama, according to Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the U. S. Constitution, is an illegal President. The law requires a candidate for the Presidency to be a “natural born citizen,” that is, a second generation American, a U.S. citizen, whose parents were also U.S. citizens at the time of the candidate’s birth………” – english.pravda.ru/opinion/

Articles Dealing With Obama’s Identity Scandal and Presidential Eligibility

View original 110 more words

OBAMA TO WRITE NEW U.S. CONSTITUTION… « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

September 28, 2012 283 comments

 

President Barack Obama said The U.S. Constitutionis out-of-date, so he is ripping it up and writing a new one.

obamadash

obamadash (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

President Barack Obama told reporters last night that the U.S. Constitution has become a hindrance to progress in America. “The document is so out-dated, that it is now becoming a hindrance to governing the country.”

Obama said that he has signed an Executive Order voiding the U.S. Constitution. “We need to move forward. We need change.”

Obama said he has already drafted a new constitution and that Americans “will love what I came up with.” Insiders say that Obama is keeping a lot of old elements from the original constitution “he’s just making it better, bringing it into the 21st century,” said White House Spokesman, Jay Carney………….

Read more…

A sad farewell to the U.S. Constitution (calls GOP treasonous for eligibility inaction)

August 29, 2012 2 comments

 

A sad farewell to the U.S. Constitution (calls GOPtreasonous for eligibility inaction)

 

obamadash

obamadash (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

WND ^ | August 28, 2012 | Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

 

Posted on Wednesday, August 29, 2012 1:10:53 PM by Perseverando

 

Exclusive: Christopher Monckton of Brenchley calls GOP treasonous for eligibility inaction

 

The U.S. Constitution was a magnificent

 

GyGRet

GyGRet (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

RPREVOLU

RPREVOLU (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

document. In that long, hot Philadelphia summer, your Founding Fathers thoughtfully debated the instrument of your freedom – a document that inspires all of us who no longer live in the knowledge that the only people who can impose laws or taxes upon us are those whom we have elected.

 

gophum

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

Read more…

Business community will fight the left’s attempt to silence us

August 28, 2012 Leave a comment

 

Serious efforts are speeding down the political pike from leftists, to curtail the free political speech of businesses. They are trying to pass laws and regulations that limit or eliminate a business’ or corporation’s ability to contribute to political candidates or PACs that support candidates. The left frets and whines about evil businesses trying to “buy” elections, yet it’s OK with them if unions do the buying. Huh? Say again?Let’s start with what the U.S. Constitution and the highest court in the land say about this issue.

Read more…

Our Secret Constitution: How Lincoln Redefined American Democracy: The Independent Review: The Independent Institute

July 19, 2012 8 comments

 

English: Abraham Lincoln, the sixteenth Presid...

English: Abraham Lincoln, the sixteenth President of the United States. Latviešu: Abrahams Linkolns, sešpadsmitais ASV prezidents. Српски / Srpski: Абрахам Линколн, шеснаести председник Сједињених Америчких Држава. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

…..Fletcher’s quest to twist the U.S. Constitution to conform to a Rawlsian theory of egalitarian justice, his attempt to square the circle, results in fundamental inconsistencies. For example, on the one hand he maintains that “the rule of law requires, of course, courts that enjoy respect and legitimacy” (p. 257), but on the other he praises Lincoln for his treatment of Chief Justice Taney’s efforts to enforce habeas corpus (p. 167).

 

 

He advocates human dignity but espouses a coercive form of government capable of denying individuals the fruits of their labors. He gives lip service to democratic ideals while promoting a form of centralization incompatible with popular control and consent. Moreover, one must not assume that the centralization he advances stops at national borders. His operative theoretical assumptions blanket the human family with a visionary egalitarian ideal of global redistribution.

 

Read more…

(Col Sellin: Winning Elections Requires Throwing the Constitution Under the Bus) Family Security Matters

July 17, 2012 14 comments

In a video recently posted on the internet, Congressman Paul Gosar(R-AZ) states that fifty percent of the American people do not believe in the Constitution and individual rights and if you principally fight to defend the Constitution, you will lose.

