Archive for April, 2009

Flu Happens by Edgar J. Steele

April 30, 2009 Leave a comment

The Nickel Ranttm
Flu Happens
by Edgar J. Steele

April 29, 2009

There is evidence there will be a major flu epidemic this coming fall. The indication is that we will see a return of the 1918 flu virus that is the most virulent form of the flu.  In 1918 a half million Americans died.  The projections are that this virus will kill one million Americans in 1976.”
— F. David Matthews, U.S. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare (Feb 1976)

Audio files of Flu Happens:
Formal Rant Only – (13 mb, 12 min) mp3 streaming mp3
Entire Broadcast – (14 mb, 60 min) mp3 streaming mp3

4-22-09 – Obummer mp3 audio
4-15-09 – Idaho – You Can See New America From Here mp3 audio
4-8-09  – Christians? In America? mp3 audio
4-1-09  – Ed Gov, Not Fed Gov mp3 audio
3-25-09 – We’re All Terrorists Now mp3 audio
3-18-09 – Second Annual State of the Revolution mp3 audio
3-11-09 – The Road to Hell is Paved with Bailout Money mp3 audio

My name is Edgar J. Steele.

After careful, close study and review of reports from around the world, I have concluded that the current Swine Flu “Public Health Emergency” is a false alarm.

Even so, I believe there is a very important lesson to be gleaned from the way we all responded to this threatened global pandemic.  In fact, it may well be the real thing, but something that plays out over such a long period of time that immediate panic is grossly unwarranted.  More on this below.

America Jumps In Once It’s Safe

The American government seems to agree with me, because it ignored this burgeoning flu epidemic altogether until at least four days after other countries had reacted, placing even the United States on their “travel advisory” lists.  Only after it became clear to me that we are in no immediate danger did the US government suddenly start reacting, declaring the “Public Health Emergency,” holding congressional hearings and issuing statements right and left.

Read more…

Judge gives courtroom spectator 30 days for this … Hauled behind bars immediately after being cited by judge

April 29, 2009 Leave a comment

This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

WorldNetDaily Exclusive

Judge gives courtroom spectator 30 days for this
Hauled behind bars immediately after being cited by judge

Posted: April 28, 2009
9:54 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh


Judge Stephen Henriod

A Utah mother of four small children has been jailed on a judge’s order to serve 30 days behind bars for allegedly sending a text message while she was watching a court proceeding.

The report comes from her father-in-law, Dennis Jackson, who told WND of the series of events that left his daughter-in-law, Susan Henwood, imprisoned.

A spokeswoman in the clerk’s office for Judge Stephen L. Henriod of Utah’s Third District Court confirmed the woman was jailed for the 30 days on the judge’s order over the issue of texting.

However, she declined to answer other questions from WND, instead transferring WND to a voice mail for the judge’s clerk. A woman identifying herself as Henriod’s clerk later called but said the judge would not speak to any reporters.

(Story continues below)

According to Jackson’s report, the incident happened in Tooele about a month ago, but his daughter-in-law was summoned to court only yesterday and ordered immediately to jail.

Henwood’s husband, Josh Henwood, was in court over a civil dispute involving a development project on which he worked.

Read all about the laws we follow, in “The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution”

Susan Henwood allegedly sent a text message, an action that didn’t affect the hearing, its participants, or the judge, but later was reported to him by a member of the court staff, according to Jackson.

Read more…

Pseudo-Sciences: Sociology and Psychology….

April 29, 2009 6 comments

All You Need To Know About Cultural Marxism, Psychology, Sociology, Education, Humanism, etc.

The Roots of Revolution

by Reginald Firehammer

In the opening article to this series, ” Marxist Revolution of the West ,” I explained that the revolution that has all but destroyed Western civilization, and is in its final stages in every aspect of Western society and culture, though explicitly planned and initiated by avowed Marxists, it was contributions of other individuals, movements, and institutions that made it possible for the revolution to be so spectacularly pulled off. The interrelationships between these various contributors to the revolution is very complex. There are six major threads of influence which I have identified and in terms of which all the complexity of that revolution can be explained.

