Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Article Two of the United States Constitution’

The Office of President of the United States of America, the Office of President of the United States and the Office of President are three different Offices. – EDRIVERA.COM

November 27, 2013 1 comment
big

big (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

 

 

 

***

The Office of President of the United States of America, the Office of President of the United States and the Office of President are three different Offices.

Filed Under Uncategorized

Only when the Constitution of September 17, 1787 is adopted, does that Constitution require that the Office of President be filled by “a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States.”

George Washington was a natural born British subject and when, on April 30, 1789 he took the Article II Section 1 Clause […]

barbflag

barbflag (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

Read more…

The Office of President of the United States of America, the Office of President of the United States and the Office of President are three different Offices. – EDRIVERA.COM

October 19, 2013 1 comment
big

big (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*****

Only when the Constitution of September 17, 1787 is adopted, does that Constitution require that the Office of President be filled by “a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States.”

 

George Washington was a natural born British subject and when, on April 30, 1789 he took the Article II Section 1 Clause […]

 

 

 

Read more…

There is a “List” and I am on it!

August 17, 2013 4 comments
big

big (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is a “List” and I am on it!

 

Rfreedom4u

 

Posted on Saturday, August 17, 2013 9:04:44 AM by rfreedom4u

 

I’ve often heard talk (and participated in it) of the government having a “list” of people they are watching. I believe it’s been going on for longer than I’ve been alive.

 

gophum

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

I did a search for my Freeper name and found a link that confirms (in my opinion) that I am on this list.

 

 

 

Read more…

The truth is there is only one President of the United States of America (POTUSA)at a time. Check the Constitution. Article II Section 1 Clause 1 vests the executive Power in a POTUSA and he and the VP shall hold Office “during the term of four Years.” The POTUSA has a four Year term not the President of the United States) ~ POTUS.November 2008 Archives – 3/4 – EDRIVERA.COM

August 6, 2013 1 comment
big

big (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

The truth is there is only one President of the United States of America (POTUSA)at a time. Check the Constitution. Article II Section 1 Clause 1 vests the executive Power in a POTUSA and he and the VP shall hold Office “during the term of four Years.” The POTUSA has a four Year term not the President of the United States) POTUS.

Barack Obama, like every President Elect before him is doing his best to keep the people in the dark. There is only one POTUSA because that Office obtains its authority from the Articles of Confederation and not the Constitution. There is no Constitution because no President Elect has ever ”Adopted” it by swearing an Oath “to support this Constitution,” according to Article VI. If there is no Constitution, there can be no Office of President. There is a POTUS, because in the words of the current POTUSA and POTUS: the Constitution is just a piece of paper.

Read more…

Thus Always to Tyrants…

August 4, 2013 46 comments
big

big (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

******

propdispl

GunnyG1345)

…..Throughout history, man has always sought self-determination as a God-given or natural right as they struggled against the rule of man through kings, royalty, and monarchs.

This nation was founded upon the principle that man, given the ability, the will, and means to do so, could flourish under self-rule and the rule of law. Flourish, we have; the amount of economic growth and wonders this nation has seen in its short existence of only 236 years is astounding and has not been rivaled in history.

gophum

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Many wonder at how this came about that we have stood in the belief of personal freedom to champion the individual, the cornerstone of our Republic above all else. We have accomplished this by creating a unique identify that embraces all, while giving none dominion over others. Our history is not blemish free, with the stain of slavery and oppression of the Indian Nations on our national honor.

We have endured, being true to our founding principles by righting these injustices with the blood of our ancestors shed in battle as this is the only way these sins can be paid.

One seminal danger that the Founders sought to address was that our President would never have divided loyalties with the simple requirement that our president be a natural born citizen as enumerated in Article II, Sec. 1 of our Constitution.

 

Read more…

Obama Suspends the Law:Like King James II, the president decides not to enforce laws he doesn’t like

July 9, 2013 Leave a comment

Obama Suspends the Law:Like King James II, the president decides not to enforce laws he doesn’t like

 

wsj ^ | 7/9/13 | MICHAEL W. MCCONNELL

 

Posted on Tuesday, July 09, 2013 9:03:22 AM by bestintxas

 

bigbrowatch

bigbrowatch (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

President Obama’s decision last week to suspend the employer mandate of the Affordable Care Act may be welcome relief to businesses affected by this provision, but it raises grave concerns about his understanding of the role of the executive in our system of government.

 

Article II, Section 3, of the Constitution states that the president “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” This is a duty, not a discretionary power. While the president does have substantial discretion about how to enforce a law, he has no discretion about whether to do so.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This matter—the limits of executive power—has deep historical roots. During the period of royal absolutism, English monarchs asserted a right to dispense with parliamentary statutes they disliked. King James II’s use of the prerogative was a key grievance that lead to the Glorious Revolution of 1688. The very first provision of the English Bill of Rights of 1689—the most important precursor to the U.S. Constitution—declared that “the pretended power of suspending of laws, or the execution of laws, by regal authority, without consent of parliament, is illegal.”

 

ourAmerica

ourAmerica (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

 

To make sure that American presidents could not resurrect a similar prerogative, the Framers of the Constitution made the faithful enforcement of the law a constitutional duty.

 

 

 

Read more…

The Founders’ Great Mistake… ““The creation of the presidency was [the Framers’] most creative act.” That may be true, but it wasn’t their best work. ” !!!!! – Garrett Epps – The Atlantic

April 13, 2013 1 comment

The historian Jack N. Rakove has written, “The creation of the presidency was [the Framers’] most creative act.” That may be true, but it wasn’t their best work. The Framers were designing something the modern world had never seen—a republican chief executive who would owe his power to the people rather than to heredity or brute force.

