Gunny G: BLOGGIN' BAD!~MAKE AMERICA "AMERICAN"! AGAIN!!!!! (FUBO!) BRING BACK AMERICA's HAT! (THAT BAD ASS DEPLORABLE FEDORA!) ~ $H!T-CAN THE STAIN, STIGMA, STENCH AND SHAME OF "THE PRINCE OF FOOLS"~ AND: "FINALLY," ~ BRING THE "POF" TO JUSTICE!, EXPOSE! AINOs (AMERICANS IN NAME ONLY), AND FLUSH THE SWAMP~POWER-FLUSH! "TWICE!"-("FLOATERS" Y'KNOW!) -POTUS .45 TRUMP COCKED and LOCKED!.....-ONE RIGHTEOUS MAN--IF WE CAN KEEP HIM! ~ Illegitimi non carborundum..!
………Is there any important difference between the 1972 Thetfordredaction (also called HLC and JCIM) of ACIM and the 1975Shucman/Wapnick redaction (also called WCV)?
Dr. Wapnick thinksthere is and that what’s been taken out consisted of errors. InFebruary 2000, Ken told the Salt Lake Tribune:”If you have a faucet that hasn’t been used for a long time andturn it on, you first get a lot of rust and impurities.
Helen’sexperience in the early weeks and months was like that,”Some have suggested there are no major differences. In between,every colour of opinion exists.Aside from Ken, no one has had access to the HLC for more than afew months, and it has not been subjected to a lot of carefulstudy and scrutiny. Insofar as Ken is telling us there areimportant differences, I agree with him. I also agree that hefeels the material removed during the redaction in which he wasinvolved represented “impurities.”
View original post 58 more words