Six Anti-Western Anti-civlizing Threads

The six threads are: 1. Cultural Marxism; 2. Post Modernism; 3. Psychology; 4. Sociology; 5. Education; and 6. Humanism.

Cultural Marxism is the movement initiated by the avowed Marxists, Antonio Gramsci, Georg Lukacs, Wilhelm Reich, Erich Fromm, Herbert Marcuse, Theodor Adorno, and Max Horkheimer and others of the Frankfurt School. These men made it clear in their writing, teaching, speeches, and lectures that a complete revolution of Western society and the eventual establishment of a one-world socialist order was and is their intention.

Post Modernism is a philosophy primarily epistemological (study of knowledge) which has its roots in the logical positivists of the Vienna Circle. Though many of the positivists were also socialists, there was never any overtly stated intention to foment revolution, though the results of their influence on society and culture has certainly resulted in one. Most important, the result of this philosophical movement produced the fertile anti-intellectual soil in which cultural Marxism has thrived.

Psychology is the pseudo-science which began with the conflation of physiology (a legitimate science) and philosophy of mind (a legitimate branch of philosophy) by Wilhelm Wundt in the early 1900s. By combining both “philosophical introspection” (subjectivity) and laboratory technique (objectivity), “psychology” provided the means to put over any wild speculation about the nature of human consciousness in the name of “science.” It was perfectly suited to the purposes of the cultural Marxists, two of whom, Wilhelm Reich and Erich Fromm, were influential “psychologists” whose marxist ideas have, through the medium of psychology, infiltrated every aspect of Western culture and thought.

Sociology is another pseudo-science, the invention of Auguste Compte (1798-1857) which he called the greatest of sciences that would subsume all others (which in a very real sense it has—think environmentalism and the subordination of science to political agendas). Sociology is “dressed-up” collectivism; it’s fundamental premise is that society is the ultimate end or purpose of values and actions and that individuals are subordinate to and derive their values and purpose from their relationship to or membership in society. Compte coined the word altruism to refer to the moral obligation of individuals to serve others and place the interests of society above their own. He is the father of positivism, which he regarded as “human religion”; both the logical positivists (Vienna Circle) and Secular Humanism have their origins in Compte. If Sociology is a science, its application is “social engineering.”

Education is a social-engineering method of implementing control, based on “principles” derived from sociology and psychology. The educational system that dominates America, and virtually all the West had its origins in Prussia, the brain-child of the collectivist philosopher, Johann Gottlieb Fichte, who said, “The schools must fashion the person, and fashion him in such a way that he simply cannot will otherwise than what you wish him to will.”

Read more…

Feds “demanded total secrecy” in NYC flyover-we demand answers (terrorism investigators response)

April 29, 2009 Leave a comment

Feds “demanded total secrecy” in NYC flyover-we demand answers (terrorism investigators response) ^ | 4/29/2009 | Doug Hagmann

Posted on Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:48:53 AM by SonOfDarkSkies

As usual, no one in the media is asking pertinent questions, and they sure aren’t demanding answers. So, please allow me:

Louis E. Caldera, director of the White House Military Office, publicly stated that he “approved” of a “mission over New York” and assumed full responsibility for the fallout it caused. If the plan did not originate with Caldera, who created the “mission” and where did it “originate?”

According to a memo obtained by NYC CBS Channel 2, “Federal officials knew that sending two fighter jets and Air Force One to buzz ground zero and Lady Liberty might set off nightmarish fears of a 9/11 replay, but they still ordered the photo-op kept secret from the public.” Why? What was the motive?

According to initial reports, federal officials failed to notify New York officials about this event (despite of the anticipated panic). However, subsequent reports indicate that some New York City officials were indeed notified, but were restricted under the severest of classification – the punishment of losing federal money – if anyone broke silence about this planned event. If this was indeed an innocuous photo-op as claimed, why the need for secrecy that includes those assigned to protect the city from enemy attack?

Who was aboard the Air Force One lookalike? Please supply the passenger manifest.