GyGRet

GyGRet (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Rep. Gosar has seemingly forgotten that he takes an oath to “support and defend” the Constitution. Apparently he thinks that adhering to the Constitution is an impediment to winning elections. He seems to be promoting the proposition that obtaining power is more important than upholding the rule of law.

The opinions expressed by Rep. Gosar are not unique, but represent the prevailing attitude in Congress. The Constitution limits the powers of the federal government and federal office-holders who want unlimited power.

Read more…

How Can a Conservative Support a RINO For President?

June 29, 2012 4 comments

After Rick Santorum dropped out of the GOP presidential primary, my plan had been to vote third-party in the presidential election. The thought of rewarding with my vote the Leftist RINO establishment and “mainstream” media for shoving a worthless excuse for a Republican like Romney down my throat tasted like bile–and it still does.

Read more…

HIJACKING AND ABUSE OF WAR POWERS TO TAKE-DOWN THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC | Veterans Today

June 21, 2012 Leave a comment
Dwight D. Eisenhower photo portrait.

Dwight D. Eisenhower photo portrait. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

THE HIJACKING AND TAKE-DOWN OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC HAS BEEN ACCOMPLISHED BY CAPTURING THE MONETARY PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND PROVOKING SERIAL FOREIGN WARS AS A MEANS OF EXTENDING THE HIDDEN WORLD EMPIRE OF THE “CITY OF LONDON” MOST THOUGHT WAS DIMINISHED

Read more…

Obama: A domestic enemy of the U.S. Constitution

June 18, 2012 19 comments

Obama: A domestic enemy of the U.S. Constitution

washingtontimes.com ^

Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 12:01:21 AM by tsowellfan

“Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation — I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.*

Read more…

WAR ON TERROR: The World’s Biggest New Business | Veterans Today

May 27, 2012 3 comments

Latest Posts:

WAR ON TERROR: The World’s Biggest New Business

The Debasement of American Intel–Step By Step

The Intel Cowboys

drronpaulrev

drronpaulrev (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Sunday, May 27th, 2012 | Posted by Preston James, Ph.D

WAR ON TERROR: The World’s Biggest New Business

3

THE WORLD TODAY IS PRIMARILY A BUSINESS COMPRISED OF A LARGE CONFEDERACY OF INTERLOCKED MAJOR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONS

DURING WW2 THE WORLD’S BIGGEST BUSINESS BECAME WAR

By the end of WW2, America had the largest war industry with Russia close behind. After WW2, the biggest business became the Cold War. Then it became the War on Drugs, and now it’s the WAR ON TERROR which is being turned against the American Citizens.

Read more…

The Debasement of American Intel–Step By Step | Veterans Today

May 24, 2012 1 comment

This opinion piece is the story of how American Intel was debased step by step, and how many great American intel heroes have been ignored, suppressed, abused, harassed and driven out of intel (or worse). This article is dedicated to these fine men and women.

Read more…

Gunny G: For Another (honest) Look At The US Constitution, The Founding Fathers, Etc…..

May 22, 2012 2 comments

Gunny G: For another (honest) look at the US Constitution, the Founding Fathers, etc.

Food for thought; and maybe makes some sense as to what went wrong, when and where!

The wriings of William Buppert, Gary North, Ed Eivera, etc.

Read more…

Zero Gov – Anti-Government, Pro-Liberty » Blog Archive » The Constitution: The God That Failed (To Liberate Us From Big Government) by Bill Buppert

May 21, 2012 1 comment

I wrote this earlier and wanted to republish since I will be debating the Articles versus the Constitution tomorrow in Yuma, Arizona at the 2012 Freedom Library Annual Awards Ceremony Debate. The issue gets more critical year by year because the Constitution may very well be one of the most clever anti-freedom documents crafted by man in the Western world.

As a result of a crafty and thorough propaganda campaign, a document that purports to support limited government and peaceful human activity has done exactly the opposite in such a gargantuan fashion that one is aghast so many people can still be deluded by the premise and continue to be bamboozled by its promise.

Read more…

Why They Still Call Him …?????

May 4, 2012 3 comments

Why They Still Call Him President

Right Side News ^ | 5/3/2012 | JB Williams

Posted on Friday, May 04, 2012 11:22:04 AM by IbJensen

Some still call Barack Obama president out of pure ignorance, but others brilliantly call him President with a very specific agenda in mind. It’s all over but the crying now… as Article II of the U.S. Constitution is officially dead.