 

RPREVOLU

RPREVOLU (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

 

 

The wonder is not that they got so much wrong, but that they got anything right at all.

 

According to James Madison’s Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787, the executive received surprisingly little attention at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. Debate over the creation and workings of the new Congress was long and lively; the presidency, by contrast, was fashioned relatively quickly, after considerably less discussion.

 

One important reason for the delegates’ reticence was that George Washington, the most admired man in the world at that time, was the convention’s president.

 

gophum

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

 

 

Every delegate knew that Washington would, if he chose, be the first president of the new federal government—and that the new government itself would likely fail without Washington at the helm. To express too much fear of executive authority might have seemed disrespectful to the man for whom the office was being tailored.

 

Read more…

Constitutional Scholar Defines Natural Born Citizen(Obama, Jindal, Cruz, Rubio Don’t Qualify)

March 11, 2013 5 comments

Constitutional Scholar Defines Natural Born Citizen(Obama, Jindal, Cruz, Rubio Don’t Qualify)

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 ^

 

Posted on Monday, March 11, 2013 3:15:07 PM by Cold Case Posse Supporter

 

mussobama

mussobama (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

Respected constitutional scholar and lawyer Herb Titus sits down to explain what a true Constitutional Article 2 Section 1 natural born Citizen is. Herb Titus credentials are impeccable when it comes to the matter of Constitutional Law and our founders original intent, especially on the subject of the presidency.

 

 

 

 

 

Titus gives a clear understandable meaning of why the founders wanted to have a natural born Citizen ONLY for the presidential requirement to hold the executive office of the United States. It is clear after listening to Herb Titus in the two part video that you will understand why Bobby Jindal, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and Barack Obama are not constitutionally eligible to hold the office of the presidency.

 

barbflag

barbflag (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

 

Read more…

“WHAT IS THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF TAKING AN OATH OR AFFIRMATION AND BEING BOUND BY OATH OR AFFIRMATION?” ~ EDRIVERA.COM – United States America Organic Law Taxes Property Jurisdiction Constitution : EDRIVERA.COM

January 24, 2013 Leave a comment

3

 

WHAT IS THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF TAKING AN OATH OR AFFIRMATION AND BEING BOUND BY OATH OR AFFIRMATION?

 

Filed Under Article II Section 1 Clause 8, Electoral College, IMPEACHMENT, Oath of Office, ORGANIC LAWS, Presidential Elector, PRESIDENTS | Leave a Comment

 

big

big (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

 

When one has a question about the Constitution of September 17, 1787, ask George—George Washington. The hero of the American Revolution was President of the May 25, 1787 Constitutional Convention and the first President of the United States of America to be elected by Article II Section 1 Clause 2 Presidential Electors. George Washington was the first President of the United States of America to take the Article II Section 1 Clause 8 oral oath for the Office of President of the United States.

 

 

 

“George, why would you take the oral oath for the Office of President of the United States, on April 30, 1789, when you had been elected to another Office, President of the United States of America on April 6, 1789?” Washington never admitted or explained what he did or why he did it.

 

Read more…

Rejection of Obama by Electoral College | Veterans Today

November 8, 2012 9 comments

EXCERPT!!!!!!

gophum

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Article 2 of the US Constitution seems to me to be clear enough. To be eligible for the presidency a candidate presented to the Electoral College has to be an American Citizen, born in the United States. It is a matter entirely for them but I see no reason why the Electors could not ask for evidence of Barack Obama’s eligibility. That applies to all candidates of all races from all parties by the way.

I don’t accept that Senator McCain was eligible to be sworn-in, as in my opinion he was born in a hospital in downtown Colon, in Panama. It wouldn’t matter if he were born on Coco Solo Marine Corps Air Base, as he claims, as that was not in the United States. Quite where on the base he was born is a moot point, since the hospital was not built for another five years. I don’t accept that Senator Goldwater qualified for the presidency either – his eligibility was queried at the time, as he was born in a territory, not a state.

Read more…

The NY Times: We Are Too Stupid To Act Without the State…

October 30, 2012 Leave a comment
Image of Lew Rockwell

Image of Lew Rockwell (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

 

Lew Rockwell Blog | The NYT declares today that “A Big Storm Requires Big Government,” and everyone knows that the NYT only speaks wisdom and truth.

 

Read more…

The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried. | Save America Foundation

October 9, 2012 4 comments

 

EXCERPT!!!!!

 

RPREVOLU

RPREVOLU (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

…..Let’s examine whether the Joint Chiefs have committed a court-marshall offense worthy of death.They have supported a man who is clearly a usurper, as if he were the President of the United StatesThis fact is manifest and notorious.

 

English: General Martin E. Dempsey, USA, 18thC...

English: General Martin E. Dempsey, USA, 18thChairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

There is one thing certain about Obama, and the Joint Chiefs know it: his father was a British subject. Four Supreme Court Cases declare that to be a natural born citizen, both parents must be U.S. Citizens. The Constitution clearly states in Article II, section ii, paragraph 5, that “No person except a natural born Citizen . . shall be eligible to the Office of President” The Joint Chiefs have been duly informed by many letters from military personnel, and from lawyers, such as Dr. Orly Taitz.

 

Read more…

Winning Elections Requires Throwing the Constitution Under the Bus by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD ~ Family Security Matters

September 22, 2012 1 comment

 

Winning Elections Requires Throwing the Constitution Under the Bus

by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD July 17, 2012

In a video recently posted on the internet, Congressman Paul Gosar (R-AZ) states that fifty percent of the American people do not believe in the Constitution and individual rights and if you principally fight to defend the Constitution, you will lose.

