Military Oaths Are Meaningless by Roger Young


Members of the US military often point to the oaths they take upon enlistment as proof they will never violate the rights of Americans. They insist they are committed toward “defending” the Piece of Paper (also known as the US Constitution)



GyGRet (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)


and thereby also defend the individual rights that this document claims to protect. But is it wise for the free individual to rely on such an oath being kept?



Since World War II, the US military has participated in numerous illegal, unconstitutional wars. The pace of participating in such actions seems to grow by the year. It has almost become difficult to keep up with them all. When considering such actions, I begin to question just when are these individuals going to begin keeping their oath? I have yet to see any mass resistance by members of the military against any of these illegal actions. I have read numerous accounts that such mass resistance will finally occur when soldiers are ordered to confiscate the weapons of, and/or fire upon, their own people. But why should I believe such an assertion?



RPREVOLU (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)


Members of the military, with very few exceptions, have followed all orders to fire upon, kidnap, and confiscate weapons from civilians in other countries all over the world. Is it that much more of a challenge for them to also execute such action against people in their own country?


How can the US Military “defend” the Piece of Paper while at the same time murdering foreigners in illegal wars of empire, thereby violating the restrictions contained in that very Piece of Paper?



obamadash (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)


They have admittedly participated in criminal acts. Therefore, they are criminals. Why should I believe unrepentant criminals?



The US military claims to defend individual liberty. But how can one who willingly lives as a military slave have any appreciation of liberty? I assure you, people willing to kill on command lack any conscience about violating someone’s liberty. Why should I be willing to believe, when given the order to kidnap or kill me, they will ignore this order?


Please remember the following truths:


These people wear the uniform of the regime.


These people work for the regime.


These people are paid by the regime.


These people follow the orders of the regime.


These people actively protect the regime.


Why should I trust them?



Given these truths, why I should I be assured that they have my best interests in mind just because a collection of words called an “oath” have passed out of their mouths?


And just who do they give this oath to? They, of course, give it to the corporate entity known as the United States of America– a political organism. It is not directed toward me, a human organism. Nowhere in this oath does it mention obeying orders from me or “officers appointed” by me.


Oaths are merely words that disappear into the vapor. They are meaningless unless backed by action. One such action would be to truly defend this Piece of Paper against “all enemies foreign and domestic” by ignoring the non-existent “foreign” enemies and concentrating on the “domestic” variety. May I suggest a mass, peaceful resistance or petitioning directed at those who initiate such threats.


However, I would be ecstatic if they all chose a less drastic, but no less courageous, form of action. If they really want to keep their “oath,” they should immediately begin resigning in droves, deserting, or seeking conscientious objector status.


Protections of my life and liberties can never come from the same institution that directly threatens my life and liberty. You don’t protect yourself, your countrymen, and your families from the mafia by becoming part of the mafia. You first free yourself from the system entirely.


If members of the US military truly want to impress upon me their dedication and devotion toward protecting my life and liberty they need to…………




via Military Oaths Are Meaningless by Roger Young.




gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)



Enhanced by Zemanta

About Gunny G

GnySgt USMC (Ret.) 1952--'72 PC: History, Poly-Tiks, Military, Stories, Controversial, Unusual, Humorous, etc.... "Simplify...y'know!"
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Military Oaths Are Meaningless by Roger Young

  1. Pingback: Late Sen. Byrd’s FBI Files Reveal CIA Leak Uproar « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  2. Pingback: Nothing Succeeds Like ‘Success’ by Justin Raimondo « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  3. Pingback: Clint Eastwood ends speculation over super bowl ad with endorsement of Romney « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  4. Pingback: Gunny G: An Open Letter To Clint Eastwood (re ray Jacobs, Iwo Jima, First Flag, Etc…… « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  5. Pingback: (Col Sellin) Will political reform occur in the United States only after a catastrophe? – English « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  6. Pingback: What you don’t know about David Petraeus « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  7. Pingback: DHS and US Military Make Final Preparations Before Announcing Martial Law : « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  8. Pingback: EDITORIAL: The Civil War of 2016 – Washington Times « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  9. Pingback: Rex84: Suppressed Oliver North Confrontation Video Footage Released « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  10. Pingback: (GyG ReBlog: Rex84: Suppressed Oliver North Confrontation Video Footage Released… « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL


  12. Pingback: Prison » The Sword Is Turned Inward « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  13. Pingback: Obama and FEMA Create Civilian Army Trained in Domestic Preparedness : « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  14. Pingback: A Duty to Disobey All Unlawful Orders » Counterpunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

Comments are closed.