Several prominent buildings were evacuated by the perceived threat of a terrorist attack on lower Manhattan shortly after 10:00 AM Monday. According to official White House accounts, Barack Hussein Obama claims he did not know about this until later in the afternoon. Considering the national security implications, what was the reason for the delay?

Read more…

Eligibility case defendants don’t want to answer now Lawyer for Obama, Congress says representation decision unmade

April 29, 2009 Leave a comment

This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

WorldNetDaily Exclusive

Eligibility case defendants
don’t want to answer now

Lawyer for Obama, Congress says
representation decision unmade

Posted: April 28, 2009
8:49 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh


Government lawyers defending President Obama and Congress in a lawsuit alleging that he’s ineligible to occupy the Oval Office and that members of the House and Senate violated the constitutional rights of citizens by refusing to investigate want still more time to respond to the accusations.

The case raises many of the same arguments as dozens of other lawsuits that have flooded into courtrooms around the nation since the November election.

It was filed in January by attorney Mario Apuzzo of New Jersey on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr. It names as defendants Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives and former Vice President Dick Cheney along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Where’s the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the “natural-born American” clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 360,000 others and sign up now!

Even though extensions had been granted to an initial round of requests to delay the proceedings, the government now says it needs even more time to prepare a response to a question that could be answered with a five-minute telephone call from the president to Hawaiian officials asking that his birth documentation be made public.

Instead, a request submitted by Ralph Marra Jr., the acting U.S. attorney, and Elizabeth Pascal, the assistant U.S. attorney in New Jersey, explains that the Department of Justice, operating under Obama appointee Attorney General Eric Holder, still is working on a decision on representation for the defendants.

(Story continues below)

“The failure to file an answer, move, or to otherwise respond before the expiration of the time specified is not the result of any neglect on any of the Defendants’ parts,” the court filing submitted yesterday said.

“Representation decisions are made by a specialized group of individuals in the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. In order to provide a fair opportunity for the Department to review this matter and to complete the representation determinations, Defendants respectfully request an extension of twenty (20) days from the date of this Order in which to answer, move, or otherwise respond,” the court filing said.

Read more…

Campaign demands boot for Napolitano

April 29, 2009 1 comment

Campaign demands boot for Napolitano ^ | April 28, 2009 | Bob Unruh

Posted on Wednesday, April 29, 2009 6:54:40 AM by Man50D

A coalition of nearly two dozen organizations is launching a campaign that demands the resignation of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and an apology from President Obama for labeling those who hold traditional American values and conservative ideals as terrorists.

“We, the law-abiding Citizens of America, demand: 1. The Resignation or Removal of DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano for her partisan political profiling of veterans and conservatives and her abuse of power,” says the petition, which is posted on the website for the coalition that goes under the name No Political Profiling.

It also demands, “An apology from President Barack Obama to ALL Americans for his administration’s call for domestic spying,” and “The Immediate Retraction of the ‘Rightwing Extremism’ report for labeling law-abiding citizens as ‘terrorists’ because of their political views.”

As WND reported, a spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security cited executed Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh as an example of why “right wing” interests must be monitored closely by his agency in the United States.

Read more…

Why Is Obama Admin Suppressing Info On First Swine Flu Death?

April 29, 2009 Leave a comment

Why Is Obama Admin Suppressing Info On First Swine Flu Death?
FinkelBlog ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on Wednesday, April 29, 2009 7:43:04 AM by governsleastgovernsbest

“A 23-month-old child from Texas has become the first American to die from the swine flu outbreak, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta confirmed today. The CDC released no other information about how — or where — the child may have contracted the disease.” — ABC report, “First U.S. Death From Swine Flu in Texas the CDC Confirms”, April 29, 2009 [emphasis added]

My antennae started to go up as I heard various reports about the first reported swine flu death in the USA. A 23-month old child “from Texas” was all that we were told. Googling, I found the ABC article above pointedly mentioning that “the CDC released no other information about how — or where — the child may have contracted the disease.”

Read more…


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,490 other followers