Rep. Gosar has seemingly forgotten that he takes an oath to “support and defend” the Constitution. Apparently he thinks that adhering to the Constitution is an impediment to winning elections. He seems to be promoting the proposition that obtaining power is more important than upholding the rule of law.

Read more…

Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., JD — The Constitution Limits the President Even as “Commander in Chief”

August 15, 2012 4 comments

 

Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.

 

February 20, 2006

 

NewsWithViews.com

 

obamadash

obamadash (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

Amidst the flood of propaganda these days on behalf of what must be the most breathtaking expansion of Presidential power since Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal, especially glaring are the assertions of self-styled “conservative” media personalities that nothing is amiss, because: (i) the President is “Commander in Chief;” (ii) in that capacity he supposedly enjoys “inherent” power to take whatever actions he may deem necessary to protect this country from “terrorism;” (iii) assertion of this Presidential power is especially vital now, with this country engaged in a “war on terror;” and (iv) in any event, Congress has broadly authorized the President to use “force” in “the war on terror.” None of these contentions can withstand even cursory scrutiny.

 

Read more…

The Evidence Is In: America Is Under Foreign Control!

July 22, 2012 1 comment

 

alk radio host Carl Gallups reveals evidence, analysis, and a challenge to the naysayers who believe our president is a natural born citizen!

 

GyGRet

GyGRet (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

 

Bypass the Mass Media: Get Articles Just Like This Straight To Your Inbox!

 

Read more…

The Constitution, Vattel, and ‘Natural Born Citizen’: What Our Framers Knew

July 18, 2012 Leave a comment

 

The Constitution, Vattel, and ‘Natural Born Citizen’: What Our Framers Knew

 

American Clarion ^ | July 18, 2012 | Publius Huldah

 

Posted on Wednesday, July 18, 2012 5:31:08 PM by WXRGina

 

English: Detail of Preamble to Constitution of...

English: Detail of Preamble to Constitution of the United States Polski: Fragment preambuły Konstytucji Stanów Zjednoczonych (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

 

 

Read more…

(Col Sellin: Winning Elections Requires Throwing the Constitution Under the Bus) Family Security Matters

July 17, 2012 14 comments

In a video recently posted on the internet, Congressman Paul Gosar(R-AZ) states that fifty percent of the American people do not believe in the Constitution and individual rights and if you principally fight to defend the Constitution, you will lose.

GyGRet

GyGRet (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Rep. Gosar has seemingly forgotten that he takes an oath to “support and defend” the Constitution. Apparently he thinks that adhering to the Constitution is an impediment to winning elections. He seems to be promoting the proposition that obtaining power is more important than upholding the rule of law.

The opinions expressed by Rep. Gosar are not unique, but represent the prevailing attitude in Congress. The Constitution limits the powers of the federal government and federal office-holders who want unlimited power.

Read more…

WHAT CONSTITUTION DID GEORGE WASHINGTON SWEAR TO “PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND”? ~ EDRIVERA.COM – United States America Organic Law Taxes Property Jurisdiction Constitution : EDRIVERA.COM

July 16, 2012 8 comments
LAS VEGAS, NV - MAY 17:  U.S. Rep. Ron Paul (R...

LAS VEGAS, NV – MAY 17: U.S. Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) and his video image (R) are reflected in glass covering a supporter’s large copy of the United States Constitution as Paul speaks to members of the Clark County Republican Party at the Silverton Casino Lodge May 17, 2011 in Las Vegas, Nevada. Paul announced last week that he is seeking the 2012 GOP nomination for president. (Image credit: Getty Images via @daylife)

 

Read more…

Supremes asked: Who is ‘natural born citizen?’

July 14, 2012 6 comments

An announcement is expected sometime in the fall on whether the U.S. Supreme Court will decide just exactly who is a “natural born citizen” as required by the U.S. Constitution for all those who would be president.

Read more…

(Will Obama Walk Away Scot-Free If Not Dealt With B4 November Election ?) Col. Larry Sellin: Obama’s Eligibility Must Be Dealt With Before 2012 Election

July 13, 2012 1 comment

Col. Larry Sellin: Obama’s Eligibility Must Be Dealt With Before 2012 Election

Read more…

(Col Sellin) Obama’s Eligibility: The Big Con , By Lawrence Sellin – El Usurpador , The Usurper

July 12, 2012 9 comments

By electing Obama without an Amendment, the Constitution has been undermined and a precedent has been established to eliminate the term “natural born” from Article II, Section I

Obama’s Eligibility: The Big Con

By Lawrence Sellin Monday, April 11, 2011

imageOrdinary Americans could be forgiven for believing that the Democrat political effete elite and the main stream media (MSM) have been working in parallel to dismantle the Constitution and create a permanent left-wing, multicultural majority in the United States.

Their apparent goal is to transform our republic into a collection of simultaneous arguments, where the only thing we have in common is our differences.

If you’ve been wondering how things got so bad, then you haven’t been paying careful attention to their shenanigans, which is exactly what they hope, would happen.

A major part of that ongoing effort by the left-wing and the MSM involved a political deception to sidestep the Constitution and permit Barack Hussein Obama to run for President.

Read more…

(Col Sellin) Censorship and Disinformation in America – English pravda.ru (“You will not see an article like this appear in any American mainstream media outlet.”)

July 9, 2012 13 comments

You will not see an article like this appear in any American mainstream media outlet.

Barack Hussein Obama is an illegal President. He is not now nor has he ever been eligible to be a candidate for or hold that office because his father was a British subject at the time of his birth.