Since the nobody Senator from nowhere rose to DNC fame during the 2004 DNC Convention and was subsequently hustled into the highest office in our land despite his blank résumé and invisible past, people have been desperately searching for an honest forum in which to ask – Who is this yahoo, where did he come from and how the hell did he become America’s first openly Marxist White House resident?

Barack Obama delivers a speech at the Universi...

Barack Obama delivers a speech at the University of Southern California (Video of the speech) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Why isn’t there a single honest journalist or court anywhere in the country willing to even entertain the litany of obvious questions which the Marxist-in-Chief has effortlessly dodged since 2004?

Read more…

Police Shut Down Event Promoting U.S. Constitution; Thomas More Law Center Sues CAIR

May 1, 2012 2 comments

ANN ARBOR, MI – In the middle of an event to extol the virtues of the U.S. Constitution and “American Laws For American Courts,” the audience learned first-hand how easy it is to lose their freedom of Speech and Assembly.

Amid shouts of “What about free speech?” from the audience, the Allegan Police Department ordered the event shut-down. School officials notified police that they had received a letter complaining about the event from Dawud Walid, Executive Director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-MI). The letter asked the school to disallow the event despite an existing contract.

Read more…

The Movement To Torch The United States Constitution…

April 25, 2012 Leave a comment

The Movement To Torch The United States Constitution
The New American ^ | May 2012 Issue | James O. E. Norell

Posted on Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:10:01 AM by IbJensen

DID YOU KNOW SOUTH AFRICA HAS A CONSTITUTION THAT’S FAR SUPERIOR TO OUR OWN? THAT’S WHAT ONE U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, AS WELL AS SHADOWY ACTIVITIST GROUPS WORKING BEHIND THE SCENES TO EFFECT CHANGE, BELIEVE.

 

 

“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012. I might look at the Constitution of South Africa … a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights …” -Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Jan. 30, 2012.

That stunning disavowal—by an associate justice of the United States Supreme Court—of the Constitution she has sworn to uphold, drew widespread and instant condemnation from conservative pundits and legal scholars.

NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris W. Cox warned that Justice Ginsburg’s statements go to the core of why the coming presidential elections are important, and why they are “about the very survival of our Constitution.” He’s right on the money.

Read more…

How to legally dissolve the U.S. Federal Government Forget Secession

April 14, 2012 2 comments

Thirty four 34 is the number of Legislatures from the several States necessary to call a States Convention or a Constitutional Convention. This also known as an Article Five5 Convention, or a Convention to Amend the U.S. Constitution. With fifty 50 States in the U.S. Federal Compact today, thirty four 34 is the Constitutional number of legislatures from the several States needed to cross the threshold for such a convention.

Let’s look at Article 5 of the U.S. Constitution :”The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress;

Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate. “Thirty eight 38 is the number of legislatures from the several States that is necessary to ratify and thus amend the U.S. Constitution after such a convention.

This amendment could be “to dissolve”. By “dissolve” I mean the whole compact between the several States. Yes, the entire Federal Government and every thing it has or was created under it’s jurisdiction. This would include but is not limited too, the Federal Debt, the Federal Reserve Bank, the FDIC, the Department of Education, the Department of Homeland Security, the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, the Marines, etc. etc… Think of it as a Constitutional self destruct mechanism.This would leave the fifty 50 several States and the numerous Federal Territories, sovereign and under their own rightful and direct jurisdiction. Of course each State or Territory would then be free to individually or in groups engage in new compacts and trade arrangements.

Read more…

Chief Justice Says States Have Compromised Their Sovereignty

March 30, 2012 Leave a comment
John Roberts as a judge of the U.S. Court of A...

John Roberts as a judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Chief Justice Says States Have Compromised Their Sovereignty

The New American ^ | 3/29/2012 | Jack Kenny

Posted on Friday, March 30, 2012 9:29:41 AM by IbJensen

Chief Justice John Roberts said Wednesday what has long been known but seldom spoken. During the third and final day of Supreme Court hearings on whether the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 is unconstitutional, Roberts said states have been compromising their sovereignty for decades through increased reliance on the federal government for money and accompanying directions on the governance of state affairs.

