PART 1 of 2

By Lynn Stuter

July 17, 2007



A well-meaning individual sent me a commentary by Raymond Kraft entitled Historical Significance. It touched a nerve by insinuating that anyone who didn’t get behind George W Bush and his “war on terror” was just anti-America, the enemy of America, unpatriotic.

I’ve heard this argument before — if you are against the war, you are against America and aiding the enemy. This is the typical “either you are for us or against us tack,” evidence to the contrary.

Who was behind, who was involved in the events of September 11, 2001 is crucial to all that follows, including the “war” in Iraq and the “war on terror.” As such, it is imperative that we look at the evidence.

Within hours of the events of September 11, 2001, the name of Osama bin Laden and his band of renegade radicals, al Qaeda, was on the lips of most mainstream news anchors. The name of Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda are indelibly etched in the minds of Americans. Within days, and through the months that followed, the names and pictures of nineteen of bin Laden’s supposed renegade radicals were paraded before the American public. George W Bush went on record, stating he wanted bin Laden “dead or alive.” The government provided not one shred of evidence that bin Laden and al Qaeda were involved. From the mainstream media blitz, the American people simply assumed that the government had the evidence pointing to bin Laden and al Qaeda.

Then news stories start appearing in mainstream media over seas that some of the individuals named as involved in the hijacking of the four jets were still alive. Despite the two passports of supposed terrorists “found”, one in pristine condition (it miraculously survived the explosion of the plane around it), in and near the WTC complex, the FBI press release makes it apparent that the FBI did not know for sure if these individuals were involved but hasn’t, to this day, changed its list of supposed hijackers. That list went from “we believe” to “that’s them” with little if any supporting evidence.

And questions concerning the government’s official story of events of 9/11 started to surface. It was obvious to a growing number of people that the official story didn’t add up. The anomalies between the official story and what the evidence showed were not answered by the 9/11 Commission, established by the government, which ignored most of the testimony that came before it. There has been no logical answer provided for all the anomalies surrounding the fall of WTC 1, 2, and 7 and the craters that appeared in WTC 6; discussed previously in Reclaiming our Heritage, Twists and Turns, Purdue University Weighs in on WTC Towers Collapse and In Perspective.

If the government had nothing to hide from the American people, it would let the American people see all the evidence instead of parceling out a little evidence here and there but keeping the rest under lock and key.

The latest to throw their hat in the ring of those who do not believe the government’s official story of 9/11 are a group of commercial airline pilots. They have obtained, from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) the flight data information from the black box of the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon along with an animation produced by the NTSB of American Airlines 77 inbound to the Pentagon. By their calculations, using the flight data information supplied by the NTSB, AA77 over flew the Pentagon by 300 to 400 feet! When questioned about this obvious anomaly, the NTSB had “no comment.” Using the simulation provided by the NTSB, these same pilots determined that the flight path, as constructed by the NTSB, did not conform to the five light poles supposedly toppled by the plane inbound to the Pentagon. Not only this, but the angle of descent did not conform to the five frames released by the FBI showing something at near-ground level streaking across the lawn of the Pentagon. (Source)

Logic supports these pilots. Anyone with any knowledge of large planes and large engines knows that no plane that large can fly that close to the ground, nose down as the NTSB simulation shows, and as would be required if the plane plowed into the ground floor of the Pentagon, as the hole in the Pentagon showed, and not plow into the ground. Anyone who has ever watched a plane that size land knows the plane comes in nose up, lands on its wing wheels first with its nose wheel settling thereafter as the plane slows. If the plane comes in nose down, it will either crash before reaching the runway or crash into the runway.

Then there is the fact that the engines on a plane that large are very powerful, acting like monstrous vacuum cleaners, sucking anything and everything in proximity to those engines, not well anchored, into and through the engines. The point being that if the plane were actually flying as low as has been claimed, what would have been vacuumed into and through those engines would have caused the engines to malfunctioned before the plane got close to the Pentagon. And the prop wash from the engines would have literally tossed the vehicles caught in its wake as well as spewing out bits and pieces of whatever was sucked into and through the engines.

What actually hit the Pentagon leaving a mere 16 foot in diameter entrance hole at ground level, no wreckage, and penetrating nine feet of concrete through three rings (six walls) of the Pentagon? Good question. But the after-effect certainly diverted attention away from the $2,300,000,000,000 (trillion) in Pentagon funds unaccounted for under the leadership of Donald Rumsfeld. Interesting that the part of the Pentagon hit that day housed the computers that held all the information and the civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts who would have investigated where those missing funds went. To this day, five years later, that question has not been answered.

