Support for stricter gun laws hasn’t jumped as fast or as far in recent weeks as many liberals had hoped and expected.
If you’re wondering why, maybe the reason is the shakiness of the public’s trust in government itself.
Read more at nypost.com …
Today, the leftwing media is still not talkina about the emails. They would have been if the guy in the White was a Republican because they detail the manufacturing of a tragedy. The emails were sent from the US mission in Benghazi to the State Department, the CIA, the Pentagon and the White House situation room.
The first of these emails were not sent on or around Sept. 11, 2012 as the White House initially led us to believe, but on August 27 when Ambassador Christopher Stevens reiterated to Washington about the ttwo earlier attacks on the embassy compound—the first one taking place in June. At that time, on Aug. 27, he requested a detachment of Marines at the Consulate.
I don’t know what Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said to Stevens, or Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, because I suspect neither wanted their fingerprints on the reply. I would speculate that some underling replied that his request was “…under advisement but for the present, he needed to get along with what he had because there simply were no other assets to spare.”
Originally posted on We Moved > Go To::
Contributed by GoldBugGal
Should we believe what the main stream media is telling us about Sandy Hook?? Why were actors involved? Why is there a “RIP Facebook page for V. Soto on Dec. 10th?” The incident happened on the 14th. How did they know Soto was going to die 4 days before the event?? Do you think it’s a coincidence that Feinstein and Obama immediately started working on gun control? Think, sheeple.. Did Sandy Hook even happen? These are questions that we are asking.
The only ‘conspiracy’ I see here, is the conspiracy of the Progressives to take our guns using fake situations and set-ups. Reminds me of that movie; “Arlington Road”. Maybe Lanza’s mother was set-up to die? Who knows.
These are questions. That’s all. We have a right to ask.
Crowds may have flocked to the National Mall to see President Obama make history in 2009, but the team behind the president’s 2013 inauguration bash later this month are bracing themselves for a ton of empty seats. The ceremony that Washington will stage in a few weeks won’t be the historic affair it was in 2009, when nearly 2 million people flocked to the Capitol to watch Obama take the oath of office. This time, District of Columbia officials expect between 600,000 and 800,000 people for Obama’s public swearing-in on the steps of the Capitol on Monday, January 21.
YouTube/ABCnews ^ | 21 December, 2012 | Bloomberg
Posted on Sunday, January 06, 2013 6:09:03 PM by marktwain