Read more…

Obama Will Go Scot Free – Compliments of Complicit Cowardly Politicans « moralmatters.org

July 9, 2012 9 comments

Obama Will Go Scot Free – Compliments of Complicit Cowardly Politicans

June 16, 2012 Nathan M. Bickel Leave a comment Go to comments

Dr. Col Lawrence Sellin

How Barack Obama avoids prison – by Dr. Col. Lawrence Sellin – english.pravda.ru/opinion/

“A political deal will be struck to save the Democrat Party from total collapse and protect the Republican Party from revelations of complicity in the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people.

English: Barack Obama delivers a speech at the...

English: Barack Obama delivers a speech at the University of Southern California (Video of the speech) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Read more…

(Col Sellin) Barack Obama is an illegal president, period – English pravda.ru

June 28, 2012 21 comments

By Lawrence Sellin

Barack Obama is an illegal president, period. 47404.jpegAmerican politicians and the media are lying to the American people. They do so because they hope that their complicity in the greatest fraud in U.S. history will be overtaken by events, that is, the 2012 election.

It is the Big Stall to cover up the Big Lie.In the Russian language there is a term called “vranyo.” It is loosely defined as telling a white lie or a semi-truth. It may contain fantasy or involve the suppression of unpleasant parts of the truth.In regard to Obama’s ineligibility and his alleged felonies, politicians and the media expect the American people to respond in this way:”You know that you are lying, I know that you are lying, and you know that I know that you are lying, but we both smile and nod in agreement.”

Read more…

Obama: A domestic enemy of the U.S. Constitution

June 18, 2012 19 comments

Obama: A domestic enemy of the U.S. Constitution

washingtontimes.com ^

Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 12:01:21 AM by tsowellfan

“Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation — I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.*

Read more…

If We Took the Constitution Seriously, Obama Would Be Impeached

June 16, 2012 2 comments

If the citizens of this Republic still took the Constitution seriously, Obama would be impeached for his decision to unilaterally grant amnesty to certain illegal aliens.

English: Barack Obama delivers a speech at the...

English: Barack Obama delivers a speech at the University of Southern California (Video of the speech) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Article 1, Sec. 8 of the Constitution, which enumerates the power of Congress, states that “Congress shall have the Power To… establish an [sic] uniform Rule of Naturalization.”

Read more…

JB Williams — Romney, Rubio, McCain and Natural Born Citizen

June 12, 2012 24 comments

The recent release of my previous column titled Rubio Can Lock the Election for Obama resulted in numerous reader emails that demonstrate a continuing confusion over the indisputable definition and application of the term Natural Born Citizen. This follow up column is written to remove all confusion from the topic, once and for all.

Sadly, most of the people concerned with this topic believe they each know the truth, even though they do not agree on what the truth is. Most opinions are based upon second source or third hand information, most of it motivated by political agenda.

My objective is to establish through first source evidence the true meaning of the term Natural Born Citizen as used by our Founders in Article II of the Constitution, and spread the truth, no matter who it helps or harms in the political arena. I have written on this subject extensively and my only loyalty here is to the truth, no matter who it serves.

The true definition of Natural Born Citizen…..

isdees

isdees (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Read more…

(“It’s no secret that Barrack Hussein Obama is NOT a Natural Born Citizen of the United States, even though everyone in a position of power is pretending to not notice while working around the clock to alter the definition of the term via precedent”) JB Williams — Rubio Can Lock the Election for Obama

June 11, 2012 15 comments

…..It’s no secret that Barrack Hussein Obama is NOT a Natural Born Citizen of the United States, even though everyone in a position of power is pretending to not notice while working around the clock to alter the definition of the term via precedent.

English: Official portrait of US Senator Marco...

English: Official portrait of US Senator Marco Rubio of Florida. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Because Marco Rubio has a résumé almost as blank as Obama’s in terms of actual accomplishments, I must conclude that the primary interest in running Rubio on the ticket with Romney is nothing more than one more attempt to forever alter the definition of Natural Born Citizen.

Members of Congress have tried on at least eight occasions to officially alter the definition of Natural Born Citizen or eliminate the requirement from Article II of the Constitution altogether.

All of those efforts failed. However, allowing a foreigner like Obama to hold the highest office in our land for one full term is setting a precedent that anyone from anywhere in the world can be president of the United States, and nobody in the United States is going to do anything about it. Putting another foreigner with dual or divided loyalties in the White House would seal the deal.

Read more…

Text Of Schwartzenegger For Pres Bill In Congress

June 1, 2012 1 comment

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to make eligible for the Office of President a person who has been a United States citizen for 20 years.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States:

“ArticleSec. –

“Section 1. A person who is a citizen of the United States, who has been for 20 years a citizen of the United States, and who is otherwise eligible to the Office of President, is not ineligible to that Office by reason of not being a native born citizen of the United States.

Read more…

Col. Lawrence Sellin | Teri O’Brien – America’s Original Conservative Warrior Princess

May 27, 2012 9 comments
Joe Biden und Barack Obama in Springfield, Ill...

Joe Biden und Barack Obama in Springfield, Illinois, right after Biden was formerly introduced by Obama as his running mate (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

…..As we watch the disgusting spectacle of an unaccomplished, unqualified, affirmative-action assisted empty suit occupying the Oval Office and masquerading as a leader, we can only hope our long national nightmare will soon end.

The desperation in the Obama campaign is obvious, from their doubling down on deceptive campaign ads about his profligate spending, to their unabashed playing the race card to appeal to the emotionally-driven perpetual adolescents who continue to support him, but is liberalism really kaput? That’s the thesis of the latest book from conservative icon, and founder of the American Spectator, R. Emmett Tyrell, in his new book, The Death of Liberalism. Is it too soon to celebrate? And what connection does he have to Chicago’s infamous Haymarket riot?