Was 9/11 the work of bin Laden’s renegade band of radicals with box cutters? Not unless they had free run of the World Trade Center complex, which, given bin Laden’s connections to the CIA (see In Perspective), isn’t impossible. Researchers would learn that the head of the New York Port Authority, in charge of security at the WTC complex right up to the day of 9/11, was none other than Marvin Bush, brother of George W Bush.

George W Bush, right after his inauguration in January 2001, ordered that all investigation of bin Laden family members, living in the U.S., cease. With all planes ordered grounded following the events of September 11, 2001, with planes only being allowed to fly with high government-level permission, members of the bin Laden family boarded a jet and left the United States in the days immediately following 9/11. As stated previously, in the days following 9/11, George W Bush vowed to bring bin Laden to justice. In March of 2002, however, Bush went on record stating that bin Laden wasn’t important. If bin Laden wasn’t important in March 2002, it is obvious that he also wasn’t important in September 2001 when Bush and Company fervently placed the blame for 9/11 at his doorstep. For part 2 click below.

Click here for part —–> 2,

© 2007 Lynn M. Stuter – All Rights Reserved

Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts

Mother and wife, Stuter has spent the past ten years researching systems theory with a particular emphasis on education. She home schooled two daughters, now grown and on their own. She has worked with legislators, both state and federal, on issues pertaining to systems governance and education reform. She networks nationwide with other researchers and citizens concerned with the transformation of our nation. She has traveled the United States and lived overseas. Web site: www.learn-usa.com E-Mail: lmstuter@learn-usa.com



About Gunny G

GnySgt USMC (Ret.) 1952--'72 PC: History, Poly-Tiks, Military, Stories, Controversial, Unusual, Humorous, etc.... "Simplify...y'know!"
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.


  1. gunnyg says:

    PART 2 HERE!!!!!

    PART 2 of 2

    By Lynn Stuter

    July 17, 2007


    Researchers would also discover a PNAC document, published in 2000, Rebuilding America’s Defenses; Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century, page 51, in which it is suggested that a New Pearl Harbor is needed to galvanize the people of this nation behind a policy of American imperialist expansionism. PNAC members later showing up in the Bush Administration include Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Cohen, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, and Lewis “Scooter” Libby. Jeb Bush, George Bush’s brother, is also a member along with such notables as Elliott Abrams, Gary Bauer, Midge Decker, Bill Bennett, Steve Forbes and Dan Quayle.

    Seven short months after Bush took office just such an event occurred on September 11, 2001.

    In March 2002 Bush invaded Iraq on the premise that Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMD’s) and was aiding and abetting al Qaeda. The first premise proved false; further, that Bush knew (Bush Sought ‘Way’ to Invade Iraq, Secret US Plans for Iraq’s Oil, Bush Began Iraq Plan pre-911, What I didn’t find in Africa) it was false when he made the claim. The second premise got lost in the shadow of the first premise, along with the fact that there was no connection between Hussein and bin Laden. As the invasion went on, the premise changed from WMD’s to establishing a “free and democratic” Iraq.

    Bush invaded Iraq because of September 11, 2001. But wait, there is not connection between Hussein and bin Laden, no connection between Hussein and September 11, 2001. So if Iraq isn’t about terrorists or the “war on terrorism”, what is Bush’s invasion of Iraq about?

    What Americans aren’t being told concerning Iraq is that America is establishing a military presence there. The largest embassy complex in the world is being built in Baghdad; a number of American military bases have sprung up in Iraq. Does this sound like the machinations of a country intending to liberate Iraq then leave? As Mr Kraft pointed out in his article, a stable Iraq can be used as a launching platform for meddling in the affairs of other Middle East countries. Yesterday a British newspaper bore this headline: “Cheney pushes Bush to act on Iran.”

    If people from another country meddled in the affairs of the American people, would we like it? Of course not. Then why should we even entertain the idea that meddling in other countries is okay? But meddle we have, we are, and under false pretenses.