“It seems to me that they have compromised their status as independent sovereigns because they are so dependent on what the federal government has done,” the chief justice said during Wednesday’s nearly three hours of hearings on the controversial health insurance law.

The final day’s arguments had to do with whether the law could stand if the justices find the mandate for uncovered individuals to purchase health insurance is unconstitutional — something the court’s conservative majority appears ready to do. Another feature of the law called into question by lawyers opposing the act is the expansion of Medicaid, the federal-state program that provides health care for low-income families. Under the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid is expanded to include a larger number of parents, as well as low-income adults with no dependent children. Half of the 32 million who would get new health insurance coverage under the law would receive it through Medicaid.

Read more…

Dave Daubenmire — Defy the Bastards

March 22, 2012 1 comment
Diagram of US Federal Government and American ...

Diagram of US Federal Government and American Union. Published: 1862, July 15. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The most common use of the term “bastard” refers to a child who is born from illegitimate means. Marriage is what makes a child “legitimate.” Any child produced outside of a legal-marriage was once considered “illegitimate” because he/she was not under the authority of a father.

Illegitimacy is destroying America. A father-less generation of children is roaming the streets of America in search of authority. Recent statistics show that over 40% of all babies born in America are bastards.

To many of those children, government becomes the father. We have seen the effects that “government-parenthood” has had on this nation. A government-paycheck does not a father make.

But the larger issue is that our Federal Government has become bastardized. At its origin, the Federal Government was the birth-child of the thirteen colonies. “We the People of the United States” gave birth to the Federal Government, and, as Thomas Jefferson said, tied it “down with the chains of the Constitution.”

Follow me now. The Federal Government was the birth child of the U.S. Constitution. The Constitution was the spawn of the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration received its authority from the elected representatives of the thirteen States who gathered at Independence Hall in Philadelphia and signed it. Those elected representatives received their authority from the individual citizens in the independent states. The individual-citizens were endowed with the authority as a birthright from their Creator. The Creator was, and still is, the ultimate authority over the individual. He IS the Father of all.

Read more…

(“Th‘One Nation Under Socialism’ glowers directly as if challenging the viewer. His right hand is holding e Constitution and his left hand is pointing to the flames.”) Controversial Painter Depicts Obama With Burning Constitution

March 20, 2012 2 comments

Controversial Painter Depicts Obama With Burning Constitution
CBS DC ^ | 03/20/12 | Peter V. Milo

Posted on Tuesday, March 20, 2012 8:01:37 PM by nhwingut

Provo, Utah (CBS DC) – Jon McNaughton, a controversial artist who often mixes religion and politics in his work, has released a new painting.

In ‘One Nation Under Socialism’ President Obama holds the U.S. Constitution as it burns.

While McNaughton previously depicted Obama stepping on the nation’s founding document, Th‘One Nation Under Socialism’ glowers directly as if challenging the viewer. His right hand is holding e Constitution and his left hand is pointing to the flames.

Read more…

(“add Republican neo-cons and RINOs to that list, as they are left-wing as well—that is and, the”) A Man for all Treasons and the US Constitution

March 19, 2012 1 comment
English: Barack Obama delivers a speech at the...

Image via Wikipedia

By Jim ONeill Monday, March 19, 2012

“Breathes there the man with soul so deadWho never to himself hath said,This is my own, my native land!…If such there breathe, go, mark him well;…The wretch, concentred all in self,… doubly dying, shall go downTo the vile dust from whence he sprung,Unwept, unhonored , and unsung.”—Sir Walter Scott 1771-1832 excerpt from “The Lay of the Last Minstrel

“If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.

In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.” James Madison 1751-1836

 

“Father of the US Constitution” Federalist #51 The Campaigner in Chief, Barack Hussein Obama, is of course only the most visible element of a vast left-wing conspiracy. Take a stroll through “Discover the Networks” if you doubt me—the “Tides Foundation” is a good place to start.

Note: the connections are so widespread that the webpage may take some time to load—be patient, the network will eventually appear.

Read more…

I’m Fed Up With Constitution Worship! by Gary D. Barnett

February 25, 2012 2 comments

I must say that I didn’t always feel this way, but I am now truly sick of hearing every day about how we should uphold, defend, and worship the U.S. Constitution. Yes, I am aware that if it were followed to the letter that we would all be somewhat better off, but was that ever the real intent? I think not.