We’re also delighted and honored to have (Ret.) Colonel Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D, columnist for Family Security Matters stop by to reflect on Memorial Day from the perspective of one who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, and who questions Barack Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of president because he is not an Article II “natural born citizen.”

How did that fact affect his service in the military? Why does what he calls “possibly the greatest constitutional crisis since the Civil War” continue to be at best mocked, and at worst, ignored by the vast majority of the media, including supposedly conservative outlets?

Read more…

Thus Always to Tyrants (“Why The Word “Tyrant” Accurately Describes Obama”)

May 27, 2012 9 comments

“Sic Semper Tyrannis”, latin for “Thus Always to Tyrants,“ is the rallying cry against tyranny dating back to the Roman Empire with the utterance of this phrase by Marcus Junius Brutus upon the assassination of Julius Caesar. This simple phrase has been used by countless European nationals as a cry to arms for independence from their oppressive monarchs, as well as others down through the ages since first spoken two thousand years ago.

drronpaulrev

drronpaulrev (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

English: Abraham Lincoln, the sixteenth Presid...

English: Abraham Lincoln, the sixteenth President of the United States. Latviešu: Abrahams Linkolns, sešpadsmitais ASV prezidents. Српски / Srpski: Абрахам Линколн, шеснаести председник Сједињених Америчких Држава. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

To give an American context to this phrase, John Wilkes Booth immortalized it as he leapt to the stage from the Presidential Box after mortally wounding Abraham Lincoln at Fords Theater 147 years ago, and it is the motto for the state of Virginia.

Throughout history, man has always sought self-determination as a God-given or natural right as they struggled against the rule of man through kings, royalty, and monarchs. This nation was founded upon the principle that man, given the ability, the will, and means to do so, could flourish under self-rule and the rule of law. Flourish, we have; the amount of economic growth and wonders this nation has seen in its short existence of only 236 years is astounding and has not been rivaled in history.

Read more…

The New Media Journal | Obama’s Contempt for the US Constitution by Joan Swirsky

May 11, 2012 3 comments

Print Email Archive

Recent Articles

Fems Love Abortion-on-Demand, Hate Sarah Palin

In Palin-Gibson Throwdown, Gov Gets A, Media F

My Mother’s Birth Certificate…And Obama’s

Obama’s Birth Certificate…Still Missing

Obama’s Contempt for the US Constitution

About Joan Swirsky

Joan Swirsky, is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal. A New York-based author and journalist, she was formerly a longtime health-and-science and feature writer for The New York Times Long Island section. She is the recipient of seven Long Island Press Awards…

Joan Swirsky

Obama’s Contempt for the US Constitution

November 1, 2008

On February 10, 2007, Senator Barack Obama stood outside the Old State Capitol building in Illinois and announced his intention to run for the presidency.

Barack Obama

Barack Obama (Photo credit: jamesomalley)

“I recognize there is a certain presumptuousness, a certain audacity, to this announcement,” Obama said. “I know I haven’t spent a lot of time learning the ways of Washington. But I’ve been there long enough to know that the ways of Washington must change.”

Of course, that depends on what his definition of “been there long enough” is. Actually, after he took office in November 2004, he spent a total of 143 days “on the job” – the number of days the senate was in session – before beginning his campaign for President of the United States. So now we know that, to Obama, “been there long enough” means that four months and change is quite enough preparation to be not only president but also the Commander in Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces, chief executive of the federal government, and leader of the free world.

At least he got the “audacity” part right.

In responding to disparagement from his opponents about the three years he spent as a community organizer in Chicago, Obama explained – with startlingly unselfconscious narcissism – that it was a good preparation for the top job in the world because it helped in “understanding where I’m coming from, who I believe in, who I’m fighting for and why I’m in this race.”

“They haven’t talked about the fact that I was a civil rights lawyer;” Obama added. “They haven’t talked about the fact that I taught constitutional law…”

Read more…

(Col Sellin) Censorship and Disinformation in America – English pravda.ru

May 5, 2012 6 comments

You will not see an article like this appear in any American mainstream media outlet.

Barack Hussein Obama is an illegal President. He is not now nor has he ever been eligible to be a candidate for or hold that office because his father was a British subject at the time of his birth.

Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires that all candidates for the Presidency be “natural born citizens.” As defined in the binding Supreme Court precedent of Minor v. Happersett (1875) and confirmed in the subsequent ruling of U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) and others, all candidates for the offices of President and Vice President must be second generation Americans, that is, US citizens of citizen parents at the time of birth.

President and Vice President are the only U.S. political offices with that requirement. It was the intent of the American Founding Fathers that the chief executive and the commander-in-chief of the armed forces would not have dual allegiance or loyalty to a foreign power.

Read more…

Why They Still Call Him …?????

May 4, 2012 3 comments

Why They Still Call Him President

Right Side News ^ | 5/3/2012 | JB Williams

Posted on Friday, May 04, 2012 11:22:04 AM by IbJensen

Some still call Barack Obama president out of pure ignorance, but others brilliantly call him President with a very specific agenda in mind. It’s all over but the crying now… as Article II of the U.S. Constitution is officially dead.

Since the nobody Senator from nowhere rose to DNC fame during the 2004 DNC Convention and was subsequently hustled into the highest office in our land despite his blank résumé and invisible past, people have been desperately searching for an honest forum in which to ask – Who is this yahoo, where did he come from and how the hell did he become America’s first openly Marxist White House resident?

Barack Obama delivers a speech at the Universi...

