Posted on 9/20/2016, 4:32:05 PM by PROCON
President Obama advocated that nations will have to give up some of their autonomous freedoms for international cooperation to achieve security on Tuesday during his speech to the United Nations General Assembly.
Obama told the audience how he believes global security can be achieved with the help of international institutions like the U.N. In his remarks, Obama said “powerful nations” like the United States will have to accept constraints and give up some of their freedoms.
The president acknowledged that he has been criticized by his own citizens for this belief but he remains convinced he is right. Obama also stated that while countries will have to accept some limits on their freedom, they should not give up autonomous rights like the freedom to defend themselves.
(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com …
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Click to Add Topic
KEYWORDS: globalism; globalsecurity; nationalsecurity; obama; obamaunspeech; tyranny; un; worldgovernment; Click to Add Keyword
FU BO go __k yourself and The U.N. can rot in hell.
In response to the man who holds the office of: “leader of the FREE World”,
I state: “Uranus!”
“President Obama advocated that nations will have to give up some of their autonomous freedoms for international cooperation to achieve security on Tuesday during his speech to the United Nations General Assembly.”
That statement tells me everything I need to know about the future. It also reminded me I am going boating this weekend.
Isn’t that seditious?
“Obama: Submit to World Government”
F- the President.
Diana to 0bama: NEVER!
0bama said “powerful nations” like the United States will have to accept constraints and give up some of their freedoms.Give up more freedoms?
so a nation who is a protector who stands between safety and certain horrible slaughter of millions around the world should have be tied up and made helpless so that murderous countries can overpower and annihilate her peaceful citizens …
yeah this guy who is in my White House sure is for so called “world peace”…
Seditious, yes.But mainly antithetical to our Constitution.
Now we know why he is so much in favor and lending support to international terrorism. Everything he does Create your own crisis with the help of the muslim and presto you have the population clamoring for someone to take control and fix the problem. The movie V is a perfect playbook for the liberals and one world government.
Kenyanesian Usurpers who are allowed to ignore Article II Section 1 don’t feel any particular need to pay any attention to the rest of the Constitution.
Incredible, huh?Let’s see how the drive-bys treat it.
World government is not a democracy. And we have already seen its highly susceptible to corruption.
How positively Wilsonian of him. This ought to work out as well as the defunct League of Nations did back then, too.I have only two things to say:
1. We’ll give up sovereignty after China does first; and
2. F_ck you, Barry. Go climb back into whatever hole you oozed out of before your pathetic attempt to destroy mankind’s greatest hope for peace and prosperity.
The unholy koran teaches “submission”.
Well Mr. Obama, good borders makes good neighbors!
Nuts to that