(Col Sellin: Winning Elections Requires Throwing the Constitution Under the Bus) Family Security Matters

In a video recently posted on the internet, Congressman Paul Gosar(R-AZ) states that fifty percent of the American people do not believe in the Constitution and individual rights and if you principally fight to defend the Constitution, you will lose.

GyGRet

GyGRet (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Rep. Gosar has seemingly forgotten that he takes an oath to “support and defend” the Constitution. Apparently he thinks that adhering to the Constitution is an impediment to winning elections. He seems to be promoting the proposition that obtaining power is more important than upholding the rule of law.

The opinions expressed by Rep. Gosar are not unique, but represent the prevailing attitude in Congress. The Constitution limits the powers of the federal government and federal office-holders who want unlimited power.

The Code of Ethics for U.S. Government Service, adopted by the House of Representatives July 11, 1958 with the Senate concurring, resolved that it is the sense of the Congress that the following Code of Ethics should be adhered to by all Government employees, including officeholders.

The first two requirements state that any person in Government service should:

1. Put loyalty to the highest moral principles and to country above loyalty to Government persons, party, or department.

2. Uphold the Constitution, laws, and legal regulations of the United States and of all governments therein and never be a party to their evasion.

Does any American believe that Rep. Gosar or anyone of his colleagues in Congress adheres to either of those requirements?

The instances of federal office-holders ignoring the Constitution or politicians choosing party over country are far too numerous to list in anything less than a multi-volume publication.

Here are two relevant examples.

Article I of the U.S. Constitution requires Congress to pass a federal budget. Despite the imminent threat to the financial stability of the United States and the clear priority the Constitution gives to maintaining discipline in federal spending, the last time Congress enacted a budget was April 29, 2009.

Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires that all candidates for the Presidency be “natural born citizens.” As defined in the binding Supreme Court precedent of Minor v. Happersett (1875) and previous and subsequent rulings, all candidates for the offices of President and Vice President must be second generation Americans, that is, US citizens of citizen parents at the time of birth.

It was the intent of the American Founding Fathers that the chief executive and the commander-in-chief of the armed forces would not have dual allegiance or loyalty to a foreign power.

There is no ambiguity, although the Democrat and Republican parties and the media are and have been deliberately trying to confuse the American public as to the true meaning of natural born citizenship.

They do so for two reasons.

via Family Security Matters.

URL:

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/winning-elections-requires-throwing-the-constitution-under-the-bus?f=must_reads

*****

ayersflag

ayersflag (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

isdees

isdees (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

gophum

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Enhanced by Zemanta

About Gunny G

GnySgt USMC (Ret.) 1952--'72 PC: History, Poly-Tiks, Military, Stories, Controversial, Unusual, Humorous, etc.... "Simplify...y'know!"
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to (Col Sellin: Winning Elections Requires Throwing the Constitution Under the Bus) Family Security Matters

  1. Pingback: Times That Try Men’s Souls… « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  2. Pingback: The Constitution, Vattel, and ‘Natural Born Citizen’: What Our Framers Knew « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  3. Pingback: Obamacare and the Revenge of the ‘Secret Constitution’ by William Norman Grigg (“… the mission of Abraham the Destroyer was not to preserve the constitutional union, but rather to impose a new order – one created through aggress

  4. Pingback: (“In his book Our Secret Constitution: How Lincoln Redefined American Democracy, George P. Fletcher, a Marxist Columbia University School of Law professor, describes how the mission of Abraham the Destroyer was not to preserve the constitutional uni

  5. Pingback: Our Secret Constitution: How Lincoln Redefined American Democracy: The Independent Review: The Independent Institute « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  6. Pingback: The Evidence Is In: America Is Under Foreign Control! « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  7. Pingback: The Mises Review: Unsound Constitution by George Fletcher « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  8. Pingback: Gunny G: FEATURED POSTS… « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  9. Pingback: Articles By Col Lawrence Sellin, PhD, USAR (Ret.) « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  10. Pingback: (Col Sellin) Will political reform occur in the United States only after a catastrophe? – English pravda.ru « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  11. Pingback: Un-Asked Questions about the Aurora, CO Shooting « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  12. Pingback: Why the News Blackout of Possibly Greatest Constitutional Crisis since the Civil War? by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD ~ Family Security Matters « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  13. Pingback: (Col Sellin) 2012 Political Season Will Be a Street Fight ~ Family Security Matters « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  14. Pingback: Winning Elections Requires Throwing the Constitution Under the Bus by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD ~ Family Security Matters « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

Comments are closed.