As I perused an article recently in the Christian Science Monitor titled “Why Do Americans Get the Constitution So Wrong” by Lion Calandra, I thought it was time to expose some of the misconceptions about our so-called reverent “founding” document. The first few words of that article set the stage for my rant.

The opening statement: “On this day, 223 years ago, the U.S. Constitution was born, giving Americans the freedoms that they hold dear, the freedoms that men and women have died to defend.”

Obviously, the author also got it wrong, because everything in the above sentence is patently false. Our freedoms did not come from any political class or due to any drafting of a political document. Our rights and freedoms are God-given and inherent. They are natural human rights, and cannot be bestowed by men! Our natural rights to life, liberty, and property encompass all others; this a fact barely acknowledged by most.

Read more…

If There is NO Constitution, There is NO Fed| The Post & Email

February 21, 2012 5 comments
English: Abraham Lincoln, the sixteenth Presid...

Image via Wikipedia

“DERIVING THEIR JUST POWERS FROM THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED

by JB Williams, ©2012

Does the current federal government allow for “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?”

(Feb. 21, 2012) — Are Washington, DC politicians absolutely sure that they want to make the US Constitution null and void? If the US Constitution is null and void, then so is the union of states that it created, as that fragile union of sovereign states was very carefully ratified via a very specific and carefully crafted balance of power between the federal government and the states.

Read more…

The U.S. Constitution: The 18th Century Patriot Act

February 20, 2012 11 comments
The Articles of Conferderation, ratified in 17...

Image via Wikipedia

At some point in the past, the American ethos was centered on suspicion of government –whether liberal, conservative, or otherwise.

For most of America’s first two centuries, Americans were taxed less, regulated less, and left more alone by their government than any other people in the world. These conditions resulted in an explosion of innovation, wealth, and culture unsurpassed at any time in human history.

As that trend seems to have reversed, Americans look to their past to try to establish where we have gone wrong and what we can do to solve our problems. Increasingly, some Americans point to the U.S. Constitution and our abandonment of its “limits on government” as the reason for our downfall. It is generally argued by “strict constitutionalists” that the purpose of the U.S. Constitution was to limit the power of the government. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Don’t get me wrong. If our government were limited to the powers granted it in that document, the United States of America would be far freer, far more prosperous, and likely not facing any of the monumental problems that it is facing now. However, that does not change the facts about why the Constitutional Convention was called or why the Constitution itself was created. If you are astounded that any Republican can still claim that George Bush was “pro-freedom” or that any Democrat can claim that Barack Obama is “anti-war,” you should be equally surprised that anyone can claim that the U.S. Constitution limited the powers of the central government.

Remember that there was already a federal government of the United States prior to the U.S. Constitution. It was defined in a document called the Articles of Confederation and had been in existence since 1778. Under the Articles, the young nation had defeated the mightiest military empire in human history to win its independence. Acknowledging the true meaning of the words “federation” and “federal,” the document defined the relationship between the states as “a firm league of friendship with each other.”

Read more…

OBAMA TO WRITE NEW U.S. CONSTITUTION…

February 19, 2012 4 comments

OBAMA TO WRITE NEW U.S. CONSTITUTION
The Weekly World News ^ | 2/10/12 | Frank Lake

Posted on Sunday, February 19, 2012 10:28:17 AM by YankeeReb

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama said The U.S. Constitution is out-of-date, so he is ripping it up and writing a new one.

President Barack Obama told reporters last night that the U.S. Constitution has become a hindrance to progress in America. “The document is so out-dated, that it is now becoming a hindrance to governing the country.”

Obama said that he has signed an Executive Order voiding the U.S. Constitution. “We need to move forward. We need change.”

Obama said he has already drafted a new constitution and that Americans “will love what I came up with.” Insiders say that Obama is keeping a lot of old elements from the original constitution “he’s just making it better, bringing it into the 21st century,” said White House Spokesman, Jay Carney.

Many Democrats said that President Obama was a constitutional scholar and probably the only President – since the Founding Fathers – who is qualified to change the Constitution.

Read more…

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,081 other followers