Archive
Breaking: IRS Targeted Conservative Groups That Taught US Constitution
Breaking: IRS Targeted Conservative Groups That Taught US Constitution
The Gateway Pundit ^ | May 13, 2013, 6:49 AM | Jim Hoft
Posted on Monday, May 13, 2013 9:03:36 AM by Texas Fossil
The IRS not only targeted conservative Tea Party groups and Jews… They also targeted conservative groups that taught the US
Constitution.
The Washington Post reported:
>snip
On Jan. 15, 2012 the agency decided to target “political action type organizations involved in limiting/expanding Government, educating on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, social economic reform movement.,” according to the appendix in the IG report, which was requested by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and has yet to be released.
The Good Guys Are NOT Coming To Save Us…
The Good Guys Are NOT Coming To Save Us
Free-Man’s Perspective ^ | 4/23/13 | Paul RosenbergPosted on Thursday, April 25, 2013 2:03:45 PM by kreitzer
Cropped screenshot of John Wayne and Angie Dickinson from the trailer for the film Rio Bravo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
A lot of Americans know that the US government is out of control. Anyone who has cared enough to study the US Constitution even a little knows this. Still, very few of these people are taking any significant action, and largely because of one error: They are waiting for “the good guys” to show up and fix things.Some think that certain groups of politicians will pull it together and fix things, or that one magnificent politician will ride in to fix things.
Others think that certain members of the military will step in and slap the politicians back into line. And, I’m sure there are other variations.There are several problems with this. I’ll start with the small issues:It doesn’t happen.
A lot of good people have latched on to one grand possibility after another, waiting for a good guy to save the day, and it just doesn’t happen. Thousands of hours of reading, writing and waiting are burned with each new “great light” who comes along with a promise to run the system in the “right” way, and give us liberty and truth. Or whatever.
JB Williams — Our Rights Shall NOT Be Infringed…
NewsWithViews.com
Political leftists with global ambitions, who fear the wrath of a free people, have been trying to disarm American citizens for more than a hundred years now. Although Americans have been quite tolerant of past overreaches of political authority at the federal, state and local level, the silence of the people should not be misinterpreted as their consent. Far from it…
In the end, our rights shall NOT be infringed! PERIOD!
The subject of our inalienable rights, protected by the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights and State Constitutions, is simple. – “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Why? – Because, a well-regulated Militia is necessary to the security of a free State and a free people.
A state which is subservient to any supreme central power is not a “free state.” Our Founders created a Constitutional Representative Republic, not a democracy. The thirteen original colonies and the balance of the states by ratification, created a federal government via a compact known as the U.S. Constitution, and further protected states and individual rights via the Bill of (inalienable) Rights.
The people, via their states, assigned certain specific and limited duties to the federal government they created, along with the limited authority to carry out those duties.
Forget Guns…How About More ‘Congress Control’? (GyG: How Bout Back To Our First Constitution, The Articles of Confederation !!!!!)
Part 1 – A Look Behind the Curtain
Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters. - Daniel Webster
Every elected federal official in the U.S. must take an oath of office. The first Congress swore the oath in 1789; it was revised during the Civil War and the current version was enacted in 1884: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
The Abuse, Abandonement and Planned Replacement of the American Soldier | Veterans Today
HAS THERE BEEN A SECRET 100 YEAR PLAN TO ABUSE, ABANDON AND EVENTUALLY REPLACE THE AMERICAN SOLDIER WITH ROBOTS AND AUTOMATED WAR MACHINES ?
by Preston James
The American Soldier has been the greatest war-fighter in the world.
Is the Secret Shadow Government (SSG) now engaged in a long term plan to abuse, abandon, debase and replace the American Soldier with fully Automated Fighting Machines ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjiq44DgDf0&feature=player_detailpage
YouTube – Veterans Today -
THE AMERICAN SOLDIER—THE GREATEST SOLDIER IN MODERN HISTORY
Gil Gilbertson — Sheriff Will Not Obey Unlawful, Unconstitutional Orders
Dear Mr. Vice President,
As the elected Sheriff of this County, I am saddled with the duty, as well as responsibility, to uphold the Constitution and protect those people who placed their trust in me to do what is right.
I believe in our Constitution and all it stands for. We, you and I, are sworn to protect and defend our Constitution as required through the “Oath of Office”. This same Constitutional form of government provided us with the most privileged, and envied, country in world history.