Barack Obama delivers a speech at the University of Southern California (Video of the speech) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Why isn’t there a single honest journalist or court anywhere in the country willing to even entertain the litany of obvious questions which the Marxist-in-Chief has effortlessly dodged since 2004?

Read more…

Rubio, Amnesty and Article II (“…there is a reason why members of congress tried to alter the Natural Born Citizen requirement at least eight times in the run-up to Obama’s fraudulent election in 2008 – why leftists insist that the founders meant “anchor baby” when they required that only Natural Born Citizens of the United States could hold the highest offices in our land – and that Marco Rubio would make the perfect VP selection for Mitt Romney in 2012…./In short, the reason is — kill the constitution”)

April 28, 2012 6 comments

However, there is a reason why members of congress tried to alter the Natural Born Citizen requirement at least eight times in the run-up to Obama’s fraudulent election in 2008

Official portrait of US Senator Marco Rubio of...

Official portrait of US Senator Marco Rubio of Florida. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

– why leftists insist that the founders meant “anchor baby” when they required that only Natural Born Citizens of the United States could hold the highest offices in our land – and that Marco Rubio would make the perfect VP selection for Mitt Romney in 2012….

Read more…

JB Williams — Rubio, Amnesty and Article II

April 26, 2012 7 comments

I realize that many Tea Party folks have fallen for leftist tricks aimed at keeping the current Article II constitutional crisis off the table, but just how far are they willing to fall in the name of political agendas?

Real “constitutionalists” are as concerned about Article II as they are any other constitutional text, maybe even more so since the current Muslim-n-Chief is a one-man constitutional crisis of monumental proportions. Faux “constitutionalists” are those who cherry-pick which parts of the founding document to take issue with, based on their individual political agenda.

Many Tea Party folks seem to not care whether or not we uphold Article II constitutional requirements for the offices of President and Vice President. Others seem perfectly happy to accept fraudulent definitions of the term “Natural Born Citizen” so long as it suits their political agenda.

However, there is a reason why members of congress tried to alter the Natural Born Citizen requirement at least eight times in the run-up to Obama’s fraudulent election in 2008 – why leftists insist that the founders meant “anchor baby” when they insisted that only Natural Born Citizens of the United States hold the highest offices in our land – and that Marco Rubio would make the perfect VP selection for Mitt Romney in 2012….

In a word, the reason is AMNESTY by any means.

Barack Hussein Obama Jr. is without any reasonable doubt, a total fraud, and ineligible for the office he currently holds. Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen of the United States and neither is Marco Rubio.

So, to keep Obama in office, leftists must eliminate the true meaning of the term Natural Born Citizen and the best way to do that is to get Republicans to put their own ineligible candidate on the ticket with Romney… enter Marco Rubio.

Simply stated, a Natural Born Citizen is a citizen via the bloodline of the natural birth father. Obama’s natural birth father was a no time in his life, a legal citizen of the United States. He was at all times a legal citizen of Kenya and as such, could only pass Kenyan citizenship to Barack Hussein Obama II.

Official photographic portrait of US President...

Official photographic portrait of US President Barack Obama (born 4 August 1961; assumed office 20 January 2009) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Read more…

Who Else Will Challenge Obama’s Eligibility, If Not Us? | Western Journalism.com

February 1, 2012 3 comments

Stand up and fight or we can lose this fight.

A grassroots internet effort is happening this week to blast fax each state’s Secretary of State with thousands of requests to take Barack Obama’s name off of their state’s presidential election ballot because he is not Constitutionally eligible to serve as our president.

Coming on the heels of the explosive eligibility hearing in the courtroom of Judge Michael Malihi, this citizens’ effort is being led by RightMarch.com.

RightMarch recognizes we have to take up our own cause to see that only eligible candidates get on our 2012 election ballots because clearly, an omerta or code of silence is preventing our Congress state legislators or our Supreme Court from looking into this matter.

Long ago we realized we could no longer depend on our country’s media to provide us with the information we need in this matter. Even a blackout of news on Obama’s eligibility exists on talk radio. Have you heard much about the Georgia case on your favorite show?

Read more…

Resolution 511 McCain born to American citizens (PLURAL)

January 28, 2012 5 comments

In 2008, the Senate passed a bill by unanimous consent declaring John McCain to be a “natural born citizen” and thus eligible to run for President. Ironically, this bill was co-sponsored by both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Below is the full text of the resolution. Third paragraph from bottom refers to prior presidents born “outside the US” being eligible for the office. However, it is my understanding that this applied to only one individual (Chester Alan Arthur ?) and his place of birth (still disputed) was not known at the time of his candidacy. I believe Leo Donofrio has submitted comprehensive narrative on this in the past.

Last two paragraph’s address McCain’s qualifications and it is to be noted that both parents (plural) were U.S. citizens.

Once the GA default judgment is issued and an appeal is made, the recalcitrant defendant and his staff of vipers will make a full blown effort to assemble the most vicious legal arsenal in history to target and rebut ALL antiquated references. In a day when most supporting evidence being submitted for clarifying the meaning of “natural born citizen” predates 1900, it may behoove us to consider more current documentation to make a case and defend the truth.

Here is full text of Resolution 511: ———————————————————

S. Res. 511

Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a “natural born Citizen” of the United States;

Read more…

The Dirty “little” Secret Of The Natural Born Citizen Clause Revealed.

January 27, 2012 4 comments

The Dirty “little” Secret Of The Natural Born Citizen Clause Revealed.

I have emphasized the word “little” because the truth of the law on this issue is very simple, folks. So simple that the mystery is deciphered by application of one of the most clear, concise and undeniable rules of law; the code of statutory construction governs, and therefore, “natural born Citizen” must require something more than being born in the United States.

