Bigotry and contempt at taxpayer expense
May 21, 2008
Once upon a time, feminism stood for fairness, equality, and possibility. But feminism traces its roots back to Karl Marx, George Engels, and Vladimir Lenin. That fact alone should make us think twice before acquiescing to the insistent demands of the women’s libbers.
Rep. Howard Berman, California Democrat, recently introduced the International Violence Against Women Act (H.R. 5927). Known to its supporters as I-VAWA, the bill is based on the Violence Against Women Act, first signed into law in 1994 at the behest of First Lady Hillary Clinton.
The crusade to stop intimate partner violence began in 1972 when activist Erin Pizzey established the first woman’s abuse shelter in London. Pizzey quickly discovered that many of the women in her shelter were just as violent as their partners. That led her to conclude that partner abuse is a human, not gender-specific problem.
That revelation didn’t sit well with the rad-fems, who were determined to usurp the domestic violence issue to leap-frog their own political agenda. So they stormed the meetings and Pizzey was soon voted out.
These experiences compelled Pizzey to pen an exposé called “How the Women’s Movement Taught Women to Hate Men.” Her essay highlights spiteful women like the zealot who openly declared, “We don’t like men …If there is ever to be any equality, marriage and the family must be abolished.”
Thanks to the domestic violence movement, the contempt of men began to spread across the globe.
In Canada, abuse shelters became known as “one-stop divorce shops” that forbade women to reconcile with their partners. It got so bad that former shelter resident Nezha Saad revealed to a local judge, “I was put under tremendous pressure…to say even more negative things about my husband to get him in more trouble with the law.”
Disdain for men permeates the domestic violence industry in the United States, as well. Three years ago conservative icon Phyllis Schlafly excoriated the Violence Against Women Act as the “hate-men law.” That damning appraisal is confirmed by numerous industry insiders. (Caution: vulgar language ahead!)
In Minnesota a shelter director left her job in disgust because the residents were subjected to a constant barrage of lesbian propaganda that said in so many words, “All men are sh*ts, all men are abusers.”
Joy Taylor, who had volunteered at her local shelter, was shocked by the staff’s militant feminist ideology. “Men were always presented at potential abusers; any goodness one might see in them was only temporary,” she revealed.
In Washington state, the head of one shelter admitted, “Whenever I speak of male abuse, I am met with disbelief and, even worse, laughter.” Many of these shelters not only turn away male victims of violence, they even refuse to accept adolescent males who are children of female abuse victims.
One Seattle-area judge wrote, “I am a member of the advisory committee for the local shelter. I was shocked at the anti-male bias of the ladies who ran the center. My committee expressed concern about the underlying anti-male bias which even showed up in the name of the shelter.”
The Violence Against Women Act also bankrolls educational programs for law enforcement personnel. In California, retired police officer George Sperry described domestic violence training classes as “so dripping with male hatred that everyone in the class felt uncomfortable, male and female officers alike.”
In 2006 the presenter at a West Virginia seminar openly referred to a man accused of domestic violence as a “scum bag,” at the same time making light of a Florida incident where a young man was sexually assaulted by his female teacher.
So it’s probably no surprise that the International Violence Against Women Act is filled with numerous one-sided and alarmist claims that amount to a spiteful indictment of the male species.
The bill is filled with neo-Marxist cant about “power inequities.” But no where does the bill mention the recent 32-nation survey that found women were more likely to strike the first blow. And of course the proposed law never mentions that men are twice as likely as women to die of violence-related causes.
The domestic violence industry needs a top-to-bottom house-cleaning. Scratch below the veneer of self-serving clichés like “helping battered women escape the cycle of abuse,” and you’ll find a self-perpetuating industry that cares only about breaking up families and vilifying men.
All this thanks to the largesse of the U.S. taxpayer, to the tune of $1 billion a year. And this is what Rep. Berman wants to export to the rest of the world.
Carey Roberts is an analyst and commentator on political correctness. His best-known work was an exposé on Marxism and radical feminism.
Mr. Roberts’ work has been cited on the Rush Limbaugh show. Besides serving as a regular contributor to RenewAmerica.us, he has published in The Washington Times, LewRockwell.com, ifeminists.net, Men’s News Daily, eco.freedom.org, The Federal Observer, Opinion Editorials, and The Right Report.
Previously, he served on active duty in the Army, was a professor of psychology, and was a citizen-lobbyist in the US Congress. In his spare time he admires Norman Rockwell paintings, collects antiques, and is an avid soccer fan. He now works as an independent researcher and consultant.
© Copyright 2008 by Carey Roberts