The Real Second Amendment… (“We must first understand that we did not invent the 2nd Amendment; we inherited it”)
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed As simple as these word are, we have been arguing about what they mean for a long time. Part of the problem is that many people engaged in the argument do not interpret the 2nd Amendment with respect for its historical context, but rather in light of what they want it to mean in support of their purposes.
If we want to be honest about it, we must look to the origins of the amendment to understand it in the context of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, and only then can we consider it in our present context.
The issue is further complicated by the fact that an increasingly large proportion of the U.S. population has no experience in the use of arms; they see arms as irrelevant to their lives at best or a threat at worst.
This is important because the 2nd Amendment is always susceptible and becomes vulnerable when too many think it is an archaic artifact. We must first understand that we did not invent the 2nd Amendment; we inherited it……………
A sad farewell to the U.S. Constitution (calls GOP treasonous for eligibility inaction)
A sad farewell to the U.S. Constitution (calls GOPtreasonous for eligibility inaction)
WND ^ | August 28, 2012 | Christopher Monckton of Brenchley
Posted on Wednesday, August 29, 2012 1:10:53 PM by Perseverando
Exclusive: Christopher Monckton of Brenchley calls GOP treasonous for eligibility inaction
The U.S. Constitution was a magnificent
document. In that long, hot Philadelphia summer, your Founding Fathers thoughtfully debated the instrument of your freedom – a document that inspires all of us who no longer live in the knowledge that the only people who can impose laws or taxes upon us are those whom we have elected.
Business community will fight the left’s attempt to silence us
Serious efforts are speeding down the political pike from leftists, to curtail the free political speech of businesses. They are trying to pass laws and regulations that limit or eliminate a business’ or corporation’s ability to contribute to political candidates or PACs that support candidates. The left frets and whines about evil businesses trying to “buy” elections, yet it’s OK with them if unions do the buying. Huh? Say again?Let’s start with what the U.S. Constitution and the highest court in the land say about this issue.
Our Secret Constitution: How Lincoln Redefined American Democracy: The Independent Review: The Independent Institute
English: Abraham Lincoln, the sixteenth President of the United States. Latviešu: Abrahams Linkolns, sešpadsmitais ASV prezidents. Српски / Srpski: Абрахам Линколн, шеснаести председник Сједињених Америчких Држава. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
…..Fletcher’s quest to twist the U.S. Constitution to conform to a Rawlsian theory of egalitarian justice, his attempt to square the circle, results in fundamental inconsistencies. For example, on the one hand he maintains that “the rule of law requires, of course, courts that enjoy respect and legitimacy” (p. 257), but on the other he praises Lincoln for his treatment of Chief Justice Taney’s efforts to enforce habeas corpus (p. 167).
He advocates human dignity but espouses a coercive form of government capable of denying individuals the fruits of their labors. He gives lip service to democratic ideals while promoting a form of centralization incompatible with popular control and consent. Moreover, one must not assume that the centralization he advances stops at national borders. His operative theoretical assumptions blanket the human family with a visionary egalitarian ideal of global redistribution.
How Can a Conservative Support a RINO For President?
After Rick Santorum dropped out of the GOP presidential primary, my plan had been to vote third-party in the presidential election. The thought of rewarding with my vote the Leftist RINO establishment and “mainstream” media for shoving a worthless excuse for a Republican like Romney down my throat tasted like bile–and it still does.
HIJACKING AND ABUSE OF WAR POWERS TO TAKE-DOWN THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC | Veterans Today
THE HIJACKING AND TAKE-DOWN OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC HAS BEEN ACCOMPLISHED BY CAPTURING THE MONETARY PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND PROVOKING SERIAL FOREIGN WARS AS A MEANS OF EXTENDING THE HIDDEN WORLD EMPIRE OF THE “CITY OF LONDON” MOST THOUGHT WAS DIMINISHED
The Debasement of American Intel–Step By Step | Veterans Today
This opinion piece is the story of how American Intel was debased step by step, and how many great American intel heroes have been ignored, suppressed, abused, harassed and driven out of intel (or worse). This article is dedicated to these fine men and women.
Gunny G: For Another (honest) Look At The US Constitution, The Founding Fathers, Etc…..
Gunny G: For another (honest) look at the US Constitution, the Founding Fathers, etc.
Food for thought; and maybe makes some sense as to what went wrong, when and where!