Let me put it to you in appropriately simple language:

Read more…

GUNNY G: ANOTHER WRITER TO THE DEFENSE OF DR RON PAUL AGAINST ATTACKS BY NEO-CON (PSEUDO-CONSERVATIVE) WRITERS!

January 15, 2012 6 comments
Ron Paul at the 2007 National Right to Life Co...

Image via Wikipedia

GUNNY G: ANOTHER WRITER TO THE DEFENSE OF DR RON PAUL AGAINST ATTACKS BY NEO-CON (PSEUDO-CONSERVATIVE) WRITERS!

J.B. William’s article attacking Ron Paul, released on December 30, 2011 on NewsWithViews.com, perhaps deserves (I use the word loosely) a response. Williams’ assumes a lot and qualifies virtually nothing. He takes for granted the meaning and understanding of words like “conservative” and “liberal” and uses them to pigeon hole politics and pit people against Ron Paul. It is this kind of miniscule attention to detail that spreads misinformation and disinformation masqueraded as “fact.”

Let us consider Williams’ attacks on Ron Paul in order, and I will offer a critique for the sake of integrity in journalism and truth in politics.

Read more…

The Republican Plantation| The Post & Email

November 8, 2011 2 comments

…Apparently, those evil Twin Sisters, Power and Greed, have succeeded in seducing Republicans to join the Democrats’ conspiracy on a scale few of us ever thought would be possible.

And where Power and Greed failed, Fear stepped in. Not one single member of Congress or the Supreme Court can claim they did not know of Barack Obama’s ineligibility to hold office.

We told them. Over and over again. By phone, email, snail mail, in person at town hall meetings. We cited Article II, Section I, Clause 5 until we could recite it in our sleep.

We contacted our local sheriffs, the FBI, district attorneys, clerks of the court, held Citizen Grand Juries, wrote letters to the Editor, tried to educate our friends and families, sued at every court level, and absolutely besieged Republican congressmen. All of our efforts were to no avail.

Read more…

The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried…| The Post & Email

October 10, 2011 Leave a comment

The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried…| The Post & Email

The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried…| The Post & Email:

They have supported a man who is clearly a usurper, as if he were the President of the United States

This fact is manifest and notorious. There is one thing certain about Obama, and the Joint Chiefs know it: his father was a British subject. Four Supreme Court Cases declare that to be a natural born citizen, both parents must be U.S. Citizens. The Constitution clearly states in Article II, section ii, paragraph 5, that “No person except a natural born Citizen . . shall be eligible to the Office of President” The Joint Chiefs have been duly informed by many letters from military personnel, and from lawyers, such as Dr. Orly Taitz. The Joint Chiefs have the opportunity and aide of the best legal counsel.

The Joint Chiefs therefore have knowingly sided with a usurper to the Presidency, and given him obedience as if he were the President of the United States.

In doing so they have violated their oaths to uphold the U.S. Constitution, and committed treason………

EXCERPT…..

via BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.~ ALAS, 1984+ IS NOW UPON US! ~: The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried…| The Post & Email.

The Patriots News: EVIDENCE BROADENS OBAMA NATURAL BORN CONSPIRACY by JB Williams , 06/07/11

September 27, 2011 1 comment

Evidence that we have a fraud and a usurper currently residing in the people’s White House is overwhelming, despite the overt lack of journalistic investigating on the part of the American press. But now new evidence indicates that the conspiracy to carry out that fraud was much broader than originally thought.

The story of whom and what Barack Hussein Obama II really is – is a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell. Strong evidence suggests that he was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance.

But there was a major hurdle that had to be overcome – the U.S. Constitution, in this case, Article II – Section I – Clause V specifically, which requires that “no person except a natural-born citizen of the United States” can hold the office of President. – Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States…and may not even be a legal citizen of the United States. So, how can he be President?

This column focuses upon the period 2003-2008 and the political maneuvers that took place in order to make way for America’s first unconstitutional resident of the White House…………..

MORE…..

*****

via The Patriots News: EVIDENCE BROADENS OBAMA NATURAL BORN CONSPIRACY by JB Williams , 06/07/11.

2012 Presidential Candidates – One Question Only| The Post & Email

September 20, 2011 Leave a comment

“AN OVERT ACT OF TREASON”

by JB Williams

Will any of the candidates for President face the eligibility matter, or will they all pretend it doesn’t exist?

(Sep. 20, 2011) — As the 2012 election cycle heats up, the most pressing issue facing our nation today is the reinstatement of the U.S. Constitution as the Law of this Land, and the survival of our constitutional republic, complete with sovereign borders, the rule of law, states rights and a republican form of government guaranteed every citizen by the Constitution. There is no more pressing issue in America today…

As reinstating the U.S. Constitution is the highest priority of the 2012 election, and the fact that reinstating Article II requirements for the office of president is first and foremost in the effort to reinstate the constitution as the supreme law of this land, all presidential candidates must face the most vital question of the day.

Before being entrusted with the most powerful political office in our land and the world for that matter, I have only ONE question for every candidate seeking the office of President of the United States……………………

MORE…..

via 2012 Presidential Candidates – One Question Only| The Post & Email.

Abolish the Presidency. It’s a Useless Job. by James Altucher

September 1, 2011 Leave a comment

Here’s my question: What does the President even do? Do we need one?

In fact, one step further: I think the institution of the Presidency has largely ruined my life and the lives of most other people.

My proposal: We don’t need a President of the United States. In fact, he’s useless.

First off, the Constitution doesn’t even address the powers of the Presidency until Article II. The Founders clearly thought the legislative branch was more important, i.e. the actual branch that creates laws, declares wars, etc.

