Home > Uncategorized > Articles: Obama’s Sons: They Are Real for Him

Articles: Obama’s Sons: They Are Real for Him

…..Thomas Lifson toys with the notion that Obama might in fact have secret sons, as a way of making sense of the seeming insanity of it. Selwyn Duke suggests it might indicate brain damage from Obama’s (presumably) past drug use. (Funny, isn’t it, how often one is left no choice but merely to presume about the Cipher-in-Chief.)

isdees

isdees (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

David Paulin asks whether Obama might be the victim of a teleprompting prankster/saboteur.

All of these are reasonable speculations — which is, in itself, reason to be perturbed about America’s current devolved state. However, I would like to throw one more possibility into the mix, more straightforward, but no less bizarre, than the others. I believe it is likely that Obama compared the future prospects of “my daughters” to that of “my sons” precisely according to a sincerely prepared and carefully vetted script.

Watching the two instances on video, it is clear that he does not blink in either case, suggesting that he doesn’t think he is making an error. True, he didn’t blink when he heard himself talking about 57 states, either. But of course that one could plausibly be chalked up to genuine ignorance. After all, why should a 47 year-old man, serving as one of the 100 elected members of a body comprised of exactly 2 people from each U.S. state, himself famously (and presumably) born in the 50th state, and running for President, necessarily know how many states there are?

Arguing, as Selwyn Duke does, that every American school child, “when very little,” knows there are 50 states, misses the point, in as much as Obama was not an American school child when he was very little. When he was very little, he was (presumably) studying in Indonesia, where his homework on American history was, presumably, very little. Thus, Duke’s point that Obama ought to have known how many states there are by the time he ran for President is the height of unfairness. And we all know how Obama feels about unfairness. (Which reminds me of another possible explanation for offering imaginary sons to match his real daughters: equality, as in familial justice, a “fair” distribution of genders in the Obama home.)

To display a similar level of ignorance about the composition of one’s own immediate family, however — and to do it in exactly the same way, in exactly the same context, on two different occasions — now we’re into the realm of the supernaturally strange. This is why I doubt it was a mistake.

So what to make of it? Here is the text of one of the two almost identical…..

EXCERPT

via Articles: Obama’s Sons: They Are Real for Him.

drronpaulrev

drronpaulrev (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Enhanced by Zemanta
  1. No comments yet.
  1. May 28, 2012 at 12:13 PM | #1
  2. June 15, 2012 at 10:50 AM | #2
  3. June 17, 2012 at 8:09 AM | #3
  4. June 17, 2012 at 6:36 PM | #4
  5. June 18, 2012 at 7:56 AM | #5
  6. June 19, 2012 at 9:41 AM | #6
  7. June 19, 2012 at 10:02 AM | #7
  8. June 19, 2012 at 7:12 PM | #8
  9. June 22, 2012 at 2:10 PM | #9
  10. June 27, 2012 at 1:05 PM | #10
  11. March 14, 2013 at 1:01 PM | #11
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,087 other followers