The wriings of William Buppert, Gary North, Ed Eivera, etc.
Zero Gov – Anti-Government, Pro-Liberty » Blog Archive » The Constitution: The God That Failed (To Liberate Us From Big Government) by Bill Buppert
I wrote this earlier and wanted to republish since I will be debating the Articles versus the Constitution tomorrow in Yuma, Arizona at the 2012 Freedom Library Annual Awards Ceremony Debate. The issue gets more critical year by year because the Constitution may very well be one of the most clever anti-freedom documents crafted by man in the Western world.
As a result of a crafty and thorough propaganda campaign, a document that purports to support limited government and peaceful human activity has done exactly the opposite in such a gargantuan fashion that one is aghast so many people can still be deluded by the premise and continue to be bamboozled by its promise.
Police Shut Down Event Promoting U.S. Constitution; Thomas More Law Center Sues CAIR
ANN ARBOR, MI – In the middle of an event to extol the virtues of the U.S. Constitution and “American Laws For American Courts,” the audience learned first-hand how easy it is to lose their freedom of Speech and Assembly.
Amid shouts of “What about free speech?” from the audience, the Allegan Police Department ordered the event shut-down. School officials notified police that they had received a letter complaining about the event from Dawud Walid, Executive Director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-MI). The letter asked the school to disallow the event despite an existing contract.
The Movement To Torch The United States Constitution…
The Movement To Torch The United States Constitution
The New American ^ | May 2012 Issue | James O. E. Norell
Posted on Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:10:01 AM by IbJensen
DID YOU KNOW SOUTH AFRICA HAS A CONSTITUTION THAT’S FAR SUPERIOR TO OUR OWN? THAT’S WHAT ONE U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, AS WELL AS SHADOWY ACTIVITIST GROUPS WORKING BEHIND THE SCENES TO EFFECT CHANGE, BELIEVE.

“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012. I might look at the Constitution of South Africa … a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights …” -Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Jan. 30, 2012.
That stunning disavowal—by an associate justice of the United States Supreme Court—of the Constitution she has sworn to uphold, drew widespread and instant condemnation from conservative pundits and legal scholars.
NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris W. Cox warned that Justice Ginsburg’s statements go to the core of why the coming presidential elections are important, and why they are “about the very survival of our Constitution.” He’s right on the money.
How to legally dissolve the U.S. Federal Government Forget Secession
Thirty four 34 is the number of Legislatures from the several States necessary to call a States Convention or a Constitutional Convention. This also known as an Article Five5 Convention, or a Convention to Amend the U.S. Constitution. With fifty 50 States in the U.S. Federal Compact today, thirty four 34 is the Constitutional number of legislatures from the several States needed to cross the threshold for such a convention.
Let’s look at Article 5 of the U.S. Constitution :”The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress;
Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate. “Thirty eight 38 is the number of legislatures from the several States that is necessary to ratify and thus amend the U.S. Constitution after such a convention.
This amendment could be “to dissolve”. By “dissolve” I mean the whole compact between the several States. Yes, the entire Federal Government and every thing it has or was created under it’s jurisdiction. This would include but is not limited too, the Federal Debt, the Federal Reserve Bank, the FDIC, the Department of Education, the Department of Homeland Security, the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, the Marines, etc. etc… Think of it as a Constitutional self destruct mechanism.This would leave the fifty 50 several States and the numerous Federal Territories, sovereign and under their own rightful and direct jurisdiction. Of course each State or Territory would then be free to individually or in groups engage in new compacts and trade arrangements.
Chief Justice Says States Have Compromised Their Sovereignty

John Roberts as a judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Chief Justice Says States Have Compromised Their Sovereignty
The New American ^ | 3/29/2012 | Jack Kenny
Posted on Friday, March 30, 2012 9:29:41 AM by IbJensen
Chief Justice John Roberts said Wednesday what has long been known but seldom spoken. During the third and final day of Supreme Court hearings on whether the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 is unconstitutional, Roberts said states have been compromising their sovereignty for decades through increased reliance on the federal government for money and accompanying directions on the governance of state affairs.
“It seems to me that they have compromised their status as independent sovereigns because they are so dependent on what the federal government has done,” the chief justice said during Wednesday’s nearly three hours of hearings on the controversial health insurance law.