But, in a prior post I’ve already written that there’s no longer a need for a legislative branch the way the Founders conceived it. Times have changed and technology has driven away all of the initial reasons for a republic-based legislative branch so we can have a true democracy commanded by a much more informed electorate:

Just to summarize my prior post: The only original reasons the founding fathers had for an elected legislative branch (a republic instead of a democracy) were:

A) there was no way to transmit information quickly to the voters (now we have the internet so everyone can actually vote and be informed)

B) the founding fathers figured only rich landowners could afford to be congressmen (still mostly true) so that their interests above all would be represented (again, not a true democracy but more a bastardized distortion of one).

So now, we could:

A) save the $4bb in costs that is the budget of congress each year

B) save the trillion or so in costs that are all the “you vote for my bridge and I’ll vote for yours” pork that happens

C) save the 10s of billions in lobbying costs each year (not it would cost 100s of billions to do the same lobbying via advertising instead of just taking a congressman out for dinner)

D) avoid all the fear-mongering and partisanship that was caused by the debt ceiling argument and other similar meaningless arguments

E) actually have mothers vote on whether or not to send their kids to war.

Ok, enough on that. [See also, why I don't vote: "Politics is a Scam"]

So what’s the Presidency for? According to the Constitution:……………………

via Abolish the Presidency. It’s a Useless Job. by James Altucher.

Obama’s ineligibility: Prepare to defend America – Take down Obama and the rogue government

August 11, 2011 Leave a comment

Obama’s ineligibility: Prepare to defend America – Take down Obama and the rogue government

Share  | Bookmark and Share | (2) Comments | Subscribe | Back to full Article | Contact Us
 By Lawrence Sellin  Thursday, August 11, 2011imageIf wanting to uphold the Constitution, restore the rule of lawand save our country from destruction is now considered terrorism or even treason; then count me among the guilty.When a government stops listening to the voice of the people; then count them among the tyrants that patriotic Americans have always stood against.

Deceitful and arrogant political leadership has made the entire federal government culpable of obstruction of justice and dereliction of duty.

Ignoring our Constitutional crisis and the endemic corruption of the political establishment will, without a doubt, lead to the end of the United States.

There is no doubt that Barack Hussein Obama was illegally elected to the Presidency according to Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the Constitution and the Supreme Court binding precedent of Minor and Happersett.

The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried…| The Post & Email (via ~ BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984+ ~ (BLOG & EMAIL))

August 5, 2011 Leave a comment

They have supported a man who is clearly a usurper, as if he were the President of the United States This fact is manifest and notorious. There is one thing certain about Obama, and the Joint Chiefs know it: his father was a British subject. Four Supreme Court Cases declare that to be a natural born citizen, both parents must be U.S. Citizens. The Constitution clearly states in Article II, section ii, paragraph 5, that “No person except a natural … Read More

via ~ BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984+ ~ (BLOG & EMAIL)

Obama’s ineligibility: Prepare to defend America – As the scam unravels

August 4, 2011 Leave a comment

In Barack Hussein Obama’s America, ordinary Americans exercising their Constitutional rights are considered “terrorists”, simply because they oppose his radical agenda. Obama’s contempt for us knows no bounds. His plan to suppress us is no longer constrained by the Constitution and the rule of law. Or so he hopes. Although Obama is trying to empty Guantánamo Bay of real terrorists, it is still too small for Obama to house the millions of Americans who now realize that he is an illegal President and has committed felonies both before and after occupying the White House. To facilitate the suppression of free speech and other Constitutional rights, the Obama White House has unveiled a new domestic terror strategy, which will be useful against Tea Party malcontents and supporters of Sarah Palin or Michele Bachmann. According to the plan, local communities around the country are best suited to take on the challenge of combating the kind of violent extremism that inspires people to kill or oppose Obama’s policies. The strategy calls on federal agencies to help police, schools and community groups prevent violent extremism or the exercise of former Constitutional rights through the use of gulags and re-education camps. Unfortunately for Obama, his co-conspirators and sycophants, the scam is starting to unravel. The most pertinent questions in the coming months will be: •Who will be sent to prison with Obama? •Who will cop a plea for immunity from prosecution? (hint) •Which members of Congress will be put out to pasture for their complicity? Obama is an illegal President according to Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the Constitution and the binding precedent of Minor vs. Happersett (1875). There is no ambiguity, although those complicit in the fraud have deliberately provided information to mislead the American people.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com …

via Obama’s ineligibility: Prepare to defend America – As the scam unravels.

The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried…| The Post & Email (via ~ BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984+ ~ (BLOG & EMAIL)) (via ~ BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984+ ~ (BLOG & EMAIL))

August 3, 2011 Leave a comment

They have supported a man who is clearly a usurper, as if he were the President of the United States This fact is manifest and notorious. There is one thing certain about Obama, and the Joint Chiefs know it: his father was a British subject. Four Supreme Court Cases declare that to be a natural born citizen, both parents must be U.S. Citizens. The Constitution clearly states in Article II, section ii, paragraph 5, that “No person except a natural … Read More

via ~ BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984+ ~ (BLOG & EMAIL)

The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried…| The Post & Email (via ~ BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984+ ~ (BLOG & EMAIL))

August 3, 2011 Leave a comment

They have supported a man who is clearly a usurper, as if he were the President of the United States This fact is manifest and notorious. There is one thing certain about Obama, and the Joint Chiefs know it: his father was a British subject. Four Supreme Court Cases declare that to be a natural born citizen, both parents must be U.S. Citizens. The Constitution clearly states in Article II, section ii, paragraph 5, that “No person except a natural … Read More

via ~ BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984+ ~ (BLOG & EMAIL)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,071 other followers