    Was 9/11 and inside job? The evidence is pointing more and more that direction. The American people have been lead to believe that 9/11 was the work of foreign terrorists wielding box cutters who “hate our freedom”. But the evidence does not point in that direction. The evidence is pointing more and more to 9/11 being the work of home-grown terrorists (as defined by the Patriot Act) that now occupy the highest levels of our government and that 9/11 was intended to galvanize the America people behind the policies of imperialist expansionism, if only for just long enough to get the real agenda behind the events of 9/11 accomplished, just as Pearl Harbor galvanized the American people behind entering World War II.

    And one of the most crucial aspects pointing to that does not even deal with the events of 9/11 but concerns what happened afterward. If 9/11 were truly the work of foreign terrorists with box cutters, the first action of George W Bush would have been to secure our borders, especially in light of his “war on terror.”

    Has he done that? No he hasn’t. Why hasn’t he? That question leads us directly to the fact that George W Bush, as his father, is a proponent of One World Government, the New World Order (NWO) or One World Order (OWO). To that end, George W Bush has embarked, with the leaders of Canada and Mexico, in the establishment of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) in pursuit of the North American Union, dissolving the borders of America, dissolving the United States Constitution, and embarking on a new form of government without so much as a vote of the people.

    His intentions are further supported by the fact that, while invading Iraq on the pretense of the “war on terror”, Bush’s answer to the invasion of America by 12 to 20,000,000 illegal aliens — criminals one and all — was to introduce two bills: S 1348 sponsored by Harry Reid, Edward Kennedy, Patrick Leahy, Robert Menendez and Ken Salazar, and S 1639 sponsored by Edward Kennedy and Arlen Specter — giving these invaders amnesty. Incongruous, you might conclude. Not at all. This is Bush in pursuit of the NWO/OWO agenda.

    No government, pursuing a course of imperial expansionism (empire building) has ever withstood the test of time and America is, as Ron Paul has stated, on the verge of bankruptcy. That also falls right in line with NWO/OWO agenda for America. The depression that will result will make the one in ’29 look like child’s play! People back then knew how to survive; the majority of people today don’t. Another NWO/OWO agenda — 80% world depopulation.

    As for radical Islamic fundamentalists — while we definitely should not ignore the threat they pose, we have far more to fear, at this point in time, from George W Bush then we have to fear from radical Islamic fundamentalists. It is not radical Islamic fundamentalists who have weakened our country, our economy, and our military defense capability to the point of collapse; that has been the doing of George W Bush.

    It is under the watch of George W Bush that

    * the NSA has data mined telephone calls, bank records and e-mail of American citizens;
    * the writ of habeas corpus has been suspended without cause;
    * Posse Comitatus has been suspended (New Orleans, Hurricane Katrina);
    * the Fourth Amendment (illegal search and seizure) has been suspended;
    * the National ID card (your papers, please) came about.

    These actions by George W Bush have not been against radical Islamic fundamentalists, they have been against the American people. These are not the actions of someone trying to protect Americans or America; these are the actions of someone seeking to curb the rights of Americans in pursuit of an anti-American agenda.

    I submit that if you do not oppose this war, you do not want to hold George W Bush accountable for the damage he has done to this nation, the crimes he has committed, I hope you like the idea that your children, or grandchildren, will live under the Fascist/Communist ideology of the NWO/OWO that is so quickly overrunning our Constitutional Republic. Our enemy is not from without as those who support Bush’s war would have us believe, our enemy is within and Bush’s war is but a means of accomplishing evil ends.

    And to those who say I am the enemy of America, I say this: I will stand shoulder to shoulder with any freedom-loving America in defense of our Constitutional Republic. At the same time, I will not stand idly by while the likes of George W Bush and his rogue band of swaggering neo-cons leads our nation astray through deceit, treachery and treason! Anyone who thinks George W Bush is out to protect this nation is expecting that the fox will guard the hen house.

    This is not about Democrat or Republican; this is not about liberal or conservative; this is about the evidence, where that evidence leads, and what it means for the future of America. For part 1 click below.

    Click here for part —–> 1,

    © 2007 Lynn M. Stuter – All Rights Reserved

    Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts

    Mother and wife, Stuter has spent the past ten years researching systems theory with a particular emphasis on education. She home schooled two daughters, now grown and on their own. She has worked with legislators, both state and federal, on issues pertaining to systems governance and education reform. She networks nationwide with other researchers and citizens concerned with the transformation of our nation. She has traveled the United States and lived overseas.

    Web site: http://www.learn-usa.com

    E-Mail: lmstuter@learn-usa.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.