The final day’s arguments had to do with whether the law could stand if the justices find the mandate for uncovered individuals to purchase health insurance is unconstitutional — something the court’s conservative majority appears ready to do. Another feature of the law called into question by lawyers opposing the act is the expansion of Medicaid, the federal-state program that provides health care for low-income families. Under the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid is expanded to include a larger number of parents, as well as low-income adults with no dependent children. Half of the 32 million who would get new health insurance coverage under the law would receive it through Medicaid.
Dave Daubenmire — Defy the Bastards
Diagram of US Federal Government and American Union. Published: 1862, July 15. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
The most common use of the term “bastard” refers to a child who is born from illegitimate means. Marriage is what makes a child “legitimate.” Any child produced outside of a legal-marriage was once considered “illegitimate” because he/she was not under the authority of a father.
Illegitimacy is destroying America. A father-less generation of children is roaming the streets of America in search of authority. Recent statistics show that over 40% of all babies born in America are bastards.
To many of those children, government becomes the father. We have seen the effects that “government-parenthood” has had on this nation. A government-paycheck does not a father make.
But the larger issue is that our Federal Government has become bastardized. At its origin, the Federal Government was the birth-child of the thirteen colonies. “We the People of the United States” gave birth to the Federal Government, and, as Thomas Jefferson said, tied it “down with the chains of the Constitution.”
Follow me now. The Federal Government was the birth child of the U.S. Constitution. The Constitution was the spawn of the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration received its authority from the elected representatives of the thirteen States who gathered at Independence Hall in Philadelphia and signed it. Those elected representatives received their authority from the individual citizens in the independent states. The individual-citizens were endowed with the authority as a birthright from their Creator. The Creator was, and still is, the ultimate authority over the individual. He IS the Father of all.
If There is NO Constitution, There is NO Fed| The Post & Email
“DERIVING THEIR JUST POWERS FROM THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED”
by JB Williams, ©2012
Does the current federal government allow for “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?”
(Feb. 21, 2012) — Are Washington, DC politicians absolutely sure that they want to make the US Constitution null and void? If the US Constitution is null and void, then so is the union of states that it created, as that fragile union of sovereign states was very carefully ratified via a very specific and carefully crafted balance of power between the federal government and the states.
‘We the People’ Loses Appeal With People Around the World
Sure, it is the nation’s founding document and sacred text.
And it is the oldest written national constitution still in force anywhere in the world. But its influence is waning.In 1987, on the Constitution’s bicentennial, Time magazine calculated that “of the 170 countries that exist today, more than 160 have written charters modeled directly or indirectly on the U.S. version.”
A quarter-century later, the picture looks very different. “The U.S. Constitution appears to be losing its appeal as a model for constitutional drafters elsewhere,” according to a new study by David S. Law of Washington University in St. Louis and Mila Versteeg of the University of Virginia.
Supreme Court justice: U.S. Constitution inferior…
One member of the U.S. Supreme Court, whose members are sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States, says she would look elsewhere – Canada, South Africa and Europe – should she be tasked with writing a constitution now.
The stunning statements come from Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Prison Planet.com » If The TSA Will Treat Senator Rand Paul Like A Scumbag, What Will They Do TO YOU?
On Monday, U.S. Senator Rand Paul was detained by the TSA for about two hours at an airport in Nashville. By doing so, TSA officials directly violated the U.S. Constitution and they demonstrated once again why the rest of the world is coming to regard us as a bunch of disgusting, arrogant “pig people”.
Do we really want to get such a bad reputation that virtually nobody will ever want to visit this country? We are going to absolutely destroy our tourism industry with this nonsense. Yes, we all want to fly safely, but other countries get the job done without their security officials running around acting like a bunch of Nazi prison guards. The TSA should be shut down, but if Congress wants it to continue to exist it should be given a dual mandate. It should be directed to protect the dignity of the American people first, and the safety of the American people second. If those running the TSA don’t believe that this is possible, then they should be immediately replaced, because there are a whole lot of good people out there that could get the job done. Right now, TSA officials are treating American citizens like they aren’t even human. The truth is that Rand Paul got off easy compared to what has happened to many other Americans. As I have written about previously, some elderly Americans have been strip-searched, some have had their adult diapers removed, and some have even been left covered in urine by invasive TSA searches.







































Recent Comments